Skip to main content
. 2024 Oct 7;12(10):23259671241274770. doi: 10.1177/23259671241274770

Table 4.

Survey Studies of ACLR Since 2016 a

Year Authors Participants Preferred Graft Tunnel Drilling Femoral Fixation Tibial Fixation IS Screw Type AL Augment CPM RTP
2016 Grassi et al 18 SIGASCOT (Italy) HS 81% NR NR NR NR NR NR 6-8 months 69%
2016 Vaishya et al 38 DAS (India) HS 83% AM 90% Button 94% IS 96% Bio 97% NR NR NR
2017 Budny et al 4 AOSSM and AANA (US) HS 45%, BPTB 41% AM 61% BPTB: IS 79%
ST: Button 79%
BPTB: IS 98%
ST: IS 41%
NR NR 23% 6-9 months 66%
2021 Sherman et al 34 ACL Study Group (International) HS 53%, BPTB 36% AM 73% Button 50% IS 50% NR Rare/never 54% NR 6-8 months 44%
2023 Tuca et al 37 ISAKOS (Intl) HS 80% AM 79% BPTB: IS 93%
ST: Button 83%
BPTB: IS 95%
ST: IS 77%
BPTB: Metal 49%
ST: Bio 81%
Never 45% NR 9 months 33%
2024 Engler et al, this study Herodicus (US+) BPTB 59%, Quad 15% AM 67% BPTB: IS 79%
ST: Button 80%
BPTB: IS 77%
ST: IS 78%
Nonmetal 55% Rare/never 64% 17% 7-9 months 26%
a

AANA, Arthroscopy Association of North America; ACL, anterior cruciate ligament; ACLR, ACL reconstruction; AL, anterolateral; AM, anteromedial; AOSSM, American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine; Bio, bioabsorbable; BPTB, bone–patellar tendon–bone; CPM, continuous passive motion; DAS, Delhi Arthroscopy Society; HS, hamstring; IS, interference screw; ISAKOS, International Society of Arthroscopy, Knee Surgery and Orthopaedic Sports Medicine; NR, not reported; Quad, quadriceps tendon; RTP, return to play; SIGASCOT, Italian Society of Arthroscopy, Knee, Upper Limb, Sports, Cartilage and Orthopaedic Technologies; ST, soft tissue.