Skip to main content
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation logoLink to Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
. 2024 Mar 27;39(9):1426–1441. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfae074

Prevalence and characteristics of genetic disease in adult kidney stone formers

Manuel A Anderegg 1,2,#, Eric G Olinger 3,4,5,6,#, Matteo Bargagli 7,8, Rob Geraghty 9, Lea Taylor 10, Alexander Nater 11, Rémy Bruggmann 12, John A Sayer 13,14,15, Bruno Vogt 16, André Schaller 17,#, Daniel G Fuster 18,19,#,
PMCID: PMC11483609  PMID: 38544324

ABSTRACT

Background

Molecular mechanisms of kidney stone formation remain unknown in most patients. Previous studies have shown a high heritability of nephrolithiasis, but data on the prevalence and characteristics of genetic disease in unselected adults with nephrolithiasis are lacking. This study was conducted to fill this important knowledge gap.

Methods

We performed whole exome sequencing in 787 participants in the Bern Kidney Stone Registry, an unselected cohort of adults with one or more past kidney stone episodes [kidney stone formers (KSFs)] and 114 non-kidney stone formers (NKSFs). An exome-based panel of 34 established nephrolithiasis genes was analysed and variants assessed according to American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics criteria. Pathogenic (P) or likely pathogenic (LP) variants were considered diagnostic.

Results

The mean age of KSFs was 47 ± 15 years and 18% were first-time KSFs. A Mendelian kidney stone disease was present in 2.9% (23/787) of KSFs. The most common genetic diagnoses were cystinuria (SLC3A1, SLC7A9; n = 13), vitamin D-24 hydroxylase deficiency (CYP24A1; n = 5) and primary hyperoxaluria (AGXT, GRHPR, HOGA1; n = 3). Of the KSFs, 8.1% (64/787) were monoallelic for LP/P variants predisposing to nephrolithiasis, most frequently in SLC34A1/A3 or SLC9A3R1 (n = 37), CLDN16 (n = 8) and CYP24A1 (n = 8). KSFs with Mendelian disease had a lower age at the first stone event (30 ± 14 versus 36 ± 14 years; P = .003), were more likely to have cystine stones (23.4% versus 1.4%) and less likely to have calcium oxalate monohydrates stones (31.9% versus 52.5%) compared with KSFs without a genetic diagnosis. The phenotype of KSFs with variants predisposing to nephrolithiasis was subtle and showed significant overlap with KSFs without diagnostic variants. In NKSFs, no Mendelian disease was detected and LP/P variants were significantly less prevalent compared with KSFs (1.8% versus 8.1%).

Conclusion

Mendelian disease is uncommon in unselected adult KSFs, yet variants predisposing to nephrolithiasis are significantly enriched in adult KSFs.

Keywords: kidney stones, mendelian, monogenic, nephrolithiasis, whole exome sequencing

Graphical Abstract

Graphical Abstract.

Graphical Abstract


KEY LEARNING POINTS.

What was known:

  • Kidney stone formation is strongly influenced by genetic factors (positive family history in 30–60%) and >30 Mendelian forms of kidney stone disease have been described, explaining 6.8–29.4% of stones in selected populations.

  • However, the diagnostic utility of whole exome sequencing in unselected adults with nephrolithiasis has not been established.

  • Current strategies to manage this common and relapsing disease are inadequate.

This study adds:

  • Mendelian disease in unselected adults with nephrolithiasis is rare and far less common than previously reported.

  • Genetic variants predisposing to kidney stone formation are significantly enriched in individuals with nephrolithiasis, yet the associated phenotypes display a significant overlap with individuals without diagnostic variants.

  • While many Mendelian forms of nephrolithiasis can be detected with thorough phenotypic analysis, genetic testing can ameliorate the diagnosis in adult stone formers, where phenotypes are often less pronounced.

Potential impact:

  • Whole exome sequencing allows accurate assessment of Mendelian disease and identification of predisposing variants in adult individuals with nephrolithiasis.

  • Our study highlights the potential of genetic testing to direct patients to personalized therapies and clinical trials.

INTRODUCTION

Nephrolithiasis is a common global healthcare problem [1]. Kidney stones recur frequently and cause substantial morbidity, reduced quality of life and enormous cost [2–4]. A comprehensive phenotypic examination is paramount for the detection of urinary abnormalities and provides an efficient way for the identification of underlying Mendelian disease. Still, in many adult patients with kidney stones, the molecular pathogenesis of clinical traits associated with kidney stone formation (e.g. hypercalciuria) remains unknown. Consequently, undifferentiated dietary and pharmacological preventive measures are initiated, but many patients continue to form stones [5, 6]. Current strategies in managing this very common and debilitating disease are clearly inadequate and is an unmet need for novel diagnostic and therapeutic approaches.

Kidney stone formation is strongly influenced by genetic factors: a positive family history is present in 30–60% of individuals with kidney stones [7], and both twin [8] and genealogy [9] studies revealed a high heritability of nephrolithiasis. More than 30 Mendelian (also called monogenic) causes of nephrolithiasis have been described thus far [10]. Recent studies have also highlighted the importance of intermediate effect size/incomplete penetrance variants in increasing the risk for nephrolithiasis [11–14]. Identification of patients with Mendelian forms of nephrolithiasis remains a major challenge and no clear consensus exists on clinical parameters to guide genetic testing. Clinical phenotypes can be diagnostic for many Mendelian diseases—if phenotypic screening is diligently performed—and usually prompt personalized genetic testing. Yet, many cases of genetic forms of nephrolithiasis are missed and incorrectly labelled as ‘idiopathic’.

Whole exome sequencing (WES) is widely applied as a diagnostic tool for rare diseases and the detection of pathogenic variants in cancer [15, 16]. In contrast, the diagnostic utility of WES has not been established for most constitutional disorders, such as nephrolithiasis. In small, selected cohorts of early-onset or familial nephrolithiasis, a Mendelian cause was identified in 6.8–29.4% of cases [10, 17–19]. However, the frequency and phenotypic spectrum of genetic disease in sporadic adult-onset nephrolithiasis, by far the most common type encountered in clinical routine, is unknown. To address these important knowledge gaps, we analysed a WES-based gene panel in a deeply phenotyped, little selected European cohort of 787 adult kidney stone formers (KSFs) and in 114 non-kidney stone formers (NKSFs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study cohort

The study was conducted with participants enrolled in the Bern Kidney Stone Registry (BKSR), an observational cohort of adult KSFs described previously and in the SI [20–23]. Inclusion criteria for the BKSR are written informed consent, age ≥18 years and one or more past kidney stone episodes.

Inclusion criteria for NKSFs were written informed consent, age ≥18 years and no history of past kidney stones and no evidence of asymptomatic nephrolithiasis or nephrocalcinosis on ultrasound at enrolment.

Whole exome sequencing and variant calling

Isolation of genomic DNA, exome capture, high-throughput sequencing and bioinformatic analysis including joint variant calling using the Genome Analysis Toolkit version 3.8 (GATK) according to the GATK best practices recommendations [24, 25] and annotation using Ensembl Variant Effect Predictor Release 106 (https://useast.ensembl.org/info/docs/tools/vep/index.html) [26] was performed using established methods, described in more detail in the Supplementary Methods. After filtering for predicted consequences and Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD; https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/) minor allele frequency (<1% in all populations) [27], variants in 34 genes [10, 17–19, 28] previously implicated in Mendelian kidney stone disease were examined (Fig. 1, lower panel). Further variant stratification was performed according to the recommendations of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) [29] after manual review of phenotype data. Only variants classified as likely pathogenic (LP) or pathogenic (P) applying the ACMG criteria were defined as diagnostic variants leading to a genetic diagnosis. Separation into Mendelian or LP/P variants predisposing to nephrolithiasis was conducted depending on the evidence available from this study and/or from published case–control studies, described in more detail in the SI [11, 12, 30, 31] (Fig. 1 and Supplementary Methods).

Figure 1:

Figure 1:

(upper panel) Flowchart of patient inclusion, exclusion and genetic analysis in the BKSR. Data from 1152 individuals recruited into the BKSR were analysed. After exclusion of individuals without genetic information available, declined consent or multiple inclusions, the analysed cohort consisted of 901 individuals (787 KSFs and 114 NKSFs). Before inclusion in the BKSR, NKSFs underwent ultrasound imaging to exclude nephrolithiasis (NL) and/or nephrocalcinosis (NC). Genetic analysis was performed in a standardized prioritization pathway in 34 known kidney stone genes. N: number of individuals; genetic diagnosis: likely pathogenic or pathogenic variant according to ACMG criteria; LP/P variant: monoallelic LP/P variant, predisposing to nephrolithiasis. (lower panel) Kidney stone disease gene panel used for genetic analysis. Panel of 34 known nephrolithiasis genes used with their inheritance mode, as accepted for classification as ‘Mendelian disease’ in this article, grouped by phenotypes. AD: autosomal dominant; AR: autosomal recessive; XLR: X-linked recessive; MODY: maturity-onset diabetes of the young; FRTS: Fanconi renal tubular syndrome.

Statistical analysis

Continuous variables were reported as medians with 25th–75th percentiles [interquartile range (IQR)] or means with standard deviations (SDs) and categorical variables were reported as counts with percentages, as appropriate. Different statistical methods were employed to analyse differences between independent groups, depending on the nature of the variables involved. The Mann–Whitney U test was used for non-normally distributed continuous variables, while the Student's t-test was applied for normally distributed variables. For categorical variables, the Fisher's exact test was used. Findings from these analyses were summarized and presented as descriptive tables. Statistical tests were two-sided and a P-value <.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analyses were performed using Stata version 16 (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA). Pie charts and dot plots were generated with GraphPad Prism version 8.4.3 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA).

RESULTS

Study cohort

We performed WES in 901 individuals, including 787 KSFs and 114 NKSFs (Fig. 1). Clinical characteristics of the study cohort, separated as KSFs and NKSFs, are shown in Table 1. The mean age was 46.6 ± 14.5 years in KSFs and 42.4 ± 14.9 years in NKSFs. The majority of KSFs were male [71.8% (n = 565)], but the percentage of men was lower in NKSFs [54% (n = 61)]. Consistent with previous reports, KSFs were significantly more likely to report a positive family history of kidney stones compared with NKSFs (43.6% versus 6.8%; Table 1) [32, 33], and lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) was lower in KSFs compared with NKSFs (Table 1) [34, 35].

Table 1:

Characteristics of the study cohort.

Characteristics KSFs (n = 787) NKSFs (n = 112)a P-value
Age (years), mean (SD) 46.64 (14.57) 42.41 (14.88) .007
Male, n (%) 565 (71.8) 61 (54.0) <.001
Body mass index (kg/m2), mean (SD) 26.83 (5.08) 26.34 (4.55) .37
Hypertension, n (%) 255 (36.0) 28 (35.9) 1.00
Diabetes, n (%) 24 (3.1) 1 (1.1) .50
Obesity (BMI ≥30 kg/m2), n (%) 168 (22.4) 14 (15.1) .11
Hyperuricemia, n (%) 346 (44.0) 54 (47.8) .48
Family history of kidney stone disease, n (%) 317 (43.6) 3 (6.8) <.001
Kidney stone recurrence (>1 stone event), n (%) 614 (82.2)
Age at first stone event (years), mean (SD) 35.41 (13.85)
Total number of stone events, median (IQR) 3.00 (2.00–4.00)
Blood parameters
 Total calcium (mmol/l), mean (SD) 2.36 (0.12) 2.30 (0.12) <.001
 Ionized calcium (mmol/l), median (IQR) 1.21 (1.19–1.23) 1.19 (1.18–1.22) .002
 Phosphorus (mmol/l), mean (SD) 1.01 (0.17) 1.01 (0.16) .89
 Magnesium (mmol/l), mean (SD) 0.83 (0.07) 0.86 (0.08) <.001
 Uric acid (μmol/l), mean (SD) 328.96 (169.56) 308.44 (71.51) .26
 Intact PTH (ng/l), median (IQR) 39.06 (30.00–51.00) 37.50 (30.50–48.00) .56
 25-OH vitamin D3 (nmol/l), median (IQR) 40.18 (27.00–59.00) 48.50 (32.72–72.44) .017
 eGFR creatinine (CKD-EPI 2009 equation, ml/min/1.73 m2), mean (SD) 94.18 (21.08) 96.31 (21.88) .36
Urine parameters
 Total urine volume (l/24 h), median (IQR) 1.98 (1.47–2.54) 2.10 (1.49–2.65) .41
 Urine pH, median (IQR) 5.94 (5.39–6.60) 6.00 (5.50–6.75) .14
 Urine sodium:creatinine ratio (mmol/mmol/24 h), median (IQR) 13.62 (10.97–16.98) 13.76 (9.92–16.21) .37
 Urine potassium:creatinine ratio (mmol/mmol/24 h), median (IQR) 4.70 (3.77–5.82) 5.56 (4.43–6.55) <.001
 Urine uric acid:creatinine ratio (mmol/mmol/24 h), mean (SD) 0.61 (0.10) 0.38 (0.27) <.001
 Urine calcium:creatinine ratio (mmol/mmol/24 h), median (IQR) 0.43 (0.30–0.58) 0.33 (0.21–0.44) <.001
 Urine magnesium:creatinine ratio (mmol/mmol/24 h), median (IQR) 0.30 (0.24–0.38) 0.32 (0.27–0.42) .059
 Urine citrate:creatinine ratio (mmol/mmol/24 h), median (IQR) 0.19 (0.13–0.27) 0.24 (0.18–0.30) .003
 Urine phosphate:creatinine ratio (mmol/mmol/24 h), mean (SD) 2.18 (0.54) 2.24 (0.57) .41
 Urine oxalate:creatinine ratio (mmol/mmol/24 h), median (IQR) 0.03 (0.02–0.04) 0.03 (0.02–0.05) .062
Stone phenotypes, n (%)
 Calcium oxalate dihydrate 73 (12.9)
 Calcium oxalate monohydrate 287 (50.8)
 Calcium phosphate 130 (23.0)
 Uric acid 38 (6.7)
 Cystine 18 (3.2)
 Struvite 15 (2.7)
BMD, mean (SD)
 Lumbar spine (g/cm2) 1.02 (0.14) 1.06 (0.13) .011
 Lumbar spine T-score −0.57 (1.26) −0.11 (1.20) .005
 Lumbar spine Z-score −0.11 (1.38) 0.29 (1.29) .024
 Femoral neck (g/cm2) 0.84 (0.13) 0.86 (0.12) .21
 Femoral neck T-score −0.55 (1.02) −0.31 (0.95) .076
 Femoral neck Z-score 0.11 (0.99) 0.24 (0.86) .30

aThe NKSFs with LP/P variants (#5948, #5500) were removed for phenotypic analyses.

Characteristics are indicated separately for participants with and without kidney stone disease.

eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate.

Genetic analysis

Among 787 unrelated, unselected adult KSFs, we discovered in 23 patients (2.9%) with a Mendelian form of nephrolithiasis, i.e. pathogenic (P) or likely pathogenic (LP) variants in genes associated with Mendelian forms of nephrolithiasis respecting the relevant mode of inheritance (autosomal dominant and/or autosomal recessive and X-linked recessive) (Table 2, Fig. 1, Fig. 2). Mendelian disease was detected in 9 of 34 analysed genes (n = number of patients): AGXT (n = 1), ATP6V1B1 (n = 1), CYP24A1 (n = 5), GRHPR (n = 1), HOGA1 (n = 1), SLC3A1 (n = 9), SLC4A1 (n = 1), SLC7A9 (n = 4) and SLC12A1 (n = 1).

Table 2:

Genotype and phenotype of patients with Mendelian diagnosis.

ID Gene Inheritance Allelic state Nucleotide change Amino acid change ACMG class ACMG criteria AF gnoMAD (allel/tot/hom) gnoMAD (NFE) Acc. no. dbSNP Sex Age at first stone (years) Past stone events, n Stone composition analysis (%) Family history Key phenotype Clinical diagnosis before WES Genetic diagnosis after WES
AGXT—Primary Hyperoxaluria Type 1 (PH1)
5011 AGXT AR hom c.466G>A p.Gly156Arg P PS1, PM5, PM1, PP2, PM2, PP3, PP5 7/226.862/0
5/101.706/0
NM_000030.3 rs121908530 M 4 8 1) 80 COM, 20 COD
2) 80 COM, 20 COD
N CaOx NL, normal kidney function
Hyperoxaluria (1100)
PH1 PH1
ATP6V1B1–Distal renal tubular acidosis with sensorineural hearing loss/deafness (AR dRTA)
5775 ATP6V1B1 AR hom c.242T>C p.Leu81Pro P PP3s, PM2, PP5 1/250.636/0
0/113.172/0
NM_001692.4 rs121964880 M N/A >5 100 CA N CaP NL, dRTA, medullary NC,
sensorineural deafness
AR-dRTA AR-dRTA
CYP24A1–(Infantile) HC/NL, 1,25-OH vitamin D-24 hydroxylase deficiency
5033 CYP24A1 AR hom c.1186C>T p.Arg396Trp P PM2, PM5, PP3m, PP5vs 167/251.228/1
124/113.676/1
NM_000782.5 rs114368325 F 24 1 N/A Y NL, osteoporosis, single kidney cyst.
Hypercalcemia (total 2.64; ionized 1.4)
Normal PTH (47)
Normal 25-Vit D (83)
Normal 1,25-Vit D (105)
Hypercalciuria (7.7)
Idiopathic, infantile HC, NL, s/p parathyreo-idectomy (Infantile) HC/NL
5052 CYP24A1 AR hom c.1186C>T p.Arg396Trp P PM2, PM5, PP3m, PP5vs 167/251.228/1
124/113.676/1
NM_000782.5 rs114368325 M N/A 1 N/A Y NL, Nephrocalcinosis, multiple kidney cysts, CKD stage 4, Osteopenia, Chondrocalcinosis.
Hypercalcemia (total 2.8; ionized 1.41)
Low PTH (4)
Low 25-Vit D (16)
Normal 1,25-Vit D (112)
Hypercalciuria (7.2)
Infantile HC/NL, CKD IV° due to NC, s/p parathyreo-idectomy (Infantile) HC/NL
5152 CYP24A1 AR het c.1186C>T p.Arg396Trp P PM2, PM5, PP3m, PP5vs 167/251.228/1
124/113.676/1
NM_000782.5 rs114368325 M 26 2 N/A N NL, multiple kidney cysts.
Normocalcemia (total 2.4; ionized 1.26)
Low PTH (10)
Normal 25-Vit D (87)
Normal 1,25-Vit D (177)
Hypercalciuria (19)
Idiopathic NL, polycystic kidney disease (Infantile) HC/NL
het c.428_430 del p.Glu143del P PM2, BS2, PM4, PP5vs 133/251.266/1
119/113.708/1
rs777676129
5334 CYP24A1
(NB* also CLDN16 monoallelic)
AR het c.1226T>C p.Leu409Ser LP PM2, PP5vs
188/251.066/0
153/113.656/0
NM_000782.5 rs6068812 M 21 3 1) 90 COM, 10 COD; 2) 80 COM, 20 COD Y CaOx NL, osteopenia, multiple kidney cysts.
Normal plasma calcium (total 2.48; ionized 1.27)
Normal plasma magnesium (0.72)
Low PTH (9)
Normal 25-Vit D (59)
Normal 1,25-Vit D (93)
Hypercalciuria (14.3)
Idiopathic NL, polycystic kidney disease (Infantile) HC/NL
het c.400T>G p.Trp134Gly LP PM2, PP3m, PP5s 4/251.146/0
3/113.702/0
rs1170841548
5794 CYP24A1 AR hom c.428_430del p.Glu143del P PM2, BS2, PM4, PP5vs 133/251.266/1
119/113.708/1
NM_000782.5 rs777676129 M 61 2 N/A N NL, NC, multiple kidney cysts, incomplete dRTA
Normal plasma calcium (total 2.49; ionized 1.25)
Low PTH (12)
Low 25-Vit D (26)
Normal 1,25-Vit D (73)
Hypercalciuria (10.2)
Medullary sponge kidney (Infantile) HC/NL
GRHPR—Primary hyperoxaluria, type 2 (PH2)
5432 GRHPR AR hom c.103del p.Asp35ThrfsTer11 P PVS1, PM2, PP5vs 59/248.776/0
57/111.550/0
NM_012203.2 rs80356708 M 28 8 1) 80 COM, 20 COD
2): 90 COM, 10 COD
3): 90 COM, 10 COD
Y CaOx NL, CKD stage 3
Hyperoxaluria (1796)
Low urine glycolate/high urine glycerate
Hypocitraturia (1.3)
PH2, start dialysis at age 57 PH2
HOGA1 –Primary hyperoxaluria, type 3 (PH3)
5595 HOGA1 AR hom c.700 + 5G>T p.? P PM2, PP3m, PP5vs 312/251.412/1
239/113.698/1
NM_138413.4 rs185803104 M 36 5 80 COM, 20 COD N CaOx NL, CKD stage 2
Normal urine calcium (2.88)
Normal urine oxalate random diet (428–463), high urine oxalate low Ca/Na diet (1090)
Idiopathic NL PH3
SLC3A1–Cystinuria type A
5030 SLC3A1 AR het c.1400T>C p.Met467Thr P PM1, PP2, PM2, PM5, PP3, PP5vs, PP4 627/251.156/4
479/113.498/3
NM_000341.4 rs121912691 F 18 5 80 Cystine, 20 CA Y Cystine NL, CKD stage 3, osteoporosis.
Urine cystine (115-254 mmol/mol Creatinine)
Norm: <30)
Cystinuria Cystinuria type A
het c.1617 + 1G>A p.? LP PVS1s, PM2, PP4 4/250.972/0 rs558461213
5092 SLC3A1 AR het c.851A>G p.Asp284Gly LP PP3s, PM2, PP2, PP4 NF/NF NM_000341.4
M 17 1 100 Cystine Y Cystine NL,
Urine cystine (263 mmol/mol Creatinine)
Norm: <30)
Cystinuria Cystinuria type A
het c.1617 + 5G>A p.? LP PS4m, PM2, PP3m, PP4 NF/NF
5094 SLC3A1 AR het c.1400T>C p.Met467Thr P PM1, PP2, PM2, PM5, PP3, PP5vs, PP4 627/251.156/4
479/113.498/3
NM_000341.4 rs121912691 M 54 5 1) 90 CA 10
COM
2) 100 cystine
Y Cystine NL, CKD stage 2, kidney cysts
Urine cystine (247 mmol/mol Creatinine)
Norm: <30)
Cystinuria Cystinuria type A
het c.809G>A p.Arg270Gln LP PP3s, PM2, PP2, PP4 2/251.430/0
0/113.720/0
rs142358712
5156 SLC3A1 AR hom c.1400T>C p.Met467Thr P PM1, PP2, PM2, PM5, PP3, PP5vs, PP4 627/251.156/4
479/113.498/3
NM_000341.4 rs121912691 M 22 5 100 cystine Y Cystine NL
Urine cystine (193-235 mmol/mol Creatinine)
Norm: <30)
Cystinuria Cystinuria type A
5162 SLC3A1 AR het c.1400T>C p.Met467Thr P PM1, PP2, PM2, PM5, PP3, PP5vs, PP4 627/251.156/4
479/113.498/3
NM_000341.4 rs121912691 F 24 5 100 cystine N Cystine NL, CKD stage 3
Urine cystine (267-939 mmol/mol Creatinine)
Norm: <30)
Cystinuria Cystinuria type A
het c.787A>C p.Ser263Arg LP PP3m, PM2, PP2, PP4 NF/NF
5168 SLC3A1 AR het c.851A>G p.Asp284Gly LP PP3s, PM2, PP2, PP4 NF/NF NM_000341.4
F 18 5 1) 100 cystine
2) 100 cystine
3) 90 cystine, 10 CA
Y Cystine NL
Urine cystine (213-435 mmol/mol Creatinine)
Norm: <30)
Cystinuria Cystinuria type A
het c.1617 + 5G>A p.? LP PS4m, PM2, PP3, PP4 NF/NF
5479 SLC3A1 AR het c.1400T>C p.Met467Thr P PM1, PP2, PM2, PM5, PP3, PP5vs, PP4 627/251.156/4
479/113.498/3
NM_000341.4 rs121912691 F 22 3 1) 100 cystine
2) 100 cystine
Y Cystine NL, CKD stage 2
Urine cystine (191-232 mmol/mol Creatinine)
Norm: <30)
Cystinuria Cystinuria type A
het c.1094G>T p.Arg365Leu P PM1, PP2, PM2, PM5, PP3m, PP5, PP4 2/251.376/0
1/113.678/0
rs567478582
SLC7A9 AD/AR het C.544G>A p.Ala182Thr P PM2, PM1supp, PP2, PP5vs 727/282810/2
504/113.736/2
NM_014270.5
rs79389353
See above See above
5288 SLC3A1 AR hom c.647C>T p.Thr216Met LP PP3s, PM2, PP2, PP5, PP4 23/251.414/0
15/113.710/0
NM_000341.4 rs369641941 F 19 5 1–5) 100 cystine N Cystine NL, CKD stage 3
Urine cystine (291-306 mmol/mol Creatinine)
Norm: <30)
Cystinuria Cystinuria type A
5578 SLC3A1 AR hom c.833T>C p.Phe278Ser LP PP3s, PM2, PP2, PP4 1/251.432/0 1/113.722/0 NM_000341.4 rs762218116 M 20 18 N/A N Cystine NL, CKD stage 3
Urine cystine (145-239 mmol/mol Creatinine)
Norm: <30)
Cystinuria Cystinuria type A
SLC7A9–Cystinuria, type B
5038 SLC7A9 AR het c.1316A>G p.Tyr439Cys LP PM2, PP3m, PP2, PP4 NF/NF NM_014270.5- F 17 28 1) 60 cystine, 40 CA
2) 100 cystine
N Cystine NL, CKD stage 3
Urine cystine (301 mmol/mol Creatinine)
Norm: <30)
Cystinuria Cystinuria, type B
het c.775G>A p.Gly259Arg LP PP3m, PM2, PP2, PP5, PP4 2/251.260/0
2/113.626/0
rs121908483
5160 SLC7A9 AR hom c.313G>A p.Gly105Arg P PM1, PP2, PM5supp, PP3m, PP5, PP4 96/251.028/1
64/113.436/1
NM_014270.5 rs121908480 M 1 4 100 cystine Y Cystine NL
Urine cystine (286 mmol/mol Creatinine)
Norm: <30)
Cystinuria Cystinuria, type B
5412 SLC7A9 AR hom c.313G>A p.Gly105Arg P PM1, PP2, PM5supp, PP3m, PP5, PP4 96/251.028/1
64/113.436/1
NM_014270.5 rs121908480 M 44 5 100 cystine N Cystine NL
Urine cystine (223 mmol/mol Creatinine)
Norm: <30)
Cystinuria Cystinuria, type B
5716 SLC7A9 AR hom c.313G>A p.Gly105Arg P PM1, PP2, PM5supp, PP3m, PP5, PP4 96/251.028/1
64/113.436/1
NM_014270.5 rs121908480 F 16 2 100 cystine Y Cystine NL
Urine cystine (273 mmol/mol Creatinine)
Norm: <30)
Cystinuria Cystinuria, type B
SLC12A1–Bartter syndrome, type 2
5769 SLC12A1 AR het c.1493C>T p.Ala498Val VUS-LP PP3s, PM2, PP4 4/152.154/0
0/112.752/0
NM_000338.3 rs1366101480 F 22 1 1) 100 CA
2) 20 COD, 20 Struvite, 60 CA
3) 20 COD, 20 Struvite, 60 CA
N CaP/CaOx NL, NC,
CKD stage 2
Low Plasma K (3.3)
High plasma bicarbonate (28)
High urine pH (7.0)
High PTH (88)
Low 25-Vit D (22)
Normal 1,25-Vit D (114)
Hypercalciuria (5.31)
Hypocitraturia (1.8)
Normal urine oxalate (219)
Idiopathic NL and NC, CKD, incomplete dRTA Bartter syndrome, type 2
het c.1878G>A p.Trp626Ter LP PVS1, PM2, PP4 1/251.116/0
1/113.462/0
rs768765027

Acc.No.: RefSeq accession number; ACMG: American C;llege of Medical Genetic:, AF: allele frequency; AR: autosomal recessive; AD: autosomal dominant; dbSNP: reference SNP number of variant; het: heterozygous; hom: homozygous; LP: likely pathogenic, P: pathogenic; tot: total; Novel: mutation detected for the first time in this study/not previously described; NS: nonsense; family history: N = no, Y = yes; M: male; F: female; mo: months; NL: nephrolithiasis; NC: nephrocalcinosis; dRTA: distal renal tubular acidosis; CaOx: calcium oxalate; COM: calcium oxalate monohydrate; COD: calcium oxalate dihydrate; CaP: calcium phosphate; CA: carbonate apatite; Brushite: calcium hydrogen phosphate dihydrate; MAP: magnesium ammonium phosphate (=Struvite); UA: uric acid.

Normal/pathologic values laboratory parameters:

Plasma calcium (mmol/l): 2.15–2.5; hypercalciuria (mmol/24 h): >5.

Plasma magnesium (mmol/l): 0.66–1.07; hyperoxaluria (µmol/24 h): >500.

Plasma phosphate (mmol/l): 0.81–1.45; hypocitraturia (mmol/24 h): <1.65.

PTH (pg/ml): 15–65.

Urine magnesium (mmol/24 h): 3–5.

25-vitamin D (nmol/l): 50–135.

Urine phosphate (mmol/24 h): 13–32.

1,25-vit D (pmol/l): 48–190.

Figure 2:

Figure 2:

Overall yield of genetic diagnoses: (A) diagnostic yield (Mendelian versus LP/P variants predisposing to nephrolithiasis) in KSFs; (B) diagnostic yield in NKSFs; (C) overview of Mendelian diagnoses in KSFs, sorted by phenotype groups; (D) overview of LP/P variants predisposing to nephrolithiasis in KSFs, sorted by phenotype groups.

A total of 66 individuals (8.4%), 64 (8.1%) of which were KSFs, presented with LP/P variants not fulfilling our stringent criteria for Mendelian disease, but predisposing for nephrolithiasis (Supplementary Table S1). LP/P variants were detected in 9 of 34 genes (n = number of patients): ADCY10 (n = 1), CASR (n = 4), CLDN16 (n = 8), CYP24A1 (n = 8), SLC4A1 (n = 1), SLC7A9 (n = 3), SLC34A1 (n = 15), SLC34A3 (n = 17) and SLC9A3R1 (n = 8). Of these variants, 18% (12/66) were novel and previously unreported in ClinVar or HGMD (Supplementary Table S2).

Prior to WES, a Mendelian form of nephrolithiasis was known or suspected in 18 of 23 individuals (78%) with a post-WES Mendelian diagnosis, despite each case being reviewed by a kidney stone expert. Therefore, in 5 of 23 individuals (22%) with Mendelian disease [i.e. 5/787 (0.6% of total KSFs)], genetic analysis established a new or corrected a suspected a priori diagnosis. The diagnostic yield was similar between first-time and recurrent stone formers (Supplementary Table S3) and between men and women (Table 3, Supplementary Table S4).

Table 3:

Characteristics of stone formers with and without pathogenic gene variants.

Characteristics No genetic diagnosis (n = 700) LP/P variants (n = 64) Mendelian disease (n = 23) P-value
Age (years), mean (SD) 47.18 (14.30) 43.73 (15.78) 39.13 (15.83) .009
Male, n (%) 502 (71.7) 50 (78.1) 14 (60.9) .27
Body mass index (kg/m2), mean (SD) 26.94 (5.12) 26.56 (4.91) 24.42 (3.15) .074
Hypertension, n (%) 223 (35.4) 23 (41.1) 9 (40.9) .57
Diabetes, n (%) 23 (3.4) 1 (1.6) 0 (0.0) .86
Obesity (BMI ≥30 kg/m2), n (%) 152 (22.8) 15 (24.2) 1 (4.8) .12
Hyperuricemia, n (%) 306 (43.7) 28 (43.8) 12 (52.2) .75
Family history of kidney stone disease, n (%) 278 (43.1) 29 (49.2) 9 (40.9) .66
Kidney stone recurrence (>1 stone event), n (%) 547 (82.5) 49 (79.0) 18 (81.8) .73
Age at first stone event (years), mean (SD) 35.96 (13.76) 33.89 (13.47) 23.48 (12.29) <.001
Total number of stone events, median (IQR) 3.00 (2.00–4.00) 3.00 (2.00–4.00) 5.00 (2.00–5.00) .14
Blood parameters
 Total calcium (mmol/l), mean (SD) 2.35 (0.12) 2.38 (0.12) 2.40 (0.11) .075
 Ionized calcium (mmol/l), median (IQR) 1.21 (1.19–1.23) 1.22 (1.19–1.25) 1.23 (1.21–1.25) .17
 Phosphorus (mmol/l), mean (SD) 1.01 (0.17) 0.96 (0.14) 1.07 (0.13) .037
 Magnesium (mmol/l), mean (SD) 0.83 (0.07) 0.84 (0.07) 0.81 (0.07) .40
 Uric acid (μmol/l), mean (SD) 328.87 (177.47) 325.73 (74.03) 342.85 (78.56) .93
 Intact PTH (ng/l), median (IQR) 40.00 (30.00–52.00) 35.60 (27.80–44.00) 36.00 (22.00–55.00) .069
 25-OH vitamin D3 (nmol/l), median (IQR) 40.00 (27.00–59.00) 45.00 (29.50–60.00) 32.45 (22.00–73.00) .71
 eGFR creatinine (CKD-EPI 2009 equation; ml/1.73 m2) 96.42 (81.53–109.15) 99.10 (83.07–110.36) 93.52 (71.42–97.96) .28
Urine parameters
 Total urine volume (l/24 h), median (IQR) 1.96 (1.47–2.50) 2.05 (1.37–2.59) 2.54 (2.38–3.30) <.001
 Urine pH, median (IQR) 5.89 (5.35–6.52) 6.29 (5.60–6.70) 6.82 (6.63–7.16) <.001
 Urine sodium:creatinine ratio (mmol/mmol/24 h), median (IQR) 13.58 (10.97–16.79) 12.39 (10.70–17.20) 18.78 (15.27–20.41) <.001
 Urine potassium:creatinine ratio (mmol/mmol/24 h), median (IQR) 4.69 (3.75–5.78) 4.26 (3.71–5.56) 6.52 (5.18–7.57) <.001
 Urine uric acid:creatinine ratio (mmol/mmol/24 h), mean (SD) 0.62 (0.10) 0.59 (0.10) 0.60 (0.14) .19
 Urine calcium:creatinine ratio (mmol/mmol/24 h), median (IQR) 0.43 (0.30–0.58) 0.47 (0.36–0.60) 0.40 (0.24–0.53) .13
 Urine magnesium:creatinine ratio (mmol/mmol/24 h), median (IQR) 0.30 (0.24–0.38) 0.28 (0.23–0.35) 0.38 (0.28–0.47) .039
 Urine citrate:creatinine ratio (mmol/mmol/24 h), median (IQR) 0.19 (0.13–0.27) 0.20 (0.14–0.27) 0.22 (0.13–0.31) .72
 Urine phosphate:creatinine ratio (mmol/mmol/24 h), mean (SD) 2.19 (0.55) 2.15 (0.47) 2.15 (0.46) .82
 Urine oxalate:creatinine ratio (mmol/mmol/24 h), median (IQR) 0.03 (0.02–0.04) 0.02 (0.01–0.04) 0.04 (0.02–0.05) .12
 Urine cystine:creatinine ratio (mmol/mol/24 h), median (IQR) 4.00 (3.00–5.00) 4.00 (3.00–6.00) 204.00 (3.00–263.00) <.001
Stone phenotypes, n (%)
 Calcium oxalate dihydrate 66 (13.1) 7 (15.9) 0 (0.0) .24
 Calcium oxalate monohydrate 264 (52.4) 19 (43.2) 4 (23.5) .035
 Calcium phosphate 115 (22.8) 13 (29.5) 2 (11.8) .35
 Uric acid 37 (7.3) 1 (2.3) 0 (0.0) .40
 Cystine 7 (1.4) 0 (0.0) 11 (64.7) <.001
 Struvite 12 (2.4) 3 (6.8) 0 (0.0) .17
BMD, mean (SD)
 Lumbar spine (g/cm2) 1.01 (0.14) 1.00 (0.11) 1.11 (0.13) .022
 Lumbar spine T-score −0.58 (1.28) −0.71 (1.01) 0.32 (1.05) .022
 Lumbar spine Z-score −0.11 (1.40) −0.28 (1.14) 0.64 (1.15) .086
 Femoral neck (g/cm2) 0.83 (0.13) 0.84 (0.10) 0.89 (0.21) .37
 Femoral neck T-score −0.57 (1.02) −0.48 (0.87) −0.14 (1.50) .26
 Femoral neck Z-score 0.11 (1.00) 0.09 (0.79) 0.34 (1.39) .67

Characteristics are indicated separately for stone formers with Mendelian disease and with/without LP/P predisposing gene variants.

eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate.

Genotype–phenotype correlation

The mean age of the first kidney stone event (23.5 ± 12.3 versus 35.9 ± 13.8 years; P < .001) and the mean age of presentation for metabolic workup (39 ± 15.8 versus 47.2 ± 14.3 years; P = .009) were lower in KSFs with a Mendelian diagnosis compared with KSFs without, with intermediate results for patients with LP/P variants predisposing for nephrolithiasis (Table 3, Supplementary Fig. S3). Furthermore, cystine stones were significantly more common (64.7% versus 1.4%) and calcium oxalate monohydrate stones less common (23.5% versus 52.5%) in KSFs with a Mendelian diagnosis compared with KSFs with LP/P variants or without a genetic diagnosis, in line with higher urinary cystine and urine pH in KSFs with a Mendelian diagnosis (Table 3, Supplementary Fig. S2). The prevalence of a positive family history of kidney stone disease was similar in all three groups (43.1% versus 49.2% versus 46.0%). Additionally, KSFs with Mendelian disease had more past kidney stone events [median 5 (IQR 2–5) versus 3 (2–4); P = 0.052] than KSFs with LP/P variants. In contrast, KSFs with LP/P variants had significantly lower plasma phosphate (Table 3). Lumbar spine BMD was higher in KSFs with Mendelian disease compared with KSFs without genetic disease or LP/P variants predisposing for nephrolithiasis (Table 3, Supplementary Fig. S6).

Mendelian disease

The most common Mendelian diagnosis was cystinuria (n = 13) due to biallelic diagnostic variants in SLC3A1 (type A cystinuria; n = 9) or SLC7A9 (type B cystinuria; n = 4). Urine cystine excretion, where available, was increased in all KSFs with a genetic diagnosis of cystinuria. One patient had biallelic diagnostic variants in SLC3A1 and a monoallelic LP/P variant in SLC7A9. KSFs with biallelic diagnostic SLC3A1 or SLC7A9 variants all had cystine stones.

Five patients had biallelic diagnostic variants in CYP24A1, which encodes the vitamin D–inactivating enzyme vitamin D 24-hydroxylase. Interestingly, all KSFs with biallelic variants in CYP24A1 (but no KSFs with a monoallelic CYP24A1 variant) displayed cystic kidney disease, as reported previously [31, 36]. Common misdiagnoses for patients with biallelic variants in CYP24A1 (n = 3) were polycystic kidney disease or medullary sponge kidney. Two patients with biallelic CYP24A1 variants underwent parathyroidectomy for suspected primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT), without phenotype alleviation postoperatively.

We further identified three patients with primary hyperoxaluria (PH) in our cohort. The diagnosis was already established in the two patients with primary hyperoxaluria type 1 (PH1) and primary hyperoxaluria type 2 (PH2). The diagnosis was previously unknown in the patient with primary hyperoxaluria type 3 (PH3) due to a homozygous pathogenic HOGA1 variant. This patient had his first kidney stone episode at age 36. Metabolic workup at age of 67 showed CKD stage 2 and a urine oxalate in the upper normal range on free-choice diet, but a strong increase after an instructed 1-week diet low in calcium and sodium.

No Mendelian form of nephrolithiasis was detected in the 114 NKSFs included in this study (Fig. 1, Fig. 2, Supplementary Table S5).

LP/P variants predisposing to nephrolithiasis

The most common identified genetic predisposition to nephrolithiasis was renal phosphate wasting due to monoallelic variants in the genes encoding the renal sodium–phosphate co-transporters NaPi-2a and NaPi-2c [SLC34A1 (n = 15) and SLC34A3 (n = 18)] or in the gene SLC9A3R1, encoding the regulatory interaction protein for NaPi-2a/2c, NHERF (n = 7). LP/P variants in SLC34A1 and SLC34A3, but not in SLC9A3R1, were enriched in KSFs compared with controls (NKSFs and gnomAD, Supplementary Table S5). KSFs with LP/P variants in SLC34A1/A3 or SLC9A3R1 had similar plasma phosphate and renal tubular maximum reabsorption rate of phosphate/glomerular filtration rate (TmP/GFR) compared with KSFs without a genetic diagnosis, but urine calcium in individuals with LP/P variants in SLC34A3 was higher compared with KSFs without a genetic diagnosis (Supplementary Fig. S4).

We also identified eight patients carrying the same previously described monoallelic LP/P variant (c.458A>G, p.Asn153Ser) in CLDN16, encoding the tight junction protein claudin-16. Biallelic pathogenic variants in CLDN16 cause familial hypomagnesemia with hypercalciuria and nephrocalcinosis [37], and an increased prevalence of nephrolithiasis has been observed in monoallelic carriers of pathogenic CLDN16 variants [30, 38]. Individuals with the monoallelic CLDN16 variant presented with hypercalciuria and calcium oxalate stones but normal renal function and plasma magnesium. The identified CLDN16 variant was more prevalent in KSFs versus NKSFs and versus all LP/P-variants in CLDN16 in gnomAD non-Finnish European (NFE) (Supplementary Table S5).

Additionally, eight patients carried monoallelic LP/P variants in CYP24A1, and the respective variants were five to eight times more prevalent in KSFs versus NKSFs and versus gnomAD NFE (Supplementary Table S5). Overall (i.e. considering the prevalence of all variants), CYP24A1 variants were not enriched in our cohort compared with gnomAD NFE (Supplementary Table S5). KSFs with mono- and biallelic CYP24A1 variants displayed hypercalciuria, but hypercalcemia and/or suppressed parathyroid hormone (PTH) or nephrocalcinosis were only present in KSFs with biallelic variants. Urine calcium was higher in KSFs with biallelic variants, but KSFs with monoallelic variants had a higher number of past stone events (Supplementary Fig. S5). BMD and the prevalence of osteoporosis/osteopenia were similar in patients with genetic variants predisposing to urinary phosphate or calcium wasting compared with KSFs without a genetic diagnosis (Supplementary Fig. S6 and Supplementary Table S7).

We also identified six patients with monoallelic LP/P variants in SLC7A9. Risk variants were either previously described to cause autosomal dominant cystinuria [c.544G>A p.(Ala182Thr)] [39–42] or were enriched in KSFs versus NKSFs and gnomAD [c.313G>A p.(Gly105Arg)]. In contrast to biallelic variants, the six KSFs with monoallelic SLC7A9 variants presented with calcium-containing kidney stones without cystine content, similar to previously reported cases [43–45]. KSFs with monoallelic SLC7A9 variants had elevated urine cystine, albeit lower levels compared with KSFs with biallelic variants in SLC3A1/SLC7A9. No significant differences in stone number or age at first stone event were detected between the two groups of patients (Supplementary Fig. S5). In seven individuals with cystine-containing kidney stones and two individuals with increased urine cystine, no diagnostic variants in SLC3A1 or SLC7A9 could be identified (Supplementary Table S6).

Four KSFs had LP/P variants in the gene encoding the calcium-sensing receptor (CASR), which is associated with familial hypocalciuric hypercalcaemia type 1 (FHH1) or autosomal dominant hypocalcaemia. The frequency of CASR LP/P variants in KSFs was significantly higher than LP/P variants in all gnomAD NFE participants (Supplementary Table S5). The phenotype of these patients was variable: two patients presented with hypercalciuria but normal plasma calcium, phosphate and PTH; one patient had hypercalcemia with a low-normal PTH and low urine calcium; and another patient presented with elevated PTH, hypercalcemia, pronounced hypophosphatemia, hypercalciuria and calcium oxalate dihydrate stones, compatible with the diagnosis of PHPT. Parathyroidectomy led to a complete normalization of the phenotype.

In the 114 NKSFs included in this study, exome sequencing revealed an LP/P variant in two individuals, corresponding to a prevalence of variants predisposing to nephrolithiasis of 1.8% (compared with 8.13% for KSFs) (Fig. 1, Fig. 2, Supplementary Table S5).

DISCUSSION

In this exome-based targeted panel study in a large, unselected European cohort of 787 adult KSFs, we detected a Mendelian kidney stone disease in 23 patients (2.9%) using stringent diagnostic criteria. This diagnostic yield is significantly lower compared with previous studies conducted in selected groups of KSFs [10, 17, 46], yet the fraction of additional individuals (8.13%) with LP/P variants predisposing to nephrolithiasis is substantial, especially when considering the broad inclusion criteria, the high prevalence of the disease and the potential rate of false negatives due to stringent molecular genetic diagnosis criteria and technical limitations of exome sequencing, such as an inability to detect deep intronic or difficulty in reliably calling copy number variants. In fact, if Mendelian disease and variants predisposing to nephrolithiasis are combined, the overall diagnostic yield is 11% (87/787 individuals), comparable to neurometabolic disorders or cancer, where exome sequencing is routinely used [16, 47, 48]. Interestingly, the diagnostic yield was not different between first-time and recurrent stone formers and did not differ when stratified by sex. In NKSFs, no Mendelian kidney stone disease was detected, and LP/P variants in nephrolithiasis genes were significantly less prevalent compared with KSFs (1.8% versus 8.1%).

Cystinuria due to biallelic diagnostic variants in SLC3A1 or SLC7A9 was the most common Mendelian disease in our cohort (57%; n = 13/23 individuals with Mendelian disease), and an additional 6 individuals carried monoallelic LP/P variants in SLC7A9. We confirmed a high prevalence of CKD in KSFs with cystinuria [49], yet this applied only to KSFs with biallelic diagnostic variants. We were unable to provide a genetic diagnosis in nine KSFs with a cystinuria phenotype, including seven individuals with cystine-containing kidney stones and two individuals with elevated urinary cystine excretion. While this could be at least partially due to technical limitations, such as the inability to detect deep intronic variants or missed copy number variations [39], it may also indicate that the genetic architecture of cystinuria is not yet completely deciphered. Of note, the prevalence of phenotypic cystinuria (including patients with elevated urinary cysteine but no cysteine stones) in the BKSR [22/787 KSFs (2.8%)] was only marginally higher than described for adult stone formers (1–2%), but significantly lower than in paediatric cohorts (6–10%) [50, 51].

Of the LP/P variants detected predisposing to nephrolithiasis, by far the most common [63% (n = 40/64)] were variants in SLC34A1/3 or SLC9A3R1, highlighting the pathophysiological importance of renal phosphate loss in the increasing risk for kidney stone formation [12, 52]. However, the phenotype of KSFs with LP/P variants in these genes on a free-choice diet was very subtle and mostly indistinguishable from KSFs without predisposing variants. Future studies need to determine if the phenotype of KSFs with LP/P variants in these genes can be unmasked by dietary interventions (e.g. by a low phosphate diet) for diagnostic purposes and mitigated for prevention of future stone events (e.g. by phosphate supplementation).

We only detected one KSF with a monoallelic LP/P variant in ADCY10, indicating that variants in ADCY10 are not contributing significantly to the overall nephrolithiasis risk, at least in individuals of European descent [43, 53]. Further, we identified four patients with CASR LP/P variants in our cohort with very variable phenotypes. Atypical characteristics such as chondrocalcinosis or kidney stones have been described in patients with FHH1 but complicate the separation from PHPT [54–56]. Yet, separation is of critical importance: parathyroidectomy is the first-line treatment in PHPT, but surgery is ineffective in FHH1. Additional complexity arises from the fact that PHPT and FHH1 can coexist, as observed in patient 6023 [57, 58]. Interestingly, the diagnostic rate in uric acid stone formers was very low, with no Mendelian disease and only one monoallelic LP/P variant (in ADCY10) found in 38 uric acid stone formers, suggesting no significant contribution of Mendelian disease in uric acid stone disease.

Genetic diagnoses in KSFs can have important prognostic implications and therapeutic consequences. However, while the pathophysiology is well delineated, the effectiveness of therapeutic interventions has not been studied systematically in most forms of Mendelian nephrolithiasis. The widespread use of genetic testing will facilitate the inclusion of KSF with Mendelian disease and LP/P variants predisposing to nephrolithiasis in prospective registries and clinical trials to study disease evolution and evaluate tailored therapeutic interventions. Currently KSFs are only subjected to genetic testing if a specific disease is strongly suspected. While clinical signs suggesting an inherited disorder have been proposed [59], Mendelian disease was missed or misclassified in 5 of 23 (22%) KSFs in our cohort, despite individual review of each case by a kidney stone expert. The situation is even far more difficult in KSFs with LP/P variants predisposing to nephrolithiasis: the associated phenotypes were discrete and variable, with a large phenotype overlap with KSFs without LP/P variants. But the low prevalence of LP/P variants detected in NKSFs suggests a rather high penetrance of LP/P variants predisposing to nephrolithiasis in adults, with the limitation of a small NKSF sample size. Together, these results preclude the definition of clear phenotypic criteria to reliably prioritize genetic testing in adult KSFs, with the notable exception of Mendelian forms of nephrolithiasis with clear and unequivocal phenotypes. In addition, LP/P variants present with their own challenges in clinics and considerations for clinical reporting of LP/P variants and risk alleles have recently been suggested [14].

Strengths of our study include very minor patient pre-selection with broad inclusion criteria, the large sample size, availability of ethnically matched non-stone-forming controls and the detailed phenotype. Our study also has limitations, such as the inability to detect deep intronic and copy number variants, lack of family recruitment for segregation analyses, monocentric recruitment, overrepresentation of men and limited ethnic diversity.

In conclusion, our study shows that Mendelian disease is far less common in adult KSFs than previously suggested, but simultaneously reveals a high prevalence of LP/P variants predisposing to nephrolithiasis in adult KSFs. Our study also highlights the potential of genetic testing in unselected adult KSFs for accurate assessment of Mendelian disease and identification of variants predisposing to nephrolithiasis to direct patients to tailored therapies and clinical trials.

Supplementary Material

gfae074_Supplemental_Files

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Part of this work was presented in an abstract form at the American Society of Nephrology Kidney Week, 3–6 November 2022, Orlando, FL, USA. We wish to thank all the patients and staff from all units participating in the study. We also wish to thank Hans Anderegg for technical expertise in database development.

Contributor Information

Manuel A Anderegg, Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; Swiss National Centre of Competence in Research Kidney.CH, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.

Eric G Olinger, Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; Swiss National Centre of Competence in Research Kidney.CH, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland; Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK; Center for Human Genetics, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium.

Matteo Bargagli, Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; Swiss National Centre of Competence in Research Kidney.CH, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.

Rob Geraghty, Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

Lea Taylor, Interfaculty Bioinformatics Unit, University of Bern and Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Bern, Switzerland.

Alexander Nater, Interfaculty Bioinformatics Unit, University of Bern and Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Bern, Switzerland.

Rémy Bruggmann, Interfaculty Bioinformatics Unit, University of Bern and Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Bern, Switzerland.

John A Sayer, Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK; Renal Services, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK; National Institute for Health Research Newcastle Biomedical Research Centre, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.

Bruno Vogt, Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

André Schaller, Department of Human Genetics, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Daniel G Fuster, Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; Swiss National Centre of Competence in Research Kidney.CH, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.

FUNDING

M.A.A. was supported by a grant for protected research time by the InselGruppe. E.G.O was supported by Postdoc Mobility Stipendien of the Swiss National Science Foundation (grants P2ZHP3_195181 and P500PB_206851) and Kidney Research UK (grant Paed_RP_001_20180925). D.G.F. was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (grants 31003A_172974 and 33IC30_166785/1) and the Swiss National Centre of Competence in Research Kidney.CH. J.A.S. is supported by the Northern Counties Kidney Research Fund (22/01), Kidney Research UK (Paed_RP_001_20180925), LifeArc and the Medical Research Council (MR/Y007808/1).

AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTIONS

D.G.F., A.S. and J.A.S. conceptualized the study. D.G.F. and M.A.A. acquired financial support. M.A.A., E.G.O. and D.G.F. designed the data analysis plans. M.A.A., E.G.O., M.B., A.S. and D.G.F. performed data analysis and data interpretation. M.A.A. wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors contributed to discussion and editing of the text and approved the final version of the manuscript.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

The authors declare no competing interests.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Chewcharat A, Curhan G. Trends in the prevalence of kidney stones in the United States from 2007 to 2016. Urolithiasis 2021;49:27–39. 10.1007/s00240-020-01210-w [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ferraro PM, Curhan GC, D'Addessi Aet al. Risk of recurrence of idiopathic calcium kidney stones: analysis of data from the literature. J Nephrol 2017;30:227–33. 10.1007/s40620-016-0283-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.New F, Somani BK. A complete world literature review of quality of life (QOL) in patients with kidney stone disease (KSD). Curr Urol Rep 2016;17:88. 10.1007/s11934-016-0647-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Saigal CS, Joyce G, Timilsina AR. Direct and indirect costs of nephrolithiasis in an employed population: opportunity for disease management? Kidney Int 2005;68:1808–14. 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.00599.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Pearle MS, Goldfarb DS, Assimos DGet al. Medical management of kidney stones: AUA guideline. J Urol 2014;192:316–24. 10.1016/j.juro.2014.05.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Dhayat NA, Bonny O, Roth Bet al. Hydrochlorothiazide and prevention of kidney-stone recurrence. N Engl J Med 2023;388:781–91. 10.1056/NEJMoa2209275 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Curhan GC, Willett WC, Rimm EBet al. Family history and risk of kidney stones. J Am Soc Nephrol 1997;8:1568–73. 10.1681/ASN.V8101568 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Goldfarb DS, Fischer ME, Keich Yet al. A twin study of genetic and dietary influences on nephrolithiasis: a report from the Vietnam Era Twin (VET) Registry. Kidney Int 2005;67:1053–61. 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.00170.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Edvardsson VO, Palsson R, Indridason OSet al. Familiality of kidney stone disease in Iceland. Scand J Urol Nephrol 2009;43:420–4. 10.3109/00365590903151479 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Halbritter J, Baum M, Hynes AMet al. Fourteen monogenic genes account for 15% of nephrolithiasis/nephrocalcinosis. J Am Soc Nephrol 2015;26:543–51. 10.1681/ASN.2014040388 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sadeghi-Alavijeh O, Chan MMY, Moochhala SHet al. Rare variants in the sodium-dependent phosphate transporter gene SLC34A3 explain missing heritability of urinary stone disease. Kidney Int 2023;104:975–84. 10.1016/j.kint.2023.06.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Nwachukwu C, Singh G, Moore Bet al. Risk of nephrolithiasis in adults heterozygous for SLC34A3 Ser192Leu in an unselected health system cohort. J Am Soc Nephrol 2023;34:1819–21. 10.1681/ASN.0000000000000204 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Halbritter J. Urinary stone disease: closing the heritability gap by challenging conventional Mendelian inheritance. Kidney Int 2023;104:882–5. 10.1016/j.kint.2023.08.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lebo M, Steeves M, Benson Ket al. O31: risk allele evidence curation, classification, and reporting: recommendations from the ClinGen Low Penetrance/Risk Allele Working Group. Genet Med Open 2023;1:100457. 10.1016/j.gimo.2023.100457 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Groopman EE, Marasa M, Cameron-Christie Set al. Diagnostic utility of exome sequencing for kidney disease. N Engl J Med 2019;380:142–51. 10.1056/NEJMoa1806891 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Tarailo-Graovac M, Shyr C, Ross CJet al. Exome sequencing and the management of neurometabolic disorders. N Engl J Med 2016;374:2246–55. 10.1056/NEJMoa1515792 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Daga A, Majmundar AJ, Braun DAet al. Whole exome sequencing frequently detects a monogenic cause in early onset nephrolithiasis and nephrocalcinosis. Kidney Int 2018;93:204–13. 10.1016/j.kint.2017.06.025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Braun DA, Lawson JA, Gee HYet al. Prevalence of monogenic causes in pediatric patients with nephrolithiasis or nephrocalcinosis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2016;11:664–72. 10.2215/CJN.07540715 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Amar A, Majmundar AJ, Ullah Iet al. Gene panel sequencing identifies a likely monogenic cause in 7% of 235 Pakistani families with nephrolithiasis. Hum Genet 2019;138:211–9. 10.1007/s00439-019-01978-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Dhayat NA, Schaller A, Albano Get al. The vacuolar H+-ATPase B1 subunit polymorphism p.E161K associates with impaired urinary acidification in recurrent stone formers. J Am Soc Nephrol 2016;27:1544–54. 10.1681/ASN.2015040367 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Dhayat NA, Luthi D, Schneider Let al. Distinct phenotype of kidney stone formers with renal phosphate leak. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2019;34:129–37. 10.1093/ndt/gfy170 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Dhayat NA, Schneider L, Popp AWet al. Predictors of bone mineral density in kidney stone formers. Kidney Int Rep 2022;7:558–67. 10.1016/j.ekir.2021.12.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Fuster DG, Morard GA, Schneider Let al. Association of urinary sex steroid hormones with urinary calcium, oxalate and citrate excretion in kidney stone formers. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2022;37:335–48. 10.1093/ndt/gfaa360 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.DePristo MA, Banks E, Poplin Ret al. A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next-generation DNA sequencing data. Nat Genet 2011;43:491–8. 10.1038/ng.806 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Poplin R, Ruano-Rubio V, DePristo MAet al. Scaling accurate genetic variant discovery to tens of thousands of samples. Biorxiv 2018;201178. 10.1101/201178 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.McLaren W, Gil L, Hunt SEet al. The Ensembl variant effect predictor. Genome Biol 2016;17:122. 10.1186/s13059-016-0974-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Karczewski KJ, Francioli LC, Tiao Get al. The mutational constraint spectrum quantified from variation in 141,456 humans. Nature 2020;581:434–43. 10.1038/s41586-020-2308-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Policastro LJ, Saggi SJ, Goldfarb DSet al. Personalized intervention in monogenic stone formers. J Urol 2018;199:623–32. 10.1016/j.juro.2017.09.143 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Richards S, Aziz N, Bale Set al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med 2015;17:405–24. 10.1038/gim.2015.30 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Weber S, Schneider L, Peters Met al. Novel paracellin-1 mutations in 25 families with familial hypomagnesemia with hypercalciuria and nephrocalcinosis. J Am Soc Nephrol 2001;12:1872–81. 10.1681/ASN.V1291872 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Tebben PJ, Milliner DS, Horst RLet al. Hypercalcemia, hypercalciuria, and elevated calcitriol concentrations with autosomal dominant transmission due to CYP24A1 mutations: effects of ketoconazole therapy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2012;97:E423–7. 10.1210/jc.2011-1935 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Resnick M, Pridgen DB, Goodman HO. Genetic predisposition to formation of calcium oxalate renal calculi. N Engl J Med 1968;278:1313–8. 10.1056/NEJM196806132782403 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Curhan GC, Willett WC, Rimm EBet al. A prospective study of dietary calcium and other nutrients and the risk of symptomatic kidney stones. N Engl J Med 1993;328:833–8. 10.1056/NEJM199303253281203 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Sakhaee K, Maalouf NM, Kumar Ret al. Nephrolithiasis-associated bone disease: pathogenesis and treatment options. Kidney Int 2011;79:393–403. 10.1038/ki.2010.473 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Melton L J 3rd, Crowson CS, Khosla Set al. Fracture risk among patients with urolithiasis: a population-based cohort study. Kidney Int 1998;53:459–64. 10.1046/j.1523-1755.1998.00779.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Hanna C, Potretzke TA, Cogal AGet al. High prevalence of kidney cysts in patients with CYP24A1 deficiency. Kidney Int Rep 2021;6:1895–903. 10.1016/j.ekir.2021.04.030 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Simon DB, Lu Y, Choate KAet al. Paracellin-1, a renal tight junction protein required for paracellular Mg2+ resorption. Science 1999;285:103–6. 10.1126/science.285.5424.103 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Praga M, Vara J, Gonzalez-Parra Eet al. Familial hypomagnesemia with hypercalciuria and nephrocalcinosis. Kidney Int 1995;47:1419–25. 10.1038/ki.1995.199 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Font-Llitjos M, Jimenez-Vidal M, Bisceglia Let al. New insights into cystinuria: 40 new mutations, genotype-phenotype correlation, and digenic inheritance causing partial phenotype. J Med Genet 2005;42:58–68. 10.1136/jmg.2004.022244 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Gaildrat P, Lebbah S, Tebani Aet al. Clinical and molecular characterization of cystinuria in a French cohort: relevance of assessing large-scale rearrangements and splicing variants. Mol Genet Genomic Med 2017;5:373–89. 10.1002/mgg3.294 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Font MA, Feliubadalo L, Estivill Xet al. Functional analysis of mutations in SLC7A9, and genotype-phenotype correlation in non-type I cystinuria. Hum Mol Genet 2001;10:305–16. 10.1093/hmg/10.4.305 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Reig N, Chillaron J, Bartoccioni Pet al. The light subunit of system bo,+ is fully functional in the absence of the heavy subunit. EMBO J 2002;21:4906–14. 10.1093/emboj/cdf500 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Halbritter J, Baum M, Hynes AMet al. Fourteen monogenic genes account for 15% of nephrolithiasis/nephrocalcinosis. J Am Soc Nephrol 2015;26:543–51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Elkoushy MA, Andonian S. Characterization of patients with heterozygous cystinuria. Urology 2012;80:795–9. 10.1016/j.urology.2012.04.062 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Cupisti A, Farnesi I, Armillotta Net al. Staghorn cystine stone in a 72-year-old recurrent calcium stone former. Clin Nephrol 2012;78:76–80. 10.5414/CN107046 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Schonauer R, Scherer L, Nemitz-Kliemchen Met al. Systematic assessment of monogenic etiology in adult-onset kidney stone formers undergoing urological intervention-evidence for genetic pretest probability. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 2022;190:279–88. 10.1002/ajmg.c.31991 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Huang KL, Mashl RJ, Wu Yet al. Pathogenic germline variants in 10,389 adult cancers. Cell 2018;173:355–70.e14. 10.1016/j.cell.2018.03.039 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Zhang J, Walsh MF, Wu Get al. Germline mutations in predisposition genes in pediatric cancer. N Engl J Med 2015;373:2336–46. 10.1056/NEJMoa1508054 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Prot-Bertoye C, Lebbah S, Daudon Met al. CKD and its risk factors among patients with cystinuria. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2015;10:842–51. 10.2215/CJN.06680714 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Edvardsson VO, Goldfarb DS, Lieske JCet al. Hereditary causes of kidney stones and chronic kidney disease. Pediatr Nephrol 2013;28:1923–42. 10.1007/s00467-012-2329-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Milliner DS, Murphy ME. Urolithiasis in pediatric patients. Mayo Clin Proc 1993;68:241–8. 10.1016/S0025-6196(12)60043-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Sadeghi-Alavijeh O, Chan MMY, Moochhala SHet al. Rare variants in in the sodium-dependent phosphate transporter gene SLC34A3 explain missing heritability of urinary stone disease. Kidney Int 2023;104:975–84. 10.1016/j.kint.2023.06.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Reed BY, Gitomer WL, Heller HJet al. Identification and characterization of a gene with base substitutions associated with the absorptive hypercalciuria phenotype and low spinal bone density. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2002;87:1476–85. 10.1210/jcem.87.4.8300 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Mouly C, Vargas-Poussou R, Lienhardt Aet al. Clinical characteristics of familial hypocalciuric hypercalcaemia type 1: a multicentre study of 77 adult patients. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2020;93:248–60. 10.1111/cen.14211 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Volpe A, Guerriero A, Marchetta Aet al. Familial hypocalciuric hypercalcemia revealed by chondrocalcinosis. Joint Bone Spine 2009;76:708–10. 10.1016/j.jbspin.2009.02.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Stratta P, Merlotti G, Musetti Cet al. Calcium-sensing-related gene mutations in hypercalcaemic hypocalciuric patients as differential diagnosis from primary hyperparathyroidism: detection of two novel inactivating mutations in an Italian population. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2014;29:1902–9. 10.1093/ndt/gfu065 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Eldeiry LS, Ruan DT, Brown EMet al. Primary hyperparathyroidism and familial hypocalciuric hypercalcemia: relationships and clinical implications. Endocr Pract 2012;18:412–7. 10.4158/EP11272.RA [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Egan AM, Ryan J, Aziz MAet al. Primary hyperparathyroidism in a patient with familial hypocalciuric hypercalcaemia due to a novel mutation in the calcium-sensing receptor gene. J Bone Miner Metab 2013;31:477–80. 10.1007/s00774-012-0399-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Ferraro PM, D'Addessi A, Gambaro G. When to suspect a genetic disorder in a patient with renal stones, and why. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2013;28:811–20. 10.1093/ndt/gfs545 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

gfae074_Supplemental_Files

Data Availability Statement

The data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.


Articles from Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES