Skip to main content
. 2024 Sep 3;34(3):12366. doi: 10.4081/ejtm.2024.12366

Table 3.

Comparison of MVC by timepoints.

T0 T1 T2 T3 p-value
T0-T1 T1-T2 T2-T3 T0-T2 T0-T3
FMV+AO 329.1 380.5 408.7 407.1
(-88.35, +120.78) (-79.95, +101.21) (-97.42, +127.92) (-97.85, +132.31) 0.0832 0.2346 0.9994 0.0344 0.0239
AO 316.2 393.4 380.1 399.2
(-96.77, +139.44) (-74.08, +91.27) (-78.19, +98.45) (-95.39, +125.35) 0.2212 0.8652 0.6476 0.3932 0.0961
FMV 317 333.1 347.4 324.8
(-70.69, +90.98) (-93. 8, +130.58) (-91.77, +124.72) (-93.3, +130.89) 0.7687 0.7447 0.3364 0.2208 0.9721
NT 283.2 324.6 337.8 322
(-82.49, +116.4) (-96.65, +137.63) (-74.51, +95.6) (-71.42, +91.77) 0.2347 0.9984 0.4873 0.0659 0.1562

Data are summarized by geometrical mean and standard deviation calculated from the standard deviation factor. The p-value was calculated in for data the logarithmic domain. The conditions were analyzed with Repeated measure one-way ANOVA and the post-hoc Tukey’s multiple comparison test. Statistical difference was set for a p-value<0.05. ns, p≥0.05; *p<0.05.