Skip to main content
. 2024 Oct 1;1(10):431–436. doi: 10.5588/ijtldopen.24.0320

Table 2.

Levels of decision-making and examples of public health application of M tuberculosis whole genome sequencing (WGS). Adapted from Denholm JT, et al. Developing best practice public health standards for whole genome sequencing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Lancet Regional Health-Western Pacific. 2024;46:101014.

Levels of decision-making Potential implications of decision shift Considerations for decision-making
Macro-level implications (health policy) • Formulation of national policy and strategic plan • Monitor program effectiveness through review of relapse/reinfection • Undertake periodic multisectoral review to prioritise and contextualise response.
• Monitoring and evaluation of performance and progress • Consider whole-of-system engagement eg migration screening, labour protections
Meso-level implications (TB programmes) • Plan targeted interventions based on apparent transmission • Optimise treatment plans and isolation requirements for drug resistance • Regular and active community engagement for planning and implementing case finding and educational interventions
• Support laboratory accreditation • Improved understanding of epidemiological context, including isolation and contact tracing requirements
• Enhanced awareness of TB risk factors
Micro-level implications (individual cases/clusters) • Therapeutic decision-making • Improved understanding of local risk factors for recent transmission • Ensure equity is prioritised in responses
• Contact investigation • Enhanced capacity and better-informed participation in community activities for TB risk reduction • Human rights-based approach to promoting health and reducing stigma