Skip to main content
. 2024 Oct 9;6(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s43014-024-00264-2

Table 4.

Associations between NOVA groups (in g/d) and breast cancer risk with further adjustment for alcohol consumption

Breast cancer subtypes N Cases NOVA 1 NOVA 2 NOVA 3 NOVA 4
HR per 1 SD (95%CI)a Phomogeneity HR per 1 SD (95%CI)a Phomogeneity HR per 1 SD (95%CI)a Phomogeneity HR per 1 SD (95%CI)a Phomogeneity
Overall 14,933 0.99 (0.97-1.01) 1.01 (0.99-1.03) 1.01 (0.98-1.03) 1.00 (0.98-1.03)
In situ 1603 0.98 (0.91-1.04) 0.61 1.00 (0.94-1.07) 0.84 0.98 (0.90-1.07) 0.51 1.01 (0.95-1.08) 0.89
Invasive 13,320 0.99 (0.97-1.02) 1.01 (0.99-1.03) 1.01 (0.98-1.04) 1.01 (0.99-1.03)
Invasive ER+ 7789 0.99 (0.96-1.02) 0.58 1.00 (0.97-1.04) 0.33 1.00 (0.97-1.04) 0.50 1.00 (0.98-1.03) 0.11
Invasive ER- 1736 1.01 (0.95-1.08) 1.04 (0.98-1.11) 1.03 (0.96-1.12) 1.06 (1.00-1.11)
Invasive PR+ 5268 1.00 (0.96-1.04) 0.51 1.01 (0.98-1.05) 0.30 1.00 (0.95-1.06) 0.30 0.99 (0.95-1.03) 0.15
Invasive PR- 2726 0.98 (0.93 -1.03) 0.98 (0.94-1.03) 1.04 (0.98-1.11) 1.03 (0.98-1.09)
Invasive HER2+ 901 0.99 (0.91-1.08) 0.91 1.00 (0.92-1.08) 0.56 1.07 (0.96-1.19) 0.29 1.04 (0.97-1.12) 0.44
Invasive HER2- 3676 1.00 (0.95-1.04) 1.02 (0.98-1.07) 1.00 (0.95-1.05) 1.01 (0.97-1.05)

CI Confidence Interval, ER Estrogen Receptor, HER2 Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, HR Hazard ratio, NOVA 1 Unprocessed/minimally processed foods, NOVA 2 Processed culinary ingredients, NOVA 3 Processed foods, NOVA 4 Ultra-processed foods; PR, progesterone receptor, SD Standard deviation

aModels were stratified by age and center and adjusted for education, height, physical activity, age at menarche, oral contraceptive use, age at first full-term pregnancy, parity, breastfeeding, menopausal status, menopausal hormone therapy use and alcohol consumption. Each NOVA group was mutually adjusted for the other NOVA groups