TABLE 2.
Library Name | No. of sequences deleted or under-representeda | Library size/1,024b
|
Estimated diversitye at:
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sublibrary | Library | Transfectionc | Minimumd | P0 | P3 | ||
−35 | 6 | 9 | 7 | 586 | 7 | 520 | 6 |
−30 | 2 | 17 | 304 | 527 | 17 | 670 | 49 |
−25 | 2 | 142 | 357 | 791 | 142 | 426 | 142 |
−20 | 4 | 12 | 28 | 371 | 12 | 571 | 46 |
−15 | 22 | 82 | 68 | 98 | 68 | 417 | 5 |
−10 | 4 | 180 | 11 | 98 | 11 | 433 | 1 |
−5 | 2 | 10 | 11 | 15 | 10 | 496 | 2 |
+1 | 2 | 50 | 49 | 27 | 27 | 688 | 11 |
+5 | 3 | 797 | 80 | 1270 | 80 | 589 | 71 |
The number of sequences expected to be underrepresented or deleted, due to the use of XbaI, XhoI, BssHII, and SstI during construction and runoff transcription of the libraries.
The observed number of clones or infective centers, divided by 1024, the size of an ideal library with five randomized positions.
The number of infectious centers obtained after transfection (7) was used as a minimal estimate of the library size in transfected cells.
Smallest library size observed, up to and including the transfection step, equivalent to the minimum average number of times a promoter sequence is expected to be in the virus population at P0. In all cases, there is a 0.999 or better probability (by the Poisson distribution, 1 − eλ, where λ = the smallest library size observed) that all possible sequences in the randomized region are present in the P0 population. Subsequent passages, at a MOI of ≤0.1, used a minimum of 2,000 PFU.
The diversity (8) of each population at P0, immediately after transfection, and passage 3 is estimated by analysis of the sequence of individual isolates (see Materials and Methods).