Skip to main content
. 2024 Aug 9;327(4):H1067–H1085. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00702.2023

Table 6.

Summary of female mouse echocardiography values in control and HFD studies

Echo Parameter Young
Aged
WT CD SSPN−/− CD WT HFD SSPN−/− HFD WT CD SSPN−/− CD WT HFD SSPN−/− HFD
n 7 5 6 7 7 18 6 8
HR, beats/min 461.7 ± 21.1 429.9 ± 10.4 460.92 ± 11.0 445.43 ± 19.7 531.8 ± 34.4 477.0 ± 12.0 509.5 ± 22.0 482.2 ± 10.2
LVID;s, mm 2.23 ± 0.16 2.40 ± 0.22 1.80 ± 0.08 1.85 ± 0.04 1.83 ± 0.20 1.95 ± 0.06 1.44 ± 0.15 1.83 ± 0.09
LVID;d, mm 3.44 ± 0.17 3.56 ± 0.22 3.47 ± 0.18 3.28 ± 0.07 3.20 ± 0.17 3.33 ± 0.06 2.88 ± 0.10a 3.34 ± 0.06
LV;s, µL 11.62 ± 1.15 14.21 ± 1.97 16.27 ± 2.16 8.96 ± 1.98 13.36 ± 3.14 12.92 ± 1.15 6.89 ± 2.39 15.14 ± 1.99
LV;d, µL 44.53 ± 3.51 48.82 ± 1.65 55.06 ± 5.12 40.34 ± 2.65 41.83 ± 4.86 45.68 ± 1.85 32.59 ± 3.17a 45.63 ± 1.88
LV EF, % 61.74 ± 2.89 62.09 ± 3.76 70.61 ± 2.56 78.18 ± 2.30c 74.98 ± 4.09 72.99 ± 1.35 82.40 ± 3.30 76.6 ± 2.57
LV FS, % 32.6 ± 1.98 32.99 ± 2.60 39.39 ± 2.16 46.31 ± 2.37c 39.64 ± 2.80 41.47 ± 1.12 50.88 ± 3.26 45.3 ± 1.96
SV, µL 30.41 ± 3.10 32.97 ± 3.84 36.06 ± 4.71 36.59 ± 3.32 32.29 ± 2.93 32.79 ± 1.01 25.71 ± 0.95 35.1 ± 0.98
CO, µL 12.64 ± 2.17 14.30 ± 1.83 16.61 ± 2.30 14.58 ± 2.07 16.18 ± 2.00 14.77 ± 1.02 12.94 ± 0.71 17.0 ± 0.71
MV E/A 1.97 ± 0.26 1.62 ± 0.11 2.28 ± 0.19 2.27 ± 0.13 1.46 ± 0.10 1.31 ± 0.19 1.34 ± 0.14 1.33 ± 0.09b
IVRT, ms 16.05 ± 0.75 13.92 ± 1.10 18.31 ± 1.95 18.17 ± 1.88 15.17 ± 1.23 15.70 ± 1.46 14.10 ± 1.04 15.31 ± 0.70
IVCT, ms 13.10 ± 1.20 11.85 ± 1.11 11.19 ± 0.01 11.97 ± 0.01 16.18 ± 2.50 10.41 ± 0.56 13.37 ± 2.18 16.42 ± 1.12
LVmass, mg 103.0 ± 13.16 103.5 ± 4.70 108.4 ± 9.51 107.6 ± 5.74 104.6 ± 13.13 109.4 ± 6.60 116.1 ± 22.92 119.1 ± 13.45
Age, mo 8.41 ± 0.40 8.35 ± 0.50 7.74 ± 0.25 8.12 ± 0.51 17.43 ± 0.55 17.20 ± 0.15 18.69 ± 0.40 17.17 ± 0.19
HW/TL, mg/mm 7.19 ± 0.21 6.62 ± 0.42 7.77 ± 0.17 7.08 ± 0.19 6.25 ± 0.68 6.34 ± 0.84 7.06 ± 1.39 6.19 ± 0.41

Values are means ± SE; n, number of mice. CD, control diet; CO, cardiac output; Echo, echocardiography; EF, ejection fraction; FS, fractional shortening; HFD, high-fat diet; HR, heart rate; HW/TL, heart weight-to-tibia length ratio; ID;d, inner dimension, diastole; ID;s, inner dimension, systole; IVCT, intraventricular contraction time; IVRT, isovolumic relaxation time measurements; LV, left ventricular; SV, stroke volume; MV E/A, mitral valve E/A; SSPN−/−, sarcospan deficient; WT, wild type. One-way ANOVA was used to compare differences between groups. aP < 0.05, WT (young vs. aged) HFD mice; bP < 0.05, SSPN−/− (young vs. aged) HFD mice; cP < 0.05, SSPN−/− (young) CD vs. HFD mice. Significant groups: WT (young vs. aged) HFD mice: *LVID;s, *LV;d; SSPN−/− (young vs. aged) HFD mice: *E/A, IVRT; SSPN−/− (young) CD vs. HFD mice: *LV EF%, *LV FS%), **; WT vs. SSPN−/− aged CD mice, WT (aged) CD vs. HFD mice.