Skip to main content
. 2024 Oct 9;6(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s43014-024-00264-2

Table 6.

Associations between NOVA intake (in g /d) and breast cancer risk, stratified by alcohol intake and BMI at recruitment

Characteristics at recruitment NOVA 1 NOVA 2 NOVA 3 NOVA 4
N
cases
HR per 1 SD (95%CI)a HR per 1 SD (95%CI)a HR per 1 SD (95%CI)a HR per 1 SD (95%CI)a
Alcohol intake (g/d)
 Non-drinkers 2014 0.99 (0.93-1.05) 1.00 (0.94-1.05) 1.00 (0.91-1.10) 1.01 (0.95-1.07)
 > 0 - ≤3 4311 0.97(0.93-1.01) 1.03 (0.99-1.07) 1.00 (0.93-1.07) 1.01 (0.98-1.05)
 >3 - ≤12 4594 1.02 (0.98-1.06) 1.02 (0.98-1.06) 0.99 (0.93-1.05) 1.00 (0.97-1.04)
 >12 - ≤24 2298 0.98 (0.93-1.03) 0.97 (0.92-1.03) 1.05 (0.99-1.12) 1.01 (0.96-1.07)
 >24 1716 0.99 (0.93-1.05) 0.99 (0.93-1.05) 1.02 (0.99-1.06) 1.01(0.95-1.07)
Pinteraction 0.79 0.17 0.68 0.52
Body mass index
 <25 8871 0.99 (0.97-1.02) 1.01 (0.98-1.04) 1.05 (1.03-1.08) 1.01 (0.98-1.04)
 ≥25 6062 0.97 (0.94-1.01) 1.01 (0.97-1.04) 1.05 (1.02-1.08) 1.00 (0.97-1.03)
Pinteraction 0.57 0.31 0.27 0.88

CI Confidence Interval, NOVA 1 Unprocessed/minimally processed foods, NOVA 2 Processed culinary ingredients, NOVA 3 Processed foods, NOVA 4 Ultra-processed foods, SD Standard deviation

aModels were stratified by age and center and adjusted for education, height, physical activity, age at menarche, oral contraceptive use, age at first full-term pregnancy, parity, breastfeeding, menopausal status and menopausal hormone therapy use. Each NOVA group was mutually adjusted for the other NOVA groups