Table 4.
Project | Engagement approach | Engagement Contributions identified as facilitating use of study findings |
---|---|---|
Use case 1: Integration of CER study findings | ||
Integration Research Project 1 | Multiple perspective advisory group; intentionally hired community member as research staff |
• Improved response to study outreach • Facilitated dissemination by connecting PI to a local community group; this group started sharing the materials at regular, community events. • Continued to work with the project team to implement study findings and develop a new intervention for caregivers |
Integration Research Project 2 | Single perspective advisory group; Input from social media survey and online focus group |
• Recommended how to modify the approach for identifying cohort members, which increased the cohort size by about 30% • Prioritized which data and outcomes would be most meaningful to report out for the community • Recommended journals that would have the largest visibility • Clinical partner facilitated getting findings cited in two sets of forthcoming clinical guidelines after CER study |
Integration Research Project 3 | Multiple perspective advisory group |
• Recommended focusing study aims on patient-clinician communication • Suggested both phone and mail surveys for data collection to reach study participants who may be hard of hearing, thus expanding the reach of the study • At least one advisory group member co-authored every publication • Co-authors prioritized which secondary data analyses would be most meaningful for publication • Directly advocated for the use of intervention at meetings with government agency |
Use case 2: Implementation of findings beyond the CER study | ||
Implementation Project Set 1 | ||
Research Project | Single perspective advisory group; Ad hoc engagement with clinicians | • Helped develop and then adapt a feasible and easy-to-access program prior to and during the research project |
Implementation Project | Multiple perspective advisory group, working groups |
• Helped adapt the intervention, including broadening it for different diagnoses • Connected researchers with advocacy organizations • Helped problem solve challenges (e.g., low completion rates) |
Implementation Project Set 2 | ||
Research Project | Multiple perspective advisory group |
• Helped to develop a feasible and easy-to-use program prior to research project • Adapted the intervention for the study population • Helped to problem solve when the study encountered low survey completion rates |
Implementation Project | Multiple perspective advisory group |
• Helped determine next steps, based on study findings, for the project • Developed messaging and outreach strategies for implementation sites • Connected researchers with contacts at implementation sites • Adapted in-person training materials to an online training format |
Implementation Project Set 3 | ||
Research Project | Patient co-investigators; professional society; input from interviews |
• Patient co-investigators helped write proposal, determine study design, develop the survey, and problem solve when there were recruitment and retention issues • Added quality of life as an outcome based on interviews |
Implementation Project | Patient co-investigator; professional society; site-based patient representatives |
• Helped to determine next steps for findings and provided input on program to improve prescribing practices • Adapted program and developed educational modules for implementation project |
Use case 3: Active Dissemination of CER findings by external parties | ||
Dissemination Project Set 1 | ||
Research Project | Multiple perspective advisory group; intentionally hired community member as research staff; input from interviews and focus groups |
• Developed intervention prior to research project based on input from interviews and focus groups with community members • Improved feasibility by advising on recruitment and approaches • Reviewed and adapted all study materials including the intervention • Interpreted study results • Co-developed publications |
Engagement Award | Patient co-investigator; multiple perspective advisory group; partner-led work groups |
• Adapted and created new materials for the intervention • Actively distributed educational materials using a variety of in-person and virtual methods |
Dissemination Project Set 2 | ||
Research Project | Multiple perspective advisory group |
• Tailored intervention materials to better address the needs of patients • Advised on the relevance of the intervention |
Engagement Award | Included patients as team members; representatives from patient organizations, professional societies, and member organizations |
• Assisted in conducting focus groups which informed the dissemination strategy • Adapted and posted educational materials • Disseminated materials via email outreach |
Dissemination Project Set 3 | ||
Research Project | Multiple perspective advisory group |
• Provided guidance and oversight of the project during its implementation • Assisted with decision making and helped to resolve problems during CER study |
Engagement Award | Multiple perspective advisory group |
• Convened a planning committee of clinical leaders to provide guidance and input on the conference sessions • Involved patients in presentations which gave a real-world perspective on the nuances of implementation • Drafted a research framework for advancing the evidence generation necessary for widespread, population-based implementation strategies |
Dissemination Project Set 4 | ||
Research Project | Patient co-investigator; Multiple perspective advisory group; input from town hall |
• Developed intervention prior to research project based on input from community town halls • Developed culturally tailored educational materials • Used their connections to help recruit hundreds of community ambassadors • Interpreted study findings |
Engagement Award | Hired community member as research staff; representatives from organizational partners |
• Adapted materials from the research project for dissemination • Actively distributed educational materials using a variety of in-person and virtual methods |