Skip to main content
. 2024 Sep 25;13(19):3046. doi: 10.3390/foods13193046

Table 3.

Proximal analysis of Açaí in three stages of maturity and two production areas.

City/Province Maturity Stage Ashes (g·100 g−1) Protein (g·100 g−1) Fat (g·100 g−1) Fiber (g·100 g−1) Total Carbohydrates (g·100 g−1)
Gonzalo Pizarro/Sucumbíos Unripe 0.15 ± 0.01 Ac 4.38 ± 0.58 Ab 0.83 ± 0.04 Ae 46.46 ± 0.26 Ae 48.18 ± 0.53 Ab
Half ripe 0.18 ± 0.01 Aa 4.61 ± 0.19 Aab 9.38 ± 0.33 Ab 54.07 ± 0.03 Aa 30.92 ± 0.23 Ae
Ripe 0.12 ± 0.01 Ab 4.95 ± 0.09 Aab 12.15 ± 0.11 Aa 51.55 ± 0.05 Ac 31.57 ± 0.01 Ae
Loreto/Orellana Unripe 0.14 ± 0.01 Bbc 4.43 ± 0.17 Bab 1.27 ± 0.04 Be 40.51 ± 0.47 Bf 53.30 ± 0.27 Ba
Half ripe 0.15 ± 0.01 Bc 4.78 ± 0.27 Bab 4.03 ± 0.10 Bd 47.51 ± 0.24 Bd 42.95 ± 0.57 Bc
Ripe 0.13 ± 0.01 Bbc 5.36 ± 0.55 Ba 8.74 ± 0.18 Bc 53.10 ± 0.15 Bb 33.59 ± 0.17 Bd

Results expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). Capital letters indicate significant differences between states of maturity (p < 0.05). Lowercase letters indicate significant differences between provinces (p < 0.05) using the ANOVA analysis followed by Tukey’s test.