Table 3.
Associations of relationship quality and social support with maternal responsiveness at six-weeks postpartum
| Crude coefficient (95% CI) | Adjusted coefficient (95% CI)† | |
|---|---|---|
| Relationship quality ‡ | ||
| Overall | 3.49 (2.68, 4.30)** | 2.49 (1.48, 3.50)** |
| Subscales: | ||
| Emotional support | 2.49 (1.75, 3.22)** | 1.53 (0.68, 2.38)** |
| Conflict/demand‡ | −2.59 (−3.27, −1.90)** | −1.48 (−2.31, −0.66)** |
| Instrumental support | 2.59 (1.90, 3.28)** | 1.74 (0.98, 2.51)** |
| Social support | ||
| Overall | 2.12 (1.46, 2.78)** | 1.07 (0.31, 1.83)* |
| Subscales: | ||
| Support from family | 1.75 (1.08, 2.43)** | 0.50 (−0.26, 1.27) |
| Support from friends | 1.64 (1.12, 2.18)** | 0.98 (0.40, 1.57)** |
Models were adjusted for treatment group, monthly household income, preterm birth, exposure to intimate partner violence (IPV) at postpartum, and postpartum depressive symptoms (PPD).
High scores in conflict/demand subscale indicates high levels of conflict or demand. In the overall score, conflict/demand subscale was reversely scored. High scores in overall relationship quality indicate good relationship with spouse.
Note: Romano-Wolf stepdown p-values was calculated to take account for multiple hypothesis testing.
adjusted p<0.05
adjusted p<0.01
adjusted p<0.001.