Laboratory |
• Technical capacity for real-time WGS |
• Timely recognition of laboratory contamination |
• Long-term investment in adequate storage and sequencing infrastructure |
• Reduce reliance on phenotypic drug susceptibility testing |
• Long-term investment in adequate data systems and bioinformatic expertise |
|
Clinical |
• Simple and clear reporting from laboratories |
• Optimise treatment plans and isolation requirements for drug resistance |
• Education regarding the clinical use and public health implications of genotypic findings |
• Improved understanding of epidemiological context, including isolation and contact tracing requirements |
• Maintain good communication pathways with laboratories and public health |
• Enhanced awareness of TB risk factors |
Public health |
• Capacity to coordinate timely multi-disciplinary meetings |
• Increased efficiency in targeted public health responses |
• Flexible public health staff to respond to findings |
• Monitoring, comparing and benchmarking program performance with standardised metrics |
• Public health database with linkage of relevant laboratory and clinical information |
|
• Legal and governance framework for data sharing and linkage, as well as privacy protection |
|
People with TB |
• Understanding the ‘added value’ of WGS for their personal care and community protection |
• Better person-centred care; Individualised therapy |
• Willingness to provide information on TB history and potential contacts |
• Increased confidence in accurate diagnosis and optimal treatment |
Affected community |
• Forum for sharing relevant WGS findings in a respectful and sensitive way |
• Improved understanding of local risk factors for recent transmission |
• Education regarding the interpretation and implications of WGS |
• Enhanced capacity and better-informed participation in community activities for TB risk reduction |