Skip to main content
. 2024 Jun 10;42(30):3593–3605. doi: 10.1200/JCO.24.01001

TABLE 2.

Coprimary Pharmacokinetic and Key Efficacy End Points

End Point Subcutaneous Group (n = 206) Intravenous Group (n = 212) Treatment Effect (95% CI) P
Coprimary pharmacokinetic end pointsa
 Ctrough, µg/mL (%CV) Geometric mean ratio (90% CI)
  Cycle-2-day-1 365 (33) 314 (32) 1.15 (1.04 to 1.26)
  Cycle-4-day-1 (steady state) 224 (39) 162 (42) 1.43 (1.27 to 1.61)
 AUCD1-D15, µg·h/mL (%CV) Geometric mean ratio (90% CI)
  Cycle 2 142,236 (31) 135,552 (24) 1.03 (0.98 to 1.09)
Secondary end points
 Objective responseb
  Patients, % (95% CI) 30 (24 to 37) 33 (26 to 39) Relative risk for noninferiority, 0.92 (0.70 to 1.23)c .001
 Progression-free survival
  Median, mo (95% CI) 6.1 (4.3 to 8.1) 4.3 (4.1 to 5.7) HR, 0.84 (0.64 to 1.10) .20
  Patients, % (95% CI)
   At 6 months 50 (43 to 58) 42 (35 to 50)
   At 12 months 37 (28 to 46) 20 (8 to 35)
 Overall survival
  Median, mo (95% CI) 12.9 (12.9 to NE) NE (10.2 to NE) HR, 0.62 (0.42 to 0.92)d .02d
  Patients, % (95% CI)
   At 6 months 85 (79 to 89) 75 (68 to 80)
   At 12 months 65 (52 to 74) 51 (37 to 64)

Abbreviations: %CV, % coefficient of variation; AUCD1-D15, area under the curve from cycle-2 day-1 to day-15; Ctrough, observed serum concentration of amivantamab at steady state; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; Ex19del, exon 19 deletion; HR, hazard ratio; NE, not estimable; TKI, tyrosine kinase inhibitor.

a

The pharmacokinetic population for evaluating the coprimary pharmacokinetic end points included all patients who received all doses without dose modifications before the respective end point and who provided the pharmacokinetic samples necessary to derive each parameter. The efficacy population included all the patients who had undergone random assignment.

b

The objective response (complete or partial response as best response) was assessed by the investigator among all responders.

c

Odds ratio (95% CI), 0.87 (0.58 to 1.32); P = .52. P value is calculated via a logistic regression model stratified by brain metastases at baseline (yes v no), EGFR mutation (L858R v Ex19del), race (Asian v non-Asian), and last therapy (osimertinib [or another third-generation EGFR-TKI] v chemotherapy).

d

For overall survival, 95% CIs were not adjusted for multiplicity and should not be used in place of hypothesis testing; P value is nominal.