Skip to main content
Journal of Chiropractic Humanities logoLink to Journal of Chiropractic Humanities
. 2024 Oct 1;31:33–47. doi: 10.1016/j.echu.2024.02.002

Research Trends in Dry Needling for Neck Pain Treatment: A Bibliometric Analysis

Varun Kalia 1,, Priyanka Rajput 1
PMCID: PMC11471195  PMID: 39403608

Abstract

Objective

The objective of this study was to analyze the published literature on the utilization of dry needling in the management of neck pain.

Methods

We performed a bibliometric analysis of publications from January 1, 2002 to December 31, 2022. Using the Scopus database, articles about the utilization of dry needling in neck pain were found. Scopus analyzer was used to obtain results such as “documents by year,” “source,” “country,” and so on. VOS viewer Version 1.6.18 was used to analyze various units such as “co-authorship,” “co-occurrences,” and “citation analysis.”

Results

The search yielded 125 articles. Most articles were published in the years 2022, followed by 2021. A network analysis of various parameters reveals that the topic has a high research potential.

Conclusion

This bibliometric analysis offers an understanding of the literature on dry needling therapy for neck pain. The number of studies in this sector has increased over a decade. There is a gap in research from low- and middle-income countries on use of dry needling in the management of neck pain.

Key Indexing Terms: Neck Pain, Dry Needling, Bibliometrics

Introduction

Neck pain (NP) is a prevalent and debilitating condition that impacts individuals across various age groups and demographics.1 NP prevalence rates varied widely from 45.5% among office employees to 45.8% to 54.7% among health care providers.2,3 Furthermore, the incidence of NP in the overall population varies from 0.4 to 86.8% globally.4 The literature reveals a 59.7% pervasiveness of NP in students of the university, with 51% reporting symptoms as a result of myofascial trigger points within neck muscles.5 As a result, researchers and health care practitioners have continuously sought innovative approaches to enhance NP treatment outcomes. Among these approaches, dry needling has emerged as a promising therapeutic intervention with the potential to alleviate pain, improve function, and enhance the quality of life for individuals with NP.6

Dry needling has garnered substantial attention from researchers, clinicians, and patients alike due to its minimally invasive nature and purported efficacy in targeting myofascial trigger points, improving muscle function, and modulating pain perception. Dry needling refers to the insertion of thin, solid needles into specific anatomical sites, often referred to as trigger points, within muscles, tendons, ligaments, or fascia without the injection of any medication or substance.7

Understanding the trajectory of research trends in dry needling for NP is crucial for several reasons. First, it allows researchers and clinicians to identify the most influential studies, prominent authors, and leading institutions, thereby facilitating the dissemination of evidence-based practices. Second, by mapping out the thematic clusters and areas of active investigation, this analysis can guide future research endeavors and highlight potential gaps in knowledge that warrant further exploration. Additionally, a comprehensive bibliometric analysis can provide a global perspective on the adoption and dissemination of dry needling interventions for NP, helping bridge the gap between research and clinical practice.

A bibliometric analysis would help to shed light on the evolving trends, research hotspots, and key contributors in the field of dry needling for NP treatment. A bibliometric study could offer valuable insights into the growth of research, the distribution of publications, and the collaborative networks that have shaped the landscape of dry needling research in the context of NP. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to provide a comprehensive overview of the research landscape surrounding the application of dry needling for NP.

Methods

Collection of Primary Databases

We used Scopus for the analysis because it is a popular and widely used database for bibliometric analysis8,9 because it provides comprehensive coverage of scientific literature, citation information, allowing researchers to analyze citation patterns, track citation trends, and it assesses the impact of individual publications or authors. On January 21, 2023, the search terms employed in the search yielded a total of 125 publication results.5,9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132 There was no restriction on open access, to the subject area, source title, source type, publication stage, keywords, affiliation, funding sponsor, or country. We limited the search to the English language, the year January 1, 2002 to December 31, 2022, articles, and review documents. Each publication includes details such as author, region, citations, documents, and sources, and the exact data56 were utilized for the analysis. GLOBAL “Guidance list for reporting Bibliometric analysis” was used in this bibliometric analysis presentation.133

Results

Performance Analysis

Along with the “Scopus analysis,” VOS viewer 1.6.18 software134 was used for analysis. It gives a method to perform “Statistical Analysis and network analysis of Databases.” Furthermore, statistical analysis analyzed the “Documents by Source,” “Documents by Year,” “Documents by Subject Area,” “Documents by Type,” “Documents by Country,” “Documents by the Author,” “Documents by Affiliation,” “Documents by Top Funding Agencies.” In addition, network analysis analyzed the documents for “Co-authorship: Authors, organizations, country,” “Co-occurrence: All keywords, Author keywords, Index keywords,” “Citation Analysis: Sources, authors, organizations, country,” “Bibliographic coupling: Documents, Authors.”

Analysis of Keywords

In addition to primary keywords, other keywords were discovered during the search. Table 1 contains a list of the most popular 15 keywords. The keyword with the most publications is “Human,” It has been found that each of these keywords is connected to a person's overall well-being.

Table 1.

Publication Analysis Based on Top 15 Keyword Analysis

Serial Number Keywords Number of Publications
1. Human 114
2. Dry Needling 102
3. Humans 96
4. Trigger Point 95
5. Trigger Points 89
6. Neck Pain 82
7. Adult 80
8. Female 80
9. Myofascial Pain 76
10. Article 70
11. Male 69
12. Controlled Study 67
13. Trapezius Muscle 61
14. Myofascial Pain Syndromes 60
15. Randomized Controlled Trial 60

Source: http://www.scopus.com (assessed January 21, 2023).

Statistical Analysis

Document Analysis by Sources

A total of 125 articles concerning the utilization of dry needling in the rehabilitation of NP have been published in various journals. The top 10 journals that published articles related to the search topic are listed here in Table 2. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies is the journal that published the maximum number of articles (25 articles) related to the search topic. Figure 1 depicts a pictograph of the various journals, as well as the number of articles published annually.

Table 2.

Analysis of Documents by Sources

Serial Number Journals Number of Published Articles
1. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies 25
2. Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation 8
3. Acupuncture in Medicine 7
4. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 7
5. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy 6
6. Journal of Manipulative & Physiological Therapeutics 5
7. PM&R 5
8. Archives of Physical Medicine And Rehabilitation 4
9. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine 4
10. Journal of Clinical Medicine 3

Source: http://www.scopus.com (assessed January 21, 2023).

Fig 1.

Fig 1

Analysis of documents by sources.

Documents Analysis by Year

Data were gathered from the DBs from the last 2 decades 2002 to 2022 that include articles and review articles. It is observed from the analysis that only 1 article was published in 2002 related to the searched topic and the pace of publication remained low till 2012, then there was a rapid spike in article publication, with 2022 having the most publications, followed by 2021 (Fig 2). Additionally, this shows that there will be plenty of opportunity to work in this field in the years to come.

Fig 2.

Fig 2

Analysis of documents by year.

Documents by Subject Area

The treatment of NP with dry needling is coming under the scope of medicine and health care and the data analysis also reported the maximum number of article publications done in the field of medicine (51.0%) followed by health professionals (41.7%). Whereas 7.3% of articles are published in other subject areas like Neurosciences, Nursing, Environmental Science, Engineering, Biochemistry, Genetics, Molecular Biology, and Multidisciplinary.

Documents by Type

The analysis shows that journal articles make up the majority of published articles (98), followed by review articles (27).

Analysis of Publications by Country or Territory

Countries were analyzed using the number of articles published in the Scopus DB. It demonstrates that the “United States” has the most articles published “45” between the identified timeline and accompanied by Spain (number 40) & Iran (number 22). Figure 3 depicts the countries in terms of the number of articles published on the searched topic.

Fig 3.

Fig 3

Analysis of publications by country or territory.

Documents by Author

Authors with multiple publications were considered in this analysis. Dommerholt had the most publications in this area “14,” followed by Hooks, T. “12,” Finnegan, M., and Grieve, R. “8” (Figure in supplementary file).

Documents by Affiliations

The top 15 affiliations were regarded in this analysis. It has been discovered that Universidad Rey Juan Carlos has affiliations in up to 24 published articles, followed by Bethesda Physiocare and Myopain Seminars (14 published articles) (Figure in supplementary file).

Analysis by Funding Sponsors

The “National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases” funds the most research in the “United States.” According to the analysis, the majority of the funding institutes are in the field of health science. Figure 4 depicts the top 15 funding sources for dry-needling research.

Fig 4.

Fig 4

Analysis of documents by funding sponsor.

Network Analysis and Co-authorship Analysis

Co-authorship in Terms of Authors

This analysis included 3 parameters, that is, authors, organizations, and countries.

This analysis excludes articles with a large number of authors. This estimate is assumed to be 25. An author is considered who have written at least 2 articles.

It was discovered that 70 authors out of 412 have written at least 2 articles. As a whole, co-authorship strength is determined in collaboration with all other authors. Link strengths are achieved using this technique. Dommerholt had the greatest link strength of 36, with 82 citations for 14 different articles. Seventy authors were discovered to be related in regard to co-authorship (Figure in supplementary file).

Co-authorship in Terms of Organizations

Co-authorship in the component of organizations was determined using a minimum of 2 documents in organizations without contemplating citations; 34 organizations fulfill the requirements out of 364 overall organizations.

Co-authorship in Terms of Nation

Regarding the nation, co-authorship was also achieved. There are 27 countries in which these DBs are available. After taking into account the requirement of a minimum of 5 articles in a nation, 7 nations met the requirement. The “United States” was discovered to possess the most citations (950), the strongest link strength (27), and the most published documents (45), which is also the highest among all. Table 3 contains information on 7 countries.

Table 3.

Analysis of Co-authorship in Terms of Nation

Serial Number Nation Document Citations Total Link Strength
1. United States 45 950 27
2. Spain 40 701 13
3. United Kingdom 11 171 11
4. Iran 22 309 5
5. Belgium 5 218 4
6. Taiwan 5 125 4
7. Turkey 10 295 0

Network Analysis of Co-occurrences

Co-occurrence Analysis in Terms of All Keywords

Different keywords were considered for the co-occurrence analysis. The minimum number of keyword occurrences was considered to be 5. One hundred fifty keywords out of 1091 met the criteria (Fig 5).

Fig 5.

Fig 5

Co-occurrence analysis in terms of all keywords.

Co-occurrence Analysis in Terms of Author Keywords

The co-occurrence of author keywords has been investigated using a minimum standard of 5 per author. The threshold was met by 15 of the 178 keywords (Fig 6).

Fig 6.

Fig 6

Co-occurrence network analysis (author keywords).

Co-occurrence in Terms of Index Keywords

Of the 999 index keywords, hardly 138 met the criterion for co-concurrence (Fig 7).

Fig 7.

Fig 7

Co-occurrence of index keywords.

Network Analysis of Citations

This interpretation was carried out using the following units of analysis: “documents,” “sources,” “authors,” “country,” & “organization.”

Citation Analysis of Documents

A count of 125 documents was used to determine a cutoff of 5 citations per article. As a result, 75 documents met the requirement. Liu et al.108 has the most citations (144), and the link strength is 23 (Fig 8).

Fig 8.

Fig 8

Network analysis of citations (in terms of documents).

Citation Analysis of Sources

The 5 citations per source limit have been taken into consideration in order to perform citation analysis on the sources. Only 7 of the 50 sources met the criteria. The Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies received the most citations (284) (Figure in supplementary file).

Citation Analysis by Authors

The least amount of citations per author regarded here was 3. Among the total of 412 authors, 37 met the criterion. Nourbakhsh has a count of 160 citations (Figure in supplementary file).

Citation Analysis by the Organization

Using a minimum of 3 documents per organization as the threshold, 15 organizations out of 364 met the requirement. The maximum number of citations for Bethesda Physiocare, Bethesda, MD, USA is 82 (Figure in supplementary file).

Citation Analysis by Country

Twenty-seven nations have DBs of dry needling in the treatment of NP. Seven of them fulfilled the citation standards, with a minimum of 5 citations per nation (Fig 9).

Fig 9.

Fig 9

Citation analysis of the country.

Network Analysis of Bibliographic Coupling

Bibliographic Coupling of Documents

Seventy-five out of 125 articles satisfy the requirement when taking into account a minimum of 5 citations per document. The maximum total link strength and the number of citations for Cerezo-Tellez et al.98 are 408 and 64, respectively (Fig 10).

Fig 10.

Fig 10

Bibliographic coupling of documents.

Bibliographic Coupling of Authors

Concerning, a least threshold of 3 documents per author there were 37 authors out of 412 authors fulfilled the cutoff requirements (Figure in supplementary file).

Discussion

Bibliometric analysis is a valuable method for evaluating and understanding trends in academic research. The study emphasizes the rising interest and involvement of nations, organizations, and writers in the field of dry needling for the treatment of NP. This shows that there is growing awareness of the potential advantages of dry needling in the management of NP. The collaborative network that has been identified between a few universities and authors points to fruitful partnerships in dry needling management in NP management. This emphasizes how crucial it is for the field to advance through knowledge exchange and teamwork. The chosen keywords—human, dry needling, and neck pain—indicate areas of emphasis on dry needling in the management of NP. This means that researchers are looking into specialized interventions and treatments to deal with the difficulties experienced by people with NP.

The volume of scholarly literature addressing DN for NP has shown a steady increase from 2012 to 2021, suggesting that research into this area has gained significant traction among scholars globally, and provides a solid foundation for subsequent research.

Bibliometric analysis provides information regarding the most popularly used keywords in the highly cited publications and with the help of it; bibliometric analysis can help gauge the impact and influence of these research topics. In addition, researchers and information professionals can use keyword frequency data to refine search strategies for literature reviews and information retrieval, ensuring that relevant publications are captured. Discovering keywords that are less common can highlight knowledge gaps in the literature, prompting researchers to explore new areas of study or contribute to existing gaps.

The Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies emerged as the journal with the highest co-citations and centrality, indicating that the research literature published in this journal wields influence and serves as a reference source for future research endeavors. The information regarding the influential journals can potentially attract collaboration opportunities from researchers who are already engaged with those journals.

Studies on DN for NP have been carried out across 27 countries and regions, with the United States and Spain standing out as prominent contributors in this domain. This prominence may be due to their advanced economies and robust health care systems, which foster the development of treatments for NP. Involvement of the 27 countries and prominence of United State and Spain shows that dry needling for NP is a part of broader international efforts.

The analysis of publications by country or territory allows for the identification of countries with strong research output in specific fields. In the present study, the “United States” emerged as the country with the most articles published within the identified timeline, signifying its significant contribution to research in NP.

The examination of documents by author facilitates the quantification of an author's productivity through the analysis of the number of publications ascribed to them. This analytical approach proves valuable in the assessment of the scholarly output manifested by individual researchers within a defined temporal scope. The current investigation revealed that Dommerholt exhibited the highest volume of publications within the examined domain, thereby delineating his specific areas of research interest. This finding implies an opportunity for collaboration with researchers sharing analogous research interests in forthcoming studies. Moreover, institutions and funding agencies can employ bibliometric analysis as a tool for the appraisal of the research output produced by their affiliated authors. The resultant information derived from such analyses serves to guide decisions pertaining to promotions, allocation of funding resources, and strategic planning initiatives.

The analysis of documents by affiliations allows for the systematic evaluation of an institution's research productivity, accomplished by scrutinizing the quantity of publications linked to said institution. These data hold significance for benchmarking exercises and facilitates the comparative assessment of the scholarly output across various research institutions. The current investigation ascertains that Universidad Rey Juan Carlos exhibits affiliations in the highest number of published articles within the investigated research domain. Such discernments provide valuable insights, enabling research institutes to strategically engage in collaborative endeavors with institutions demonstrating optimal research productivity in specific areas of research.

The National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases funds the most research in the United States. This information may help funders identify which research projects and areas have resulted in the most publications and impact, allowing for informed decisions on future funding priorities.

Co-occurrence analysis, as applied to index keywords in bibliometric investigation, entails the identification and examination of the frequency of keywords appearing jointly in scholarly publications. The present study discerned 138 instances of keywords co-occurring with one another. This analytical approach proves instrumental in delineating prevalent research themes by elucidating the keywords that recurrently manifest in conjunction. Such insights contribute to a comprehensive understanding of the primary topics and focal areas within a specific field of research.

The analysis of citation networks involves the examination of relationships between scientific papers, primarily derived from citation patterns. In the current study, it is observed that among 125 documents, 75 have garnered a minimum of 5 citations, with Liu I (2015) emerging as the document with the highest citation count. This information serves to identify citation networks and clusters of interrelated papers, providing researchers with the means to explore cohesive groups of literature, identify influential works, and gain insights into the intellectual structure inherent within a specific field of study.

Strengths and Limitations

In this study, bibliometric analysis was used for the first time to visualize the literature on DN treatment of NP from 2002 to 2022, summarize the research status, and identify the research trend in this field. In addition, we used methods to analyze data, which was suitable for multiangle interpretation of conclusions. However, limitations still exist that need to be addressed. First, only the Scopus database was used in this study. Therefore, it is possible that some papers were missed in our analysis. Furthermore, the exclusion of non-English language publications may result in an incomplete representation of the global research landscape, limiting the generalizability of our findings. Additionally, it is imperative to acknowledge that bibliometric analysis, being primarily reliant on quantitative data, inherently neglects nuanced qualitative aspects of research. As such, critical dimensions such as the novelty of ideas, methodological rigor, and societal impact remain beyond the scope of our evaluation, highlighting the necessity for complementary qualitative assessments to offer a more comprehensive understanding of research contributions.

Future Recommendations

Future research may focus on promoting international collaboration between academic institutions and researchers to foster knowledge sharing, the sharing of best practices, and collaborative research projects. By doing this, the already-existing cooperative network would be strengthened. This may lead to deeper investigation and innovations in the field.

In terms of research output and recognition, future studies should work to close the gap between developed and developing nations. To empower researchers from underdeveloped nations and assure their active engagement in the field, this might encompass measures like capacity-building programs, information transfer, and technology sharing.

Conclusion

This bibliometric analysis offers an understanding of the literature on dry needling therapy for NP. The number of studies in this sector has increased over a decade. There is a gap in research from low- and middle-income countries on use of dry needling in the management of NP.

Acknowledgments

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Mrs. Minni Sharma for reading and correcting the English grammatical part of this manuscript.

Appendix. Supplementary materials

mmc1.docx (725.3KB, docx)

Funding Sources and Conflicts of Interest

No funding sources and conflict of interests were reported for this study.

Contributorship Information

Concept development (provided idea for the research):

V.K.

Design (planned the methods to generate the results):

V.K.

Supervision (oversight, organization and implementation):

V.K.

Data collection/processing (experiments, organization, or reporting data):

V.K., P.R.

Analysis/interpretation (analysis, evaluation, presentation of results):

V.K., P.R.

Literature search (performed the literature search):

P.R.

Writing (responsible for writing a substantive part of the manuscript):

P.R.

Critical review (revised manuscript for intellectual content):

V.K.

Practical Applications.

  • We analyzed the literature on dry needling in the management of neck pain.

  • The search yielded 125 articles.

  • The network analysis of various parameters indicates that there is room for contribution in future research.

Alt-text: Unlabelled box

Footnotes

Supplementary material associated with this article can be found in the online version at doi:10.1016/j.echu.2024.02.002.

References

  • 1.Mansfield M, Smith T, Spahr N, Thacker M. Cervical spine radiculopathy epidemiology: a systematic review. Musculoskelet Care. 2020;18(4):555–567. doi: 10.1002/msc.1498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Chan LLY, Wong AYL, Wang MH, Cheung K, Samartzis D. The prevalence of neck pain and associated risk factors among undergraduate students: a large-scale cross-sectional study. Int J Ind Ergon. 2020;76 doi: 10.1016/j.ergon.2020.102934. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Cagnie B, Danneels L, Van Tiggelen D, De Loose V, Cambier D. Individual and work related risk factors for neck pain among office workers: a cross sectional study. Eur Spine J. 2007;16(5):679–786. doi: 10.1007/s00586-006-0269-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gheysvandi E, Dianat I, Heidarimoghadam R, Tapak L, Karimi-shahanjarini A. Neck and shoulder pain among elementary school students : prevalence and its risk factors. BMC Public Health. 2019;19:1299. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7706-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Manoharlal MA, Shin LJ, Lee Cardoso ST, Yin SY. Prevalence of myofascial trigger points in non-specific neck or shoulder pain among university students. Int J Med Exerc Sci. 2016;02(02):122–133. doi: 10.36678/ijmaes.2016.v02i02.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Martín-Sacristán L, Calvo-Lobo C, Pecos-Martín D, Fernández-Carnero J, Alonso-Pérez JL. Dry needling in active or latent trigger point in patients with neck pain: a randomized clinical trial. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):1–13. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-07063-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Fernández-de-Las-Peñas C, Nijs J. Trigger point dry needling for the treatment of myofascial pain syndrome: current perspectives within a pain neuroscience paradigm. J Pain Res. 2019;12:1899–1911. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S154728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Alryalat SA, Malkawi L, Momani SM. Comparing bibliometric analysis using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. J Vis Exp. 2019;152:e58494. doi: 10.3791/58494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Baas J, Schotten M, Plume A, Côté G, Karimi R. Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies. Quant Sci Stud. 2020;1(1):1–10. doi: 10.1162/qss_a_00019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Rodríguez-Jimenez J, Ortega-Santiago R, Bonilla-Barba L, Falla D, Fernández-De-Las-Peñas C, Florencio L. Immediate effects of dry needing or manual pressure release of upper trapezius trigger points on muscle activity during the craniocervical flexion test in people with chronic neck pain: a randomized clinical trial. Pain Med. 2022;22(10):1717–1725. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnac034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Gerber L, Shah J, Rosenberger W, et al. Dry needling alters trigger points in the upper trapezius muscle and reduces pain in subjects with chronic myofascial pain. PM&R. 2015;7(7):711–718. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2015.01.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ilbuldu E, Cakmak A, Disci R, Aydin R. Comparison of laser, dry needling, and placebo laser treatments in myofascial pain syndrome. Photomed Laser Ther. 2004;22(4):306–311. doi: 10.1089/pho.2004.22.306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Nunes AMP, Moita JPAM. Effectiveness of physical and rehabilitation techniques in reducing pain in chronic trapezius myalgia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Osteopath Med. 2015;18(3):189–206. doi: 10.1016/j.ijosm.2015.03.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bahadir C, Majlesi J, Unalan H. The effect of high-power pain threshold ultrasound therapy on the electrical activity of trigger points and local twitch response on electromyography: a preliminary study. J Musculoskelet Pain. 2009;17(2):162–172. doi: 10.1080/10582450902820572. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Audette JF, Wang F, Smith H. Bilateral activation of motor unit potentials with unilateral needle stimulation of active myofascial trigger points. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;83(5):368–374. doi: 10.1097/01.PHM.0000118037.61143.7C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Fernández-De-Las-Peñas C, Cuadrado M. Dry needling for headaches presenting active trigger points. Expert Rev Neurother. 2016;16(4):365–366. doi: 10.1586/14737175.2016.1152889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Dommerholt J. Myofascial pain syndrome-trigger points. J Musculoskelet Pain. 2009;17(2):202–209. doi: 10.1080/10582450902816422. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ay S, Evcik D, Tur BS. Comparison of injection methods in myofascial pain syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rheumatol. 2010;29(1):19–23. doi: 10.1007/s10067-009-1307-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Maher RM, Hayes DM, Shinohara M. Quantification of dry needling and posture effects on myofascial trigger points using ultrasound shear-wave elastography. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94(11):2146–2150. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.04.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Taheri N, Rezasoltani A, Okhovatian F, Karami M, Hosseini SM, Kouhzad Mohammadi H. Quantification of dry needling on myofascial trigger points using a novel ultrasound method: a study protocol. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2016;20(3):471–476. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2015.11.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Güzel R, Akkoca H, Şeydaoǧlu G, Uǧuz Ş, Kozanoǧlu E, Sarpel T. Efficacy of local anesthetic injection versus dry needling in myofascial pain syndrome treatment. Turk Fiz Tip Rehabil Derg. 2006;52(1):22–27. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Gallego-Sendarrubias GM, Rodríguez-Sanz D, Calvo-Lobo C, Martín JL. Efficacy of dry needling as an adjunct to manual therapy for patients with chronic mechanical neck pain: a randomised clinical trial. Acupunct Med. 2020;00(0):1–11. doi: 10.1136/acupmed-2018-011682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Turo D, Otto P, Hossain M, et al. Novel use of ultrasound elastography to quantify muscle tissue changes after dry needling of myofascial trigger points in patients with chronic myofascial pain. J Ultrasound Med. 2015;34(12):2149–2161. doi: 10.7863/ultra.14.08033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Eroǧlu PK, Yilmaz Ö, Bodur H, Ateş C. A comparison of the efficacy of dry needling, lidocaine injection, and oral flurbiprofen treatments in patients with myofascial pain syndrome: a double-blind (For Injection, Groups Only), randomized clinical trial. Turk J Rheumatol. 2013;28(1):38–46. doi: 10.5606/tjr.2013.2779. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Rayegani SM, Bayat M, Bahrami MH, Raeissadat SA, Kargozar E. Comparison of dry needling and physiotherapy in treatment of myofascial pain syndrome. Clin Rheumatol. 2014;33(6):859–864. doi: 10.1007/s10067-013-2448-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Martín-Pintado-Zugasti A, Pecos-Martin D, Rodríguez-Fernández ÁL, et al. Ischemic compression after dry needling of a latent myofascial trigger point reduces postneedling soreness intensity and duration. PM R. 2015;7(10):1026–1034. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2015.03.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Martín-Pintado Zugasti A, Rodríguez-Fernández Á, García-Muro F, et al. Effects of spray and stretch on postneedling soreness and sensitivity after dry needling of a latent myofascial trigger point. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;95(10):1925–1930. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.05.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Xu A, Huang Q, Rong J, Wu X, Deng M, Ji L. Effectiveness of ischemic compression on myofascial trigger points in relieving neck pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2023;36(4):783–798. doi: 10.3233/BMR-220045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Mansfield C, Vanetten L, Willy R, Di Stasi S, Magnussen R, Briggs M. The effects of needling therapies on muscle force production: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2019;49(3):154–170. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2019.8270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Gerwin R. The enigma of muscle pain: a neglected entity. Pain Med. 2019;20(7):1261–1264. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnz108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Neck pain: dry needling can decrease pain and increase motion. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2014;44(4):261. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2014.0502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Dommerholt J, Layton M, Hooks T, Grieve R. A critical overview of current myofascial pain literature. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2015;19(2):337–349. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2015.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Miles D. Dry needling alters trigger points in the upper trapezius muscle and reduces pain in subjects with chronic myofascial pain. PM R. 2016;8(12):1225–1226. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2016.07.533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Dommerholt J, Grieve R, Layton M, Hooks T. An evidence-informed review of the current myofascial pain literature. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2015;19(1):126–137. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2014.11.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Dommerholt J, Grieve R, Finnegan M, Hooks T. A critical overview of the current myofascial pain literature. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2016;20(3):657–671. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2016.07.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Dommerholt J, Grieve R, Hooks T, Layton M. A critical overview of the current myofascial pain literature. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2015;19(4):736–746. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2015.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Dommerholt J, Finnegan M, Grieve R, Hooks T. A critical overview of the current myofascial pain literature. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2016;20(1):156–167. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2015.12.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Khanittanuphong P, Saesim A. Comparison of the effectiveness between dry needling with and without needle retention in myofascial trigger points in upper trapezius muscle: a randomized comparative trial. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2022;35(6):1247–1255. doi: 10.3233/BMR-210177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Arias-Buría J, Monroy-Acevedo Á, Fernández-de-las-Peñas C, Gallego-Sendarrubias G, Ortega-Santiago R, Plaza-Manzano G. Effects of dry needling of active trigger points in the scalene muscles in individuals with mechanical neck pain: a randomized clinical trial. Acupunct Med. 2020;38(6):380–387. doi: 10.1177/0964528420912254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Tabatabaiee A, Ebrahimi-Takamjani I, Ahmadi A, Sarrafzadeh J, Emrani A. Comparison of pressure release, phonophoresis and dry needling in treatment of latent myofascial trigger point of upper trapezius muscle. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2019;32(4):587–594. doi: 10.3233/BMR-181302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Ziaeifar M, Arab AM, Nourbakhsh MR. Clinical effectiveness of dry needling immediately after application on myofascial trigger point in upper trapezius muscle. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15(4):252–258. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.08.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Doǧan N, Şengül I, Akçay-Yalbuzdaǧ Ş, Kaya T. Kinesio taping versus dry needling in the treatment of myofascial pain of the upper trapezius muscle: a randomized, single blind (evaluator), prospective study. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2019;32(5):819–827. doi: 10.3233/BMR-181162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Haq K, Riaz H. Comparison of dry needling and Graston technique on active myofascial trigger points in upper trapezius. Rawal Med J. 2022;47(1):129–132. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Valiente-Castrillo P, Martín-Pintado-Zugasti A, Calvo-Lobo C, Beltran-Alacreu H, Fernández-Carnero J. Effects of pain neuroscience education and dry needling for the management of patients with chronic myofascial neck pain: a randomized clinical trial. Acupunct Med. 2021;39(2):91–105. doi: 10.1177/0964528420920300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Funk M, Frisina-Deyo A. Dry needling for spine related disorders: a scoping review. Chiropr Man Ther. 2022;28(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12998-020-00310-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Hoseininejad Z, Kouhzad Mohammadi H, Azadeh H, Taheri N. Comparison of immediate and delayed effects of superficial and deep dry needling in patients with upper trapezius myofascial trigger points. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2023;33:106–111. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2022.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Abbaszadeh-Amirdehi M, Ansari NN, Naghdi S, Olyaei G, Nourbakhsh MR. Neurophysiological and clinical effects of dry needling in patients with upper trapezius myofascial trigger points. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2017;21(1):48–52. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2016.04.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Khanittanuphong P, Upho P. Day of peak pain reduction by a single session of dry needling in the upper trapezius myofascial trigger points: a 14 daily follow-up study. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2020;24(4):7–12. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2020.06.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.De Meulemeester K, Calders P, Dewitte V, Barbe T, Danneels L, Cagnie B. Surface electromyographic activity of the upper trapezius before and after a single dry needling session in female office workers with trapezius myalgia. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;96(12):861–868. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000761. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Ziaeifar M, Arab AM, Mosallanezhad Z, Nourbakhsh MR. Dry needling versus trigger point compression of the upper trapezius: a randomized clinical trial with two-week and three-month follow-up. J Man Manip Ther. 2019;27(3):152–161. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2018.1530421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Onat SS, Polat CS, Bicer S, Sahin Z, Tasoglu O. Effect of dry needling injection and kinesiotaping on pain and quality of life in patients with mechanical neck pain. Pain Physician. 2019;22(6):583–589. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Valera-Calero JA, Sánchez-Jorge S, Buffet-García J, Varol U, Fernández-de-las-Peñas C, Álvarez-González J. Changes in stiffness at active myofascial trigger points of the upper trapezius after dry needling in patients with chronic neck pain: a randomized controlled trial. Acupunct Med. 2023;41(3):121–129. doi: 10.1177/09645284221104831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Aydın T, Dernek B, Ege TS, Karan A, Aksoy C. The effectiveness of dry needling and exercise therapy in patients with dizziness caused by cervical myofascial pain syndrome; prospective randomized clinical study. Pain Med. 2019;20(1):153–160. doi: 10.1093/pm/pny072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Olesiejuk M, Marusiak J, Chalimoniuk M. Myofascial trigger points therapy decreases myotonometric tone and stiffness of trapezius muscle, benefits headaches and muscle pain in migraine. NeuroRehabilitation. 2023;52(2):299–310. doi: 10.3233/NRE-220237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Chys M, Bontinck J, Voogt L, et al. Immediate effects of dry needling on pain sensitivity and pain modulation in patients with chronic idiopathic neck pain: a single-blinded randomized clinical trial. Braz J Phys Ther. 2023;27(1) doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2023.100481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Toghtamesh M, Tajali SB, Jalaei S. Comparing between the effects of dry needling and shock wave in the treatment of trapezius myofascial pain. J Mod Rehabil. 2020;14(4):225–232. doi: 10.18502/JMR.V14I4.7720. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Hakim IK, Takamjani IE, Sarrafzadeh J, Ezzati K, Bagheri R. The effect of dry needling on the active trigger point of upper trapezius muscle: eliciting local twitch response on long-term clinical outcomes. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2019;32(5):717–724. doi: 10.3233/BMR-181286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Stieven F, Ferreira G, de Araújo F, Angellos R, Silva M, da Rosa LH. Immediate effects of dry needling and myofascial release on local and widespread pressure pain threshold in individuals with active upper trapezius trigger points: a randomized clinical trial. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2021;44(2):95–102. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2020.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Manafnezhad J, Salahzadeh Z, Salimi M, Ghaderi F, Ghojazadeh M. The effects of shock wave and dry needling on active trigger points of upper trapezius muscle in patients with non-specific neck pain: a randomized clinical trial. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2019;32(5):811–818. doi: 10.3233/BMR-181289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.De Meulemeester KE, Castelein B, Coppieters I, Barbe T, Cools A, Cagnie B. Comparing trigger point dry needling and manual pressure technique for the management of myofascial neck/shoulder pain: a randomized clinical trial. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2017;40(1):11–20. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2016.10.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Callejas-Marcos I, Torrijos-Bravo A, Torres-Chica B, Ortiz-Gutiérrez R. Efficacy of dry needling in neck pain compared with other physiotherapy techniques: a systematic review. Rehabilitacion. 2019;53(3):189–197. doi: 10.1016/j.rh.2018.11.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Lew J, Kim J, Nair P. Comparison of dry needling and trigger point manual therapy in patients with neck and upper back myofascial pain syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Man Manip Ther. 2021;29(3):136–146. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2020.1822618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Gallego-Sendarrubias G, Voogt L, Arias-Buría JL, Braithwaite F, Fernández-de-las-Peñas C. Effects of previous experience with dry needling therapy on blinding effectiveness and pain outcomes in people with neck pain: a preliminary sham-controlled study. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2022;58 doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2022.102515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Martín-Pintado-Zugasti A, Fernández-Carnero J, León-Hernández JV, et al. Postneedling soreness and tenderness after different dosages of dry needling of an active myofascial trigger point in patients with neck pain: a randomized controlled trial. PM R. 2018;10(12):1311–1320. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2018.05.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Montero Navarro S, del Rio Medina S, Martín Botella Rico J, Isabel Rocha Ortiz M, Teresa Pérez Gracia M. Analysis and comparison of pain pressure threshold and active cervical range of motion after superficial and deep dry needling techniques of the upper trapezius muscle. Acupunct Med. 2022;40(1):13–23. doi: 10.1177/09645284211039523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Hadizadeh M, Tajali SB, Moghadam BA, Jalaei S, Bazzaz M. Effects of intramuscular electrical stimulation on pain and dysfunction following upper trapezius trigger points. J Mod Rehabil. 2023;17(1):11–20. doi: 10.18502/jmr.v17i1.11290. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Benito-de-Pedro AI, Becerro-de-Bengoa-Vallejo R, Losa-Iglesias ME, Rodríguez-Sanz D, Calvo-Lobo C, Benito-de-Pedro M. Efficacy of deep dry needling versus percutaneous electrolysis in ultrasound-guided treatment of active myofascial trigger points of the levator scapulae in short-term: a randomized controlled trial. Life. 2023;13(4):939. doi: 10.3390/life13040939. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Ceballos-Laita L, Medrano-De-La-Fuente R, Mingo-Gómez MT, Hernando-Garijo I, Estébanez-De-Miguel E, Jiménez-Del-Barrio S. Effects of dry needling on pain, disability, kinesiophobia, pain catastrophizing and psychological distress in patients with chronic neck pain: a randomized controlled pilot study. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2022;35(2):393–401. doi: 10.3233/BMR-200322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Sánchez-Infante J, Bravo-Sánchez A, Jiménez F, Abián-Vicén J. Authors’ reply to the comment on “Effects of dry needling on mechanical and contractile properties of the upper trapezius with latent myofascial trigger points: a randomized controlled trial”. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2022;59 doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2022.102525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Liu Q, Huang Q, Liu L, Nguyen TT. Efficacy of dry needling under EMG guidance for myofascial neck and shoulder pain: a randomized clinical trial. J Pain Res. 2022;15:2293–2302. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S372074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Sánchez-Infante J, Bravo-Sánchez A, Jiménez F, Abián-Vicén J. Effects of dry needling on mechanical and contractile properties of the upper trapezius with latent myofascial trigger points: a randomized controlled trial. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2021;56 doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2021.102456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Yaghoubi Z, Pardehshenas H, Takamjani IE. The effect of upper trapezius muscle dry needling treatment on sleep quality: a case report. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2018;22(2):333–336. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2017.05.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Gallego-Sendarrubias G, Voogt L, Arias-Buría JL, Bialosky J, Fernández-De-Las-Peñas C. Can patient expectations modulate the short-term effects of dry needling on sensitivity outcomes in patients with mechanical neck pain? A randomized clinical trial. Pain Med. 2022;23(5):965–976. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnab134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Dlkhoush CT, Bakhshi S, Farokhi ZS, Mirmohammadkhani M. Comparison of dry needling and inhibitory kinesio taping on the pain and functional disability in females with myofascial pain syndrome in upper trapezius muscle. Koomesh. 2019;21(4):610–618. [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Almaee Nejad F, Dommerholt J, Attarbashi Moghadam B, Shadmehr A, Khazaei Pour Z. Impact of physical therapists’ instructions on function and the perception of post-dry needling soreness in mechanical cervical pain; a randomized clinical trial. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2020;24(4):118–123. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2020.06.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Martín-Rodríguez A, Sáez-Olmo E, Pecos-Martín D, Calvo-Lobo C. Effects of dry needling in the sternocleidomastoid muscle on cervical motor control in patients with neck pain: a randomised clinical trial. Acupunct Med. 2019;37(3):151–163. doi: 10.1177/0964528419843913. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Fernández-De-Las-Peñas C, Plaza-Manzano G, Sanchez-Infante J, et al. Is dry needling effective when combined with other therapies for myofascial trigger points associated with neck pain symptoms? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Pain Res Manag. 2021;2021 doi: 10.1155/2021/8836427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.León-Hernández J V, Martín-Pintado-Zugasti A, Frutos LG, Alguacil-Diego IM, De La Llave-Rincón AI, Fernandez-Carnero J. Immediate and short-term effects of the combination of dry needling and percutaneous TENS on post-needling soreness in patients with chronic myofascial neck pain. Braz J Phys Ther. 2016;20(5):422–431. doi: 10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Ansari M, Baradaran Mahdavi S, Vahdatpour B, Lahijanian A, Khosrawi S. Effects of dry needling and low-power laser for the treatment of trigger points in the upper trapezius muscle: a randomized clinical trial. J Chiropr Med. 2022;21(4):288–295. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2022.02.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Otadi K, Sarafraz H, Jalaie S, Rasouli O. Combining patient education with dry needling and ischemic compression for treating myofascial trigger points in office workers with neck pain: a single-blinded, randomized trial. J Chiropr Med. 2020;19(4):222–229. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2020.02.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Sedighi A, Nakhostin Ansari N, Naghdi S. Comparison of acute effects of superficial and deep dry needling into trigger points of suboccipital and upper trapezius muscles in patients with cervicogenic headache. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2017;21(4):810–814. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2017.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Escaloni J, Butts R, Dunning J. The use of dry needling as a diagnostic tool and clinical treatment for cervicogenic dizziness: a narrative review & case series. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2018;22(4):947–955. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2018.02.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Purwata TE, Adnyana IMO, Widyadharma IPE, Suhendro W. Dry needling reduces pain in Sanglah general hospital Denpasar workers with myofascial pain syndrome in the upper trapezius muscle. Malta Med J. 2020;32(2):24–31. [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Garcia-de-Miguel S, Pecos-Martin D, Larroca-Sanz T, et al. Short-term effects of PENS versus dry needling in subjects with unilateral mechanical neck pain and active myofascial trigger points in levator scapulae muscle: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Med. 2020;9(6):1665. doi: 10.3390/jcm9061665. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Navarro-Santana M, Sanchez-Infante J, Fernández-de-las-Peñas C, Cleland J, Martín-Casas P, Plaza-Manzano G. Effectiveness of dry needling for myofascial trigger points associated with neck pain symptoms: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Med. 2020;9(10):1–37. doi: 10.3390/jcm9103300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Bagheri R, Taghizadeh Delkhoush C, Mirmohammadkhani M, Safavi Farokhi Z, Bakhshi S. Comparison of dry needling and inhibitory kinesio taping in treatment of myofascial pain syndrome of the upper trapezius muscle: a randomized controlled trial. J Chiropr Med. 2022;21(1):23–31. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2022.01.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Sanal Toprak C, Ozsoy Unubol T. Effectiveness of dry needling in the treatment of neck pain and disability associated with myofascial trigger points. Marmara Med J. 2021;34(1):40–44. doi: 10.5472/marumj.866557. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Dalpiaz A, Kuriki HU, Barbosa RAP, Diefenthaeler F, Marcolino AM, Barbosa RI. Dry needling and photobiomodulation decreases myofascial pain in trapezius of women: randomized blind clinical trial. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2021;44(1):61–71. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2020.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Gattie E, Cleland J, Pandya J, Snodgrass S. Dry needling adds no benefit to the treatment of neck pain: a sham- controlled randomized clinical trial with 1-year follow-up. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2021;51(1):37–45. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2021.9864. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Navarro-Santana M, Sanchez-Infante J, Gómez-Chiguano G, et al. Dry needling versus trigger point injection for neck pain symptoms associated with myofascial trigger points: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pain Med. 2022;23(3):515–525. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnab188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.France S, Bown J, Nowosilskyj M, Mott M, Rand S, Walters J. Evidence for the use of dry needling and physiotherapy in the management of cervicogenic or tension-type headache : a systematic review. Cephalagia. 2014;0(0):1–10. doi: 10.1177/0333102414523847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Mejuto-Vázquez MJ, Salom-Moreno J, Ortega-Santiago R, Truyols-Domínguez S, Fernández-De-Las-peñas C. Short- Term changes in neck pain, widespread pressure pain sensitivity, and cervical range of motion after the application of trigger point dry needling in patients with acute mechanical neck pain: a randomized clinical trial. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2014;44(4):252–260. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2014.5108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Abbaszadeh-Amirdehi M, Ansari NN, Naghdi S, Olyaei G, Nourbakhsh MR. The neurophysiological effects of dry needling in patients with upper trapezius myofascial trigger points: study protocol of a controlled clinical trial. BMJ Open. 2013;3(5) doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002825. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Ong J, Claydon L. The effect of dry needling for myofascial trigger points in the neck and shoulders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2014;18(3):390–398. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2013.11.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Segura-Ortí E, Prades-Vergara S, Manzaneda-Piña L, Valero-Martínez R, Polo-Traverso JA. Trigger point dry needling versus strain-counterstrain technique for upper trapezius myofascial trigger points: a randomised controlled trial. Acupunct Med. 2016;34(3):171–177. doi: 10.1136/acupmed-2015-010868. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Pecos-Martín D, Montañez-Aguilera F, Gallego-Izquierdo T, et al. Effectiveness of dry needling on the lower trapezius in patients with mechanical neck pain: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96(5):775–781. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.12.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Peloso PM, Gross A, Haines T, Trinh K, Goldsmith C, Burnie S. Medicinal and injection therapies for mechanical neck disorders. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;(3) doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000319.pub4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Cerezo-Téllez E, Lacomba MT, Fuentes-Gallardo I, Mayoral del Moral O, Rodrigo-Medina B, Gutiérrez Ortega C. Dry needling of the trapezius muscle in office workers with neck pain: a randomized clinical trial. J Man Manip Ther. 2016;24(4):223–232. doi: 10.1179/2042618615Y.0000000004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Nejati P, Angoorani H, Khatami F, Mousavi R. Acupuncture plus dry needling, an effective treatment method for chronic neck pain. Shiraz E Med J. 2015;16(6):e27942. doi: 10.17795/semj27942. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Hernandez JVL, Calvo-Lobo C, Zugasti AMP, Fernandez-Carnero J, Alacreu HB. Effectiveness of dry needling with percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation of high frequency versus low frequency in patients with myofascial neck pain. Pain Physician. 2021;24(2):135–143. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Martín-Pintado-Zugasti A, Rodríguez-Fernández ÁL, Fernandez-Carnero J. Postneedling soreness after deep dry needling of a latent myofascial trigger point in the upper trapezius muscle: characteristics, sex differences and associated factors. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2016;29(2):301–308. doi: 10.3233/BMR-150630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Tsai CT, Hsieh LF, Kuan TS, Kao MJ, Chou LW, Hong CZ. Remote effects of dry needling on the irritability of the myofascial trigger point in the upper trapezius muscle. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;89(2):133–140. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e3181a5b1bc. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Hyuk G, Choi JH, Park CH, Yoon HJ. Dry needling of trigger points with and without paraspinal needling in myofascial pain syndromes in elderly patients. J Altern Complement Med. 2007;13(6):617–623. doi: 10.1089/acm.2006.6371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Capó-Juan M. Cervical myofascial pain syndrome. Narrative review of physiotherapeutic treatment. An Sist Sanit Navar. 2015;38(1):105–115. doi: 10.4321/s1137-66272015000100011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Myburgh C, Hartvigsen J, Aagaard P, Holsgaard-Larsen A. Skeletal muscle contractility, self-reported pain and tissue sensitivity in females with neck/shoulder pain and upper Trapezius myofascial trigger points- a randomized intervention study. Chiropr Man Ther. 2012;20:36. doi: 10.1186/2045-709X-20-36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Ziaeifar M, Arab AM, Karimi N, Nourbakhsh MR. The effect of dry needling on pain, pressure pain threshold and disability in patients with a myofascial trigger point in the upper trapezius muscle. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2014;18(2):298–305. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2013.11.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Cagnie B, Castelein B, Pollie F, Steelant L, Verhoeyen H, Cools A. Evidence for the use of ischemic compression and dry needling in the management of trigger points of the upper trapezius in patients with neck pain: a systematic review. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;94(7):573–583. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Liu L, Huang QM, Liu QG, et al. Effectiveness of dry needling for myofascial trigger points associated with neck and shoulder pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96(5):944–955. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.12.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Llamas-Ramos R, Pecos-Martín D, Gallego-Izquierdo T, et al. Comparison of the short-term outcomes between trigger point dry needling and trigger point manual therapy for the management of chronic mechanical neck pain: a randomized clinical trial. J Orthop Sport Phys Ther. 2014;44(11):852–861. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2014.5229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Yeganeh Lari A, Okhovatian F, sadat Naimi S, Baghban AA. The effect of the combination of dry needling and MET on latent trigger point upper trapezius in females. Man Ther. 2016;21:204–209. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2015.08.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Rathore N, Gupta R. Letter to the editor “Effects of dry needling on mechanical and contractile properties of the upper trapezius with latent myofascial trigger points: a Randomized controlled trial”. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2022;59 doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2022.102524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Cerezo-Téllez E, Torres-Lacomba M, Fuentes-Gallardo I, et al. Effectiveness of dry needling for chronic nonspecific neck pain: a randomized, single-blinded, clinical trial. Pain. 2016;157(9):1905–1917. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000591. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Irnich D, Behrens N, Gleditsch JM, et al. Immediate effects of dry needling and acupuncture at distant points in chronic neck pain: results of a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled crossover trial. Pain. 2002;99(1-2):83–89. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(02)00062-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Fernández-Carnero J, Gilarranz-De-Frutos L, León-Hernández JV, et al. Effectiveness of different deep dry needling dosages in the treatment of patients with cervical myofascial pain: a pilot RCT. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;96(10):726–733. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Campagna CA, Anauate J, Vasconoelos LG, Oiticica J. Effectiveness of dry needling in bothersome chronic tinnitus in patients with myofascial trigger points. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2022;26(2):233–242. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1730429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Kheradmandi A, Kamali F, Ebrahimian M, Abbasi L. Comparison between dry needling plus manual therapy with manual therapy alone on pain and function in overhead athletes with scapular dyskinesia: a randomized clinical trial. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2021;26:339–346. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2020.11.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Araya-Quintanilla F, Rubio-Oyarzun D, Gutiérrez-Espinoza H, Arias-Poblete L, Olguín-Huerta C. Dry needling and changes in muscular activity in subjects with myofascial trigger points: case series. Rev Soc Esp Dolor. 2019;26(2):89–94. doi: 10.20986/resed.2018.3677/2018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Motavalian M, Tajali SB, Moghadam BA, Hosseini SZ. Effects of low-level laser irradiation and dry needling on the symptoms of myofascial pain syndrome: a controlled pilot study. J Mod Rehabil. 2020;14(4):217–224. doi: 10.18502/JMR.V14I4.7719. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Sánchez Romero EA, Lim T, Villafañe JH, et al. The influence of verbal suggestion on post-needling soreness and pain processing after dry needling treatment: an experimental study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(8):4206. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18084206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Korkmaz MD, Ceylan CM. Effect of dry-needling and exercise treatment on myofascial trigger point: a single-blind randomized controlled trial. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2022;47 doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2022.101571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Segura-Pérez M, Hernández-Criado M, Calvo-Lobo C, Vega-Piris L, Fernández-Martín R, Rodríguez-Sanz D. A multimodal approach for myofascial pain syndrome: a prospective study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2017;40(6):397–403. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2017.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Arias-Buría JL, Franco-Hidalgo-Chacón M, Cleland J, Palacios-Ceña M, Fuensalida-Novo S, Fernández-de-las-Peñas C. Effects of kinesio taping on post-needling induced pain after dry needling of active trigger point in individuals with mechanical neck pain. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2020;43(1):32–42. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2019.02.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.García-Hidalgo Tajuelo E. Myofascial pain syndrome treatment in a patient diagnosed with tension headache: a case report. Fisioterapia. 2021;43(6):366–370. doi: 10.1016/j.ft.2021.02.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Gerber LH, Sikdar S, Aredo J, et al. Beneficial effects of dry needling for treatment of chronic myofascial pain persist for 6 weeks after treatment completion. PM R. 2017;9(2):105–112. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2016.06.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Luan S, Zhu Z, Ruan J, et al. Randomized trial on comparison of the efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave therapy and dry needling in myofascial trigger points. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2019;98(8):677–684. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Martín-Pintado-Zugasti A, López-López A, González Gutiérrez JL, et al. The role of psychological factors in the perception of postneedling soreness and the influence of postneedling intervention. PM R. 2017;9(4):348–355. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2016.07.529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Sánchez-Infante J, Bravo-Sánchez A, Esteban-García P, Jiménez F, Abián-Vicén J. Changes in electromyographic activity of latent trigger points after a dry needling intervention: a randomised controlled trial. Physiotherapy. 2022;117:72–80. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2022.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Lane E, Clewley D, Koppenhaver S. Complaints of upper extremity numbness and tingling relieved with dry needling of the teres minor and infraspinatus: a case report. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2017;47(4):287–292. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2017.7055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Sánchez-Infante J, Bravo-Sánchez A, Jiménez F, Abián-Vicén J. Effects of dry needling on muscle stiffness in latent myofascial trigger points: a randomized controlled trial. J Pain. 2021;22(7):817–825. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2021.02.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Nakandala P, Nanayakkara S, Nanayakkara I. Evaluating the effectiveness of attention distraction method on perception of pain during the use of myofascial trigger point release technique. Sri Lankan J Anaesthesiol. 2023;31(1):15–21. doi: 10.4038/slja.v31i1.9212. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Cerezo-Téllez E, Torres-Lacomba M, Mayoral-Del-Moral O, Pacheco-Da-Costa S, Prieto-Merino D, Sánchez-Sánchez B. Health related quality of life improvement in chronic non-specific neck pain: secondary analysis from a single blinded, randomized clinical trial. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018;16(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-1032-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Aridici R, Yetisgin A, Boyaci A, et al. Comparison of the efficacy of dry needling and high-power pain threshold ultrasound therapy with clinical status and sonoelastography in myofascial pain syndrome. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;95(10):e149–e158. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Jeremy NG, Haustein S, Ebrahimzadeh S, et al. 2023. Guidance List for repOrting Bibliometric AnaLyses (GLOBAL): a research protocol. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.van Eck N, Waltman L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics. 2010;84(2):523–538. doi: 10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

mmc1.docx (725.3KB, docx)

Articles from Journal of Chiropractic Humanities are provided here courtesy of National University of Health Sciences

RESOURCES