Skip to main content
. 2024 Sep 2;310(5):2623–2630. doi: 10.1007/s00404-024-07699-5

Table 3.

Multiple logistic regression to assess the association of correct measurement of tumor stage (accordance) with tumor size cT, cN, BMI, age, tumor subtype, grading, histology, Ki67

Odds ratio 95% Confidence interval p

Clinical tumor stage

cT

1.23 (1.10–1.38)  ≤ 0.001

Clinical tumor stage

cN (cN0 vs. cN +)

1.02 (0.81–1.27) 0.88
BMI 0.997 (0.977–1.02) 0.78
Age 1.00 (0.997–1.01) 0.26
Tumor subtype 0.007
 Luminal A (served as reference category)
 Luminal B 0.71 (0.59–0.87)  ≤ 0.001
 HER2 positive 0.95 (0.54–1.68) 0.86
 Triple negative 1.01 (0.68–1.50) 0.97
Grading 0.26
 G1 (served as reference category)
 G2 1.23 (0.93–1.64) 1.23
 G3 1.09 (0.78–1.51) 1.09
Histology
 NST (served as reference category)
 Invasive lobular 0.96 (0.75–1.21) 0.71
 Other 1.09 (0.73–1.64) 0.68
Ki67 1.00 (0.995–1.01) 0.82

All variables were tested in univariable binary logistic regression first