Skip to main content
. 2024 Jun 10;42(30):3593–3605. doi: 10.1200/JCO.24.01001

TABLE A1.

Response End Points

End Point Subcutaneous Group (n = 206) Intravenous Group (n = 212)
Objective responsea
 Patients including all responders, % (95% CI) 30 (24 to 37) 33 (26 to 39)
 Patients including only confirmed responders, % (95% CI) 27 (21 to 33) 27 (21 to 33)
Best overall response, No. (%)a
 Complete responseb 1 (0.5) 1 (0.5)
 Partial responseb 61 (30) 68 (32)
 Stable disease 93 (45) 81 (38)
 Progressive disease 37 (18) 42 (20)
 Not evaluable 14 (7) 20 (9)
Disease control rate, % (95% CI)c 75 (69 to 81) 71 (64 to 77)
DoR
 Median among all responders, months (95% CI) 11.2 (6.1 to NE) 7.1 (5.3 to NE)
 Median among confirmed responders, months (95% CI) 11.2 (6.1 to NE) 8.3 (5.4 to NE)
Time to response
 Median, months (range) 1.5 (1.2-6.9) 1.5 (1.2-9.9)

NOTE. The efficacy population included all the patients who had undergone random assignment.

Abbreviations: DoR, response duration; NE, not estimable.

a

The objective response (complete or partial response as best response) was assessed using RECIST, v1.1 and analyzed using logistic regression.

b

Among all responders.

c

Not protocol-specified; calculated as the sum of complete response, partial response, and stable disease; all responders were included.