Table 1.
Comparisons between the countries reviewed
| Country | CET for health outcome | CET USD-PPP | Threshold as a ratio of GDPpc | Was the cost-effectiveness threshold estimated with real-world evidence? | Use of CET for public health policy decision making | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Australia | AUD 28,033 per QALY | 22,979.2 | 0.35 | Yes | No | Edney [21] |
| Colombia | COP 17,000,000 per QALY | 14,766.0 | 0.71 | Yes | Yes, but by the Colombian Agency for Health Technology Assessment (IETS). This is not binding on the decisions of the Ministry of Health and Social Protection | Espinosa et al. [22] |
| COP 14,700,000 per YLL | 12,768.3 | 0.61 | ||||
| England | GBP 20,000–30,000 per QALY | 42,920.9 | 0.75 | No | Yes, the government explicitly uses a threshold, especially for pricing and eligibility for public funding | Appleby et al. [23], National Institute for Health and Care Excellence [24] |
| 64,381.3 | 1.12 | |||||
| Malaysia | MYR 12,810–22,840 per QALY | 8677.7 | 0.26 | Yes | No | Lim et al. [25] |
| 15,472.2 | 0.46 | |||||
| The Netherlands | EUR 73,600 per QALY | 115,984.9 | 1.55 | Yes | No | Stadhouders et al. [26] |
| Spain | EUR 21,000–24,000 per QALY | 40,679.7 | 0.84 | Yes | It is not officially used, but the network of HTA agencies of the Spanish Ministry of Health refers to the threshold in its reports. | Vallejo-Torres et al. [13] |
| 46,491.1 | 0.96 | |||||
| South Africa | ZAR 38,500 (USD 3015) per DALY | 3881.0 | 3.99 | Yes | No | Edoka and Stacey [27] |
| Thailand | BAHT 59,000–285,000 per QALY | 5554.6 | 0.27 | Yes | Yes, the government explicitly uses a threshold, especially for pricing and eligibility for public funding. | Thavorncharoensap et al. [28], Teerawattananon et al. [29] |
| 26,831.5 | 1.30 | |||||
| USA | USD 104,000 per QALY | 104,000.0 | 1.36 | Yes | No | Vanness et al. [30] |
Authors’ elaboration based on the literature reviewed. Estimates were translated into PPP by bringing the estimate to 2022 prices in each country currency, and then converting into PPP using OECD data figures for that year. GDPpc, according to the World Bank Statistics of 2022, converted to PPP, was used to compute the ratio of GDPpc
CET cost-effectiveness threshold, GDPpc gross domestic product per capita, PPP purchasing power parity, QALY quality-adjusted life-year, USD US Dollars, YLL years of life lost