Skip to main content
Virus Research logoLink to Virus Research
. 2024 Oct 1;350:199473. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2024.199473

Isolation and characterization of lytic bacteriophage vB_KpnP_23: A promising antimicrobial candidate against carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae

Qian Wang a,1, Ran Chen a,1, Hui Liu c, Yue Liu a, Jinmei Li b,d, Yueling Wang a, Yan Jin a, Yuanyuan Bai a, Zhen Song a, Xinglun Lu a, Changyin Wang a,, Yingying Hao a,b,
PMCID: PMC11474366  PMID: 39332682

Highlights

  • Phage vB_KpnP_23 lyses nine different capsule types of CRKP.

  • Phage vB_KpnP_23 lacks virulence/resistance genes, ideal for clinical use.

  • Phage vB_KpnP_23 represents a new species within the genus Przondovirus.

  • Phage vB_KpnP_23 and antibiotics synergistically reduce MIC values against CRKP.

Keywords: Klebsiella pneumoniae, Bacteriophage therapy, Carbapenem-resistant, Genome analysis

Abstract

The global health threat posed by carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) is exacerbated by the limited availability of effective treatments. Bacteriophages are promising alternatives to conventional antimicrobial agents. However, current phage databases are limited. Thus, identifying and characterizing new phages could provide biological options for the treatment of multi-drug resistant bacterial infections. Here, we report the characterization of a novel lytic phage, vB_KpnP_23, isolated from hospital sewage. This phage exhibited potent activity against carbapenemase-producing CRKP strains and was characterised by an icosahedral head, a retractable tail, and a genome comprising 40,987 base pairs, with a G + C content of 51 %. Capable of targeting and lysing nine different capsule types (K-types) of CRKP, including the clinically relevant ST11-K64, it demonstrated both high bacteriolytic efficiency and stability in various environmental contexts. Crucially, vB_KpnP_23 lacks virulence factors, antimicrobial resistance genes, or tRNA, aligning with the key criteria for therapeutic application. In vitro evaluation of phage-antibiotic combinations revealed a significant synergistic effect between vB_KpnP_23 and meropenem, levofloxacin, or amikacin. This synergy could lead to an 8-fold reduction in the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), suggesting that integrated treatments combining this phage with the aforementioned antibiotics may substantially enhance drug effectiveness. This approach not only extends the clinical utility of these antibiotics but also presents a strategic advance in combating antibiotic resistance. Specifically, it underscores the potential of phage-antibiotic combinations as a powerful tool in the treatment of infections caused by CRKP, offering a promising avenue to mitigate the public health challenges of antibiotic-resistant pathogens.

1. Introduction

Klebsiella pneumoniae (K. pneumonia), a common gram-negative bacterium belonging to the family Enterobacteriaceae, is a major human multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogen. It is considered one of the most common causes of community-acquired infections, such as urinary tract infections (UTIs), pneumonia, bloodstream infections, liver abscesses, wound infections, and sepsis (Bengoechea and Sa Pessoa, 2019; Feng et al., 2023). K. pneumoniae can cause serious infections of the urinary tract, lungs, abdominal cavity, intravascular devices, surgical sites, and soft tissues (Shon et al., 2013).

Carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae (CRKP) originated from the widespread use of carbapenem antibiotics (Yigit et al., 2001). CRKP has been listed as a “critical” priority pathogen by the World Health Organization and poses a great threat to human health (Tacconelli et al., 2018). It has spread globally and poses a significant threat because of the very limited therapeutic options against it (McKenna, 2013). Therefore, researchers have focused on developing novel antimicrobial agents. Recently, phage therapy was identified as an alternative approach for treating infections caused by antimicrobial-resistant bacteria, including CRKP (Chang et al., 2022).

Phages have been used to treat lung infections in patients with transplants, as well as bone and joint infections caused by MDR pathogens (Van Nieuwenhuyse et al., 2022; Ferry et al., 2022). Successful cases using phages to treat patients with CRKP infections have been reported worldwide in the last few years; therefore, phages have the potential to solve the issues faced in the post-antibiotic era (Nir-Paz and Kuijper, 2023). Bacteriophages are viruses that can effectively infect and lyse bacteria (Van Nieuwenhuyse et al., 2022). However, the current phage databases are still limited (Parmar et al., 2017). Identifying and studying new phages could enrich phage databases and provide biological options for the treatment of MDR bacterial infections.

Here, we isolated a novel lytic phage, vB_KpnP_23, from hospital sewage using the CRKP clinical strain JNKPN23 as the host bacterium and explored its potential suitability for use as a biocontrol agent against CRKP infections.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Bacterial strains

The CRKP clinical strain, JNKPN23, was used for phage isolation. To examine the lysis spectrum of this phage, 57 CRKP strains isolated from various clinical sources were used.

2.2. Phage isolation

Wastewater samples were collected from Shandong Province Hospital using capsular type K64 K. pneumoniae JNKPN23 as the host strain. Host bacteriophages were isolated using a double-layer agar (DLA) technique. To prepare the samples, 100 mL of wastewater was added to 0.6 g CaCl2 for 10 min, followed by centrifugation at 12,000 × g for 10 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was filtered through a 0.22 μm filter to remove bacterial debris. Then, 400 μL of host culture at the logarithmic phase and 20 mL of LB broth were added to 20 mL of filtered sewage supernatants. The co-culture was incubated at 160 rpm and 37 °C for 4 h and then centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 5 min at 4 °C. Then, the supernatants were filtered through 0.22 µm filters. The filtered supernatant (100 µL) was mixed with 900 µL of a K. pneumoniae JNKPN23 culture at the logarithmic phase (10-fold dilution) and incubated at 37 °C for 10 min. The mixture was then added to 9 mL of top agar (0.7 %) and poured onto a 1.5 % LB agar plate. After overnight incubation at 37 °C, the phage plaques were formed. A single plaque was picked and soaked in SM buffer. The DLA method was repeated at least three times until the purified phage was obtained, which was stored at 4 °C.

2.3. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM)

Phage particles (1 × 109 PFU/ml) were dropped onto carbon-coated copper grids for 10 min and then stained with a drop of 2.0 % phosphotungstic acid. The morphology of vB_KpnP_23 was visualised using a transmission electron microscope (JEM-1200EX, JEOL, Japan) at an acceleration voltage of 80 kV.

2.4. Expression and purification of the phage depolymerase

TFP (Dep_46), a putative phage depolymerase, was amplified from the purified phage vB_KpnP_23 by PCR using the primers TFP_E_F (5′- CCGGAATTC ATGGACCAAGATACTAAAACAATCAT −3′) and TFP_H_R (5′- CCCAAGCTTTTATGCGTTCAGGTACACCC −3′). The PCR fragment was excised with EcoRI and HindⅢ and inserted into the pET-28a expression vector. The constructed plasmid was used to transform E. coli BL21 cells. The TFP protein was expressed under 0.1 mM isopropyl β-d-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) induction at 16 °C overnight. Cells were pelleted and suspended in lysis buffer (50 mM Tris–HCl [pH 8.0], 300 mM NaCl) and disrupted by three freeze-thaw cycles and sonication (8 to 10 cycles with 30-s pulses and 30-s pauses). The protein was purified from the soluble fraction using a Ni-NTA column according to the manufacturer's instructions, and then analyzed using sodium dodecyl sulphate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE).

2.5. Phage and depolymerase activity spectrum

To assess the host range of activity of vB_KpnP_23 and its recombinant depolymerase, Dep_46, spot assays were conducted using 57 different K. pneumoniae strains characterized by various sequence types (STs). The bacteria were grown to the logarithmic phase, and then 100 μL of this culture was combined with 9 mL of 0.7 % top agar and spread on a solid medium base. This setup created a double-layered agar plate within minutes. Subsequently, 10 μL of either the phage vB_KpnP_23 at a concentration of 108 PFU/mL or the purified enzyme at 1 μM was applied to the top agar layer. These plates were then incubated overnight at 37 °C. The next day, the formation of clear or opaque zones on the bacterial layer indicated the antibacterial effects of the phage and the enzyme, respectively.

2.6. Determination of the optimal multiplicity of infection (MOI)

The MOI is the number of bacteriophages and host bacteria at the time of infection. At the optimal MOI, the phage produces the highest number of progeny phages. The optimal plural infection for the phages and host bacteria was determined as previously described (Li et al., 2022). Briefly, the host bacterial strain JNKPN23 was grown to logarithmic phase, and the colony number was adjusted to approximately 108 CFU/mL. Then, the vB_KpnP_23 and host solutions were mixed (100 μL each) and incubated at 37 °C for 10 min at different MOIs (0, 0.01, 0.1, 1, 10, 100), added to 5 mL LB liquid medium, incubated at 160 rpm for 4 h, and centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 10 min.

The supernatant was filtered through a 0.22 μm filter membrane. The MOI resulting in the highest titre was considered the optimal MOI, and each independent experiment was repeated three times.

2.7. Phage adsorption and one-step growth

The one-step growth curve was determined as follows: bacterial and phage solutions were mixed at the optimal MOI of 0.1, cultured at 37 °C for 10 min, and then centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 5 min to remove the unabsorbed phage in the supernatant. The precipitate was then resuspended in LB broth three times. The washed mixture was placed in 20 mL of LB broth at 37 °C, and a 1 mL samples was taken and filtered, which was labelled as 0 min. The remaining mixture was incubated at 37 °C and 160 rpm in a shaker. Samples were taken at 10 min intervals within 110 min and then centrifuged to obtain the supernatant. The supernatant was filtered through a 0.22 μm filter and the phage titres were measured using the DLA method. Each independent experiment was repeated thrice.

2.8. Effects of pH and temperature on activity

To test the effects of different temperatures and pH values on the activity of phage vB_KpnP_23, we exposed the phage to different pH and temperature values. 1) Effect of temperature on phage stability: 1 mL samples of the prepared phage solution in 1.5 mL EP tubes were placed in a water bath at different temperatures (37 °C, 50 °C, 60 °C, and 70 °C) and in a 4 °C refrigerator or at −20 °C or −80 °C. After temperature stabilisation for 1 h, the titre was determined by the DLA method. To determine the pH stability, a 109 PFU/mL phage solution was prepared and 100 μL of the solution was added to 900 μL LB of different pH (2–13). The mixture was placed in a 37 °C water bath for 1 h, with phage titre of each pH group on the side. Each independent experiment was repeated thrice.

2.9. Phage genomic DNA extraction, sequencing, and analysis

We extracted the genome of the isolated phage using the QIAamp1 DNA Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Germany). The phage genome was sequenced using an Illumina HiSeq 2500 platform (Berry Genomics Corp., China). Clean reads were de novo assembled using MetaviralSPAdes. One contig identified as complete viral genome by the Viralverify v1.1 and Viralcomplete underwent a BLASTn search against the Pfam-A database v35.0 (Antipov et al., 2020). To identify putative transfer RNA (tRNA) genes, tRNA scan-SE 2.0 was used (Chan et al., 2021). Sequence annotation of the resulting open reading frames was performed using RAST (https://rast.nmpdr.org), and Blastp was used to identify putative homologies with predicted phage proteins. The virulence factor and drug resistance genes of the phage were analysed using the Abricate v1.0.0 software (https://github.com/tseemann/abricate) in the virulence factor database (VFDB v2024) and comprehensive antibiotic resistance database (CARD v2023), respectively. CGView was used to construct a circular genome map (Grant and Stothard, 2008). The physicochemical properties of the endolysin, holin, and Rz-like lysis proteins from phage vB_KpnP_23 were assessed through ProtParam (Gasteiger et al., 2005). Additionally, the transmembrane domains and signal peptides of these proteins were predicted using THMMM-2.0 (Möller et al., 2001) and SignalP-6.0 (Teufel et al., 2022), respectively. The protein sequence of Dep_46 was analyzed using PHYRE2 (Kelley et al., 2015).

Phage sequences from the NCBI database were analyzed to explore evolutionary connections with phage vB_KpnP_23. Species identity was confirmed by calculating the shared average nucleotide identity (ANI) between genomes using FastANI v1.34 (Jain et al., 2018). Phylogenetic trees for tail fibre proteins were generated using MEGA 11 (Tamura et al., 2021). Additionally, genome analysis identified orthologous gene groups with OrthoFinder (Emms and Kelly, 2019). A maximum likelihood tree, supported by 1000 bootstrap replicates, was constructed using RAxML-NG (Kozlov et al., 2019). Phage genomes were classified using Centrifuge (Kim et al., 2016) and taxonomically visualized with the Pavian (Breitwieser and Salzberg, 2020).

2.10. Phage-antibiotic synergy assay

By calculating the fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI), the synergistic effect between the isolated phage and the three antibiotics commonly used for K. pneumonia infection (meropenem, amikacin, and levofloxacin) was determined using the chequerboard microdilution method. The method is as follows: vB_KpnP_23 and the antibiotic were serially diluted (1:10 and 1:2, respectively) in a 96-well plate, and the bacterial suspension (105 CFU/mL) was added to each well. The plate was incubated at 37 °C for 16–18 h, after which the MIC was determined by measuring the OD600.The FICI was calculated using the following equations: FICI = Cantibiotic/MICantibiotic + Cphage/MICphage. Where MICantibiotics and MICphages are the MICs of the antibiotic and phage alone, respectively. The Cantibiotic and Cphage are the respective concentrations of the antibiotic and phage in combination. A FICI ≤ 0.5 indicates a synergistic effect; 0.5 ˂ FICI ≤ 1 indicates an additive effect; 1 ˂ FICI ≤ 2 indicates no effect; FICI > 2 indicates an antagonistic effect.

3. Results

3.1. Isolation and characterization of the phage

Phage vB_KpnP_23 was isolated from hospital wastewater using K. pneumonia JNKPN23 as the host. This phage produced large, clear plaques (5.0–6.0 mm in diameter) surrounded by halos (Fig. 1A). TEM was used to observe phage morphology and showed that it possessed an icosahedral head of 50–60 nm in diameter and a short tail (Fig. 1B).

Fig. 1.

Fig 1

Morphology of phage vB_KpnP_23.

(A) Phage vB_KpnP_23 plaques. (B) Transmission electron micrograph of phage vB_KpnP_23.

3.2. Activity spectrum of phage vB_KpnP_23 and depolymerase Dep_46

57 CRKP isolates (Hao et al., 2021) were used to determine the depolymerase ability of the expressed depolymerase Dep_46, and the lytic spectrum of phage vB_KpnP_23 was testified simultaneously. Phage vB_KpnP_23 formed clear plaques on 40 strains, specifically those with capsular types K2, K17, K47, K52, K54, K64, K107, K116, and K149, demonstrating a relatively broad lytic range. Notably, phage vB_KpnP_23 lysed all ST11-K64 CRKP strains among the 57 K. pneumoniae strains. Additionally, 38 strains were sensitive to Dep_46. The depolymerase activity spectrum of Dep_46 differed from that of phage vB_KpnP_23 but appeared to be broader, covering 13 capsular types, including additional capsular types K10, K15, K21, and K28 compared to the phage. For the ST11-K64 strains, the results were consistent with those observed for the phage (Table 1).

Table 1.

Activity spectrum of phage vB_KpnP_23 and depolymerase Dep_46.

Strain ST K-type Phage Dep_46
JNKPN01 ST11 K64 + +
JNKPN02 ST11 K64 + +
JNKPN03 ST11 K64 + +
JNKPN04 ST11 K47
JNKPN05 ST11 K64 + +
JNKPN06 ST528 K27
JNKPN07 ST133 K116 + +
JNKPN08 ST11 K64 + +
JNKPN09 ST258 K107 + +
JNKPN10 ST3924 K25
JNKPN11 ST11 K64 + +
JNKPN12 ST2246–2LV K52 + +
JNKPN13 ST11 K64 + +
JNKPN14 ST392 K64
JNKPN15 ST11 K64 + +
JNKPN16 ST323 K21 +
JNKPN17 ST15 K19
JNKPN18 ST11 K64 + +
JNKPN19 ST11 K47 + +
JNKPN21 ST25 K2 + +
JNKPN22 ST11 K47 + +
JNKPN23 ST11 K64 + +
JNKPN24 ST11 K64 + +
JNKPN26 ST11 K64 + +
JNKPN27 ST24 K25
JNKPN28 ST11 K64 + +
JNKPN29 ST11 K64 + +
JNKPN30 ST11 K64 + +
JNKPN31 ST11 K64 + +
JNKPN32 ST15 K112 ±
JNKPN33 ST11 K47 + +
JNKPN34 ST11 K64 + +
JNKPN35 ST101 K17 + +
JNKPN36 ST11 K64 + +
JNKPN37 ST11 K64 + +
JNKPN38 ST11 K64 + +
JNKPN40 ST29 K54 + +
JNKPN41 ST11 K47 + +
JNKPN42 ST1537 K24 ± +
JNKPN43 ST11 K47
JNKPN44 ST11 K64 + +
JNKPN45 ST485 K28 +
JNKPN46 ST1031–1LV K10 +
JNKPN47 ST101 K17 + +
JNKPN48 ST11 K19
JNKPN49 ST11 K64 + +
JNKPN50 ST37 K15 +
JNKPN51 ST24 K25
JNKPN52 ST11 K47
JNKPN54 ST11 K47 + +
JNKPN55 ST11 K47 + +
JNKPN56 ST37 K81
JNKPN57 ST11 K47 + +
JNKPN58 ST11 K64 + +
JNKPN59 ST152 K149 + +
JNKPN60 ST11 K47 + +
JNKPN61 ST11 K64 + +

+, clear lytic spots; -, no lytic spots; ±, ambiguous lytic spots; NA, not available.

3.3. Optimal MOI and one–step growth curve

The highest titre of phage vB_KpnP_23 was obtained under the MOI of 0.1 (Fig. 2A), indicating that 0.1 was the optimal MOI for the growth of vB_KpnP_23.

Fig. 2.

Fig 2

Biological characteristics of phage vB_KpnP_23. (A) Optimal MOI of phage vB_KpnP_23; (B) One-step growth curve of phage vB_KpnP_23; (C) Titres at different temperatures and (D) pH values. The data represent the mean ± SD (n = 3).

One-step growth curve experiments were used to characterise the lytic capability of phage vB_KpnP_23 at an MOI of 0.1. Phage vB_KpnP_23 had a latent period of approximately 10 min and a rising phase of approximately 90 min. This suggested that is vB_KpnP_23 an efficient lytic phage (Fig. 2B).

3.4. Stability of phage vB_KpnP_23

To investigate the stability of phage vB_KpnP_23 under different environmental conditions, we assessed its survival rate at various temperatures and pH values. The results showed that the titre of phage vB_KpnP_23 was considerably stable at temperatures ranging between −80 °C and 50 °C. However, the activity of phage vB_KpnP_23 slowly declined from 50 °C to 60 °C, while nearly no phages survived when incubated at 70 °C (Fig. 2C). In the pH stability test, the titre of phage vB_KpnP_23 remained relatively unchanged from pH 4.0 to pH 11.0, and the phage was completely inactivated at pH = 3.0 and pH = 12.0 (Fig. 2D). These results indicate that vB_KpnP_23 has strong adaptability to the environment.

3.5. Genomic features of the vB_KpnP_23 genome

The vB_KpnP_23 genome was characterised as a 40,987-base pair (bp) double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) structure with a G + C content of 51 %. The genome has been annotated and submitted to the GenBank database and is accessible under the specified accession number (Accession no PP542034.1). Subsequent online BLASTn analysis of the vB_KpnP_23 sequence in GenBank revealed pronounced similarity to the genome of the Klebsiella phage vB_KpnP_cmc356ctg1 (Accession No OR105945.1) sourced from sewage in Sichuan, China. The comparison yielded an 87 % query coverage and 95 % nucleotide identity.

Genomic examination revealed 51 open reading frames (ORFs), but no tRNA sequences were identified. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) analysis facilitated the functional annotation of 37 ORFs, designating the remainder as proteins of unknown function. Further functional analysis revealed a modular genomic architecture, including modules for structural proteins (13 ORFs); DNA packaging (3 ORFs); DNA metabolism, repair, and replication (20 ORFs); and lysis system comprising endolysin (ORF_18), holin (ORF_47) and Rz lysis protein (ORF_49), which are essential for phage release from host cells (Fig. 3, Table 2).

Fig. 3.

Fig 3

Circular genome annotation of phage vB_KpnP_23. Arrows in various colors represent predicted CDSs encoding products of different functions.

Table 2.

Annotation and features of predicted ORFs in the vB_KpnP_23 genome.

ORF Description Scientific Name Coverage E-value Identity Accession
ORF_1 hypothetical protein HOS61_gp01 Klebsiella phage SH-Kp 152,410 100 8.00E-37 98.41 YP_009796975.1
ORF_2 hypothetical protein HOS61_gp02 Klebsiella phage SH-Kp 152,410 79 7.00E-19 100 YP_009796976.1
ORF_3 hypothetical protein Klebsiella pneumoniae 100 8.00E-68 92.11 WP_221,690,650.1
ORF_4 hypothetical protein Staphylococcus epidermidis 100 4.00E-36 93.33 WP_227,954,138.1
ORF_5 hypothetical protein HOV32_gp04 Klebsiella phage Pharr 100 2.00E-38 100 YP_009821341.1
ORF_6 serine-threonine kinase Klebsiella phage kpssk3 100 0 93.26 YP_009816994.1
ORF_7 DNA-directed RNA polymerase Klebsiella pneumoniae 100 0 98.79 WP_221,690,647.1
ORF_8 hypothetical protein HOU69_gp07 Klebsiella phage kpssk3 100 8.00E-34 100 YP_009816997.1
ORF_9 dGTPase inhibitor Klebsiella phage K5–2 100 2.00E-50 94.12 YP_009788565.1
ORF_10 DNA ligase Klebsiella phage SH-Kp 152,410 100 0 92.88 YP_009796982.1
ORF_11 hypothetical protein HOS61_gp09 Klebsiella phage SH-Kp 152,410 100 4.00E-21 100 YP_009796983.1
ORF_12 hypothetical protein HOT25_gp09 Klebsiella phage KP32_isolate 196 97 2.00E-55 98.85 YP_009801446.1
ORF_13 nucleotide kinase Klebsiella phage KP32_isolate 196 98 5.00E-69 80.65 YP_009801447.1
ORF_14 RNA polymerase inhibitor Klebsiella phage KP32_isolate 192 100 1.00E-26 100 YP_009801318.1
ORF_15 Gp2.5-like ssDNA binding protein and ssDNA annealing protein Klebsiella phage KP32_isolate 195 100 1.00E-166 99.57 YP_009801403.1
ORF_16 endonuclease Klebsiella phage KP32_isolate 195 89 7.00E-92 99.24 YP_009801404.1
ORF_17 endonuclease I Enterobacteriaceae 100 5.00E-105 100 WP_016024414.1
ORF_18 amidase(endolysin) Klebsiella phage KP32_isolate 192 100 2.00E-109 99.34 YP_009801321.1
ORF_19 hypothetical protein HOR22_gp19 Klebsiella phage vB_KpnP_KpV763 100 4.00E-13 92.11 YP_009786762.1
ORF_20 hypothetical protein HOU69_gp16 Klebsiella phage kpssk3 100 3.00E-16 89.74 YP_009817006.1
ORF_21 HNH endonuclease Klebsiella phage SH-Kp 152,234 100 6.00E-83 99.17 YP_009966349.1
ORF_22 DNA primase/helicase Klebsiella phage K11 100 0 99.8 YP_002003807.1
ORF_23 hypothetical protein HOT34_gp22 Klebsiella phage SH-Kp 152,234 100 1.00E-35 97.1 YP_009966351.1
ORF_24 hypothetical protein HOR22_gp23 Klebsiella phage vB_KpnP_KpV763 100 2.00E-66 98.06 YP_009786766.1
ORF_25 DNA polymerase I Klebsiella phage K5–2 100 0 97.88 YP_009788578.1
ORF_26 HNH endonuclease Escherichia phage LL2 100 2.00E-59 86 YP_009812337.1
ORF_27 Gp5.5-like host HNS inhibition Klebsiella phage K5–4 100 1.00E-58 93.68 YP_009788619.1
ORF_28 HNS binding protein Klebsiella phage vB_Kp1 100 7.00E-43 100 YP_009190979.1
ORF_29 hypothetical protein HOT68_gp27 Klebsiella phage vB_KpnP_IME321 100 1.00E-34 98.28 YP_009806235.1
ORF_30 exonuclease Staphylococcus epidermidis 100 0 99.34 WP_016024424.1
ORF_31 gp6.3 Klebsiella phage K11 100 4.00E-14 97.22 YP_002003817.1
ORF_32 DUF2717 domain-containing protein Bacteria 100 3.00E-52 98.77 WP_015991469.1
ORF_33 DUF5476 domain-containing protein Klebsiella phage kpssk3 100 8.00E-42 97.26 YP_009817016.1
ORF_34 host range and adsorption protein Klebsiella phage kpssk3 100 2.00E-49 97.67 YP_009817017.1
ORF_35 portal protein Klebsiella pneumoniae 100 0 99.44 WP_221,690,629.1
ORF_36 head assembly Klebsiella phage kpssk3 100 0 99.68 YP_009817019.1
ORF_37 major head protein Klebsiella phage K5–2 100 0 99.13 YP_009788587.1
ORF_38 hypothetical protein Staphylococcus epidermidis 100 2.00E-120 100 WP_227,954,113.1
ORF_39 endonuclease VII Klebsiella phage KP32_isolate 195 100 1.00E-91 97.74 YP_009801425.1
ORF_40 tail protein Klebsiella phage KP32_isolate 196 100 0 99.49 YP_009801467.1
ORF_41 internal virion protein Klebsiella phage SH-Kp 152,410 100 5.00E-97 98.54 YP_009797011.1
ORF_42 endonuclease VII Salmonella phage vB_STy-RN5i1 100 3.00E-83 96.09 YP_010678535.1
ORF_43 internal virion protein Klebsiella phage kpssk3 100 9.00E-139 99.49 YP_009817025.1
ORF_44 internal virion protein Klebsiella phage K11 100 0 98.27 YP_002003828.1
ORF_45 internal virion protein with endolysin domain Klebsiella phage vB_Kp1 100 0 98.18 YP_009190994.1
ORF_46 tail fiber protein Klebsiella phage SH-Kp 152,410 100 0 98.33 YP_009797016.1
ORF_47 type II holin Escherichia coli 100 1.00E-40 100 WP_236,266,382.1
ORF_48 terminase small subunit Klebsiella phage vB_KpnP_KpV767 100 6.00E-53 97.65 YP_009786841.1
ORF_49 lysis system i-spanin subunit Rz Klebsiella pneumoniae 100 1.00E-102 98.65 WP_221,690,619.1
ORF_50 terminase large subunit Klebsiella phage SH-Kp 152,410 100 0 99.49 YP_009797020.1
ORF_51 HNH endonuclease Klebsiella phage SH-Kp 152,410 100 4.00E-101 96.53 YP_009797021.1

3.6. Functional analysis of phage lysis system proteins

The physicochemical properties of the lysis-associated proteins of phage vB_KpnP_23 have been characterized. Endolysin, encompassing 151 amino acids, exhibits a molecular weight of 16.9 kDa and a theoretical isoelectric point (pI) of 8.47. Despite its hydrophilic attributes, it is identified as an unstable protein. In contrast, the holin protein, composed of 69 amino acids with a molecular weight of 7.5 kDa and a pI of 6.05, is recognized as a stable protein with hydrophobic qualities. The Rz lysis protein, comprising 148 amino acids with a molecular weight of 16.4 kDa and a pI of 9.35, is also classified as a stable hydrophilic protein. Analysis reveals that endolysin lacks transmembrane domains and resides outside the membrane. Holin features two transmembrane domains, with amino acids 1–13 and 56–69 located within the membrane, and amino acids 27–36 positioned outside in the transmembrane area. The Rz lysis protein includes a transmembrane domain, where amino acids 1–7 are membrane-internal, and amino acids 23–148 are external to the membrane in the transmembrane region. Notably, endolysin, holin, and the Rz-like lysis protein all lack signal peptides, indicating they are not secretory proteins.

3.7. Evolutionary analysis of phage vB_KpnP_23

We identified 39 TFP sequences with 99 % coverage and 96 % identity from a variety of phages, all homologous to the TFP (Dep_46) of phage vB_KpnP_23 and classified them within the order Caudovirales and family Autographiviridae. This identification underscores the evolutionary conservation across these phages (Fig. 4A). Phylogenetic analysis identified the TFP of phage vB_KpnP_23 and the depolymerase P510dep from phage P510 on the same cluster, revealing their close evolutionary relationships. Comparative protein sequence alignment between P510dep and Dep_46 revealed 18 amino acid differences. Phyre2 analysis specified that the Bacteriophage T7 tail fiber protein-like N-terminal domain (residues 2–152, identity: 45 %) shows 2 amino acid differences; α−1,3-galactosidase B (residues 178–761, identity: 17 %), which exhibits hydrolase activity on glycosyl bonds, has 7 amino acid substitutions; and β−1–3-glucanase (residues 273–646, identity: 22 %), which demonstrates polygalacturonase activity and belongs to the Pectate lyase superfamily, contains 6 amino acid variations. This phylogenetic proximity suggests that the Dep_46 of vB_KpnP_23 may share a functionally analogous role with the depolymerase P510dep (Li et al., 2021). This finding not only highlights the evolutionary conservation of these proteins, but also suggests a potential similarity in their functional roles, pointing towards a conserved evolutionary strategy among these phages.

Fig. 4.

Fig 4

Phylogenetic Relationships and Taxonomic Classification. (A) Phylogenetic trees generated through the neighbor-joining method, incorporating 1000 bootstrap replicates, based on the sequence of the tail fiber protein (ORF_46). (B) A Sankey diagram illustrates the classification and abundance of Klebsiella phage vB_KpnP_23 and 258 related viral genomes across multiple taxonomic levels: domain, order, family, genus, and species. (C) A detailed phylogenetic tree showcasing the evolutionary relationships among Klebsiella phage vB_KpnP_23 and its related viral genomes. The enlarged zoom shows the cluster where the bacteriophage vB_KpnP_23 is located, with the red branches representing vB_KpnP_23.

From the NCBI Standard Nucleotide database (until Mar.2024), 258 whole genome sequences of phages related to phage vB_KpnP_23 were retrieved, each displaying over 70 % identity and 45 % coverage. Detailed taxonomic analyses of these phages were conducted, and their relationships were visualized using a Sankey diagram (Fig. 4B). Phage vB_KpnP_23 belongs to the order Caudovirales, family Autographiviridae, genus Przondovirus, and is a member of the species Klebsiella phage Kp1. Genome phylogenetic analysis and Average Nucleotide Identity (ANI) analysis reveal that phage vB_KpnP_23 constitutes a new species within the genus Klebsiella phage Kp1, evidenced by its ANI of less than 95 % relative to any other phage in the genus. The phylogenetic analysis further supports the assertion that phage vB_KpnP_23 forms a distinct clade, indicative of it representing a novel variant within the Klebsiella phages (Fig. 4C).

3.8. vB_KpnP_23 exhibits a synergistic effect with commonly used antibiotics

The checkerboard analysis results indicated that when meropenem, amikacin, and levofloxacin were used in combination with bacteriophage vB_KpnP_23, the FICI values were respectively recorded as 0.125, >0.5, and 0.5. FICI values below 0.5 signify a synergistic interaction. The MIC of these antibiotics were significantly reduced from 128, >2048, and 256 µg/mL to 16, 1024, and 128 µg/mL, respectively (Fig. 5). This combination of phages and antibiotics resulted in a multiple-fold decrease in MIC values, significantly more than the reduction achieved with the use of phages or antibiotics alone. The synergistic effect is optimized by adjusting the MOI one order of magnitude above or below the ideal MOI. These findings suggest that the combined application of phage vB_KpnP_23 with antibiotics could effectively manage CRKP infections.

Fig. 5.

Fig 5

Checkerboard analysis of antibiotics and phage vB_KpnP_23. Antibiotic concentrations at the abscissa ranging from 0.5 to 512 μg/mL and phage concentrations at the ordinate (103 - 109 PFU/mL). The growth inhibition is represented as a heatmap: (A) Levofloxacin; (B) Amikacin; (C) Meropenem.

4. Discussion

CRKP is a serious nosocomial pathogen and the most frequently isolated species causing a variety of illnesses, especially in those hospitalised in intensive care units and immunocompromised patients, owing to the increased prevalence of resistant strains (Karampatakis et al., 2023; Yang et al., 2022). The misuse of these drugs and lack of access to newer drugs have led to a crisis in the spread of antimicrobial resistance; therefore, new approaches need to be considered for developing potential therapeutic or preventive drugs (Aslam et al., 2018). Phage therapy, an effective and safe treatment, has received significant interest as an alternative to antibiotics in the post-antibiotic era, and has received attention from patients with few or no alternative therapies (Pires et al., 2015; Aranaga et al., 2022). However, the clinical application of phage therapy requires thorough characterization and genomic analysis of phages to ensure their safety for therapeutic use.

Here, we isolated a novel lytic phage, vB_KpnP_23, from hospital sewage. Phage vB_KpnP_23 exhibited a strong lytic potential against the CRKP isolates tested. For phage therapy to be effective, there should be a relatively wide host range (Hyman, 2019). Phage vB_KpnP_23 lysed 38 out of 57 K. pneumoniae strains and nine capsule types (K-types). This indicates that vB_KpnP_23 has a relatively wide host range, suggesting its high potential for use in clinical settings to treat infections caused by CRKP.

The efficacy of phages as biological control agents and their use in therapeutic, storage, and production applications is significantly influenced by their tolerance to environmental conditions such as pH and temperature (Jończyk-Matysiak et al., 2019). Notably, phage vB_KpnP_23 achieves complete adsorption within 10 min. When the MOI was 0.1, the titre of vB_KpnP_23 reached its maximum value. Phage vB_KpnP_23 stands out with its extraordinary adaptability to a broader pH range (4–11) and exceptional thermal resilience, underscoring its robustness under various environmental conditions. Given these characteristics, phage vB_KpnP_23 emerges as a viable antimicrobial agent, showing great promise for use in biocontrol and phage therapy endeavors.

To ensure that phages can be safely used for in vivo therapeutic applications, it is critical to confirm that their genomes are free of lysogeny-, antibiotic resistance-, and virus-associated genes (Ling et al., 2022). This precaution is vital for the therapeutic application of phages. Analysis of the vB_KpnP_23 genome revealed that the phage is devoid of genes coding for virulence, resistance and lysogenicity, thus establishing its safety for such applications. The potential of phage therapy largely depends on the functionality of the phage-derived enzymes, including depolymerases and endolysins, which are known to effectively prevent and control biofilm formation (Chan and Abedon, 2015). The endolysin produced by vB_KpnP_23 is an unstable, hydrophilic protein without a transmembrane domain or signal peptide, indicating that the vB_KpnP_23 lyase does not function as a secreted protein and lacks the capability to autonomously traverse the inner cell membrane to access the cell wall. Lytic bacteriophages release endolysins, enzymes adept at degrading the peptidoglycan layers within the cell walls of their bacterial hosts, resulting in bacterial suppression or lethality (Schmelcher et al., 2012). This process is particularly effective against gram-positive bacteria due to the absence of an outer membrane, which, in gram-negative bacteria, serves as a barrier to endolysin efficacy, thereby limiting their action (Abdelrahman et al., 2021). To overcome this issue, endolysins have been engineered. Artilysin stands out as a notable engineered endolysin that exemplifies this breakthrough (Briers et al., 2014).

In contrast to the use of endolysin for targeting infections by gram-positive bacteria, phage-encoded depolymerases, which disintegrate bacterial capsular polysaccharides, are deployed against gram-negative bacteria like Klebsiella pneumoniae. For these bacteria, the capsule, integral to the outer membrane, acts as a significant virulence factor. Intriguingly, the severity of infection outcomes is correlated with the K-type of Klebsiella pneumoniae (Fang et al., 2004). Phage infection begins with the adsorption and recognition of specific ligands on the host surface by tail fiber proteins or tail spike proteins (TSPs). TFP with depolymerase activity recognize, bind, and digest the polysaccharide compounds of the bacterial cell wall, exposing phage receptors, which is crucial for effective phage infection of the host (Knecht et al., 2020). The depolymerase activity spectrum results show that Dep_46 is active against 13 K-types, contributing to the broad host range of the phage.

Comparative analysis revealed a high degree of similarity between the Dep_46 of phage vB_KpnP_23 and P510dep of phage P510, although there were amino acid differences. Despite this similarity, Dep_46 exhibited a broader activity spectrum, indicating its potential for wider application in targeting diverse bacterial strains. This suggests an enhanced therapeutic scope of phages against a variety of pathogens. The specific amino acid(s) responsible for this difference remain unknown and will be investigated in future experiments.

The combination of phages and conventional antibiotics can produce synergistic antibacterial effects, and the application of phage-antibiotic combination therapy has been increasingly explored in the preclinical phage therapy literature (Tagliaferri et al., 2019, Torres‐Barceló et al., 2016). Meropenem, Amikacin, and Levofloxacin, as antibiotics from different classes, inhibit bacterial growth and reproduction through distinct mechanisms. Our study shows that vB_KpnP_23 has a synergistic effect on CRKP infection in combination with antibiotics. The significant reduction in MIC values for meropenem, when used in conjunction with phage vB_KpnP_23, suggests that the phage's role extends beyond a mere adjunct to antibiotics; it may actively reshape the bacterial susceptibility landscape. Studies have shown that the synergism between phages and antibiotics varies broadly and could differ between the antibiotics and phages used (Comeau et al., 2007). For instance, a study by Elshamy, Ann, et al., showed that meropenem antibiotics indifferently act in combination with CRAB phages (Elshamy et al., 2023). This variability points towards the need for personalized medicine approaches in infectious disease treatment, where phage-antibiotic combinations are tailored based on the specific pathogen and its resistance profile. Furthermore, the finding that adjusting the MOI can optimize the synergistic effect highlights the importance of dosage strategy in phage therapy, suggesting that careful consideration of phage to bacterial cell ratios could further enhance the efficacy of combined treatments. The promising results of combining bacteriophages with antibiotics against CRKP infections open the door to a new frontier in antimicrobial therapy. This approach could lead to the development of more effective treatments for a range of resistant infections, ultimately reducing the global burden of antibiotic resistance.

5. Conclusion

We isolated and characterized vB_KpnP_23, a novel lytic phage against CRKP. Bacteriophage vB_KpnP_23 shows great environmental stability with effective antibacterial activity. Genomic analysis revealed that vB_KpnP_23 does not contain resistance-, toxin-, or virulence-related genes. These characteristics make vB_KpnP_23 an interesting candidate biocontrol agent against CRKP infections. Future studies could explore the potential of integrating vB_KpnP_23 into a multifaceted approach to combat CRKP infections, especially in clinical settings where antibiotic resistance is a significant challenge. Investigating the interaction mechanisms between vB_KpnP_23 and CRKP could provide deeper insights into phage-host dynamics and optimize phage therapy strategies. Additionally, long-term safety and efficacy trials of vB_KpnP_23 in vivo could pave the way for its application as a sustainable alternative to traditional antibiotics.

Funding

This study was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81902119) and Shandong Province Natural Science Foundation (ZR2021MH214).

Ethical approval

Not require.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Qian Wang: Writing – review & editing, Visualization, Software, Methodology. Ran Chen: Writing – original draft, Project administration, Methodology, Data curation. Hui Liu: Methodology, Investigation. Yue Liu: Validation. Jinmei Li: Methodology. Yueling Wang: Resources. Yan Jin: Funding acquisition. Yuanyuan Bai: Investigation. Zhen Song: Formal analysis. Xinglun Lu: Formal analysis. Changyin Wang: Supervision, Resources, Project administration, Conceptualization. Yingying Hao: Funding acquisition, Conceptualization.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Contributor Information

Changyin Wang, Email: 13869104858@163.com.

Yingying Hao, Email: haoyingying@sdfmu.edu.cn.

Data availability

  • The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article.

References

  1. Abdelrahman F., Easwaran M., Daramola O.I., Ragab S., Lynch S., Oduselu T.J., et al. Phage-encoded endolysins. Antibiotics. 2021;10(2):124. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10020124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Antipov D., Raiko M., Lapidus A., Pevzner P.A. Metaviral SPAdes: assembly of viruses from metagenomic data. Bioinformatics. 2020;36(14):4126–4129. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Aranaga C., Pantoja L.D., Martínez E.A., Falco A. Phage therapy in the era of multidrug resistance in bacteria: a systematic review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022;23:9. doi: 10.3390/ijms23094577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Aslam B., Wang W., Arshad M.I., Khurshid M., Muzammil S., Rasool M.H., et al. Antibiotic resistance: a rundown of a global crisis. Infect. Drug Resist. 2018;11:1645–1658. doi: 10.2147/idr.S173867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bengoechea J.A., Sa Pessoa J. Klebsiella pneumoniae infection biology: living to counteract host defences. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2019;43(2):123–144. doi: 10.1093/femsre/fuy043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Breitwieser F.P., Salzberg S.L. Pavian: interactive analysis of metagenomics data for microbiome studies and pathogen identification. Bioinformatics. 2020;36(4):1303–1304. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Briers Y., Walmagh M., Grymonprez B., Biebl M., Pirnay J.-P., Defraine V., et al. Art-175 is a highly efficient antibacterial against multidrug-resistant strains and Persisters of pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2014;58(7):3774–3784. doi: 10.1128/aac.02668-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chan P.P., Lin B.Y., Mak A.J., Lowe T.M. tRNAscan-SE 2.0: improved detection and functional classification of transfer RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49(16):9077–9096. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab688. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chang R.Y.K., Nang S.C., Chan H.K., Li J. Novel antimicrobial agents for combating antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2022;187 doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2022.114378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Comeau A.M., Tétart F., Trojet S.N., Prère M.-F., Krisch H. Phage-antibiotic synergy (PAS): β-lactam and quinolone antibiotics stimulate virulent phage growth. PLoS. One. 2007;2(8):e799. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Elshamy A., Saleh S., Aboshanab K.M., Aboulwafa M.M., Hassouna N.A. In Vitro Meropenem/Antibiotic and Meropenem/Bacteriophage Combinations against Carbapenem-Resistant gram-negative uropathogens. Arch. Pharmaceut. Sci. Ain Shams Uni. 2023;7(1):19–30. doi: 10.21608/aps.2023.198691.1111. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Emms D.M., Kelly S. OrthoFinder: phylogenetic orthology inference for comparative genomics. Genome Biol. 2019;20:1–14. doi: 10.1186/s13059-019-1832-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Fang C.-T., Chuang Y.-P., Shun C.-T., Chang S.-C., Wang J.-T. A novel virulence gene in Klebsiella pneumoniae strains causing primary liver abscess and septic metastatic complications. J. Exp. Med. 2004;199(5):697–705. doi: 10.1084/jem.20030857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Feng J., Li F., Sun L., Dong L., Gao L., Wang H., et al. Characterization and genome analysis of phage vB_KpnS_SXFY507 against Klebsiella pneumoniae and efficacy assessment in Galleria mellonella larvae. Front. Microbiol. 2023;14 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1081715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ferry T., Kolenda C., Laurent F., Leboucher G., Merabischvilli M., Djebara S., et al. Personalized bacteriophage therapy to treat Pandrug-resistant spinal Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection. Nat. Commun. 2022;13(1):4239. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-31837-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Gasteiger E., Hoogland C., Gattiker A., Duvaud S.e., Wilkins M.R., Appel R.D., et al. Springer; 2005. Protein Identification and Analysis Tools On the ExPASy server. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Grant J.R., Stothard P. The CGView Server: a comparative genomics tool for circular genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36(suppl_2):W181–W184. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hao Y., Zhao X., Zhang C., Bai Y., Song Z., Lu X., et al. Clonal dissemination of clinical carbapenem-resistant klebsiella pneumoniae isolates carrying fosA3 and bla KPC–2 coharboring plasmids in Shandong, China. Front. Microbiol. 2021;12 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.771170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hyman P. Phages for phage therapy: isolation, characterization, and host range breadth. Pharmaceuticals. (Basel) 2019;12:1. doi: 10.3390/ph12010035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Jain C., Rodriguez-R L.M., Phillippy A.M., Konstantinidis K.T., Aluru S. High throughput ANI analysis of 90K prokaryotic genomes reveals clear species boundaries. Nat. Commun. 2018;9(1):5114. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07641-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Jończyk-Matysiak E., Łodej N., Kula D., Owczarek B., Orwat F., Międzybrodzki R., et al. Factors determining phage stability/activity: challenges in practical phage application. Expert. Rev. Anti. Infect. Ther. 2019;17(8):583–606. doi: 10.1080/14787210.2019.1646126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. K Chan B., T Abedon S. Bacteriophages and their enzymes in biofilm control. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2015;21(1):85–99. doi: 10.2174/1381612820666140905112311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Karampatakis T., Tsergouli K., Behzadi P. Carbapenem-resistant klebsiella pneumoniae: virulence factors, molecular epidemiology and latest updates in treatment options. Antibiotics. (Basel) 2023;12(2) doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12020234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kelley L.A., Mezulis S., Yates C.M., Wass M.N., Sternberg M.J. The Phyre2 web portal for protein modeling, prediction and analysis. Nat. Protoc. 2015;10(6):845–858. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2015.053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Kim D., Song L., Breitwieser F.P., Salzberg S.L. Centrifuge: rapid and sensitive classification of metagenomic sequences. Genome Res. 2016;26(12):1721–1729. doi: 10.1101/gr.210641.116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Knecht L.E., Veljkovic M., Fieseler L. Diversity and function of phage encoded depolymerases. Front. Microbiol. 2020;10:2949. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Kozlov A.M., Darriba D., Flouri T., Morel B., Stamatakis A. RAxML-NG: a fast, scalable and user-friendly tool for maximum likelihood phylogenetic inference. Bioinformatics. 2019;35(21):4453–4455. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Li M., Li P., Chen L., Guo G., Xiao Y., Chen L., et al. Identification of a phage-derived depolymerase specific for KL64 capsule of Klebsiella pneumoniae and its anti-biofilm effect. Virus. Genes. 2021;57(5):434–442. doi: 10.1007/s11262-021-01847-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Li F., Li L., Zhang Y., Bai S., Sun L., Guan J., et al. Isolation and characterization of the novel bacteriophage vB_SmaS_BUCT626 against Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Virus. Genes. 2022;58(5):458–466. doi: 10.1007/s11262-022-01917-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Ling H., Lou X., Luo Q., He Z., Sun M., Sun J. Recent advances in bacteriophage-based therapeutics: insight into the post-antibiotic era. Acta Pharm. Sin. B. 2022;12(12):4348–4364. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2022.05.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Möller S., Croning M.D., Apweiler R. Evaluation of methods for the prediction of membrane spanning regions. Bioinformatics. 2001;17(7):646–653. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/17.7.646. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. McKenna M. Antibiotic resistance: the last resort. Nature. 2013;499(7459):394–396. doi: 10.1038/499394a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Nir-Paz R., Kuijper E.J. Bacteriophage therapy in humans. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2023;29(6):679–681. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2023.03.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Parmar K.M., Gaikwad S.L., Dhakephalkar P.K., Kothari R., Singh R.P. Intriguing interaction of bacteriophage-host association: an understanding in the era of omics. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:559. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Pires D.P., Vilas Boas D., Sillankorva S., Azeredo J. Phage therapy: a step forward in the treatment of pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections. J. Virol. 2015;89(15):7449–7456. doi: 10.1128/jvi.00385-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Schmelcher M., Donovan D.M., Loessner M.J. Bacteriophage endolysins as novel antimicrobials. Future Microbiol. 2012;7(10):1147–1171. doi: 10.2217/fmb.12.97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Shon A.S., Bajwa R.P., Russo T.A. Hypervirulent (hypermucoviscous) Klebsiella pneumoniae: a new and dangerous breed. Virulence. 2013;4(2):107–118. doi: 10.4161/viru.22718. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Tacconelli E., Carrara E., Savoldi A., Harbarth S., Mendelson M., Monnet D.L., et al. Discovery, research, and development of new antibiotics: the WHO priority list of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and tuberculosis. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2018;18(3):318–327. doi: 10.1016/s1473-3099(17)30753-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Tagliaferri T.L., Jansen M., Horz H.-P. Fighting pathogenic bacteria on two fronts: phages and antibiotics as combined strategy. Front. cell. infect. microbiol. 2019;9:22. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2019.00022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Tamura K., Stecher G., Kumar S. MEGA11: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 11. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2021;38(7):3022–3027. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msab120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Teufel F., Almagro Armenteros J.J., Johansen A.R., Gíslason M.H., Pihl S.I., Tsirigos K.D., et al. SignalP 6.0 predicts all five types of signal peptides using protein language models. Nat. Biotechnol. 2022;40(7):1023–1025. doi: 10.1038/s41587-021-01156-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Torres‐Barceló C., Franzon B., Vasse M., Hochberg M.E. Long‐term effects of single and combined introductions of antibiotics and bacteriophages on populations of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Evol. Appl. 2016;9(4):583–595. doi: 10.1111/eva.12364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Van Nieuwenhuyse B., Van der Linden D., Chatzis O., Lood C., Wagemans J., Lavigne R., et al. Bacteriophage-antibiotic combination therapy against extensively drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection to allow liver transplantation in a toddler. Nat. Commun. 2022;13(1):5725. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-33294-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Yang X., Sun Q., Li J., Jiang Y., Li Y., Lin J., et al. Molecular epidemiology of carbapenem-resistant hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae in China. Emerg. Microbes. Infect. 2022;11(1):841–849. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2022.2049458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Yigit H., Queenan A.M., Anderson G.J., Domenech-Sanchez A., Biddle J.W., Steward C.D., et al. Novel carbapenem-hydrolyzing beta-lactamase, KPC-1, from a carbapenem-resistant strain of Klebsiella pneumoniae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2001;45(4):1151–1161. doi: 10.1128/aac.45.4.1151-1161.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

  • The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article.


Articles from Virus Research are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES