ABSTRACT
We announce the whole genome hybrid sequences of 11 highly virulent Yersinia pestis strains of the ancient phylogenetic branch 0.ANT5, one of the closest to the strains of the First Plague Pandemic. Nine strains were isolated in 2013–2023 and two in 1953 and 1971 in the Tien Shan plague focus in Kyrgyzstan.
KEYWORDS: Yersinia pestis, genomics, plague, molecular epidemiology, evolution, phylogenetic analysis
ANNOUNCEMENT
Yersinia pestis strains of the ancient phylogenetic branch 0.ANT5, one of the closest to the First Plague Pandemic strains (1–4), are widespread in the Tien Shan high-mountain focus in Kyrgyzstan. In this work, we obtained hybrid whole genome assemblies of 11 Y. pestis strains isolated in the Tien Shan high-mountain plague focus in 1952, 1971, and 2013–2023 (Table 1). All strains in this work were obtained from the collection of the Republican Center of Quarantine and Particularly Dangerous Infections of the Ministry of Health of the Kyrgyz Republic.
TABLE 1.
Accession numbers and basic statistics of MGI and nanopore reads of Y. pestis strains
| Strain | Isolation source, date | Isolation place | SRA accession no. MGI/ONT | Data for MGI reads | Data for nanopore MinION reads | GenBank accession no. of complete hybrid assembly genome size | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total no. of filtered read pairs | Coverage (x) | Total no. of filtered reads | ONT read N50 (bp) | Coverage (x) | |||||
| 5M | Oropsylla silantiewi, 14.06.1952 | Upper-Naryn high-mountain plague focus, Dzhety-Oguz Syrts | SRR28624261/SRR28624260 | 2,347,574 | 78 | 68,149K | 24,372 | 207 | GCA_039640435.1 4.7 Mb |
| A1694 | Fleas, 07.07.1971 | Upper-Naryn high-mountain plague focus | SRR28623939/SRR28623938 | 2,012,544 | 66 | 43,291K | 26,786 | 130 | GCA_039640405.1 4.7 Mb |
| 8 | Human, 27.08.2013 | Sarydzhas high mountain plague focus, Issyk-Kul region | SRR28607551/SRR28607550 | 2,346,044 | 78 | 83,201K | 15,493 | 181 | GCA_039640455.1 4.8 Mb |
| 2 | Fleas, 28.06.2016 | Sarydzhas high mountain plague focus, Issyk-Kul region | SRR28607219/SRR28607218 | 2,344,934 | 78 | 81,861K | 20,745 | 222 | GCA_039640445.1 4.8 Mb |
| 197–15 | Marmota, 16.07.2015 | Upper-Naryn high-mountain plague focus, Ak-Shyyrak section | SRR28622503/SRR28622502 | 2,063,450 | 88 | 19,752K | 28,815 | 67 | GCA_039640465.1 4.7 Mb |
| 177 | Marmota baibacina, 08.09.2019 | Upper-Naryn high-mountain plague focus, Karakol Department, Batyr-Beshik area |
SRR28622483/SRR28622482 | 2,342,188 | 78 | 25,555K | 23,092 | 77 | GCA_039640475.1 4.7 Mb |
| 80 | Oropsylla silantiewi, 26.08.2020 | Sarydzhaz high-mountain plague focus, Ak-Su district, Kooylu river basin, Oroysuu area | SRR28623134/SRR28623133 | 2,339,355 | 77 | 263,065K | 11,016 | 460 | GCA_039640425.1 4.8 Mb |
| 91_KR | Oropsylla silantiewi, 19.08.2020 | Sarydzhaz high-mountain plague focus, Ak-Su district, Kooylu river basin, Bordu-Tor area | SRR28623332/SRR28623331 | 2,352,174 | 78 | 47,836K | 35,949 | 185 | GCA_039640415.1 4.8 Mb |
| 107 | Marmota baibacina , May 2023 | Sarydzhaz high-mountain plague focus, Chon-Karabel area | SRR28639070/SRR28639069 | 2,349,018 | 78 | 27,580K | 11,211 | 46 | GCA_039640485.1 4.8 Mb |
| 136 | Ochotona, May 2023 | Sarydzhaz high-mountain plague focus, Chon-Karabel area | SRR28624414/SRR28624413 | 2,346,198 | 78 | 84,342K | 9668 | 129 | GCA_039640395.1 4.8 Mb |
| 133 | Marmota baibacina, May 2023 | Sarydzhaz high-mountain plague focus, Chon-Karabel area | SRR28638969/SRR28638968 | 2,351,922 | 78 | 80,058K | 10,905 | 134 | GCA_039640175.1 4.8 Mb |
Strains were grown from single colonies on LB agar (pH 7.2) for 24 h at 28°C. For DNA extraction, strains were grown in LB broth (pH 7.2) for 24 h at 28°C. The DNA of three strains (107, 133, and 136) was extracted using the PureLink kit (Invitrogen, USA). The DNA of the remaining strains was obtained using phenol−chloroform extraction (5). MGIEasy FS kit and the MGIEasy UDB PF Adaptor Kit A were used to generate 150-bp paired-end reads. The pooled libraries were sequenced on the MGI platform (DNBSEQ-G50RS) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Libraries for sequencing long reads were prepared using a V14 ligation kit (SQK-LSK114; Oxford Nanopore Technologies [ONT], UK) with Native Barcoding Kit 24 v14 (SQK-NBD114.24). DNA was size selected using AMPure XP beads (Beckman Coulter, Inc.) in volume ratio 1: 0.4 sample to the beads but was not sheared. The pooled libraries were sequenced on FLO-PRO114M (R10.4.1) for 48 h according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
We removed adapters and verified the MGI read quality using fastp v0.23.3 (6). The “base-calling” stage was carried out using Oxford Nanopore Dorado v0.5.2 (https://github.com/nanoporetech/dorado) with dna_r10.4.1_e8.2_400bps_sup@v4.2.0 model. Reads were filtered using Filtlong v0.2.1 (Q score, >8; length, >2,000 bp) (https://github.com/rrwick/Filtlong). Trycycler v0.5.5 (including Flye v2.9.3) was used to generate consensus hybrid assemblies; Polypolish v0.6.0 was applied to polish genome assemblies with short reads (7–9). The genome was manually trimmed and reoriented to dnaA, the plasmids were reoriented to repA with Trycycler v0.5.5 (7). The assembly quality was assessed using QUAST v.4.3 (10) and Bandage v.0.8.1 (11). Default parameters were used for all software. The average genome size was 4.5 Mb, the median coverage of the resulting genomes was 134×, and the GC content was 47.5%. All strains contained three plasmids (pMT, pCD, and pPCP). The presence of plasmids in the genome was further confirmed by detecting plasmid DNA bands: ~96, 2 bp (pMT), ~70.3 bp (pCD), and ~9.6 bp (pPCP) using the method of C.I. Kado and S.T. Liu (12). Finally, the genomes were annotated using the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP) (13).
The obtained whole-genome hybrid sequences of Y. pestis strains of the phylogenetic branch 0.ANT5 are important for understanding the modern and historical directions of the evolution of pandemic strains of plague pathogen.
Contributor Information
Alina N. Balykova, Email: alinabalnik@gmail.com.
Julie C. Dunning Hotopp, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
DATA AVAILABILITY
The hybrid genome sequences, the raw long and short reads are deposited into NCBI GenBank under BioProject accession number PRJNA1098581 and are available under the accession numbers listed in Table 1.
REFERENCES
- 1. Eroshenko GA, Nosov NY, Krasnov YM, Oglodin YG, Kukleva LM, Guseva NP, Kuznetsov AA, Abdikarimov ST, Dzhaparova AK, Kutyrev VV. 2017. Yersinia pestis strains of ancient phylogenetic branch 0.ANT are widely spread in the high-mountain plague foci of Kyrgyzstan. PLoS One 12:e0187230. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187230 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Kutyrev VV, Eroshenko GA, Motin VL, Nosov NY, Krasnov JM, Kukleva LM, Nikiforov KA, Al’khova ZV, Oglodin EG, Guseva NP. 2018. Phylogeny and classification of Yersinia pestis through the lens of strains from the plague foci of commonwealth of independent states. Front Microbiol 9:1106. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Wagner DM, Klunk J, Harbeck M, Devault A, Waglechner N, Sahl JW, Enk J, Birdsell DN, Kuch M, Lumibao C, Poinar D, Pearson T, Fourment M, Golding B, Riehm JM, Earn DJD, Dewitte S, Rouillard J-M, Grupe G, Wiechmann I, Bliska JB, Keim PS, Scholz HC, Holmes EC, Poinar H. 2014. Yersinia pestis and the plague of Justinian 541-543 AD: a genomic analysis. Lancet Infect Dis 14:319–326. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(13)70323-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Abdikarimov ST, ESh I, ChE E. 2018. Current epizootic condition of natural plague foci in Kyrgyz Republic and measures aimed at provision of epidemiological welfare as regards plague. Probl Part Dang Infect, no. 2:45–48. doi: 10.21055/0370-1069-2018-2-45-48 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Murray MG, Thompson WF. 1980. Rapid isolation of high molecular weight plant DNA. Nucleic Acids Res Oct 8:4321–4325. doi: 10.1093/nar/8.19.4321 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Chen Sh. 2023. Ultrafast one-pass FASTQ data preprocessing, quality control, and deduplication using fastp. iMeta 2:e107. doi: 10.1002/imt2.1077 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Wick RR, Judd LM, Cerdeira LT, Hawkey J, Méric G, Vezina B, Wyres KL, Holt KE. 2021. Trycycler: consensus long-read assemblies for bacterial genomes. Genome Biol 22:266. doi: 10.1186/s13059-021-02483-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Wick RR, Holt KE. 2022. Polypolish: short-read polishing of long-read bacterial genome assemblies. PLOS Comput Biol 18:e1009802. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009802 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Kolmogorov M, Yuan J, Lin Y, Pevzner PA. 2019. Assembly of long, error-prone reads using repeat graphs. Nat Biotechnol 37:540–546. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0072-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler G. 2013. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 29:1072–1075. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt086 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Wick RR, Schultz MB, Zobel J, Holt KE. 2015. Bandage: interactive visualization of de novo genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 31:3350–3352. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv383 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Kado CI, Liu ST. 1981. Rapid procedure for detection and isolation of large and small plasmids. J Bacteriol 145:1365–1373. doi: 10.1128/jb.145.3.1365-1373.1981 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP, Zaslavsky L, Lomsadze A, Pruitt KD, Borodovsky M, Ostell J. 2016. NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 44:6614–6624. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw569 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The hybrid genome sequences, the raw long and short reads are deposited into NCBI GenBank under BioProject accession number PRJNA1098581 and are available under the accession numbers listed in Table 1.
