Table 1.
LDA | Regions | Predicted | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gansu | Sichuan | Qinghai | |||
Training | Gansu | 15 | 0 | 1 | 16 |
Sichuan | 3 | 25 | 0 | 28 | |
Qinghai | 9 | 2 | 90 | 101 | |
%, correct | 93.8 | 89.3 | 89.1 | 89.7 | |
Validation | Gansu | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
Sichuan | 2 | 12 | 3 | 17 | |
Qinghai | 2 | 0 | 22 | 24 | |
%, correct | 75.0 | 70.6 | 91.7 | 82.2 | |
k-NN | |||||
Training | Gansu | 13 | 0 | 4 | 17 |
Sichuan | 1 | 30 | 4 | 35 | |
Qinghai | 1 | 2 | 90 | 93 | |
%, correct | 76.5 | 85.7 | 96.8 | 91.7 | |
Validation | Gansu | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
Sichuan | 0 | 6 | 4 | 10 | |
Qinghai | 0 | 2 | 30 | 32 | |
%, correct | 100.0 | 60.0 | 93.8 | 86.7 | |
PLS-DA | |||||
Training | Gansu | 6 | 1 | 11 | 18 |
Sichuan | 2 | 26 | 6 | 34 | |
Qinghai | 4 | 2 | 87 | 93 | |
%, correct | 33.3 | 76.5 | 93.6 | 82.1 | |
Validation | Gansu | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
Sichuan | 1 | 8 | 2 | 11 | |
Qinghai | 0 | 0 | 32 | 32 | |
%, correct | 50.0 | 72.7 | 100.0 | 91.1 |