Skip to main content
. 2024 Oct 2;13(19):5894. doi: 10.3390/jcm13195894

Table 2.

Characteristics of highest-scoring diagnostic devices stratified by test category.

Technology Classification Antigen Tests Molecular Tests
Test Classification Near-POC POC Near-POC Low-Complexity
Developer, Product Name LumiraDx,
LumiraDx
Pfizer,
Lucira Health
Visby,
COVID-19 Test
Biocartis,
IdyllaTM
Overall Score *,† 73/110 (66%) 83/110 (75%) 78/110 (71%) 66/110 (60%)
Test summary Platform: Specifications Dimensions (cm) 21 × 9.7 × 7.3 19.1 × 8.0 × 5.2 13.8 × 6.7 × 4.4 30.5 × 19 × 50.5
Weight (g) 1100 150 NR 18,600
Power-supply Integrated battery
(20 tests)
AA batteries Mains electricity
(power adapter)
Standard electricity
Connectivity LumiraDx Connect cloud-based services;
2× USB ports; RFID reader;
Bluetooth connectivity
None None USB port; Direct RJ45 Ethernet cable; Idylla Visualizer (PDF viewer); Idylla Explore (cloud)
Max. operating temperature (°C)/humidity (%) 30/90 45/95 30/80 30/80
Multi-use Yes Yes Yes Yes
Throughput capacity 1 1 1 8
Costs (USD) NR Not applicable
(instrument-free)
Not applicable
(instrument-free)
NR
COVID-19 Assay:
Specifications
Sample type NS, NPS NS NS, NPS NPS
Hands-on time (min) 1 1 <2 <2
Running time (min) 12 30 30 90
Shelf-life (months) NR 18 NR NR
Costs per test (USD) NR >10/test NR NR
LOD (copies/mL) NR 900 100–1112 500
Sensitivity (%)/Specificity (%) 82.7/96.9 93.1/100.0 100.0/98.7 100.0/100.0
POC features
of equipment
Score 39/50 (78%) 36/50 (72%) 36/50 (72%) 32/50 (64%)
Pros
  • Compact instrument size and weight

  • Short test preparation and running time

  • Battery-powered

  • Fully integrated platform with cloud and EHR connectivity

  • Fully integrated data analysis

  • Compact instrument size and weight

  • Short test preparation and running time

  • Battery-powered

  • Instrument-free, fully integrated platform

  • Fully integrated data analysis

  • Compact instrument size and weight

  • Short test preparation and running time

  • Instrument-free, fully integrated platform

  • Fully integrated data analysis

  • High throughput capacity (n = 8)

  • Fully integrated platform with multiple options for data export and connectivity

  • Fully integrated data analysis

  • Short test preparation time

Cons
  • Low throughout capacity for an instrument-based assay (n = 1)

  • No connectivity

  • No connectivity

  • Runs on mains electricity only

  • Large instrument size and heavy weight

  • Runs on mains electricity only

POC features
of consumables
Score 9/15 (60%) 14/15 (93%) 7/15 (47%) 7/15 (47%)
Pros
  • High operating humidity

  • High operating temperature and humidity

  • Long shelf-life

None None
Cons
  • Unknown shelf-life

None
  • Unknown shelf-life

  • Low operating temperature

  • Unknown shelf-life

  • Low operating temperature

Ease of use Score 10/10 (100%) 10/10 (100%) 8/10 (80%) 6/10 (60%)
Pros
  • Can be used by community or lay worker without technical skills

  • No manual sample processing steps

  • Can be used by community or lay worker without technical skills, suitable for self-testing

  • No manual sample processing steps

  • Can be used by community or lay worker without technical skills, suitable for self-testing

  • Minimal sample processing steps

  • Can be used by healthcare workers with a minimum of training

Cons None None None
  • Sample processing steps require laboratory equipment (pipettes, vortex)

Performance Score 5/15 (33%) 7/15 (47%) 11/15 (73%) 11/15 (73%)
Pros None
  • High study-reported specificity

  • High study-reported sensitivity and specificity

  • High clinical sensitivity and specificity

Cons
  • No LoD reported

  • Poor study-reported sensitivity

  • Discrepancy between developer-reported and study-reported sensitivity data

  • High LoD

  • Low study-reported sensitivity

  • High LoD

  • High LoD

Cost Score 2/10 (20%) 6/10 (60%) 6/10 (60%) 2/10 (20%)
Pros None
  • No instrument costs

  • No instrument costs

None
Cons
  • Costs not transparently reported

  • High consumable costs

  • Consumable costs not transparently reported

  • Costs not transparently reported

Platform
versatility
Score 5/5 (100%) 5/5 (100%) 5/5 (100%) 5/5 (100%)
Pros
  • Multi-use platform

  • Multi-use platform

  • Multi-use platform

  • Multi-use platform

Cons None None None None

Abbreviations: POC = point-of-care; NR = Not Reported; NS = Nasal Swab; NPS = Nasopharyngeal Sample; LoD = Limit-of-Detection. Legend: * color coding: red = overall score/category score <33.3%; orange = overall score/category score <66.6%; green = overall score/category score ≥ 66.6%; overall score: calculated by summing the seven category scores; category scores: calculated by aggregating the scores for each variable within the respective scoring category. Please refer to Table S4 for the detailed scoring methodology; multi-use is defined as the ability to analyze multiple biomarkers from one sample on a single diagnostic device (e.g., respiratory panels).