Skip to main content
. 2024 Sep 15;14(9):4445–4458. doi: 10.62347/AXQW1100

Table 3.

Prediction performance of five radiomics models (Tumor, External2, External5, Tumor + External2, and Tumor + External5) in three cohorts

Model Cohort AUC [95% CI] Accuracy Sensitivity Specificity PPV NPV
Tumor Training 0.975 [0.963-0.987] 0.963 0.957 0.969 0.969 0.958
Internal-testing 0.800 [0.769-0.831] 0.791 0.871 0.576 0.847 0.625
External-testing 0.741 [0.686-0.796] 0.716 0.743 0.642 0.852 0.473
External2 Training 0.949 [0.937-0.961] 0.897 0.873 0.921 0.917 0.879
Internal-testing 0.779 [0.750-0.809] 0.739 0.828 0.500 0.816 0.520
External-testing 0.612 [0.551-0.673] 0.679 0.794 0.357 0.775 0.384
External5 Training 0.947 [0.932-0.961] 0.879 0.909 0.849 0.857 0.903
Internal-testing 0.765 [0.737-0.794] 0.729 0.800 0.538 0.823 0.500
External-testing 0.625 [0.562-0.688] 0.679 0.743 0.500 0.805 0.411
Tumor + External2 Training 0.971 [0.962-0.981] 0.954 0.927 0.981 0.980 0.931
Internal-testing 0.827 [0.799-0.855] 0.822 0.871 0.692 0.884 0.666
External-testing 0.745 [0.699-0.791] 0.773 0.794 0.714 0.885 0.555
Tumor + External5 Training 0.968 [0.958-0.979] 0.936 0.903 0.969 0.967 0.909
Internal-testing 0.818 [0.794-0.843] 0.770 0.828 0.615 0.852 0.571
External-testing 0.742 [0.699-0.785] 0.773 0.820 0.642 0.864 0.562