Skip to main content
[Preprint]. 2024 Oct 8:2024.10.07.24315061. [Version 1] doi: 10.1101/2024.10.07.24315061

Table 3:

Secondary outcomes

Measure Data source and sample Value Change from baseline (95% CI)
Treatment rates
 Hypertension treatment rate in month 6, n per month Routine MOH data 197 patients See Figure 3
 Diabetes treatment rate in month 6, n per month Routine MOH data 108 patients See Figure 3
Disease control a
 Blood pressure control (<130/80 mmHg) among patients with hypertension, % Routine MOH data merged with electronic monitoring tool data 50.6% n/a
 Glycemic control (FBG <115 mg/dl or RBG <160 mg/dl) among patients with diabetes, % Routine MOH data merged with electronic monitoring tool data 41.0% n/a
Adoption
 Facilities enrolling ≥1 patient, % Routine MOH data from 10 facilities 100% n/a
Fidelity
 Health worker training strategy: Health workers attending all trainings, n per district Training attendance records 20 health workers per district n/a
 Team-based care strategy: Facilities conducting monthly coordination meetings, %a Monthly assessments in n=10 facilities 10% −10% (−26% to 15%)
 Team-based care strategy: Prescriptions by non-physician health worker, % Routine MOH data from 1,341 total visits during pilot 57% n/a
 Strategy to improve access: Availability of core medications, %b Monthly assessments in n=10 facilities 81% +21% (2% to 40%)
 Strategy to improve access: Availability of core diagnostics, %b Monthly assessments in n=10 facilities 82% −5.0% (−25% to 15%)
 Fidelity to electronic monitoring tool strategy: Visits captured in electronic monitoring tools (either DHIS2 or digitized chart data), % Comparing routine MOH data with study data from electronic monitoring tools 7.6% n/a
Sustainability c
 Leadership support, mean Surveys among n=20 MOH participants 5.0 n/a
 Adequate staff to achieve goals, mean Surveys among n=20 MOH participants 5.1 n/a
 Protocol easy for clinicians to use, mean Surveys among n=20 MOH participants 5.5 n/a
 Integrated into MOH operations, mean Surveys among n=20 MOH participants 5.4 n/a
 Defined roles and responsibilities, mean Surveys among n=20 MOH participants 5.7 n/a
 Ongoing support, feedback, and training, mean Surveys among n=20 MOH participants 4.7 n/a
Usability d
 DHIS2 system Surveys among n=10 MOH participants 67.7 n/a
 Paper-based digitization system Surveys among n=8 MOH participants 80.6 n/a

Abbreviations: DHIS2, District Health Information System. FBG, Fasting blood glucose. n/a, not applicable. RBG, Random blood glucose.

a

Disease control was only calculated among the subsample of 7.6% of patients whose visits were captured in the electronic monitoring tools (either DHIS2 or digitized chart data)

b

Calculated as the mean monthly proportion across clinics over the 6-month pilot period. Core medications include: enalapril, losartan, hydrochlorothiazide, metformin, and glimepiride/glibenclamide. Core diagnostics include functioning glucometer, glucose test strips, and digital blood pressure monitor

c

Select questions from the Program Sustainability Assessment Tool (PSAT)33 and Clinical Sustainability Assessment Tools (CSAT)34 are assessed on a scale of 1 to 7 with higher scores representing a greater degree of agreement.

d

The System Usability Scale36,37 is assessed on a scale of 0 to 100 with higher scores representing a greater degree of usability.