Skip to main content
. 2024 Aug 28;327(4):E498–E511. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00181.2024

Table 2.

CA.ME.LI.A population stratified by gender, BMI, and glucose tolerance

Total Population Men Women P Value
n 2,545* 1,251 1,294
NFG/NBW 1,039 (40.8%) 372 (29.7%) (14.5%) 667 (51.6%) (26.2%) <0.0001
NFG/OWO 754 (29.6%) 395 (31.6%) (15.5%) 359 (27.7%) (14.0%)
IFG/NBW 183 (7.2%) 105 (8.4%) (4.1%) 78 (6.0%) (3.0%)
IFG/OWO 398 (15.7%) 269 (21.5%) (10.5%) 129 (10.0%) (5.1%)
DM/NBW 28 (1.1%) 15 (1.2%) (0.5%) 13 (1.0%) (0.5%)
DM/OWO 143 (5.6%) 95 (7.6%) (3.7%) 48 (1.9%) (3.7%)

The % was calculated on the total number of subjects in the group (column). For men and women columns, an additional % vs. the whole population is also reported on the left. BMI, body mass index; CA.ME.LI.A, CArdiovascular risks, MEtabolic syndrome, LIver and Autoimmune disease; DM, diabetes mellitus; IFG, impaired fasting glucose; NBW, normal body weight; NFG, normal fasting glucose; OWO, overweight-obese.

*Nine patients of the whole CA.ME.LI.A population were excluded from the analysis for the lack of data, either BMI or glucose tolerance.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure