Skip to main content
. 2024 Oct 1;15(5):101035. doi: 10.1016/j.jaim.2024.101035

Table 2.

Comparison between intervention studies using Ayurvedic medicine in patients with Cerebral Palsy and spasticity.

Author Design Sample Age Inclusion Criteria GRADE/MMAT Place Intervention Control Outcomes Found
Arun Raj, 2018 [27]
  • -

    Clinical trial

  • -

    Unicentric

  • -

    Open

  • -

    Double arm,

  • -

    Not randomized

  • -

    Homogeneous population

  • -

    Pilot study

32: 4 losses - final 28 (in 2 groups) 3–8 years Spasticity in limbs with motor coordination failure, developmental delay, hyperreflexia.Ashworth scale Moderate/moderate College and Hospital of Ayurveda Hassan, India
  • -

    Group A: Abyanga with Tila Taila for 15 min. Dashamoola Kashaya, rest and application of Salavana Upanaha. (body manipulation and oral route)

  • -

    Group B (Salavana Upanaha): oral application only

  • -

    Group A: reduction of spasticity before and after use

  • -

    Between groups: associated with body manipulation, greater reduction in spasticity

  • -

    Group A: Mean spasticity scale from 3.45 (SD 0.69) at baseline to 1.27 (SD 0.38)

  • -

    Group B: Mean spasticity scale from 3.54 (SD 0.70) at baseline to 2.06 (SD 1.06)

  • -

    No adverse events

Palande, 2017 [30]
  • -

    Clinical trial

  • -

    Unicentric

  • -

    Open

  • Randomized

  • -

    Homogeneous population

30 (divided into 3 groups) 1–12 years Children with cerebral palsy. Ashworth spasticity scale Moderate/low Balaroga Department, National Institute of Ayurveda, Jaipur, India
  • -

    Group A Shishukalyan Ghrita- 0.25 ml/kg/day in two to three divided doses + massage - 15–20 min a day. 90 days.

  • -

    Group B Kala Basti (therapeutic enema) - drugs 15 days + massage 15–20 min a day + medication group A. 90 Days

  • -

    Group C Physiotherapy 30–35 min daily

  • -

    Group A: improvement 53.33% (p < 0.01)

  • -

    Group B: 29.63% (p < 0.05) and group C 26.67% (p < 0.05) improvement before and after use

  • -

    No significant difference in the intervention

  • -

    Left upper limb with statistical difference in improvement in group A compared to C, no difference between group B and C.

  • -

    Other members: no superiority between groups.

  • -

    Ayurveda equally effective as physiotherapy, earlier

  • -

    No adverse events