Skip to main content
. 2024 Aug 8;137(4):883–891. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00340.2024

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

As seen in Fig. 3, a fixed correction factor applied to the assumption of N2 concentration of “trapped air” spaces still did not improve the correlation coefficient or remove large outliers, when comparing volume of trapped gas with trapped air%. Therefore, we used a molarity calculator to model the N2% for an individual patient that was likely present in the “trapped air” spaces which would generate a perfect agreement with trapped air % from spirometry-controlled computed tomography. Each dot is color coded for the N2% modeled to generate that perfect agreement. Note the patients in red had a larger volume of trapped gas (VTG) over residual volume % (RV%) than trapped air %, therefore N2 concentration could not be calculated. The range for N2% for the 5 inspiratory capacity breaths (5IC) method was 3.5% to 34.8% and for the 5 vital capacity (5VC) was 8.6% to 55.3%. Without having the accompanying trapped air% values calculating an accurate VTG/RV% is not possible.