Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Oct 14.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Hypertens Rep. 2020 Nov 9;22(12):105. doi: 10.1007/s11906-020-01115-4

Table 1.

Summary of Clinical Trials, by Intervention Type

Study Reference Country Study Design Study Duration Sample Size Intervention Details Comparison Group Adherence Measure Outcome
Patient Education
  Aghakhani et al, [46] Iran RCTa 4 weeks 60 Blended education consisting of face-to-face education and online education via emails Traditional face-to face education Novel self-report questionnaire 46.7% of intervention group reported good medication adherence vs. 0% of control group at 4 weeks. (P < .001)
  Delavar et al, [28] Iran RCT 1 month 118 Health literacy tailored self-management education utilizing teach back method and delivered face-to-face and by telephone Usual care MMAS-8 50% of participants in the intervention groups reported moderate or good medication adherence vs 21% of the control group at 1 month (P=0.002)
  Yazdanpanah et al, [29] Iran RCT 1 month 60 Community-based educational sessions based on Health Belief Model Usual Care MMAS-8 Mean MMAS change was higher in the intervention group (2.6 ±0.8) vs the control group score (−0.1±0.1) at 1 month (P<0.001)
  Harvin et al [18] USA Pre-post test 4 months 10 Faith-based self-management education program guided by the Understanding and Controlling Your High Blood Pressure booklet N/A HTN Self-Care Activity
Level Effects Scale (H-scale)
There was a 30% increase in the number of participants who reported being adherent to their antihypertensive medications at 4 months (P=0.034)
Simplification of Medication Regimen
  Doshi et al [55] USA Retrospective cohort study 12 months 11,452 Synchronized refill schedule of all maintenance drugs Non-synchronized refills PDCc Adherence was higher in the intervention group (92%) vs control group (86%) at 12 months (P<0.01)
  Verma et al, [54] Canada Retrospective cohort study 5 years 13,350 Fixed Dose Combination (FDC) pill Multiple-pill combination (MPC) PDC
Time to 1st Discontinuation
Adherence was higher in the intervention group (70%) vs control group (42%) at 5 years (P< 0.01); Time to 1st discontinuation was 41 days longer in the intervention group vs control group (P< 0.01)
  Kim et al, [53] Korea Retrospective cohort study 5 years 116,677 Single Pill Combination (SPC) MPC
Angiotensin Receptor Blocker (ARB)-only
Calcium Channel Blocker (CCB)-only
MPRd Adjusted MPR was higher in combination therapy (89.7% in SPC, 87.2% in MPC) than monotherapy (81.6% in ARB, 79.7% in CCB), and MPR of SPC (89.7%, 95% CI 89.3 to 90.0) was higher than MPR of MPC (87.2%, 95% CI 86.7 to 87.7) (p<0.05).
  Shen et al, [30••] China RCT 6 months 518 Low-cost reminder package (28 compartment pill box w/alarm) combined with two case-based health education session Usual care Novel self-report questionnaire Mean scores were higher in the intervention group vs the control group with a difference in change of (0.287; [0.103, 0.471] P=0.002)
  Fleig et al, [52] Germany Prospective cohort study 12 weeks 1814 FDC pill MPC Hill-Bone Medication Adherence scale In previously treated patients, adherence increased from 20.6% to 43.4% (P<0.0001)
  Ho et al, [51] Taiwan Retrospective cohort study 12 months 17,568 FDC pill MPC PDC FDC pill was associated with better medication adherence (58%) vs than MPC (47%) at 12 months (P <0.001)
  Tan et al, [58] Malaysia RCT 7 months 73 Calendar blister packaging Normal blister packaging MPR
Percentage of on-time refills
Mean MPR for the interventions group was 0.99 and 0.98 for the control group (P=0.012); percentage of on-time refills was 0.99 for the intervention and 0.93 for the control (P=0.001)
  Bartlett et al, [50] Australia Retrospective cohort study 12 months 26,848 Fixed-dose Combination pill Separate pill combination (SePC) Cessation of combination therapy (persistence) Cessation rates at 12 months were lower in in the SePC group (40%) vs FDC (44%); following adjustment for differences in age, safety-net and prior antihypertensive, the risk of cessation was higher in those that initiated the SePC: hazard ratio (95%CI)-1.15 (1.11, 1.21)
Electronic Health Tool
  Zare et al [59] Iran Matched control 8 weeks 120 Smartphone app with educational self-care information and BP monitoring 2x/week combined with case management Usual care Hill-Bone hypertension self-care questionnaire Mean adherence scores were higher in the intervention group (4.21) vs the control group (3.09) at 8 weeks (P ⩽0.001)
  Morawski et al, [14] USA RCT 12 weeks 411 Smartphone app with reminder alerts, adherence reports, and optional peer support Usual care MMAS-8 Mean MMAS scores were higher in the intervention group (6.3) vs the control group score (5.7) at 12 weeks; Mean MMAS change scores were higher in the intervention group (0.4) vs the control group score (−0.1) at 12 weeks (P<0.01)
  Sarfo et al, [32••] Ghana RCT 9 months 60 Smartphone app with Bluetooth enabled BP device for home BP monitoring (HBPM) and reporting medications; and motivational text messages based upon levels of adherence SMS messages about healthy lifestyle behaviors but not medication adherence MPR
MMAS-8
MPR was higher in the intervention group (0.88) than the control group (0.64) at 3 months (P=0.03); however, this difference was not sustained as MPR for the intervention group (0.95) than the control group (0.98) at 9 months (P=0.56); MMAS-8 was 13 in both groups (P=0.94)
  Marquez Contreras et al, [33] Spain RCT 12 months 154 Smartphone app with reminder alarms, BP measurement records and recommended BP levels, doctor’s advice about the prescribed treatment and posology; and calendar of appointments or events Usual care Global adherence via Medication Event Monitoring Systems (MEMS), defined as percentage between ≥80% of all doses taken Global adherence was higher in the intervention group (93%) vs the control group (75%) at 6 months (P<0.01). Adherence decreased in the control group to 63% at 12 months whereas the intervention group stayed relatively consistent (92%) (P<0.01)
  Varleta et al, [34] Chile RCT 6 months 314 SMS text messages related to medication adherence and healthy lifestyle practices Usual care MMAS-4 Mean adherence scores were higher in the intervention group vs the control group at 6 months (62.3% vs. 51.4%, P<0.01)
  Buis et al, [35] USA RCT 1 month 123 Daily medication reminders and two educational text messages per week based upon the Health Belief Model Usual care MMAS-8 Intervention group had greater mean change on the MMAS (0.9) compared to the control group (0.5) ( P=.26)
  Chandler et al, [36] USA RCT 9 months 54 Smartphone app with a Bluetooth enabled BP monitor for HBPM, as well as an electronic medication and reminder text messages Text messages with links to PDFs and video clips with lifestyle tips MMAS-8
Medication tray time-stamped data
Mean adherence scores were higher in the intervention group (9.81) vs the control group (6.84) at 9 months with a change in difference of 2.971 (P<0.001)
  Moorhead et al, [56] USA Post hoc analysis 12 weeks 57 Co-encapsulated, ingestible, sensor-enabled medication with dose reminder within 30 minutes of the scheduled dose Usual care Mean daily adherence and mean difference in proportion of medications taken after seeing and not seeing the dose reminder Reminder messages were associated with a 16 ± 16% increase in medication adherence; impact was larger on patients who have lower overall adherence (<60%)
  Persell et al, [21] USA RCT 6 months 333 Conversational smartphone app using artificial intelligence and cognitive behavioral therapy to coach and promote HBPM and lifestyle behavior changes Blood pressure tracking app plus HBPM 4-day recall The percentage of participants with full adherence was 80.6% in the intervention group and 81.7% in the control group at 6 months (P=0.99)
Behavioral Counseling Strategies
  Abughosh et al, [22] USA RCT 6 months 743 Pharmacy-led telephone motivational interviewing using Ask-Provide-Ask approach Usual Care PDC (adherence = PDC ≥ 0.80)
Discontinuation
Patients receiving 2 or more calls were more likely to become adherent (OR: 1.53; P = 0.009) and less likely to discontinue (OR: 0.29; P < 0.001) during the 6 months following initial calls compared with those who did not receive calls
  Bolarinwa et al, [23] Nigeria RCT 6 months 299 Nurse-led health education and counseling on healthy lifestyle behaviors and medication adherence delivered in the home Usual care MMAS-8
Low= <6
Medium= 6-7.99
High= 8
Percentage of participants with high medication adherence was higher in the intervention group (78.5%) vs control group (48.7%) at 6 months. (P<0.001)
  van der Laan et al, [25] Netherlands RCT 9 months 170 Two pharmacist-led consultations to identify participants’ barriers to medication adherence and counseling to overcome these barriers. Usual care MARS-5 No significant between group differences in the total sample.
A significant intervention effect was found in participants with ≥ 3 barriers identified during the first consultation at 9 months (mean difference 0.84 [95CI: 0.03 to 1.65], p = 0.04)
  Sheilini et al, [24] India RCT 6 months 160 Nurse-led individualized education; medication reminder boxes; and reminder calls Usual care MMAS-8 Mean adherence scores were higher in the intervention group (8.00) vs the control group (7.70) at 6 months (F(1.75,214.30)=4.24, p=0.02)
  Mirniam et al, [26] Iran RCT 4 weeks 72 Nurse-led motivational interviewing and educational sessions, use of a medication reminder box, family support, and weekly phone calls with patient and family Usual care plus a medication reminder box and educational training booklet MMAS-8 Mean change in MMAS score was higher in the intervention group (2.91 ± 1.64) than the control group (−0.36) at 4 week (P < 0.001)
  Amer et al, [27] Pakistan RCT 3 months 384 Face-to-face pharmacist-led educational session and interview addressing adherence, lifestyle choices, and barriers Usual care MMAS Mean MMAS scores were higher in the intervention group (5.89 ± 1.90) vs the control group (3.89 ± 1.19) at 3 months (P<0.001)
  Kim et al, 2019 [38] Korea RCT 2 months 124 Face-to-face nurse-led health coaching 30 minutes once a week.
Tailored text messages delivered up to two times a day
Combination intervention of face-to-face nurse-led health coaching and tailored text messages
Usual Care MMAS Mean MMAS score was significantly higher in the combination group (2.87 ± 1.11), as compared to face-to-face health coaching (2.503 ± 1.22), text-message delivered health coaching (1.87 ± 1.38), and usual care (0.87 ± 1.08) at 2 months (P<0.001)
  Joshi et al, [37] India RCT 12 months 1164 CHW-delivered advice on reduction of risk factors with household visits every 2 months Usual Care Proportion of consumed to prescribed number of pills Adherence to antihypertensive drugs was greater in the intervention (74.9%) vs control households (61.4%) at 12 months (P=0.001)
Financial Incentives
  Yeung et al, [57] USA Interrupted time series 3 years 3436 Value-based formulary that used cost-effectiveness analysis to inform medication co-payments. Similar plans without any changes in pharmacy benefits PDC No between group differences in medication adherence (P=.279).
Member expenditures decreased ($4 per member per month (PMPM); P <.001), health plan expenditures increased ($5 PMPM; P <.001).
  Kim et al, [49] Korea Retrospective cohort study 12 months 3908 Multilevel chronic disease management program including copayment reduction and physician incentives Usual care MPR: (0.8–1.1)
Persistence: 12-month cumulative persistence rate
Pre-post change in MPR adherence improved +6.0% (P <0.001) and 12-month cumulative persistence improved +6.5% (P <0.001).
  Tamblyn et al, [39] Canada RCT 12 months 3592 Decision support tool to help providers select the most cost-effective drug, as well as tools to monitor blood pressure (BP) targets and medication compliance Medical record system with no out-of-pocket expenditure module PDC Mean adherence was higher in the intervention group for both incident (intervention 57.7%; control 52.8%; P=0.70) and prevalent patients (intervention 72.1%; control 70.7%; P=0.36)
Healthcare System Changes
  Schoenthaler et al, [40] USA RCT 6 months 119 Systems-level intervention that used the electronic health record to identify patients with uncontrolled hypertension and refer them to Medical Assistant-led health coaching based on motivational interviewing Standard health coaching (provision of patient education) EMDe
MMAS
EMD-measured adherence declined in both groups; mean change in EMD adherence rates in the intervention group was −9.6% vs control group −6.6% at 6 months (p=0.66)
Mean change in MMAS scores was higher in the intervention group (1.98) vs control group (1.26) at 6 months (p=0.03)
  McWilliams et al, [48] USA Retrospective cohort study 12 months 2,169, 845 Accountable care organization contracts/Medicare Shared Savings Program Non- Medicare Shared Savings Program PDC No significant differential changes in PDC among beneficiaries with at least 1 prescription fill, except for slight increase in the PDC for β-blockers in the 2012 entry (adjusted differential change, 0.3 percentage point; 95% CI, 0.1-0.5 percentage points; or 0.4% of the mean PDC [82.3%]; P = .003)
  Lauffen-burger et al, [47] USA Retrospective cohort study 12 months 4660 Providers caring for patients using the patient-centered medical home (PCMH) model Non-PCMH primary care practices PDC Medication adherence was higher in PCMH than non-PCMH practices (mean difference: 3.2% [95CI: 2.2% to 4.2%]) at 12 months
  Son et al, [60••] Korea Non-equivalent control group design 12 months 2685 Adoption of chronic care model in primary care practices including a community-based chronic disease management program Usual care Dispensation per prescription (DPP)
Dispensation days per patient (DDPP)
DPP and the DDPP in the intervention region increased by approximately 11% and 2.2 days on average by month, respectively, compared to those in the control region
  Persell et al, [20] USA RCT 12 months 794 EHR medication management tool (medication review sheets at check-in, lay medication information sheets printed after visits) with and without a nurse-led education intervention Usual care 4-Day Recall Compared with usual care, the EHR tools alone and EHR plus education interventions did not improve medication adherence (OR, 0.9; 95%CI,0.6-1.4 for both)
Chronic Disease Management Program
Shen et al, [41] China RCT 12 months 554 Family based care management with educational text messages and medication reminders Usual Care Novel self-report questionnaire Better adherence in the intervention group vs control group at 6 months (OR 3.82; P<0.001); however, this was not sustained at 12 months (OR 1.74; P=0.097)
  Ozpancar et al, [42] Turkey RCT 6 months 60 Case Management Model that included a hypertension care protocol, dietician and individualized hypertension education Usual care Scale for Adherence to Antihypertensive Medications (SAAM) Mean scores were lower in the intervention group (i.e., better adherence, 3.77±1.19) vs the control group score (5.80±2.43) at 12 6 months; (P<0.001)
  Mattei da Silva et al, [44] Brazil RCT 12 months 94 Nurse case management model with individual care plans, tailored health education, home visits, and telephone calls for re-evaluations and reminders every 2 months Usual care with free medications, HBPM and access to extended healthcare team (e.g., Nurse, dietician) Questionnaire on Adherence to Treatment of Systemic Hypertension No between group differences in medication adherence at 12 months; slight increase in medication adherence within the intervention group with absolute difference in treatment adherence as 4.8 [3.1; 6.4] (P<.001) vs the control group −1.1 [−2.9; 0.6] (P=0.206)
Home Blood Pressure Monitoring (HBPM)
  Muhammad et al, [43] Malaysia RCT 2 months 88 HBPM with instructions to take daily readings and reminder phone call made at 1 month Usual care Novel self-report questionnaire: Mean Adherence Survey (MAS) No significant between group difference in the intervention and control groups at 2 months (1.5 (0.9–2.1) vs 1.3 (0.6–1.9), P=0.77)
  Cuffee et al, [45] USA RCT 3 months 213 Home blood pressure monitor and 5 educational pamphlets from NHLBI
Home blood pressure monitor and computer-based education modules
Usual Care + 5 educational pamphlets
Usual care + computer-based education modules
MMAS-4 No significant difference between intervention group mean change in score −0.18 (−0.45, 0.09) and the control group mean change in score −0.53 (−0.78, −0.28) (P = 0.068)