Table 2. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale tool for risk of bias assessment of the selected studies.
Authors | Selection | Comparability of cohorts | Outcome | Total score | |||||
Prospective cohort studies | Representativeness of the exposed cohort | Selection of the non-exposed cohort | Ascertainment of exposure | The outcome of interest not present at the study start | Assessment | Length of follow-up | Adequacy of follow-up of cohorts | ||
Styles et al. 2000 [18] | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | 8 |
Styles et al. 2012 [19] | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | 8 |
Ballas et al. 2006 [13] | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | 8 |
Bargoma et al. 2005 [14] | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | 8 |
Naprawa et al. 2005 [17] | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | 8 |
Ball et al. 2012 [12] | * | * | * | * | * | * | 6 | ||
Case-control studies | Is the case definition adequate? | Representativeness of the cases | Selection of controls | Definition of controls | Comparability of cohorts | Ascertainment of exposure | The same method of ascertainment for cases and controls | Non-response rate | Total score |
Styles et al. 1996 [2] | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | 7 |