Sáenz de Pipaón 2003.
Methods | Randomised controlled trial | |
Participants | Infants weighing < 1600 grams at birth. Exclusions included infants of diabetic mothers, major congenital anomalies and proven sepsis. Setting: La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain |
|
Interventions | Minimal enteral nutrition (N = 24) vs. enteral fasting (N = 12). On day 1, infants were randomly allocated to either minimal enteral nutrition (10 ml/kg/day on day 1, then 20 ml/kg/day through until day 7) or enteral fasting for 7 days | |
Outcomes | This was primarily a metabolic study examining whether enteral leucine uptake was affected by trophic feeding Authors also reported time to establish full feeds Communication with authors revealed data were collected on the incidence of necrotising enterocolitis and mortality |
|
Notes | March 2009: clarification of methods and outcome data received from Dr Saenz de Pipaon (principal investigator): "If the mother wished to give breast milk and the baby was allocated to the minimal enteral nutrition group, he or she started on day one to receive breast milk. If the mother was not able or did not wish to give breast milk the infant received formula. If the baby was allocated to the enteral fasting group, breast milk or formula was given from day seven." |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Correspondence with principal investigator revealed randomisation involved sealed opaque envelopes with 2:1 allocation ratio |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Satisfactory |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | No blinding of care givers or investigators |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | No statement about blinding of radiological assessment |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | All data were accounted for |