Table 3.
Comparison of the type of management in the case of CHVI.
| NIM (n=13) | IM (n=14) | P | |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAST grade, n (%) | – | – | – |
| I–II | 2 (15.4) | 3 (21.4) | 1.000 |
| III–V | 11 (84.6) | 11 (78.6) | 1.000 |
| Type, n (%) | |||
| Hematoma | 5 (38.5) | 6 (42.9) | 1.000 |
| Laceration | 8 (61.5) | 8 (57.1) | 1.000 |
| Size of CHVI, mm | 8 [3–25] | 18 [11–46] | <0.001 |
| Day of diagnosis following trauma, days | 3.5 | 6.5 | 0.349 |
| Length of stay in ICU, days | 4 | 4.5 | 0.641 |
| Total length of stay, days | 9 | 15 | 0.119 |
| Bilioma, n (%) | 1 (7.7) | 3 (21.4) | 0.644 |
| Delayed hemorrhage, n (%) | 3 (23.1) | 2 (14.3) | 0.927 |
Bold values are statistical significance P<0.05.
IM, Interventional management; NIM, Noninterventional management.