Skip to main content
. 2024 Oct 4;24(19):6442. doi: 10.3390/s24196442

Table 2.

Accuracy statistics of estimated temporal gait cycle parameters compared to the gold standard (gait mat).

Param. Metric mEar Gait Mat RMSEABS RMSEREL R ICC(3,1)
Stride
time
Mean 1.2 ± 0.2 s 1.2 ± 0.2 s 0.0 s 0.3% 0.999 0.999
CV 2.9 ± 2.4% 2.9 ± 2.5% 0.3% 10.0% 0.993 0.993
Asym. 0.4 ± 0.3% 0.3 ± 0.3% 0.3% 0.9% 0.635 0.629
Swing
time
Mean 0.4 ± 0.1 s 0.4 ± 0.1 s 0.0 s 3.8% 0.968 0.960
CV 4.7 ± 1.7% 3.9 ± 1.5% 1.3% 34.5% 0.814 0.801
Asym. 1.8 ± 1.5 % 0.9 ± 1.0% 1.7% 1.9% 0.373 0.347
Dsupp
time
Mean 0.1 ± 0.0 s 0.2 ± 0.1 s 0.0 s 11.5% 0.953 0.944
CV 12.6 ± 5.8% 10.2 ± 4.6% 5.5% 53.5% 0.575 0.559
Asym. 3.1 ± 4.5% 2.2 ± 3.1% 5.8% 2.6%

Significant outcomes are marked in bold. Abbreviations: Dsupp time: double support time; CV: coefficient of variation; Asym.: asymmetry; R: Pearson’s correlation coefficient (significant results marked in bold); RMSE: absolute and relative root-mean-square error; ICC: intraclass correlation coefficient.