Pace et al. [9] |
24 |
The authors’ perception was that longer bi-cortical screws were necessary to stabilize the posterior fracture fragment. Accordingly, they stated that a screw purchase in this fragment should be achieved whenever possible. In their series, 4 patients required a supplemental plate fixation. |
Haber et al. [12] |
26 |
In all, 79% of the mWJ4/5 fractures were treated operatively. The authors did not separate types 4 and 5 in their analysis. Although they did not elaborate on the technique in the text, the image provided by the authors presented a PST as their surgical method. |
Arkader et al. [10] |
13 |
A total of 12 cases were operated with uni-cortical fixation, while only 1 case was treated with a mixed uni- and bi-cortical fixation. The authors concluded that a uni-cortical fixation might be suitable in mWJ4 fractures. |
Park et al. [14] |
10 |
All fractures were fixated by a PST construct utilizing 2 (in a few cases) or 3 (in most cases) screws, most commonly 6.5 mm cancellous. The entry points were medial and lateral to the tibial tuberosity without violating the tibial apophysis. |
Formicini et al. [11] |
5 |
The authors used 4.5 mm cannulated screws and pointed out that while mWJ 1–3 could be treated with uni-cortical screws, mWJ4 fractures required greater stability, especially for the posterior component. For this reason, they used bi-cortical screws that engaged this component to form a construct regarded by them to be more effective. |
Rodriguez et al. [7] |
review |
The authors presented a review of tibial tuberosity fractures. In their review, they did not discuss the specifications of the screw trajectory but did provide an image that represented their concept of a proper screw position for fixating mWJ4 fractures. In that image, the posterior component was captured with a PST, with two fully threaded screws that were inserted through the tibial tuberosity midline. |