Abstract
The advent of artificial intelligence (AI) revolutionizes the ways of working in many areas of business and life science. In Medical Affairs (MA) departments of the pharmaceutical industry AI holds great potential for positively influencing the medical mission of identifying and addressing unmet medical needs and care gaps, and fostering solutions that improve the egalitarian and unbiased access of patients to treatments worldwide. Given the essential position of MA in corporate interactions with various healthcare stakeholders, AI offers broad possibilities to support strategic decision-making and to pioneer novel approaches in medical stakeholder interactions. By analyzing data derived from the healthcare environment and by streamlining operations in medical content generation, AI advances data-based prioritization and strategy execution. In this review, we discuss promising AI-based solutions in MA that support the effective use of heterogenous information from observations of the healthcare environment, the enhancement of medical education, and the analysis of real-world data. For a successful implementation of such solutions, specific considerations partly unique to healthcare must be taken care of, for example, transparency, data privacy, healthcare regulations, and in predictive applications, explainability.
Key Points
Implementing artificial intelligence (AI) in Medical Affairs (MA) departments of pharmaceutical companies offers a unique opportunity to beneficially impact their mission of identifying and addressing care gaps and fostering solutions that enhance the egalitarian and unbiased access of patients to treatments worldwide. |
Promising AI-supported solutions in MA are focusing on the effective utilization of heterogenous information from observations of the healthcare environment, the enhancement of medical education, and the analysis of real-world data. |
To leverage AI's capabilities in data analysis and content generation, MA must address specific ethical, legal, and regulatory considerations, partly unique to healthcare, to ensure a responsible and reliable use of AI-based methods. |
Introduction
The critical importance of Medical Affairs (MA) departments within pharmaceutical companies is emphasized by its classification as a third key realm of operations, alongside Research and Development (R&D) and Commercial departments [1]. Applications of artificial intelligence (AI) have rapidly extended to a plethora of professional domains including healthcare and the pharmaceutical industry [2, 3].
Future trajectories of MA must (i) adapt to the rapidly growing integration of AI-based systems and digitalization in clinical and corporate practice, and (ii) implement AI-based innovations of processes and approaches into workflows of MA departments themselves.
There is an inherent affinity of MA to AI, considering the escalating volume of data and the fast-paced progress and transformations in the overall medical domain. A wide range of AI use cases in MA are anticipated, with some already being implemented [4–7]. However, few publications address this fast-paced transformation and its upcoming implications for MA [1, 2, 4, 5, 8–11]. In this article, we describe a practice-oriented perspective on how AI will impact the MA function in several beneficial ways.
A 101 of AI
AI can be defined as the emulation of human intelligence in machines programmed to perform tasks that otherwise require higher-level cognitive abilities. The tasks to be covered include problem solving, learning, planning, natural language processing, as well as image analysis and interpretation [12].
AI encompasses highly diverse but potentially complementing sub-areas (Fig. 1). AI-based systems have the ability to utilize algorithms and computational models to process and interpret data, learn from content and patterns, draw conclusions, derive hypotheses, and assist in decision-making [13].
Fig. 1.
Artificial intelligence (AI): A schematic representation of functional principles.
Adapted from Pettit et al. [20]
Machine learning, a subset of AI, enables systems to increase their performance over time without explicit human programming, leveraging input data patterns and processing feedback (Table 1) [13].
Table 1.
Artificial intelligence (AI)-based technologies: description and examples
Technology | Description | Examples |
---|---|---|
AI | AI, a subset of computer science, uses a range of techniques such as computational algorithms, machine learning, natural language processing, and neural networks to learn from large datasets and make decisions [81, 82] | AI is used to operate autonomous vehicles [83] |
Machine learning (ML) | ML refines algorithms with data, covering supervised, unsupervised, and reinforcement learning in structured data, often involving feature engineering [84] | A model estimating the probability of diabetes mellitus from patient profiles [85] |
Deep learning (DL) | Deep learning, a variant of machine learning, employs multiple-layer neural networks for complex data analysis, avoiding extensive manual feature engineering [86] | A deep learning model was used for virtual screening of novel 3C-like protease enzyme inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2 [87] |
Artificial neural networks (ANNs) |
ANNs, inspired by the network architecture of the human brain, are a subset of ML. They approximate linear and nonlinear functions through a network of connected calculation steps, adjusting model parameters based on data. DL employs such neural networks with multiple layers for complex data analysis, mimicking the intricate processes in the human brain [88, 89] |
Within an ANN framework, five models with multiple layers and variable predictive parameters were tested to identify the optimum setup for the prediction of prenatal metabolic bone disease [90] |
Natural language processing (NLP) | NLP, a subset of AI, analyzes unstructured data, automatizes question answering, and conducts sentiment analysis. It uses machine learning, neural networks, and text mining [91] | Language processing of patient-initiated electronic health record messages to identify patients with COVID-19 infection for rapid therapeutic response [36] |
Large language models (LLMs) | LLMs working with billions of parameters use NLP, machine translation, and question-answering approaches to generate human-like text and content [36] | Medical reports explained by LLMs help to make health information more comprehensible for patients without medical background knowledge [92] |
Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) | Explainable AI (XAI) fosters AI system transparency by providing clear reasons for their behavior, demystifying the decision-making process [93] | XAI that provides physicians with accurate predictions and understandable explanations [94] |
Generative AI (GenAI) | The term GenAI refers to a subset of AI systems trained with existing datasets to generate content – such as text, image, music, or video – emulating the style and patterns of the input data. Utilizing advanced AI techniques (such as NLP or DL), generative AI can produce output that closely resembles work and content produced by humans [95] | Utilizing the chatbot ChatGPT in breast cancer management [96] |
AI has applications across multiple industries including healthcare. It is already used widely in virtual assistants, image analysis, speech recognition systems, chatbot engines, autonomous devices, robots, and vehicles, as well as in various other domains (Table 1) [14–19].
The use and capacities of AI in multiple healthcare domains is expanding rapidly, leading to increasingly sophisticated, capable, and useful systems [2].
Functions and Requirements of MA in a Rapidly Evolving Environment
Unlike the clearly defined responsibilities of physicians or pharmacists, the term "Medical Affairs" often is poorly understood beyond the boundaries of the pharmaceutical industry [20]. However, MA plays a pivotal role in the overall healthcare sector [21].
The primary missions of MA teams in pharmaceutical companies are (i) to effectively convey and contextualize the clinical value of innovative medicines to stakeholders, and (ii) overcome barriers impeding the use of those medicines to their full potential to improve patients’ lives [22]. The target groups of MA encompass healthcare professionals (HCPs), medical opinion leaders, medical associations, academic institutions, scientific experts, regulatory authorities, health technology assessment agencies, and other players involved in decisions in the overall healthcare field.
Key competencies of MA staff include robust medical knowledge and clinical understanding, particularly in the area of companies’ products, the competitive landscape, and the respective therapeutic areas, as well as comprehensive familiarity with regional healthcare structures and players, and proficient management skills. In many companies, MA staff oversee external scientific and policy-related engagements with heterogeneous stakeholders and ensure various internal collaborations amongst other tasks.
The core roles in MA – Medical Advisors with their primarily strategic and content-generating responsibilities, and Medical Science Liaisons (MSL) with their predominantly external scope and customer-facing activities – involve professionals with a diverse spectrum of academic backgrounds, including medicine, pharmacology, and life sciences [22–25].
Their collective expertise and analytic mindsets enable a range of collaborative engagements serving the common mission of (i) identifying and addressing unmet medical needs and care gaps to drive innovation, and (ii) fostering solutions that improve the egalitarian and unbiased access of patients to state-of-the-art treatments worldwide.
Concepts that Define the Tasks of MA
Farrington et al. describe two basic functional modalities in MA: inside-out and outside-in [22]. We propose a third modality, i.e., internal, that forms the integrating capacity, support structure, and knowledge host for both directional modalities (Table 2).
Table 2.
Modalities of Medical Affairs (MA) tasks with potential benefit from artificial intelligence (AI)-based approaches
Outside-in modalities |
AI facilitates and accelerates an enhanced understanding of disease and treatment patterns, supports research updates, and assists in detecting local, regional, or global trends It also helps to identify shortcomings and care gaps in specific therapeutic areas AI-based support of data, facts, and observations (DFO) documentation of medical fields force and real-time mining of publications enhances and accelerates the generation of actionable insights Re-evaluation and adaptation of medical strategies and tactics, planning of studies, and targeted generation of real-world insights are greatly enhanced by AI AI-assisted analyses of patient monitoring data contribute to improved study site recruitment Preparation of summaries and extracts from meeting content matters and congress proceedings are greatly facilitated Drawing insights from AI-based analyses of post-marketing studies and observational data may show opportunities for label extensions and for a broadened use of a drug in the existing indications |
Internal modalities |
Management and sharing of knowledge are facilitated through AI-based searches, categorizations, and summaries. AI supports real-time access to internal knowledge sources on specific issues and subjects, supporting meaningful healthcare professional (HCP) interactions and accelerated responses to medical inquiries Finding the right person inside the organization at the right time opens up previously unknown or underused opportunities for collaborative efforts AI-assisted learning and staff development initiatives include personalized platforms for onboarding, continuous education, and personal growth |
Inside-out modalities |
AI can enhance and support target group and patient-centric communication strategies in tailoring summaries of data and studies specifically to HCPs with diverse specializations. Materials directed at patients can be prepared by AI in multiple languages and complexity levels to enhance accessibility and understanding Strategies are implemented to identify optimal modalities for engaging with key opinion leaders (KOLs), considering factors such as fields of interest, locations, and timing to enhance stakeholder engagement. Acceleration and optimization of KOL profiling can be substantially supported by using AI-based models AI approaches facilitate the enhanced use of real-time data to support the performance of MA teams. MSLs are enabled to better engage healthcare providers with data-driven, current information, adding significant value to their interactions e.g., with KOLs |
Internal Modalities
The focus of the internal modality is information management and knowledge sharing inside the company – with the intention of harnessing synergies and foster innovative ideas. One of its central tasks is the continuous provision of contextualized up-to-date knowledge on developments and changes in the medical environment. This may stem from the latest insights on changes or ongoing developments in medical practice, from data presented at medical congresses, or from direct interaction with external stakeholders.
The interpretation of novel information from the field and its implications for corporate strategies and activities is a pivotal success factor provided by MA staff. Real-time internal knowledge sharing and its multimodal management is vital in the light of an exponential accumulation of medical data – with doubling times in the range of a few years [26, 27].
Inside-Out Modalities
Regarding inside-out modalities, the focus is on ensuring that appropriate internal data and information reaches the right external target group at the right time. This involves fostering the participation of HCPs in clinical trials or real-world studies, preparing healthcare technology assessment dossiers, and supporting the interactions of commercial functions with national payer entities to build the foundation for patient access to innovative medicines. Furthermore, MA engages in specialty-targeted and disease-centric communication through various channels, disseminating scientific data, raising awareness, and providing research-based insights and medical education of whole therapeutic fields – besides comprehensive product-related information [22].
Outside-In Modalities
On the outside-in interface, the tasks of MA revolve around understanding specific healthcare environments through active listening and targeted engagement with relevant stakeholders. This includes (i) gathering medical and clinical insights to comprehend external needs, and (ii) developing, evaluating, and communicating solutions for these demands. It is important to focus on actionable insights to generate impactful and valuable output. The enhanced understanding informs the development of corporate measures to address unmet medical needs and gaps in patient care.
The pursuit of partnerships with stakeholder groups is another important approach to collaboratively create and communicate sustainable healthcare solutions, fostering patient centricity and integrating input from the community [22].
Benefits and Visions for AI in MA
AI is transforming MA with groundbreaking innovations in evidence generation, the identification of unmet needs in defined patient cohorts and addressing them prioritized based on data-driven impact analyses. It will also accelerate and enhance the access to top-tier medical insights, by supporting documentation and analysis processes. Additionally, AI offers the opportunity to revolutionize external engagement by generating and coordinating tailored medical content across all channels, thereby enhancing decision-making for healthcare providers and patients [4].
In a rapidly changing environment, MA should play a part in evaluating how large volumes of complex data can be used to support clinical decision-making and enhance improvements in patient outcomes. MA should focus on developing comprehensive capabilities of data analysis and interpretation – embracing AI-based automation for scope, efficiency, and analytical potential. AI may foster novel ways of cross-functional collaboration to create and adapt data-driven medical strategies. Overall, these developments indicate a growing role of MA as a pivotal function in translating scientific progress into advancements of medical care and patient benefit.
The currently overwhelming surge of information in medicine is both a challenge and an opportunity. With an unprecedented volume of data and AI-based analytics at their disposal, companies have the capacity to transform the impact of MA into a more measurable asset [11]. All three modalities of MA include areas with the potential of major benefits from the implementation of AI based approaches (Table 2).
The incorporation of AI into MA has introduced a transformative era, revolutionizing key corporate functions. AI tools excel at extracting and deriving insights from diverse data sources, thereby enhancing strategic development by suggesting best practices [6].
In the domain of evidence generation, MA leverages AI to improve hypotheses and study designs supporting the drug lifecycle management or to identify and to fill data gaps in the clinical practice landscape [28–30].
AI optimizes stakeholder engagement via support in planning and selecting tailored measures. It streamlines communication, enabling real-time customization of messages to key stakeholders [31, 32]. In the following, we discuss use cases of AI according to their potential benefits in MA activities and tasks.
Generation and Analysis of Insights
The ability to capture relevant data, information, or facts using different external engagement strategies is commonly used by MA to identify insights with a potential outcome that enhances patients’ disease management. Insights are generated to understand the reasons behind HCP inquiries and anticipate subsequent actions that could close the identified care gaps [33].
Utilizing AI for the processing of medical information data delivers actionable intelligence, clusters inquiries for insights, and facilitates tailored content delivery.
AI can assist in understanding the drivers of trends and patterns. It supports insight-generating processes based on data provided by the current healthcare landscape across a range of internal and external sources [4, 6]. AI is highly effective in the evaluation of large volumes of publications and medical research data [34]. By evaluating bulk data, AI supports MA in capturing key topics of interest for HCPs or identifying gaps in healthcare provision. AI methods can also support in detecting safety signs by identifying patterns and anomalies that may indicate potential risks or adverse events, or can strengthen the evidence of safety profiles [35]. Further important applications include the detection of unmet needs, further strategic opportunities, and risks for the pharmaceutical company [4, 36].
With fully developed AI-based insight generation, the opportunity arises to better understand present requirements and proactively prepare for future needs. This can involve refining processes, devising medical strategies, or accumulating data to inform sound decisions with a focus on improving patient outcomes. Connecting medical insights to planning of activities and a strategic framework is key in this context [6].
Example: Enhancing Insight Generation with Machine Learning Techniques
MUFASA (MUltimodal Fusion Architecture SeArch (for Electronic Health Records); Medical Information Data Uses For AI Semantic Analysis) is a machine-learning tool developed to support MA activities. It leverages AI technologies such as the Sentence Transformer Library, along with clustering, semantic research, and visualization methods, aiming to boost the efficiency and effectiveness of MA intelligence.
It facilitates precisely targeted content delivery to HCPs, streamlining the management and distribution of medical information data. MUFASAs functionalities allow an effective understanding of inquiries, as demonstrated through 3D vector mapping and clustering tests.
MUFASA uses a clustering approach to uncover insights and identify actionable issues from large inquiry data sets. It provides supportive function via semantic search graphs, helping evidence-based decision-making by tracking effectiveness of initiatives and by monitoring of trends. For example, the system saves each MSL team member hours of work per week by efficiently clustering responses to similar inquiries.
Overall, these features enhance strategic decision-making based on a deep analysis of unsolicited data, cultivate actionable insights, and enhance engagement with HCPs [6].
Generation and Analysis of Real-World Evidence
Success in the rapidly evolving healthcare landscape hinges on the effective use of scientific capabilities, especially the ability to integrate, analyze, and interpret diverse datasets. This is a vital requirement to inform interactions with stakeholders and ultimately enhance patient outcomes [37].
The term real-world evidence (RWE) refers to healthcare information gathered from a variety of sources not only derived from clinical research environments. These sources include electronic health records, insurance claims, disease registries, and data collected from personal devices or health apps [38]. RWE offers valuable insights that complement clinical trials, particularly by addressing diverse patient populations and healthcare environments [39]. It contributes to several aspects of healthcare, including the development of novel therapeutics, patient care, and safety surveillance [38]. Recently, a trend is notable towards utilizing AI to process real-world data (RWD), as it facilitates rapid translation of study findings into medical practice and improved alignment of guidelines and their recommendations with the real-life patient diversity [40].
Observational data from cohort and case-control studies provide valuable insights, for example, regarding the clarification of potential safety issues that often require larger sample sizes from post-approval real-life patient cohorts [41]. Advanced techniques, such as AI-based propensity score matching, enhance the validity of non-experimental studies, and significantly broaden the spectrum of study data available to inform treatment decisions [42].
However, a large part of patient data is available as unstructured text in RWD sets, requiring curation for analysis [43, 44]. Vital information on patient characteristics, disease progression, and outcomes is embedded in clinical notes within electronic health records [45]. The conventional methods of hands-on data extraction and curation are resource-intensive and time-consuming, restricting the pool of patient information actually available for RWE generation [46]. Therefore, the use of Natural Language Processing (NLP) extraction techniques to support large-scale RWE generation from electronic healthcare records is growing [47].
NLP techniques are employed to systematically convert unstructured data sources, such as clinical notes, into structured formats suitable for analysis [48]. This workflow encompasses several stages, including data cleaning to remove inconsistencies, tokenization to break down text into manageable units, and the application of advanced methods for text classification to identify and categorize relevant data. Once the data have been standardized and structured, data are subjected to analysis using AI technologies, including Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL), which are capable of detecting complex patterns and extracting significant insights [49]. This approach facilitates the generation of robust and actionable insights for clinical research, ultimately informing and improving healthcare decision-making.
By leveraging AI-driven data analysis, MA is able to make more data-driven informed decisions and optimize its workflow to increase the value of medicines in real-life settings. For example, ML can be used to detect factors involved in the divergences of real-life outcomes from clinical trial results [7].
Example: Machine Learning Bridges the Gap Between Non-interventional Studies and Randomized Controlled Trials: The Case of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration
In real-world settings, the overall effectiveness of intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor antibodies is usually lower as compared with randomized clinical trials.
Based on machine-learning principles, a clinical decision model was developed based on ranibizumab real-world patient data from the USA validated with data from Australia and the UK. The model learned to identify the most influential factors (out of 59 initial variables) in a manner that they effectively predict the change in visual acuity (VA) over 12 months. These factors were baseline VA, presence of subretinal fluid, and administration of three loading doses by day 90 from treatment initiation.
When applying these criteria, real-world outcomes became similar to those obtained in published randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The example shows that machine learning can be used to classify real-world cohorts and identify subsets of patients whose benefit is equivalent to the results from RCT populations. This methodology may support the translation of findings from clinical trials into clinical practice settings to enhance individual treatment benefits [7].
Medical Education and Content Generation
Introducing innovative medicines demands up-to-date knowledge. The dynamic changes in the knowledge landscape, accelerated by digitalization and AI, intensify this need. Practical examples in the following section showcase areas where AI tools can be employed in MA for effective medical education.
Internal and external medical education is a central component of work within MA. For the transfer of knowledge, which is often based on complex information and data, it is essential to convey the extracted key aspects in an engaging and straightforward manner.
As discussed, NLP gathers information out of unstructured content of various sources such as publications, patent specifications, and healthcare documents [48]. Analyzing these data can unveil associations and ease researcher workload [46].
For example, in the vast realm of COVID-19 research literature, text mining has become indispensable, given the unrelenting surge of publications. Leveraging the COVID-19 Open Research Dataset (CORD-19), text-mining models using NLP facilitate a range of tasks. These include summarization, visualization, extraction, and streamlining of relevant information. These tools enable researchers to effectively derive meaningful insights from the rapidly evolving landscape of COVID-19 literature, overcoming the challenges of information overload [50]. Implementing NLP-based tools in systematic reviews significantly reduces screening time. They improve efficiency without compromising accuracy [51].
Automated text summarization supports the research and medical community by identifying and extracting essential information from large numbers of articles. These tools generate condensed versions of documents, helping users to locate crucial information in the original text more efficiently [31].
Recently, plain language summaries have been implemented in the scientific community to make the content accessible to a broader non-scientific audience [52]. AI-supported generation of lay summaries might enhance trust and transparency into research and clinical study results in a timely and resource-saving process, resulting in more well-informed patients [53].
Automated slide show generators leverage AI to read and interpret text, extracting key points to create slides with customizable designs, diagrams, images, and flow [54].
AI will soon play a crucial role in supporting MA in its mission to improve patient care by addressing care gaps with advanced medical education. By rapidly providing relevant information, structured data, and sophisticated analyses, AI enables faster and more accurate processes, contributing to overall operational effectiveness [55]. Furthermore, generative AI will empower MA to specifically tailor its educational content and strategies to the diverse needs of their audience. Customized content could be created and updated without producing a high workload for MA staff, unlocking valuable capacities for strategic responsibilities and personal customer engagements.
Possible Reasons for Unused Potential of AI in MA
As described in a recent report prepared by the management consulting firm McKinsey & Company, only 10% of life science companies are actively investing in AI solutions for MA [11]. Current approaches aim to enable real-time communication between corporate headquarters and field medical teams or provide real-time access to information for MSLs and KOLs [11].
The challenges in implementing AI-technologies in the field of MA revolve around a few core factors. Analyzing data on social interactions is complex due to the heterogeneous nature of these data, specialized terminology, but also contextual nuances and implicit meanings [56].
Further complexities arise from accurate integration of social data into models [57, 58]. Advanced AI techniques are required to effectively analyze and integrate the heterogenous data from medical records, patient surveys, and customer feedback, while ensuring data privacy and security [59].
Additionally, stringent privacy regulations in healthcare substantially limit the availability of training data for developing specific AI learning capabilities that may be useful for successful implementations of AI in MA. These restrictions could be overcome or at least eased by privacy-preserving techniques such as federated learning and hybrid techniques [60].
However, the increasing digitalization of healthcare data provides more structured and easier accessible information for AI applications [61]. Furthermore, the development of explainable AI helps to build trust in suggestions or even decisions made by AI systems [62]. Further improvements could stem from advances in natural language comprehension, for example, offering enhanced interpretation of proceedings from meetings and spoken content from external communications with stakeholders as input for augmented analytics [63].
Risks and Challenges of AI in MA
Potential risks associated with the application of AI in the pharmaceutical industry include data privacy concerns and security [64], new regulations (see chapter 6.1), and concerns regarding transparency [65].
Large Language Models (LLMs), for example, exhibit hallucinations, where the model generates plausible sounding, but incorrect or invented information presented as facts. Hallucinations arise from issues in data quality, training inconsistencies, and biases such as over-reliance on memorized data, turning them into a challenge [66, 67]. An LLM may also point to false references citing non-existent resources [68]. In medical contexts including MA, validating information derived from LLMs can be time-consuming, posing challenges to ensure the validity of information provided to healthcare professionals and patients. Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) may significantly enhance the accuracy and relevance of content by combining real-time information retrieval with generative models [69].
The increasing implementation of machine-learning algorithms in healthcare raises concerns about fairness and biases in their development, jeopardizing their utilization for clinical decisions and evaluations [70]. AI methods, often developed outside the medical realm, may face more intense skepticism in medical science. Trust in the robustness of outputs is crucial for the adoption and safe use of AI in the clinical and medical science community, where the conclusions impact clinical decisions and ambiguities drain resources [71]. In medical science and practice, the stakes are high. Trust in the robustness and stability of AI-based analyses, reporting, and recommendations is vital for the medical science community to use AI efficiently and safely [69].
An impactful challenge which comes along with the increasing implementation of AI in healthcare could be an over-reliance on AI. So-called automation biases could adversely impact humans’ autonomy due to a loss of skills resulting in decreased quality in medical decision-making. The risk to preclude further evidence checks after machine-generated output can lead to fatal consequences in patient outcomes [72]. Next to AI regulations from health authorities, risk-mitigating strategies specifically in the pharmaceutical industry such as industry self-governance solutions can support responsible handling with AI [73].
As AI becomes an integral component of corporate decision processes, the necessity for AI explainability has gained importance. Machine-learning and deep-learning models usually operate as black or gray boxes that draw conclusions without explicitly communicating the underlying process and the handling of input parameters [74].
An absence of explainability in decision support systems would counteract fundamental principles of good healthcare practice, potentially leading to adverse outcomes regarding corporate goals and policies [75]. It is crucial to comprehend the factors influencing AI-based decisions, particularly in scenarios where these choices have major implications for corporate strategies [46, 76]. Therefore, the explainability of AI-based approaches and their rationales is a critical success factor for the implementation of systems influencing healthcare decisions.
Regulation of AI in Medical Realms
The rapid deployment of AI technologies in medicine raises ethical concerns such as data privacy, cybersecurity threats, and biases. Further areas of concern include transparency, risk management, external validation, data quality, or in specific cases of direct use in humans, compliance with medical device regulations [77, 78].
The World Health Organization (WHO) has issued comprehensive regulatory considerations for the implementation of AI in healthcare. It underscores the significance of ensuring safety, efficacy, and accessibility of AI systems while advocating productive dialogues among stakeholders [79]. The guidance emphasizes the need for regulating biases and errors in training data through enhanced review and requirements of consent. WHO will provide essential principles for governments and regulatory bodies to develop or adapt guidelines on AI use at national or regional levels. For the European Union (EU) the use of AI will be regulated by the Artificial Intelligence Act that was approved by the EU Council in May 2024 [80].
Conclusion
AI is currently transforming MA with a great potential to increase efficiency, enhance stakeholder engagement, facilitate the generation and analysis of insights and real-world evidence, and leverage its value as a function within the pharmaceutical industry and the healthcare sector. Thus, AI promises a vast potential to support and enhance the MA mission in creating innovations that close care gaps and foster patient access to breakthrough advances in healthcare worldwide. However, it is important to acknowledge that implementing AI in MA presents significant challenges, including the necessity of ensuring the accuracy and reliability of data, as well as complex ethical, legal, and regulatory considerations.
Acknowledgements
All authors acknowledge and thank Markus Fischer, Fischer Biomedical, for his support in medical writing. The authors would also like to thank Lilly Zhao and Nour Hegazy for their valuable contribution to the literature research and editorial adjustments.
Declarations
Conflict of Interest
All authors are employees at Pfizer Pharma GmbH. The views and opinions expressed in this review article are those of the authors and do not represent or reflect in any way the official policy/position of the company.
Funding
Funding for this review including medical writing was provided by Pfizer Pharma GmbH.
Author Contributions
Emma Fröling, Dina Domrös-Zoungrana, and Christian Lenz were responsible for the idea and structure of this article. Emma Fröling, Neda Rajaeean, and Klara Sonnie Hinrichsmeyer mainly conducted the literature search. The technical part on artificial intelligence and the conception of the graphics were created by Neda Rajaeean. All authors contributed to writing the manuscript, reviewed it carefully, and approved the final submitted manuscript.
Ethics approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Availability of data and material
Not applicable.
Code availability
Not applicable.
References
- 1.Evers M, Suresh B, Westra A, Zemp A. A vision for medical affairs in 2025. McKinsey & Company. 2019. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/life-sciences/our-insights/a-vision-for-medical-affairs-in-2025. Accessed 26 June 2024.
- 2.Davenport T, Kalakota R. The potential for artificial intelligence in healthcare. Future Healthc J. 2019. 10.7861/futurehosp.6-2-94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Loureiro SMC, Guerreiro J, Tussyadiah I. Artificial intelligence in business: state of the art and future research agenda. J Bus Res. 2021. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.11.001. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Algazy J, Garcia A, Ryan S, Westra A, Zemp A. A vision for medical affairs 2030: Five priorities for patient impact. McKinsey & Company. 2023. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/life-sciences/our-insights/a-vision-for-medical-affairs-2030-five-priorities-for-patient-impact?cid=eml-web. Accessed 26 June 2024.
- 5.Shah B, Viswa CA, Zurkiya D, Leydon E, Bleys J. Generative AI in the pharmaceutical industry: Moving from hype to reality. McKinsey & Company. 2024. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/life-sciences/our-insights/generative-ai-in-the-pharmaceutical-industry-moving-from-hype-to-reality. Accessed 26 June 2024.
- 6.Ng KKY, Zhang PC. Advancing medical affair capabilities and insight generation through machine learning techniques. J Pharm Policy Pract. 2023. 10.1186/s40545-023-00670-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Sagkriotis A, Chakravarthy U, Griner R, Doyle O, Wintermantel T, Clemens A. Application of machine learning methods to bridge the gap between non-interventional studies and randomized controlled trials in ophthalmic patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Contemp Clin Trials. 2021. 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Feng L. The Impact of AI on Medical Affairs. The MSL: J Med Sci Liaison Soc; 2023.
- 9.Bedenkov A, Moreno C, Agustin L, Jain N, Newman A, Feng LN, et al. Customer centricity in medical affairs needs human-centric artificial intelligence. Pharm Med. 2021. 10.1007/s40290-020-00378-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Sorcero. Language Intelligence for Medical and Regulatory Affairs. Sorcero. 2022. https://medicalaffairs.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/White-paper-AI-for-Medical-Affairs-rebranded.pdf. Accessed 27 June 2024.
- 11.Lee M, Liu H, Gollapudi R. Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Medical Affairs: A Brief Overview. Blue Matter Consulting. 2023. https://bluematterconsulting.com/artificial-intelligence-healthcare-medical-affairs/. Accessed 27 June 2024.
- 12.Ertel W. Undergraduate topics in computer science: introduction to artificial intelligence. Berlin: Springer Nature; 2018. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Aldoseri A, Al-Khalifa KN, Hamouda AM. Re-thinking data strategy and integration for artificial intelligence: concepts, opportunities, and challenges. Appl Sci-Basel. 2023. 10.3390/app13127082. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Blut M, Wünderlich N, Brock C. Facilitating retail customers’ use of AI-based virtual assistants: a meta-analysis. J Retail. 2024. 10.1016/j.jretai.2024.04.001. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Aitkenhead MJ, Dalgetty IA, Mullins CE, McDonald AJS, Strachan NJC. Weed and crop discrimination using image analysis and artificial intelligence methods. Comput Electron Agr. 2003. 10.1016/S0168-1699(03)00076-0. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lee TY, Li CC, Chou KR, Chung MH, Hsiao ST, Guo SL, et al. Machine learning-based speech recognition system for nursing documentation: a pilot study. Int J Med Inform. 2023. 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Li L, Subbareddy R, Raghavendra CG. AI intelligence Chatbot to improve students learning in the higher education platform. J Interconnect Netw. 2022. 10.1142/S0219265921430325. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Nascimento AM, Vismari LF, Molina CBST, Cugnasca PS, Camargo J, de Almeida JR, et al. A systematic literature review about the impact of artificial intelligence on autonomous vehicle safety. IEEE T Intell Transp. 2020. 10.1109/Tits.2019.2949915. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Cox AM. Exploring the impact of Artificial Intelligence and robots on higher education through literature-based design fictions. Int J Educ Technol H. 2021. 10.1186/s41239-020-00237-8. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Jandhyala R. Development and validation of the Medical Affairs Pharmaceutical Physician Value (MAPPval) instrument. Pharm Med. 2022. 10.1007/s40290-021-00413-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Furtner D, Hutas G, Tan BJW, Meier R. Journey from an enabler to a strategic leader: integration of the medical affairs function in ESG initiatives and values. Pharm Med. 2023. 10.1007/s40290-023-00485-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Farrington AD, Frostrup AG, Dahl P. The value and deliverables of medical affairs: affiliate perspectives and future expectations. Pharm Med. 2023. 10.1007/s40290-023-00501-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Furtner D, Shinde SP, Singh M, Wong CH, Setia S. Digital transformation in medical affairs sparked by the pandemic: insights and learnings from COVID-19 era and beyond. Pharm Med. 2022. 10.1007/s40290-021-00412-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Bedenkov A, Rajadhyaksha V, Beekman M, Moreno C, Fong PC, Agustin L, et al. Developing medical affairs leaders who create the future. Pharmaceut Med. 2020. 10.1007/s40290-020-00351-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Setia S, Ryan NJ, Nair PS, Ching E, Subramaniam K. Evolving role of pharmaceutical physicians in medical evidence and education. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2018. 10.2147/Amep.S175683. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Coughlin S, Roberts D, O’Neill K, Brooks P. Looking to tomorrow’s healthcare today: a participatory health perspective. Intern Med J. 2018. 10.1111/imj.13661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Wiederrecht G, Darwish S, Callaway A. The healthcare data explosion. https://www.rbccm.com/en/gib/healthcare/episode/the_healthcare_data_explosion. Accessed 08 Aug 2024.
- 28.Knevel R, Liao KP. From real-world electronic health record data to real-world results using artificial intelligence. Ann Rheum Dis. 2023. 10.1136/ard-2022-222626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Mileski D. Leveraging the Power of GenAI in Real-World Evidence Studies. Climedo. 2024. https://climedo.de/en/blog/leveraging-the-power-of-genai-in-real-world-evidence-studies/. Accessed 26 June 2024.
- 30.Askin S, Burkhalter D, Calado G, El Dakrouni S. Artificial Intelligence Applied to clinical trials: opportunities and challenges. Health Technol-Ger. 2023. 10.1007/s12553-023-00738-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Afsharizadeh M, Ebrahimpour-Komleh H, Bagheri A. Automatic text summarization of COVID-19 research articles using recurrent neural networks and coreference resolution. Front Biomed Technol. 2021. 10.18502/fbt.v7i4.5321. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Shamim MI. Artificial Intelligence in project management: enhancing efficiency and decision-making. Int J Manag Inf Syst Data Sci. 2024. 10.62304/ijmisds.v1i1.107. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Cadogan AA, Lau J, Wnorowski S, Kelsch GR, Oreper J, Chavez L, et al. Defining insights. Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2023. 10.1007/s43441-023-00554-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Krishnan G, Singh S, Pathania M, Gosavi S, Abhishek S, Parchani A, et al. Artificial intelligence in clinical medicine: catalyzing a sustainable global healthcare paradigm. Front Artif Intell. 2023. 10.3389/frai.2023.1227091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Marchenko O, Russek-Cohen E, Levenson M, Zink RC, Krukas-Hampel MR, Jiang Q. Sources of safety data and statistical strategies for design and analysis: real world insights. Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2018. 10.1177/2168479017739270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Mermin-Bunnell K, Zhu YD, Hornback A, Damhorst G, Walker T, Robichaux C, et al. Use of natural language processing of patient-initiated electronic health record messages to identify patients with COVID-19 infection. JAMA Netw Open. 2023. 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.22299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Maleki Varnosfaderani S, Forouzanfar M. The role of AI in hospitals and clinics: transforming healthcare in the 21st century. Bioengineering (Basel). 2024. 10.3390/bioengineering11040337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Sherman RE, Anderson SA, Dal Pan GJ, Gray GW, Gross T, Hunter NL, et al. Real-world evidence: what is it and what can it tell us? New Engl J Med. 2016. 10.1056/NEJMsb1609216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Katkade VB, Sanders KN, Zou KH. Real world data: an opportunity to supplement existing evidence for the use of long-established medicines in health care decision making. J Multidiscip Health. 2018. 10.2147/Jmdh.S160029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Passamonti F, Corrao G, Castellani G, Mora B, Maggioni G, Gale RP, et al. The future of research in hematology: Integration of conventional studies with real-world data and artificial intelligence. Blood Rev. 2022. 10.1016/j.blre.2021.100914. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Lao KSJ, Chui CSL, Man KKC, Lau WCY, Chan EW, Wong ICK. Medication safety research by observational study design. Int J Clin Pharm-Net. 2016. 10.1007/s11096-016-0285-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Metlay JP, Armstrong KA. Clinical decision making: weighing evidence to inform clinical decisions. Ann Intern Med. 2020. 10.7326/M19-1941. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Benedum CM, Sondhi A, Fidyk E, Cohen AB, Nemeth S, Adamson B, et al. Replication of real-world evidence in oncology using electronic health record data extracted by machine learning. Cancers (Basel). 2023. 10.3390/cancers15061853. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Preston S, Wei M, Rao RJ, Tinn R, Usuyama N, Lucas M, et al. Toward structuring real-world data deep learning for extracting oncology information from clinical text with patient-level supervision. Patterns. 2023. 10.1016/j.patter.2023.100726. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Yang X, Chen A, PourNejatian N, Shin HC, Smith KE, Parisien C, et al. A large language model for electronic health records. Npj Digit Med. 2022. 10.1038/s41746-022-00742-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Estevez M, Benedum CM, Jiang CS, Cohen AB, Phadke S, Sarkar S, et al. Considerations for the use of machine learning extracted real-world data to support evidence generation: a research-centric evaluation framework. Cancers. 2022. 10.3390/cancers14133063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Liu F, Wecnh C, Yu H. Advancing clinical research through natural language processing on electronic health records: traditional machine learning meets deep learning. In: Richesson RL, Andrews JE, editors. Clinical research informatics. Cham: Springer; 2019. p. 357–78. [Google Scholar]
- 48.Kreimeyer K, Foster M, Pandey A, Arya N, Halford G, Jones SF, et al. Natural language processing systems for capturing and standardizing unstructured clinical information: a systematic review. J Biomed Inform. 2017. 10.1016/j.jbi.2017.07.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Kowsari K, Meimandi KJ, Heidarysafa M, Mendu S, Barnes L, Brown D. Text classification algorithms: a survey. Information. 2019. 10.3390/info10040150. [Google Scholar]
- 50.Wang LL, Lo K. Text mining approaches for dealing with the rapidly expanding literature on COVID-19. Brief Bioinform. 2021. 10.1093/bib/bbaa296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Perlman-Arrow S, Loo N, Bobrovitz N, Yan TT, Arora RK. A real-world evaluation of the implementation of NLP technology in abstract screening of a systematic review. Res Synth Methods. 2023. 10.1002/jrsm.1636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Stoll M, Kerwer M, Lieb K, Chasiotis A. Plain language summaries: a systematic review of theory, guidelines and empirical research. PLoS ONE. 2022. 10.1371/journal.pone.0268789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Shyr C, Grout RW, Kennedy N, Akdas Y, Tischbein M, Milford J, et al. Leveraging artificial intelligence to summarize abstracts in lay language for increasing research accessibility and transparency. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024. 10.1093/jamia/ocae186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Cagliero L, La Quatra M. Automatic slides generation in the absence of training data. P Int Comp Softw App. 2021. 10.1109/Compsac51774.2021.00025. [Google Scholar]
- 55.Lee D, Yoon SN. Application of Artificial Intelligence-based technologies in the healthcare industry: opportunities and challenges. Int J Env Res Pub He. 2021. 10.3390/ijerph18010271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Mathur L, Liang PP, Morency L. Advancing Social intelligence in AI agents: technical challenges and open questions. J Comput Sci. 2024.
- 57.Wang YW, Lu EM, Ruan ZZ, Liang Y, Zeng Y. Stream: social data and knowledge collective intelligence platform for TRaining Ethical AI Models. Ai Soc. 2024. 10.1007/s00146-023-01851-6. [Google Scholar]
- 58.Williams J, Fiore SM, Jentsch F. Supporting Artificial Social Intelligence with theory of mind. Front Artif Intell. 2022. 10.3389/frai.2022.750763. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Alanazi A. Clinicians’ views on using Artificial Intelligence in healthcare: opportunities, challenges, and beyond. Cureus J Med Sci. 2023. 10.7759/cureus.45255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Khalid N, Qayyum A, Bilal M, Al-Fuqaha A, Qadir J. Privacy-preserving artificial intelligence in healthcare: techniques and applications. Comput Biol Med. 2023. 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.106848. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Bohr A, Memarzadeh K. The rise of artificial intelligence in healthcare applications. Artif Intell Healthc. 2020. 10.1016/B978-0-12-818438-7.00002-2. [Google Scholar]
- 62.Chanda T, Hauser K, Hobelsberger S, Bucher TC, Garcia CN, Wies C, et al. Dermatologist-like explainable AI enhances trust and confidence in diagnosing melanoma. Nat Commun. 2024. 10.1038/s41467-023-43095-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Alghamdi NA, Al-Baity HH. Augmented analytics driven by AI: a digital transformation beyond business intelligence. Sensors-Basel. 2022. 10.3390/s22208071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Gholap AD, Uddin MJ, Faiyazuddin M, Omri A, Gowri S, Khalid M. Advances in artificial intelligence for drug delivery and development: a comprehensive review. Comput Biol Med. 2024. 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.108702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Singh S, Kumar R, Payra S, Singh SK. Artificial intelligence and machine learning in pharmacological research: bridging the gap between data and drug discovery. Cureus J Med Sci. 2023. 10.7759/cureus.44359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Xu Z, Jain S, Kankanhalli M. Hallucination is inevitable: an innate limitation of large language models [Preprint]. arxiv. 2024. 10.48550/arXiv.2401.11817.
- 67.McKenna N, Li T, Cheng L, Hosseini MJ, Johnson M, Steedman M. Sources of Hallucination by Large Language Models on Inference Tasks [Preprint]. arxiv. 2023. 10.48550/arXiv.2305.14552.
- 68.McGowan A, Gui YL, Dobbs M, Shuster S, Cotter M, Selloni A, et al. ChatGPT and Bard exhibit spontaneous citation fabrication during psychiatry literature search. Psychiat Res. 2023. 10.1016/j.psychres.2023.115334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Gilbert S, Kather JN, Hogan A. Augmented non-hallucinating large language models as medical information curators. Npj Digit Med. 2024. 10.1038/s41746-024-01081-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Gervasi SS, Chen IY, Smith-McLallen A, Sontag D, Obermeyer Z, Vennera M, et al. The potential for bias in machine learning and opportunities for health insurers to address it. Health Affair. 2022. 10.1377/hlthaff.2021.01287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Hunter DJ, Holmes C. Where medical statistics meets Artificial Intelligence. New Engl J Med. 2023. 10.1056/NEJMra2212850. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Ross P, Spates K. Considering the safety and quality of Artificial Intelligence in health care. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2020. 10.1016/j.jcjq.2020.08.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Roski J, Maier EJ, Vigilante K, Kane EA, Matheny ME. Enhancing trust in AI through industry self-governance. J Am Med Inform Assn. 2021. 10.1093/jamia/ocab065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Wang F, Casalino LP, Khullar D. Deep learning in medicine-promise, progress, and challenges. Jama Intern Med. 2019. 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.7117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Amann J, Blasimme A, Vayena E, Frey D, Madai VI, Consortium PQ. Explainability for artificial intelligence in healthcare: a multidisciplinary perspective. Bmc Med Inform Decis. 2020. 10.1186/s12911-020-01332-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Loh HW, Ooi CP, Seoni S, Barua PD, Molinari F, Acharya UR. Application of explainable artificial intelligence for healthcare: a systematic review of the last decade (2011–2022). Comput Meth Prog Bio. 2022. 10.1016/j.cmpb.2022.107161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Niemiec E. Will the EU medical device regulation help to improve the safety and performance of medical Al devices? Digit Health. 2022. 10.1177/20552076221089079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Fehr J, Citro B, Malpani R, Lippert C, Madai VI. A trustworthy AI reality-check: the lack of transparency of artificial intelligence products in healthcare. Front Digit Health. 2024. 10.3389/fdgth.2024.1267290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Regulatory considerations on artificial intelligence for health. Geneva: World Health Organization. 2023.
- 80.Artificial intelligence (AI) act: Council gives final green light to the first worldwide rules on AI [Press release]. Council of the EU. 2024. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2024/05/21/artificial-intelligence-ai-act-council-gives-final-green-light-to-the-first-worldwide-rules-on-ai/. Accessed 03 July 2024.
- 81.Rubinger L, Gazendam A, Ekhtiari S, Bhandari M. Machine learning and artificial intelligence in research and healthcare. Injury. 2023. 10.1016/j.injury.2022.01.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Lepakshi VA. Machine learning and deep learning based AI tools for development of diagnostic tools. Elsevier; 2022. [Google Scholar]
- 83.Garikapati D, Shetiya SS. Autonomous vehicles: evolution of Artificial Intelligence and the current industry landscape. Big Data Cogn Comput. 2024. 10.3390/bdcc8040042. [Google Scholar]
- 84.Taye MM. Understanding of machine learning with deep learning: architectures, workflow, applications and future directions. Computers. 2023. 10.3390/computers12050091. [Google Scholar]
- 85.Lai H, Huang H, Keshavjee K, Guergachi A, Gao X. Predictive models for diabetes mellitus using machine learning techniques. BMC Endocr Disord. 2019. 10.1186/s12902-019-0436-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Hederman AP, Ackerman ME. Leveraging deep learning to improve vaccine design. Trends Immunol. 2023. 10.1016/j.it.2023.03.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Haghir Ebrahim Abadi MH, Ghasemlou A, Bayani F, Sefidbakht Y, Vosough M, Mozaffari-Jovin S, et al. AI-driven covalent drug design strategies targeting main protease (m(pro)) against SARS-CoV-2: structural insights and molecular mechanisms. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 2024. 10.1080/07391102.2024.2308769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Wu J, Zhao YQ. Machine learning technology in the application of genome analysis: a systematic review. Gene. 2019. 10.1016/j.gene.2019.04.062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Bräm DS, Parrott N, Hutchinson L, Steiert B. Introduction of an artificial neural network-based method for concentration-time predictions. Cpt-Pharmacomet Syst. 2022. 10.1002/psp4.12786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Jiang H, Guo J, Li J, Li C, Du W, Canavese F, et al. Artificial neural network modeling to predict neonatal metabolic bone disease in the prenatal and postnatal periods. JAMA Netw Open. 2023. 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.51849. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Baclic O, Tunis M, Young K, Doan C, Swerdfeger H, Schonfeld J. Challenges and opportunities for public health made possible by advances in natural language processing. Can Commun Dis Rep. 2020. 10.14745/ccdr.v46i06a02. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Jeblick K, Schachtner B, Dexl J, Mittermeier A, Stüber AT, Topalis J, et al. ChatGPT makes medicine easy to swallow: an exploratory case study on simplified radiology reports. Eur Radiol. 2023. 10.1007/s00330-023-10213-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Ali S, Abuhmed T, El-Sappagh S, Muhammad K, Alonso-Moral JM, Confalonieri R, et al. Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): what we know and what is left to attain trustworthy Artificial Intelligence. Inform Fusion. 2023. 10.1016/j.inffus.2023.101805. [Google Scholar]
- 94.Ramírez-Mena A, Andrés-León E, Alvarez-Cubero MJ, Anguita-Ruiz A, Martinez-Gonzalez LJ, Alcala-Fdez J. Explainable artificial intelligence to predict and identify prostate cancer tissue by gene expression. Comput Meth Prog Bio. 2023. 10.1016/j.cmpb.2023.107719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Baig A, Yee L, Singla A, Sukharevsky A. What is generative AI? McKinsey & Company. 2024. https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/mckinsey-explainers/what-is-generative-ai. Accessed 26 June 2024.
- 96.Sorin V, Glicksberg BS, Artsi Y, Barash Y, Konen E, Nadkarni GN, et al. Utilizing large language models in breast cancer management: systematic review. J Cancer Res Clin. 2024. 10.1007/s00432-024-05678-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]