Table 4.
H/EC | Locality | Reedbuck in the network | NODF | P |
---|---|---|---|---|
H | Eastern Shores | All | 48.88 | 0.05 |
Males | 41.35 | 0.03 | ||
Females | 44.44 | 0.23 | ||
Adult | 50.97 | 0.01 | ||
Young | 30.94 | 0.55 | ||
Himeville | All | 56.37 | 0.01 | |
Males | 44.03 | 0.01 | ||
Females | 41.75 | 0.03 | ||
Adult | 42.41 | 0.05 | ||
Young | 38.78 | 0.07 | ||
EC | Eastern Shores | All | 54.73 | 0.01 |
Males | 36.01 | 0.01 | ||
Females | 40.2 | 0.01 | ||
Adult | 44.06 | 0.01 | ||
Young | 25.29 | 0.01 | ||
Himeville | All | 43.76 | 0.03 | |
Males | 33.02 | 0.03 | ||
Females | 22.61 | 0.13 | ||
Adult | 37.73 | 0.03 | ||
Young | 25.62 | 0.07 |
NODF varies from 0 (random network) to 100 (perfect nestedness). Significance of each NODF value was determined using null model with 1000 permutations.