Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Oct 13.
Published in final edited form as: Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2024 Apr 13;57(1):138–151. doi: 10.1007/s10578-024-01702-5

Table 3.

Associations of relationship quality and social support with maternal responsiveness at six-weeks postpartum

Crude coefficient (95% CI) Adjusted coefficient (95% CI)
Relationship quality
Overall 3.49 (2.68, 4.30)** 2.49 (1.48, 3.50)**
Subscales:
  Emotional support 2.49 (1.75, 3.22)** 1.53 (0.68, 2.38)**
  Conflict/demand −2.59 (−3.27, −1.90)** −1.48 (−2.31, −0.66)**
  Instrumental support 2.59 (1.90, 3.28)** 1.74 (0.98, 2.51)**
Social support
Overall 2.12 (1.46, 2.78)** 1.07 (0.31, 1.83)*
Subscales:
  Support from family 1.75 (1.08, 2.43)** 0.50 (−0.26, 1.27)
  Support from friends 1.64 (1.12, 2.18)** 0.98 (0.40, 1.57)**

Models were adjusted for treatment group, monthly household income, preterm birth, exposure to intimate partner violence (IPV) at postpartum, and postpartum depressive symptoms (PPD).

High scores in conflict/demand subscale indicates high levels of conflict or demand. In the overall score, conflict/demand subscale was reversely scored. High scores in overall relationship quality indicate good relationship with spouse.

Note: Romano-Wolf stepdown p-values was calculated to take account for multiple hypothesis testing.

*

adjusted p<0.05

**

adjusted p<0.01

***

adjusted p<0.001.