. 2024 Oct 8;16(19):3406. doi: 10.3390/nu16193406

Table 2.

Results of the in vitro efficacy assays of A. camphorata mycelium powder at different concentrations.

Assay	Normal Control	Negative Control	Concentration of Test Substance (µg/mL)			Concentration of Positive Control (µg/mL)
Assay	Normal Control	Negative Control	1 μg/mL	4 μg/mL	16 μg/mL	Concentration of Positive Control (µg/mL)
SOD activity (%)	100 ± 0.0	90.6 ± 7.9	93.5 ± 1.4	142.1 ± 14.1	107.4 ± 10.2	170.5 ± 59.9
GST activity (%)	100 ± 0.0	82.8 ± 0.1 **	109.9 ± 2.9 ^$$	99.5 ± 0.8 ^$$	119.6 ± 4.1 ^$$	108.2 ± 3.2 ^$$
ALT concentration (pg/mL)	712.9 ± 7.8	728.1 ± 16.0	707.4 ± 8.5	679.8 ± 16.7	697.7 ± 8.9	674.3 ± 18.6
AST concentration (pg/mL)	155.1 ± 2.4	198.5 ± 11.8 **	181.1 ± 4.7 ^a	171.5 ± 3.6 ^aa	155.1 ± 2.4 ^aa	157.0 ± 5.9 ^aa
Oil Red O staining assay (OD values at 510 nm)	0.150 ± 0.009	0.221 ± 0.009 **	0.190 ± 0.001 ^$$	0.159 ± 0.014 ^$$	0.141 ± 0.009 ^$$	0.044 ± 0.001 ^$$

Data are presented as the mean ± SE. The results were statistically analyzed using Student’s t-test or one-way ANOVA. ^a p < 0.05, significant difference compared to the negative control; Dunnett’s t-test. ^aa p < 0.01, significant difference compared to the negative control; Dunnett’s t-test. ** p < 0.01, significant difference compared to the normal control; Student’s t-test. ^$$ p < 0.01, significant difference compared to the negative control; Welch’s t-test.