Table 6.
Variance analysis of hydrogel preparation process screening.
| Response Source | Sum of Squares | df | Mean Square | F-Value | p-Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 276.49 | 9 | 30.72 | 48.33 | <0.0001 |
| A | 6.13 | 1 | 6.13 | 9.63 | 0.0172 |
| B | 55.13 | 1 | 55.13 | 86.71 | <0.0001 |
| C | 50 | 1 | 50 | 78.65 | <0.0001 |
| AB | 6.25 | 1 | 6.25 | 9.83 | 0.0165 |
| AC | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| BC | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1.57 | 0.25 |
| A2 | 27.92 | 1 | 27.92 | 43.92 | 0.0003 |
| B2 | 18.13 | 1 | 18.13 | 28.52 | 0.0011 |
| C2 | 98.02 | 1 | 98.02 | 154.19 | <0.0001 |
| Lack of Fit | 3.25 | 3 | 1.08 | 3.61 | 0.1234 |
| R2: 0.9842 | |||||
| Adjusted R2: 0.9638 |
Note: R2: 0.9842; Adjusted R2: 0.9638 (p < 0.01 indicates high significance, p < 0.05 indicates significance, p < 0.1 indicates non-significance). A represents the percentage content of Carbopol 940, B represents the percentage content of glycerol, and C represents the percentage content of triethanolamine.