Skip to main content
. 2024 Oct 1;15(44):18476–18489. doi: 10.1039/d4sc04947k

Fig. 3. Diffusioosmosis of a monovalent electrolyte with ion diffusivity ratio β = −0.5. The channel surface charge density q = −0.014 C m−2 corresponds to a channel surface potential ζ = −100 mV at a bulk electrolyte molar concentration C = 10−3 M. Panels (a), (c), and (e) ignore ion–ion electrostatic correlations (δc = 0). Panels (b), (d), and (f) account for electrostatic correlations (δc = κlc). (a) and (b): The diffusioosmotic mobility M̂ versus C. (c) and (d): The space charge density Created by potrace 1.16, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2019 versus the distance from the bottom channel wall ŷ at C = 1 M. (e) and (f): The diffusioosmotic velocity û versus ŷ at C = 1 M. For (a), (b), (e) and (f), the black line denotes a slip length = 0, the grey line denotes = 10−2, the blue line denotes = 10−1, and the red line denotes = 1. For (c) and (d), Created by potrace 1.16, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2019 is independent of .

Fig. 3