Abstract
Maternal responsiveness, a mother’s ability to consistently identify infant cues and then act on them, is critical for healthy child development. A woman’s social support and spousal relationship may affect responsiveness to an infant, especially among mothers with anxiety. We assessed how social support and spousal relationship quality is associated with responsiveness among anxious mothers, and if postpartum depression (PPD) moderated these associations. Cross-sectional data were collected from 2019 to 2022 in a public hospital in Pakistan from 701 women at six-weeks postpartum. Eligible women had at least mild anxiety in early- to mid- pregnancy. Linear regression analyses assessed if spousal relationship quality and social support from family and friends were associated with maternal responsiveness, measured using the Maternal Infant Responsiveness Instrument. Interaction terms were used to examine if PPD moderated these associations. Spousal relationship quality (B=2.49, 95% CI: 1.48, 3.50) and social support (B=1.07, 95% CI: 0.31, 1.83) were positively related to maternal responsiveness to the infant. Emotional support from a spouse was positively associated with responsiveness (B=1.08, 95% CI: 0.12, 2.03 depressed; B=2.96, 95% CI: 1.34, 4.58 non-depressed), and conflict with the spouse was negatively associated with responsiveness (B=−1.02, 95% CI: −1.94, −0.09 depressed; B=−2.87, 95% CI: −4.36, −1.37 non-depressed). However, social support was related to responsiveness only in non-depressed women (B=2.61, 95% CI: 1.14, 4.07). While spousal relationships and social support enhance maternal responsiveness, for depressed women, spousal relationships were particularly critical. In considering maternal-infant interventions to improve child development outcomes, our study indicates the importance of supportive relationships that foster effective responsiveness.
Keywords: infant development, maternal health, maternal responsiveness, social support, spousal relationship quality
INTRODUCTION
Maternal responsiveness refers to a mother’s ability to identify infant cues about physical and emotional states consistently and then to act on those cues (1,2). Responsiveness to an infant is critical for promoting healthy physical and psychological child development (3,4) through advancing secure infant attachment (1,5). Such responsive interactions with an infant have been identified as critical for children’s cognitive and emotional development across cultures (1,5,6). Because symptoms of anxiety in mothers have been linked to poor maternal responsiveness (7,8), children of women with anxiety are at especially high risk of poor outcomes. Such data are particularly concerning, given that global prevalence of self-reported anxiety symptoms during pregnancy and the postpartum period has been estimated at 22.4% and 15.0%, respectively (9), while postpartum depression was found in 17.2% of the global population (10). These estimates are slightly higher in LMICs, as meta-analytic studies indicate the prevalence of antepartum anxiety to be 29.2%, postpartum anxiety to be 24.4% (11), and postpartum depression to be 19% (12,13). Given the high prevalence in LMICs including Pakistan, maternal responsiveness – and thus potentially child development – may be impacted, despite limited research in such contexts.
Anxiety is a strong predictor of postpartum depression (14,15). In one study, women with high antenatal anxiety were 2.6 times more likely than those with no or low symptoms to experience postnatal depression, after controlling for confounders including the level of antenatal depression (16). This suggests that anxiety alone can have a critical impact on depression amongst postnatal mothers. Although effective treatments exist, there is minimal evidence on preventative approaches that may reduce the prevalence of postnatal depression (17). Our research was part of a parent study that assessed anxiety-focused cognitive behavioral therapy delivered to pregnant women by non-specialists to prevent postpartum depression in Rawalpindi, Pakistan (18). Given the importance of prenatal anxiety, the parent study sought to investigate the sole effect of treatment of prenatal anxiety on PPD by excluding depressed pregnant women from the study. Due to this exclusion, the parent study was able to show that women receiving the intervention were much less likely to develop depression, with 11.6% of those in the intervention arm reporting depression, compared to 40.5% of controls (18).
The role of maternal responsiveness in child development has been studied in both LMIC and HIC contexts. Across contexts, maternal responsiveness and sensitivity are positively associated with child development (1,4,19–21). Depression, however, has been negatively associated with maternal responsiveness and child development globally (6,19,22), including in rural Pakistan (20,21). While evidence from HICs indicates that psychosocial risk factors are interrelated, research shows additional complexity in LMIC settings due to their interaction with biological risk factors for poor child development (that are less pervasive in HIC settings), such as child undernutrition or low birthweight (23). As conceptual and empirical research has principally occurred in HICs (24,25), some interventions have failed to account for cross-cultural dynamics in LMIC settings, such as differing maternal roles on maternal responsiveness. There are also fewer studies from LMICs, despite being the settings where they are most needed given the compounded risk factors for poor child development, and the fact that the majority of the world’s population is both rural and non-westernized (24).
Social support encompasses informational, emotional, and material assistance (26,27) and is a strong predictor of a healthy pregnancy, including in the Pakistani context (28–30). Inadequate support in this context has been connected to poor antenatal healthcare-seeking practices, poor mental health, physical health, and child neglect (31–33). Among anxious pregnant women in Pakistan, a good, close relationship with a spouse or others has been found to contribute to maternal well-being (34,35). Relationship problems, too many children and socioeconomic adversity are risk factors for anxiety and depressive disorders among women generally in Pakistan, while supportive family and friends may protect against such disorders (36). In other contexts, high quality relationships have been shown to moderate the effect of social support on a host of broad health outcomes (37–40). In Pakistan, one study found that perceived higher social support was positively associated with marital satisfaction, which was associated with reduced risk of depression (41). Given that good social relationships are protective of anxiety (42,43), support and high-quality relationships could be resilience factors that may lead to responsiveness, especially for women with anxiety. Therefore, it is important to understand these associations among anxious women, who are at higher risk of poor responsiveness (7,8).
Prior research has shown a positive relationship between social support and maternal responsiveness, often with reference to and focused on its association with postpartum depression (PPD) (26,44,45). The larger a mother’s social network and the more social support she has, the less likely it is that PPD will occur (46). Likewise, good relationship quality is important for maternal mental health; specifically, poor partner relationship quality is a risk factor for PPD (39,47–49). Further, higher levels of PPD symptoms are associated with lower levels of responsiveness (2,50), suggesting PPD is important in this relationship. PPD could potentially moderate the relationships between spousal relationship quality and/or social support with maternal responsiveness. A thorough understanding of the associations between social relations and maternal responsiveness is lacking, particularly in LMICs and among women with anxiety symptoms. Contextual factors including low income and material stress also appear to impact maternal responsiveness and sensitivity (51). Therefore, further research in LMICs can offer deeper insight into divergent settings. The primary aim of this study was to investigate if spousal relationship quality and social support were associated with maternal responsiveness among women who had prenatal symptoms of anxiety. Secondarily, we sought to examine if PPD moderated these associations. We hypothesized that spousal relationship quality and social support would be positively associated with better maternal responsiveness among anxious women, and that PPD would moderate these associations.
METHODS
Study setting and participants
Data were collected from Holy Family Hospital (HFH), in Rawalpindi, Pakistan. This is a public facility with a catchment population of more than 7 million (52). On average, 250-300 women from low-resource communities are recipients of free antenatal care each day at HFH. This study draws on data from a randomized controlled trial (National Library of Medicine identifier: NCT03880032) to test the Happy Mother - Healthy Baby (HMHB) program, which sought to reduce anxiety among pregnant women recruited from HFH (53). A group of female assessors at the outpatient Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics recruited the women during their first prenatal visit, which occurred at or prior to 22 weeks of gestation.
Two levels of screening criteria were utilized to enroll participants. For the first level, women had to be ≥18 years old, pregnant at ≤ 22 weeks of gestation, reside ≤20 kilometers from HFH, and have a basic knowledge of Urdu. The exclusion criteria included past or current significant learning disabilities, life-threatening health conditions, past or current psychiatric disorders, or severe maternal morbidity. After meeting these criteria and demonstrating willingness to participate, potential participants were asked to give informed consent to continue in the screening process. The second level of screening assessed potential participants using the Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS) for indications of at least mild anxiety (scoring ≥8 on the HADS anxiety subscale). Participants who at least had mild depression (scoring ≥8 on the HADS depression subscale) were screened by a psychiatrist who initiated a Structured Clinical Interview for DSM Diagnoses (SCID). Women with a diagnosis of major depressive episode (MDE) were excluded. We excluded participants with past or current psychiatric disorders because we were specifically interested in the role of anxiety in pregnancy for our intervention (for which this study is a secondary analysis) which was concerned with whether reducing anxiety symptoms could prevent postpartum depression. Based on these criteria, 1,200 participants were enrolled and randomized equally into the intervention and control arms. A total of 720 women gave birth at the study hospital and responded to the questionnaire administered at a six-week postpartum visit. These postpartum data were collected between April 16, 2019, and when the last postpartum follow-up was conducted on October 7, 2022. After excluding 19 women who had missingness on income, our final analytic sample size was 701 (97.4% of the available sample; Figure 1).
Figure 1.

Consort diagram for HMHB randomized control trial
Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Rawalpindi Medical University, Human Development Research Foundation, and a NIMH-appointed Data Safety Monitoring Board.
HMHB Intervention
The HMHB intervention was implemented for the intervention group, which involved a culturally adapted cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) treatment that sought to reduce anxiety. HMHB is based on a well-established Thinking Healthy Programme and details of its development are described elsewhere (52). Briefly, this CBT treatment applied a three-step approach: 1) learning to identify unhelpful or unhealthy thinking and behavior; 2) learning to replace unhealthy or unhelpful thinking and behavior with thinking and behavior that is helpful; and 3) practicing acting and thinking healthy (52). The treatment involved six core one-on-one sessions that could be supplemented with up to six optional booster sessions, depending on individual needs. The first five core sessions were delivered weekly, beginning as early as possible during pregnancy (followed by any booster sessions). The sixth and final core session was delivered during the third trimester of pregnancy. Treatment was delivered by six non-specialist therapists, who had at least a master’s degree, but who did not have prior clinical experience. These non-specialists received 42-50 hours of classroom training and additional field training to develop experience delivering the intervention (52).
Enhanced Usual Care (EUC) was delivered to the control group. They received the standard of prenatal care, which includes up to eight visits in which any concerns were discussed, health status was evaluated and routine exams reflective of the stage of pregnancy were conducted. The study enhanced care by additionally reimbursing all participants in both arms for transportation and as many ultrasounds during pregnancy as medically indicated at HFH, in order to enhance participation in the study.
The intervention assessments were conducted individually at the Obstetrics Department of the Holy Family Teaching Hospital, Rawalpindi. They usually lasted approximately 25 minutes and were carried out with each participant after two levels of written consent, in order to maintain confidentiality according to the research protocol. Assessments were conducted by a team of six research assistants who were trained psychologists in the study’s outcome measurements. Study questionnaires were administered orally and responses were recorded electronically on android tablets, using the online data collection tool, Open Data Kit (ODK).
Variables of interest
The exposure variables in this study were relationship quality with the spouse and social support from significant others, family and friends, both measured at six-weeks postpartum. Relationship quality with the spouse was adapted from the MacArthur Battery, originally a six-item scale developed to assess whether the social network ties (including spouse, family, or friends) of older adults provide emotional or instrumental support, or whether they are a source of conflict and/or demand (54). We adapted these items specifically for the spouse, and asked participants about the frequency with which the spouse provided emotional support (two items; by making the participant feel cared for or loved; or by listening to the participant’s problems or worries) and instrumental support (two items; by helping the participant with daily tasks; or by giving participant information or advice about problems). Two further items were used to assess conflict/demand with spouse, by asking whether they made too many demands of participants or were critical of participant behavior. Example items include: How often does your spouse make you feel loved and cared for?” (emotional support); “How often does your spouse help with daily tasks like shopping, giving you a ride or helping you with household tasks?” (instrumental support); and “How often does your spouse make too many demands on you? (conflict). We used a five-point Likert scale that ranged from 0 (never) to 4 (frequently) to respond to all six items (such that mean scores also ranged from 0 to 4). We reversed conflict/demand scores when calculating the full scale mean, such that high scores indicated stronger relationship quality with a spouse. For emotional support and instrumental support subscales, high means indicated stronger relationship quality with a spouse. This adapted scale showed good internal consistency in our study (Cronbach’s α = 0.88). Translation and adaptation of the MacArthur Battery occurred in three steps: (a) initial translation; (b) cross-cultural verification and adaptation; and (c) checking the psychometric properties of the instrument in our population. We conducted the initial review and assessment to see if the instrument was understandable in the Pakistani context. Two independent translators fluent both in original English and Urdu then translated the instrument. To ensure the accuracy and cultural appropriateness, the translated version was then back translated into English by a different translator. The original version of the MacArthur battery was compared with a back-translated version to help identify any discrepancies to make sure that translated version accurately conveyed the intended meaning. Piloting and cognitive debriefing followed and the MacArthur Battery was finalized once it was refined, after getting feedback from participants.
The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS), a validated 12-item measure with subscale measures of support received from family, friends, and significant others, was used to assess social support, though excluding the subscale of significant other (55). It has been effectively adapted to the Pakistani context (30). Participants were presented with a series of statements pertaining to social support from significant others, family, and friends and asked to rate their level of agreement on a Likert scoring scale, ranging from 0 (very strongly disagree) to 4 (very strongly agree) (34). Thus, mean scores on the whole scale also ranged from 0 to 4. Higher mean scores of subscales or the full scale indicated greater perceived social support. The MSPSS, with two subscales, showed strong internal consistency in this study (Cronbach’s α = 0.95).
To measure the outcome, we used the Maternal Infant Responsiveness Instrument (MIRI), a 22-item scale measuring mother’s feelings about the infant and an appraisal of the infant’s responses measured at six-weeks postpartum (56). It includes statements such as “I have seen my baby respond to my playing with him/her” and “I believe that I can comfort my baby when she/her cries.” We used a five-point Likert scale answer option, ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Total scores range from 22 to 110, where high scores indicate good responsiveness. MIRI showed good internal consistency in our study (Cronbach’s α = 0.88).
We measured postpartum depressive symptoms (PPD), an effect modifier, at six-weeks postpartum using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). The PHQ-9 is a multipurpose instrument that screens, diagnoses, monitors and measures symptoms of depression and their severity (57). There are ten questions overall, with responses options using a four-point Likert scale from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day). High scores indicated greater severity of depression. PHQ-9 had good internal consistency in our study (Cronbach’s α = 0.92). We dichotomized PPD scores from the PHQ-9 into none-mild (score 0-4) versus moderate-severe symptoms (score 5-27) (57).
Statistical analysis
To calculate means, standard deviations (SD), and the range of our exposure and outcome variables, as well as the correlation among these variables, we conducted univariate descriptive statistics. Then, we performed bivariate descriptive analyses to compare means and SDs of MIRI scores by categories of sociodemographic variables. We used Kruskal-Wallis equality of populations rank tests (for categorical variables) and Wilcoxon rank sum tests (for binary variables) as maternal responsiveness scores were not normally distributed. If socio-demographic variables were significantly associated with maternal responsiveness scores in the bivariate analyses (p<0.05), they were then included in further regression analytic models.
We conducted seven separate Ordinary Least Square (OLS) regression analyses in order to assess social support and spousal relationship quality (for overall and subscale scores) in relation to maternal responsiveness. In these analyses, we adjusted for education, preterm birth, low child birthweight, treatment group, PPD, and exposure to intimate partner violence (IPV) in the postpartum period. To account for multiple hypotheses testing, we calculated Romano-Wolf step-down p-values with 1,000 bootstrap replications (58).
Our final analyses included creating interaction terms between the overall and subscales of PPD and exposure variables (social support and spousal relationship quality), and tests of effect modification of PPD on the association of these exposure variables on maternal responsiveness. We used Wald F-tests to identify models with significant moderating effects (p<0.05), and the models with significant interaction terms were graphically depicted in order to illustrate how associations varied by levels of PPD. All analyses were conducted using STATA 15.1 (StataCorp, College Station, TX), and p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS
Descriptive statistics
The means of spousal relationship quality and social support were 2.8 (SD=0.9) and 2.4 (SD=1.1) respectively (Table 1). These two variables were significantly positively correlated (r=0.5, p<0.001). The mean maternal responsiveness score was 90.4 (SD=10.2), showing relatively high levels of responsiveness in the range between 22 and 110. The responsiveness score was positively correlated with both spousal relationship quality (r=0.3, p<0.001) and social support (r=0.2, p<0.001).
Table 1.
Mean, standard deviation (SD), and correlation of spousal relationship quality, social support, and maternal responsiveness (n=701)
| 1. | 2. | 3. | Mean (SD) | Possible range | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Spousal relationship quality | 1.00 | 2.80 (0.89) | 0-4 | ||
| 2. Social support | 0.51*** | 1.00 | 2.35 (1.12) | 0-4 | |
| 3. Maternal responsiveness | 0.30*** | 0.23*** | 1.00 | 90.40 (10.24) | 22-110 |
Note: High scores in relationship quality and social support indicate high levels of spousal relationship quality and social support. High scores in maternal responsiveness indicate good responsiveness.
p<0.001.
Table 2 shows the bivariate relationships between demographic covariates in relation to maternal responsiveness at six-weeks postpartum. Participants in the intervention group scored significantly higher in maternal responsiveness than participants in the control group (mean=91.5, SD=9.9 for intervention; mean=89.33, SD=10.5 for control, p=0.008). Exposure to any postpartum IPV and experiencing moderate-severe PPD were significantly associated with lower maternal responsiveness scores (mean=86.2, SD=11.1 for exposed to IPV; mean=89.3, SD=10.6 for moderate-severe PPD), when compared to participants not exposed to IPV and with no or mild PPD (mean=92.0, SD=9.5 for non-exposed to IPV, p<0.001; mean=92.3, SD=9.3 for none-mild PPD, p<0.001). A monthly household income of >20,000 PKR was significantly associated with higher maternal responsiveness scores (mean=91.8, SD=9.1 for >20,000 income, mean=89.6, SD=10.8 for ≤20,000 income, p=0.02). Having a preterm birth was significantly associated with higher maternal responsiveness scores (mean=92.4, SD=9.2 for preterm, mean=89.9, SD=10.4 for full term, p=0.02).
Table 2.
Bivariate descriptive statistics for the relation of demographic variables with maternal responsiveness at six-weeks postpartum (n=701)
| n (%) | Maternal responsiveness, mean (SD) | p-value† | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Participant characteristics | |||
| Age (years) | 0.543 | ||
| ≤25 | 419 (59.77) | 90.53 (10.17) | |
| >25 | 282 (40.23) | 90.21 (10.36) | |
| Education (years) | 0.721 | ||
| ≤Middle school (≤8 years) | 287 (40.94) | 90.12 (10.86) | |
| >Middle school (>8 years) | 414 (59.06) | 90.60 (9.80) | |
| Gravidity | 0.549 | ||
| Primigravida | 201 (28.67) | 90.71 (10.10) | |
| Multigravida | 500 (71.33) | 90.28 (10.30) | |
| Previous pregnancy loss | 0.784 | ||
| Yes | 294 (41.94) | 90.27 (10.36) | |
| No | 407 (58.06) | 90.50 (10.17) | |
| Treatment group | 0.008 | ||
| Intervention group | 350 (49.93) | 91.48 (9.92) | |
| Control group | 351 (50.07) | 89.33 (10.45) | |
| Exposure to IPV at postpartum | <0.001 | ||
| Exposed to any IPV | 190 (27.10) | 86.18 (11.08) | |
| Not exposed | 511 (72.90) | 91.97 (9.45) | |
| Postpartum depressive symptoms | <0.001 | ||
| None-mild (0-4) | 258 (36.80) | 92.33 (9.25) | |
| Moderate-severe (5-27) | 443 (63.20) | 89.28 (10.63) | |
| Household characteristics | |||
| Family structure | 0.178 | ||
| Nuclear | 226 (32.24) | 89.34 (10.67) | |
| Joint (living with in-law parents) | 234 (33.38) | 90.65 (10.17) | |
| Extended/multiple households | 241 (34.38) | 91.16 (9.85) | |
| Monthly household income (PKR) | 0.021 | ||
| ≤20,000 | 445 (63.48) | 89.60 (10.79) | |
| >20,000 | 256 (36.52) | 91.79 (9.06) | |
| Child characteristics | |||
| Sex | 0.459 | ||
| Male | 341 (48.64) | 90.72 (9.82) | |
| Female | 360 (51.36) | 90.10 (10.63) | |
| Birthweight | 0.405 | ||
| Low birthweight (<2.5kg) | 97 (13.84) | 90.03 (9.30) | |
| Normal (≥2.5kg) | 604 (86.16) | 90.46 (10.39) | |
| Preterm birth | 0.017 | ||
| Preterm (<37 weeks) | 144 (20.54) | 92.35 (9.23) | |
| Full term (≥37 weeks) | 557 (79.46) | 89.90 (10.43) |
Wilcoxon rank sum tests and Kruskal-Wallis equality of populations rank test were used to compare maternal responsiveness scores by the categories of covariates.
Note: High scores in the Maternal Infant Responsiveness Instrument (MIRI) indicate good responsiveness.
Spousal relationship quality and social support in relation to maternal responsiveness
Spousal relationship quality was associated with maternal responsiveness (Table 3). A one-point increase in spousal relationship quality was associated with a 2.5 increase in maternal responsiveness, adjusting for treatment group, monthly household income, preterm birth, exposure to IPV, and PPD (B=2.49, 95% CI: 1.48, 3.50). Having emotional and instrumental spousal support was significantly related to responsiveness (B=1.53, 95% CI: 0.68, 2.38 for emotional; and B=1.74, 95% CI: 0.98, 2.51 for instrumental). In contrast, a one-point increase in conflict/demand was significantly associated with a 1.5 decrease in responsiveness score, indicating a negative association between conflict and maternal responsiveness (B=−1.48, 95% CI: −2.31, −0.66).
Table 3.
Associations of relationship quality and social support with maternal responsiveness at six-weeks postpartum
| Crude coefficient (95% CI) | Adjusted coefficient (95% CI)† | |
|---|---|---|
| Relationship quality ‡ | ||
| Overall | 3.49 (2.68, 4.30)** | 2.49 (1.48, 3.50)** |
| Subscales: | ||
| Emotional support | 2.49 (1.75, 3.22)** | 1.53 (0.68, 2.38)** |
| Conflict/demand‡ | −2.59 (−3.27, −1.90)** | −1.48 (−2.31, −0.66)** |
| Instrumental support | 2.59 (1.90, 3.28)** | 1.74 (0.98, 2.51)** |
| Social support | ||
| Overall | 2.12 (1.46, 2.78)** | 1.07 (0.31, 1.83)* |
| Subscales: | ||
| Support from family | 1.75 (1.08, 2.43)** | 0.50 (−0.26, 1.27) |
| Support from friends | 1.64 (1.12, 2.18)** | 0.98 (0.40, 1.57)** |
Models were adjusted for treatment group, monthly household income, preterm birth, exposure to intimate partner violence (IPV) at postpartum, and postpartum depressive symptoms (PPD).
High scores in conflict/demand subscale indicates high levels of conflict or demand. In the overall score, conflict/demand subscale was reversely scored. High scores in overall relationship quality indicate good relationship with spouse.
Note: Romano-Wolf stepdown p-values was calculated to take account for multiple hypothesis testing.
adjusted p<0.05
adjusted p<0.01
adjusted p<0.001.
Perceived social support from family and friends was positively associated overall with maternal responsiveness. After adjustment, a one-point increase in overall social support was positively associated with a 1.1-point increase in maternal responsiveness score (B=1.07, 95% CI: 0.31, 1.83). The perceived support from friends subscale showed a similar association to the overall social support scores (B=0.98, 95% CI: 0.40, 1.57).
Postpartum depression as an effect modifier
The associations between both spousal relationship quality and social support with maternal responsiveness were modified by PPD, adjusting for treatment group, low birthweight, preterm birth, and exposure to any IPV at six-weeks postpartum (Table 4). Interaction terms between emotional support from a spouse and PPD symptoms, as well as the interaction between conflict with a spouse and PPD symptoms were significant in relation to maternal responsiveness, indicating that PPD was an effect modifier (p=0.04 for emotional; and p=0.03 for conflict). The interaction term between overall perceived social support and PPD symptoms was significant in relation to maternal responsiveness (p=0.02), as was the support from family subscale (p=0.03).
Table 4.
Moderating effect of postpartum depressive symptoms (PPD) in the association of spousal relationship quality and social support with maternal responsiveness at six-weeks postpartum
| Interaction terms | Coefficient (95% CI)† | p-value§ |
|---|---|---|
| Spousal relationship quality ‡ | ||
| Overall × PPD | −1.68 (−3.75, 0.38) | 0.110 |
| Emotional support × PPD | −1.88 (−3.70, −0.07) | 0.042 |
| Conflict × PPD‡ | 1.85 (0.18, 3.52) | 0.030 |
| Instrumental support × PPD | 0.94 (−0.61, 2.48) | 0.234 |
| Social support | ||
| Overall × PPD | −2.01 (−3.66, −0.36) | 0.017 |
| Support from family × PPD | −2.01 (−3.89, −0.14) | 0.035 |
| Support from friends × PPD | −1.19 (−2.41, 0.04) | 0.058 |
Adjusted for treatment group, monthly household income, preterm birth, and exposure to intimate partner violence (IPV) at postpartum.
High scores in conflict/demand subscale indicates high levels of conflict or demand. In the overall score, conflict/demand subscale was reversely scored. High scores in overall relationship quality indicate high levels of relationship quality with spouse.
p-values were obtained from the Wald test for moderating effects
Figure 2 graphically displays analyses for effect modification of PPD for the associations between spousal relationship quality/social support and maternal responsiveness. Emotional support from a spouse was positively associated with maternal responsiveness, and the magnitudes of the relationships were greater in non-depressed women compared to depressed women (B=2.96, 95% CI: 1.34, 4.58 for non-depressed; and B=1.08, 95% CI: 0.12, 2.03 for depressed). Similarly, conflict with the spouse was negatively associated with maternal responsiveness with a greater decrease in non-depressed women than depressed women (B=−2.87, 95% CI: −4.36, −1.37 for non-depressed; and B=−1.02, 95% CI: −1.94, −0.09 for depressed). In contrast, overall social support was positively associated with maternal responsiveness in non-depressed women (B=2.61, 95% CI: 1.14, 4.07), whereas this association was not significant in depressed women (B=0.59, 95% CI: −0.26, 1.44). Similarly, a one-point increase in social support from family was associated with a 2.19 increase in responsiveness in women with none to mild PPD (B=2.19, 95% CI: 0.44, 3.93). The association was null among women with moderate-severe PPD symptoms (B=0.17, 95% CI: −0.65, 0.99).
Figure 2.

Potential effect modification of postpartum depressive symptoms (PPD) in the associations of spousal relationship quality and social support with maternal responsiveness
(A) Association between emotional support from spouse and maternal responsiveness; (B) Association between conflict with spouse and maternal responsiveness; (C) Association between overall social support from family and friends and maternal responsiveness; and (D) Association between social support from friends and maternal responsiveness.
Note: Models were adjusted for treatment group, monthly household income, preterm birth, and exposure to intimate partner violence (IPV) at postpartum.
Graphic created using STATA 15.1 (StataCorp, College Station, TX).
When we conducted sensitivity analyses including all socio-demographic variables (regardless of their associations with maternal responsiveness), the associations of spousal relationship quality and social support with maternal responsiveness remained consistent with the original analysis results, although the magnitude of the associations for the relationship quality and responsiveness slightly decreased (Supplementary Table 1). In these sensitivity analyses, the moderating effects of PPD remained consistent with the original analyses, except for the interaction terms between emotional support from the spouse and PPD, and between social support from family members and PPD (Supplementary Table 2). The p-values for these two interaction terms increased slightly and became non-significant.
DISCUSSION
Results of our study indicate that spousal relationship quality and social support are both positively associated with the responsiveness of a mother to her infant, supporting our original hypothesis. Among the components of our relationship quality measure, emotional and instrumental support from the spouse were associated with more responsiveness, while conflict or demands between the spouses was associated with less responsiveness. Our study also suggested that PPD modified the association of spousal relationship quality and social support with maternal responsiveness. For instance, the effects of social support and of relationship conflict on responsiveness were less pronounced among women with higher levels of PPD, compared to women with low levels. Likewise, while social support helped women who were not depressed to be more responsive to their infants, there was almost no change in responsiveness based on support levels of women who were depressed. However, our findings also indicate that among depressed women, spousal relationship quality (i.e., emotional support and less conflict) improved maternal responsiveness, whereas social support showed a null association with responsiveness, suggesting that good spousal relationship quality is particularly important to depressed women. These findings indicate complex linkages between relationship quality with a spouse, social support, PPD, and maternal-infant responsiveness that are a novel contribution to the literature from LMICs.
Our finding that spousal relationship quality was positively associated with maternal responsiveness supports prior research (including among pregnant women) showing the importance of quality of close relationships to positive interactions with infants. One meta-analytic review of US studies indicated that variations in spousal relationship quality can influence the quality of parent-child interactions (59). Another study conducted in the US found that married mothers were more sensitive to their children than stably cohabiting ones (60). Moreover, a study from Italy showed a significant association between couple relationship quality and maternal-fetal attachment (61). Our data suggests similar findings in Rawalpindi, Pakistan, a lower middle income setting. Moreover, despite the important role played by a partner in maternal well-being and child development during the postpartum period, discussion and research about men’s role in particular has been largely missing in LMICs (with the majority of similar studies being conducted in HICs) (62). However, in one qualitative study in Pakistan analyzing the agreement between non-anxious mothers’ and fathers’ stimulation of their child, the strength of agreement around engagement in stimulation appeared to be greater among couples with higher quality co-parenting relationships (63), suggesting the importance of such relationships for child development in the Pakistani context. Our study brings men into the framework of women’s mental well-being in the postpartum period, and quantitatively sheds light on what men can potentially do to improve the relationship between the mother and child. This implicates parents, irrespective of gender, as directly and indirectly critical to child developmental outcomes, and thus the role and input of both parents should be considered in clinical care when assessing child development dynamics. Our study contributes data to this knowledge gap, which is important in light of the fact that parenting practices, support received, and relationship and family dynamics vary across cultures. Research in LMICs on such topics is particularly vital since children in these settings are falling short of reaching developmental milestones (64,65).
Several studies in HICs have shown that social support reduces stress and raises self-esteem, consequently increasing maternal responsiveness (26,66,67). For instance, one US study of non-anxious women with preterm infants found that social support had a significant, positive relationship with maternal responsiveness (26). Likewise, a Korean study found that provision of social support was associated with increased maternal sensitivity and, along with several other factors, explained a large proportion of the variance in maternal sensitivity (68). Consistently, our findings indicate that social support plays an important role in maternal responsiveness among pregnant Pakistani women with at least some symptoms of anxiety. In Pakistani culture, chilla, a rest period of up to 40 days after childbirth (69), is typically a time when family members provide adequate social support, thereby, potentially improving mental health of postpartum women. Such traditional postpartum practices include a woman returning to her natal home to receive care, support, and relief from household responsibilities. Future intervention strategies aiming to promote the mental health of postpartum women could integrate provision of social support to mothers during the chilla period.
Moreover, wider cultural factors may influence the observed relationships. While conceptual and empirical research has principally occurred in HICs (24), prior research has emphasized the importance of accounting for cross-cultural dynamics in LMIC settings, such as the different roles or behaviors of mothers. Cultural norms and practices regarding spousal relationships vary across contexts. For example, Iqbal et al.’s study found that Pakistanis endorsed couple bond standards more than Westerners or Chinese, and family responsibility standards substantially more than Westerners or Chinese (70), while Qadir et al.’s study found that Pakistani women often view marriage as a social and familial obligation (71). The strength of family ties and gender dynamics in Pakistan may have a bearing on our results, especially when considering the significant positive associations of family social support among women with high levels of PPD, but not related to social support from friends. Perceived higher social support has been associated with marital satisfaction in Pakistan, and both of these have an important association with reduced risk of depression (35,41,52,72). These distinct cultural factors and their impact on health outcomes should be considered in programs when seeking to address mother-infant relationships, including family dynamics that may have a strong influence on both maternal responsiveness and maternal mental health in general.
Among depressed women, we found that spousal relationship quality (i.e., emotional support and less conflict) improved maternal responsiveness, whereas social support showed a null association with responsiveness, suggesting that spousal relationship quality is particularly important to depressed women. Our null findings that were observed among depressed women, could be a result of negative mood, depression, having a greater overall effect on maternal responsiveness than positive stimulators, e.g. social support and spousal relationship quality. This could imply that interventions in anxious women with symptoms of PPD should prioritize addressing depressive symptoms, unless those intervention strategies themselves involve the enhancement of social support and improving spousal relationships. However, additional research is required to more thoroughly understand these null associations, particularly given the importance of emotional support and less spousal conflict with spouse for maternal responsiveness among depressed women.
Overall, our findings indicate complex relationships between relationship quality with spouse, social support, PPD, and maternal-infant responsiveness that are a novel contribution to the literature from LMICs. In the Pakistani context among women with symptoms of anxiety, we observed that a mother’s close relationships to both the spouse and to wider social networks had an impact on responsiveness to their infant, only among the non-depressed, indicating positive maternal mental health (lack of depression) and maternal relationships are pathways to influencing responsiveness in this group. To our knowledge, this is the first study investigating these associations in an LMIC. Research from the HICs may shed some light on the mechanisms involved. One such study concentrated on the positive relationship between self-focus (i.e., use of “I” in speech) and depressive symptoms (73) and examined the associations between self-focus and responsiveness. That study, conducted in the UK, found that greater partner-inclusive talk – use of “we” in parents’ speech, as opposed to self-focus – was associated with reduced sensitivity to infants’ cues in mothers (74), possibly also indicating lower responsiveness. However, another study from Australia suggested that the relationships between child development outcomes and maternal mental health (i.e., depression and anxiety) were largely independent of social support (75). Our results indicate that more research is required to understand the multifaceted relationships between these variables, and thus the factors advance positive maternal health and child development in different settings.
In addition to being the first study in a LMIC to explore social support and spousal relationship quality with maternal responsiveness, we do not know of other research that has examined these relationships specifically among women with anxiety. Among the limitations of our study, firstly, data were collected at a single time point. Secondly, data collection occurred over a three-year period, April 2019 – October 2022, which may have introduced variability due to potential shifts in social, economic, or healthcare-related factors during this time, such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Thirdly, while the MSPSS and PHQ-9 were validated in Pakistan (30,76), the spousal relationship quality and MIRI scales were not previously used in our study population. It is not known if our results are generalizable to non-anxious women or a broader population, given we drew participants from one public hospital in Rawalpindi serving people with low and middle socioeconomic status; thus, more research is needed to establish if this is the case.
We found that less social support and weaker spousal relationship quality was directly related to maternal infant relationships after pregnancy, with potential implications for child development. The United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goal 3 advocates for healthy lives and well-being, including for infants, children, and parents. Our study contributes to this agenda, by providing insight into maternal responsiveness – critical to child development – and factors that support women in their parenting experience, including those with PPD. Our findings indicate that improving child developmental outcomes – of significant concern in LMIC settings – requires the attention of the wider family and social context. Maternal responsiveness, a key to child development, is enhanced through strong social support and high spousal relationship quality. The strong connections between maternal mental health, maternal-infant relationships, and the spousal and social environment, imply that policies and programs should include mothers, fathers and wider support networks in order to more effectively address child developmental concerns.
Prior research indicates the importance of accounting for cultural context when developing interventions. One study in Pakistan found that gender-sensitive and culturally-appropriate social support can promote the mental health of women from low socioeconomic backgrounds (77), while analysis of Pakistani couples suggested that couples therapy could be adjusted to specific relationship standards and expectations among such couples (78). For PPD, prior studies in Pakistan have highlighted the important role that nurses can play in identifying women at risk and connecting them to relevant treatment (79), and that found participation in chilla and similar traditional postpartum practices can be used as entry points for creating low-cost, community-based, sustainable interventions (69). Further research is required, however, to more deeply understand the associations between maternal responsiveness and partner dynamics in particular, given how it is much less studied than social support. Given the critical role responsiveness plays for child development and the high levels of depression among women globally as well as in LMIC settings, the fact we did not observe social support in general or from friends to enhance maternal responsiveness among women with high levels of depressive symptoms suggests that more research is needed to identify protective factors for these women.
SUMMARY
Our study offers unique insights into the associations between spousal relationship quality/ social support and maternal responsiveness to infants among anxious mothers, in the lower middle income setting of Pakistan. We found that social support from family and friends was related to responsiveness only in non-depressed women, while spousal relationship quality was related to responsiveness in both non-depressed and depressed women. This suggests that spousal relationship quality may be particularly important for maternal responsiveness to infants of depressed women. More research is needed to identify what aspects of social relationships are protective for anxious women, given their important impact on maternal responsiveness, which is in turn critical for child development.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the staff, patients and families for their assistance and research participation.
Funding
This study was supported by the US National Institute of Mental Health, grant RO1 MH111859.
Footnotes
Ethical Approval
This study followed ethical guidelines and obtained human subjects’ approval from Research Ethics Committees at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Rawalpindi Medical University, Human Development Research Foundation, and a US NIMH-appointed Data Safety and Monitoring Board.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all participants.
Consent for Publication
All authors participated substantively to the paper and have approved the final version of the manuscript for submission.
Competing interests
The authors declare they have no competing interests to disclose.
Availability of data and materials
Data used in this study can be accessed at the US National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) Data Archive: https://nda.nih.gov/.
References
- 1.Drake EE, Humenick SS, Amankwaa L, Younger J, Roux G. Predictors of Maternal Responsiveness. Journal of Nursing Scholarship. 2007;39(2):119–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Abuhammad S. Perceived maternal parenting self-efficacy as a predictor maternal responsiveness in infants and toddlers. International Journal of Clinical Practice. 2021;75(5):e14043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Richter L. The importance of caregiver-child interactions for the survival and healthy development of young children: A review [Internet]. 2004. [cited 2023 Jun 2]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications-detail-redirect/924159134X [Google Scholar]
- 4.Yousafzai AK, Obradović J, Rasheed MA, Rizvi A, Portilla XA, Tirado-Strayer N, et al. Effects of responsive stimulation and nutrition interventions on children’s development and growth at age 4 years in a disadvantaged population in Pakistan: a longitudinal follow-up of a cluster-randomised factorial effectiveness trial. Lancet Glob Health. 2016. Aug;4(8):e548–558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Raval V, Goldberg S, Atkinson L, Benoit D, Myhal N, Poulton L, et al. Maternal attachment, maternal responsiveness and infant attachment. Infant Behavior and Development. 2001. Mar 1;24(3):281–304. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Milgrom J, Westley DT, Gemmill AW. The mediating role of maternal responsiveness in some longer term effects of postnatal depression on infant development. Infant Behavior and Development. 2004. Dec 1;27(4):443–54. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Stein A, Craske MG, Lehtonen A, Harvey A, Savage-McGlynn E, Davies B, et al. Maternal cognitions and mother–infant interaction in postnatal depression and generalized anxiety disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 2012. Nov;121(4):795–809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Stevenson-Hinde J, Chicot R, Shouldice A, Hinde CA. Maternal anxiety, maternal sensitivity, and attachment. Attachment & Human Development. 2013. Nov 1;15(5–6):618–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Dennis CL, Falah-Hassani K, Shiri R. Prevalence of antenatal and postnatal anxiety: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry. 2017. May;210(5):315–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Wang Z, Liu J, Shuai H, Cai Z, Fu X, Liu Y, et al. Mapping global prevalence of depression among postpartum women. Transl Psychiatry. 2021. Oct 20;11(1):1–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Nielsen-Scott M, Fellmeth G, Opondo C, Alderdice F. Prevalence of perinatal anxiety in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord. 2022. Jun 1;306:71–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Gelaye B, Rondon M, Araya R, Williams MA. Epidemiology of maternal depression, risk factors, and child outcomes in low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet Psychiatry. 2016. Oct;3(10):973–82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Fawcett EJ, Fairbrother N, Cox ML, White IR, Fawcett JM. The Prevalence of Anxiety Disorders during Pregnancy and the Postpartum Period: A Multivariate Bayesian Meta-Analysis. J Clin Psychiatry. 2019. Jul 23;80(4):18r12527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Coelho HF, Murray L, Royal-Lawson M, Cooper PJ. Antenatal anxiety disorder as a predictor of postnatal depression: A longitudinal study. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2011. Mar 1;129(1):348–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Grigoriadis S, Graves L, Peer M, Mamisashvili L, Tomlinson G, Vigod SN, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of antenatal anxiety on postpartum outcomes. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2019. Oct;22(5):543–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Austin MP, Tully L, Parker G. Examining the relationship between antenatal anxiety and postnatal depression. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2007. Aug 1;101(1):169–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Khanlari S, Barnett Am B, Ogbo FA, Eastwood J. Re-examination of perinatal mental health policy frameworks for women signalling distress on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) completed during their antenatal booking-in consultation: a call for population health intervention. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019. Jul 2;19(1):221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Surkan PJ, Malik A, Perin J, Atif N, Rowther A, Zaidi A, et al. Anxiety-focused cognitive behavioral therapy delivered by non-specialists to prevent postnatal depression: a randomized, phase 3 trial. Nat Med. 2024. Feb 16;1–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kalinauskiene L, Cekuoliene D, Van IJzendoorn MH, Bakermans-Kranenburg MJ, Juffer F, Kusakovskaja I. Supporting insensitive mothers: the Vilnius randomized control trial of video-feedback intervention to promote maternal sensitivity and infant attachment security. Child: Care, Health and Development. 2009;35(5):613–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Scherer E, Hagaman A, Chung E, Rahman A, O’Donnell K, Maselko J. The relationship between responsive caregiving and child outcomes: evidence from direct observations of mother-child dyads in Pakistan. BMC Public Health. 2019. Feb 28;19(1):252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Rasheed MA, Yousafzai AK. The development and reliability of an observational tool for assessing mother–child interactions in field studies- experience from Pakistan. Child: Care, Health and Development. 2015;41(6):1161–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Mertesacker B, Bade U, Haverkock A, Pauli-Pott U. Predicting maternal reactivity/sensitivity: The role of infant emotionality, maternal depressiveness/anxiety, and social support. Infant Mental Health Journal. 2004;25(1):47–61. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Stevenson A. Child and Adolescent Development: An expanded focus on public health in Africa. Juta and Company Ltd; 2018. 362 p. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Prag A, Donald KA, Weldon E, Halligan SL, Stein DJ, Malcolm-Smith S. Has maternal sensitivity been comprehensively investigated in sub-Saharan Africa? A narrative scoping review. Acta Neuropsychiatrica. 2023. Mar 24;1–18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Haslam D, Mejia A, Thomson D, Betancourt T. Self-Regulation in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Challenges and Future Directions. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2019. Mar 1;22(1):104–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Amankwaa LC, Pickler RH, Boonmee J. Maternal Responsiveness in Mothers of Preterm Infants. Newborn and Infant Nursing Reviews. 2007. Mar 1;7(1):25–30. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ng CG, Mohamed S, See MH, Harun F, Dahlui M, Sulaiman AH, et al. Anxiety, depression, perceived social support and quality of life in Malaysian breast cancer patients: a 1-year prospective study. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 2015. Dec 30;13(1):205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Naveed S, Lashari UG, Waqas A, Bhuiyan M, Meraj H. Gender of children and social provisions as predictors of unplanned pregnancies in Pakistan: a cross-sectional survey. BMC Research Notes. 2018. Aug 14;11(1):587. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Waqas A, Zubair M, Zia S, Meraj H, Aedma KK, Majeed MH, et al. Psychosocial predictors of antenatal stress in Pakistan: perspectives from a developing country. BMC Research Notes. 2020. Mar 18;13(1):160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Sharif M, Zaidi A, Waqas A, Malik A, Hagaman A, Maselko J, et al. Psychometric Validation of the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support During Pregnancy in Rural Pakistan. Frontiers in Psychology [Internet]. 2021. [cited 2023 Jun 8];12. Available from: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.601563 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Biaggi A, Conroy S, Pawlby S, Pariante CM. Identifying the women at risk of antenatal anxiety and depression: A systematic review. J Affect Disord. 2016. Feb;191:62–77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Grav S, Hellzèn O, Romild U, Stordal E. Association between social support and depression in the general population: the HUNT study, a cross-sectional survey. J Clin Nurs. 2012. Jan;21(1–2):111–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Battulga B, Benjamin MR, Chen H, Bat-Enkh E. The Impact of Social Support and Pregnancy on Subjective Well-Being: A Systematic Review. Front Psychol. 2021;12:710858. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Malik A, Park S, Mumtaz S, Rowther A, Zulfiqar S, Perin J, et al. Perceived Social Support and Women’s Empowerment and Their Associations with Pregnancy Experiences in Anxious Women: A Study from Urban Pakistan. Matern Child Health J. 2023. May;27(5):916–25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Nazir H, Rowther AA, Rauf N, Atiq M, Kazi AK, Malik A, et al. ‘Those whom I have to talk to, I can’t talk to’: Perceived social isolation in the context of anxiety symptoms among pregnant women in Pakistan. Health & Social Care in the Community. 2022;30(6):e5885–96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Mirza I, Jenkins R. Risk factors, prevalence, and treatment of anxiety and depressive disorders in Pakistan: systematic review. BMJ. 2004. Apr 1;328(7443):794. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Uno D, Uchino BN, Smith TW. Relationship quality moderates the effect of social support given by close friends on cardiovascular reactivity in women. Int J Behav Med. 2002. Sep 1;9(3):243–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Stevenson W, Maton KI, Teti DM. Social support, relationship quality, and well-being among pregnant adolescents. Journal of Adolescence. 1999. Feb 1;22(1):109–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Barton K, Redshaw M, Quigley MA, Carson C. Unplanned pregnancy and subsequent psychological distress in partnered women: a cross-sectional study of the role of relationship quality and wider social support. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017. Jan 26;17(1):44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Whisman MA, Uebelacker LA. Impairment and distress associated with relationship discord in a national sample of married or cohabiting adults. Journal of Family Psychology. 2006;20(3):369–77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Qadir F, Khalid A, Haqqani S, Zill-e-Huma, Medhin G The association of marital relationship and perceived social support with mental health of women in Pakistan. BMC Public Health. 2013. Dec 9;13(1):1150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Leach LS, Butterworth P, Olesen SC, Mackinnon A. Relationship quality and levels of depression and anxiety in a large population-based survey. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2013. Mar 1;48(3):417–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Aktan NM. Social Support and Anxiety in Pregnant and Postpartum Women: A Secondary Analysis. Clin Nurs Res. 2012. May 1;21(2):183–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Assal-Zrike S, Marks K, Atzaba-Poria N. Prematurity, maternal emotional distress, and infant social responsiveness among Arab-Bedouin families: The role of social support as a resilience factor. Child Dev. 2022. Mar;93(2):582–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Jamshaid S, Malik NI, Ullah I, Saboor S, Arain F, De Berardis D. Postpartum Depression and Health: Role of Perceived Social Support among Pakistani Women. Diseases. 2023. Mar 31;11(2):53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Vaezi A, Soojoodi F, Banihashemi AT, Nojomi M. The association between social support and postpartum depression in women: A cross sectional study. Women and Birth. 2019. Apr 1;32(2):e238–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Faisal-Cury A, Tabb K, Matijasevich A. Partner relationship quality predicts later postpartum depression independently of the chronicity of depressive symptoms. Braz J Psychiatry. 2020. Jul 27;43:12–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Slomian J, Honvo G, Emonts P, Reginster JY, Bruyère O. Consequences of maternal postpartum depression: A systematic review of maternal and infant outcomes. Womens Health (Lond). 2019;15:1745506519844044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Małus A, Szyluk J, Galińska-Skok B, Konarzewska B. Incidence of postpartum depression and couple relationship quality. Psychiatr Pol. 2016. Dec 23;50(6):1135–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Tester-Jones M, O’Mahen H, Watkins E, Karl A. The impact of maternal characteristics, infant temperament and contextual factors on maternal responsiveness to infant. Infant Behavior and Development. 2015. Aug 1;40:1–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Alvarenga P, Cerezo MÁ, Kuchirko Y. Theoretical and Empirical Underpinnings of Maternal Sensitivity: Considerations of Sensitivity Across Cultures and Socioeconomic Status. In: Alvarenga P, Cerezo MÁ, Kuchirko Y, editors. The Maternal Sensitivity Program: A Model for Promoting Infant Development in Challenging Contexts [Internet]. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2022. [cited 2023 Jun 23]. p. 3–19. Available from: 10.1007/978-3-030-84212-3_1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Atif N, Nazir H, Zafar S, Chaudhri R, Atiq M, Mullany LC, et al. Development of a Psychological Intervention to Address Anxiety During Pregnancy in a Low-Income Country. Frontiers in Psychiatry. 2020. Jan 10;10:927. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Surkan PJ, Hamdani SU, Huma ZE, Nazir H, Atif N, Rowther AA, et al. Cognitive-behavioral therapy-based intervention to treat symptoms of anxiety in pregnancy in a prenatal clinic using non-specialist providers in Pakistan: design of a randomised trial. BMJ Open. 2020. Apr 15;10(4):e037590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Seeman TE, Lusignolo TM, Albert M, Berkman L. Social relationships, social support, and patterns of cognitive aging in healthy, high-functioning older adults: MacArthur studies of successful aging. Health Psychol. 2001. Jul;20(4):243–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Zimet GD, Dahlem NW, Zimet SG, Farley GK. The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support. Journal of Personality Assessment. 1988;52:30–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Amankwaa L, Pickler R. Measuring maternal responsiveness. ABNF J. 2007;18(1):4–15. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001. Sep;16(9):606–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Romano JP, Wolf M. Exact and Approximate Stepdown Methods for Multiple Hypothesis Testing. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 2005;100(469):94–108. [Google Scholar]
- 59.Krishnakumar A, Buehler C. Interparental Conflict and Parenting Behaviors: A Meta-Analytic Review. Family Relations. 2000;49(1):25–44. [Google Scholar]
- 60.Klausli JF, Owen MT. Stable maternal cohabitation, couple relationship quality, and characteristics of the home environment in the child’s first two years. Journal of Family Psychology. 2009;23(1):103–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Sacchi C, Miscioscia M, Visentin S, Simonelli A. Maternal–fetal attachment in pregnant Italian women: multidimensional influences and the association with maternal caregiving in the infant’s first year of life. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021. Jul 6;21(1):488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Maselko J, Hagaman AK, Bates LM, Bhalotra S, Biroli P, Gallis JA, et al. Father involvement in the first year of life: Associations with maternal mental health and child development outcomes in rural Pakistan. Soc Sci Med. 2019. Sep;237:112421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Jeong J, Siyal S, Yousafzai AK. Agreement between Fathers’ and Mothers’ Reported Stimulation and Associations with Observed Responsive Parenting in Pakistan. Children. 2019. Oct;6(10):114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Buffa G, Dahan S, Sinclair I, St-Pierre M, Roofigari N, Mutran D, et al. Prenatal stress and child development: A scoping review of research in low- and middle-income countries. PLOS ONE. 2018. Dec 28;13(12):e0207235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Kruk ME, Lewis TP, Arsenault C, Bhutta ZA, Irimu G, Jeong J, et al. Improving health and social systems for all children in LMICs: structural innovations to deliver high-quality services. Lancet. 2022. May 7;399(10337):1830–44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Burchinal MR, Follmer A, Bryant DM. The relations of maternal social support and family structure with maternal responsiveness and child outcomes among African American families. Developmental Psychology. 1996;32(6):1073–83. [Google Scholar]
- 67.Beck CT. Predictors of postpartum depression: An update. Nursing Research. 2001;50(5):275–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Shin H, Park YJ, Kim MJ. Predictors of maternal sensitivity during the early postpartum period. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2006;55(4):425–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.LeMasters K, Andrabi N, Zalla L, Hagaman A, Chung EO, Gallis JA, et al. Maternal depression in rural Pakistan: the protective associations with cultural postpartum practices. BMC Public Health. 2020. Jan 15;20(1):68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Iqbal S, Ayub N, van de Vijver F, Halford WK. Couple relationship standards in Pakistan. Couple and Family Psychology: Research and Practice. 2019;8(4):208–20. [Google Scholar]
- 71.Qadir F, de Silva P, Prince M, Khan M. Marital satisfaction in Pakistan: A pilot investigation. Sexual and Relationship Therapy. 2005. May 1;20(2):195–209. [Google Scholar]
- 72.Rowther AA, Kazi AK, Nazir H, Atiq M, Atif N, Rauf N, et al. ‘A Woman Is a Puppet.’ Women’s Disempowerment and Prenatal Anxiety in Pakistan: A Qualitative Study of Sources, Mitigators, and Coping Strategies for Anxiety in Pregnancy. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020. Jul 8;17(14):4926. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Edwards T, Holtzman NS. A meta-analysis of correlations between depression and first person singular pronoun use. Journal of Research in Personality. 2017. Jun 1;68:63–8. [Google Scholar]
- 74.Foley S, Álvarez C, McCarthy J, Hughes C. Two’s Company, Three’s a Crowd? Maternal and Paternal Talk About Their Infant Differs in Associations With Wellbeing, Couple Relationship Quality, and Caregiving Sensitivity. Frontiers in Psychiatry [Internet]. 2020. [cited 2023 Jun 23];11. Available from: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.578632 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Milgrom J, Hirshler Y, Reece J, Holt C, Gemmill AW. Social Support-A Protective Factor for Depressed Perinatal Women? Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019. Apr 21;16(8):1426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Ahmad S, Hussain S, Akhtar F, Shah FS. Urdu translation and validation of PHQ-9, a reliable identification, severity and treatment outcome tool for depression. J Pak Med Assoc. 2018. Aug;68(8):1166–70. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Hirani SS, Norris CM, Van Vliet KJ, Van Zanten SV, Karmaliani R, Lasiuk G. Social support intervention to promote resilience and quality of life in women living in Karachi, Pakistan: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Public Health. 2018. Jul;63(6):693–702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Ayub N, Iqbal S, Halford WK, van de Vijver F. Couples relationship standards and satisfaction in Pakistani couples. J Marital Fam Ther. 2023. Jan;49(1):111–28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Gulamani SS, Shaikh K, Chagani J. Postpartum depression in Pakistan: a neglected issue. Nurs Womens Health. 2013;17(2):147–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Data used in this study can be accessed at the US National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) Data Archive: https://nda.nih.gov/.
