Skip to main content
. 2024 Oct 11;56(1):2411017. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2411017

Table 3.

Prognostic factors for OS in patients with visceral metastases, selected by cox univariable and multivariable analysis.

Variants Number Prognostic factors for OS[1]
Univariable analysis
Multivariable analysis
HR[2] (95%CI[3]) p-Value HR (95%CI) p-Value
Age          
 Lower than median age (<71) 43 Ref. Ref.
 Higher than median age (> =71) 47 2.187 (1.057-4.524) *0.035 2.754 (1.259-6.024) *0.011
Site of visceral metastasis          
 Lung 61 Ref. Ref.
 Liver 21 2.609 (1.217-5.597) *0.014 2.418 (1.106-5.289) *0.027
 Both lung and liver 8 2.465 (0.826-7.353) 0.11 2.528 (0.840-7.608) 0.099
Clinical T stage          
 T = 2 29 Ref.    
 T = 3 or 4 61 1.451 (0.651-3.236) 0.36    
Clinical N stage          
N = 0 24 Ref.    
N = 1 66 0.718 (0.340-1.518) 0.39    
PSA level          
 Lower than median PSA (<79.62) 37 Ref.    
 Higher than median PSA (> =79.62) 38 1.180 (0.545-2.557) 0.67    
 Missing 15    
Gleason score          
 6-7 15 Ref.    
 8-10 47 0.906 (0.334-2.460) 0.85    
 Missing 28    
[18F]FDG uptake in primary tumor          
 Lower than median SUVmax (<6.10) 44 Ref.    
 Higher than median SUVmax (> =6.10) 46 1.140 (0.567-2.296) 0.71    
[18F]FDG uptake in metastatic lesion          
 Lower than median SUVmax (<2.85) 45 Ref. Ref.
 Higher than median SUVmax (> =2.85) 45 3.150 (1.485-6.682) **0.003 4.399 (1.984-9.753) ***<0.001

[1] OS: overall survival.

[2] HR: hazard ratio.

[3] 95% CI: 95% confidence interval.

[4] Significance level set at p < 0.05. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.