Table 1.
First Author | Ref | Pub Year | Location | Start Date | End Date | Ages (Cases) | Assay | Cutoff, pg/mL | Source Data | Population | Definition of Case | Definition of Control |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ahava | [10] | 2022 | Helsinki, Finland | 3/1/2020 | 5/31/2020 | Me 54 | Salocor Antigen Quantitative Assay Kit | 2.97 | No | Samples sent to hospital laboratory | RT-PCR+ | NA |
R 24–86 | ||||||||||||
Blain | [11] | 2022 | Montpellier, France | 3/1/2021 | 4/30/2021 | Me 91.1 | COV-QUANTO | 2.97 | Yes | Nursing home residents | NP RT-PCR+ | NA |
R 74.7–101.8 | ||||||||||||
Chenane | [12] | 2022 | Paris, France | 1/25/2020 | 9/2/2020 | Me 63 | COV-QUANTO | 2.98 | No | French COVID cohort | See clinical trial | NA |
IQR 52–71 | ||||||||||||
Damhorst | [13] | 2023 | Atlanta, Georgia, USA | 3/17/2020 | 3/30/2021 | Me 14 | Quanterix Simoa | 0.099 | Yes | Hospitalized children | −3 to +14 d since RT-PCR+ and and within ≤14 d of symptoms; ≤10 d of hospitalization | NA |
R 0–20 | ||||||||||||
Damhorst | [14] | 2023 | Atlanta, Georgia, USA | 1/4/2022 | 2/16/2022 | Me 54.5 | Quanterix Simoa | 3 | Yes | Inpatient or emergency department | RT-PCR+ | NA |
IQR 46–68 | ||||||||||||
Favresse | [15, 16] | 2022 | Belgium | NR | NR | Me 77 | Quanterix Simoa | 0.099 | Yes | Inpatient and outpatient | RT-PCR+ within 1 da,b | NA |
R 20–97 | ||||||||||||
Hingrat | [17] | 2020 | France | 1/25/2020 | 9/2/2020 | NR | COVID-19 Quantigene CE-IVD ELISA microplate assays | 2.98 | No | Clinical trial cohorts French COVID (NCT04262921) and CoV-CONTACT (NCT04259892) | See clinical trials | NA |
Jilg | [18] | 2023 | Multinational | 1/1/2021 | 7/31/2021 | NR | Quanterix Simoa | 3 | No | Outpatient (ACTIV-2 trial) | See clinical trial | NA |
Li | [19] | 2020 | Anhui Province, China | NR | NR | NR | BIOHIT ELISA | 2 | No | Inpatient | RT-PCR+ and CT changes | RT-PCR & N Ab negative |
Ogata | [20] | 2020 | Boston, Massachusetts, USA | 3/25/2020 | 5/20/2020 | Me 63 | Quanterix Simoa | 0.02 | Yes | Patients presenting to hospital | RT-PCR+ | RT-PCR- |
R 19–91 | ||||||||||||
Oueslati | [21] | 2022 | France | 3/1/2020 | 12/31/2020 | NR | COV-QUANTO | 2.98 | No | Patients with respiratory symptoms | RT-PCR+ same day | RT-PCR- |
Parraud | [22] | 2023 | France | 3/1/2020 | 4/30/2020 | Me 67 | COV-QUANTO | 3 | Yes | Inpatient | RT-PCR+ | NA |
R 27–86 | ||||||||||||
Perna | [23] | 2021 | Italy | NR | NR | Mn 60 | Lumipulse G SARS-CoV-2 Ag CLEIA | 0.1c | Yes | Inpatient | COVID-19 | NA |
SEM 7 | ||||||||||||
Rogers | [24] | 2022 | Multinational | 8/1/2020 | 11/15/2021 | Me 57 | Quanterix Simoa | 3 | No | TICO clinical trial (inpatients) | ≤12 d of symptoms | NA |
IQR 46–68 | ||||||||||||
Saini | [25] | 2023 | Chicago, Illinois, USA | NR | NR | Me 35 | Quanterix Simoa | 1.25 | Yes | Outpatient and inpatient | SC2 negative | |
R 27–67 | ||||||||||||
Shan | [26] | 2021 | Bonn, Germany | 3/30/2020 | 6/17/2020 | NR | Quanterix Simoa | 1.25 | SI | Inpatient and commercial source | RT-PCR+ | NA |
Sigal | [27] | 2022 | USA | 6/17/2020 | 6/17/2021 | R 0.1–20.8 | MSD S-PLEX | 1.28 | Yes | Overcoming COVID-19 Immunobiology Study (inpatients) | RT-PCR+ same day and symptoms | RT-PCR- same day |
Su | [28] | 2021 | Beijing, China | NR | NR | Mn 57.9 | Quanterix Simoa | 0.0157 | No | Hospital, inpatient or outpatient not specified | RT-PCR+ | RT-PCR- |
SD 15.1 | ||||||||||||
Sullivan | [29] | 2023 | USA | 8/1/2020 | 7/31/2021 | NR | Quanterix Simoa | 3 | No | Inpatient | RT-PCR+ within 14 d | NA |
Swank | [30] | 2022 | Boston, Massachusetts, USA | NR | NR | Me 53 | Quanterix Simoa | NR | Yes | COVID-19 with and without PASC | Previously infected with SARS-CoV-2a | NA |
R 0–83 | ||||||||||||
Thudium | [31] | 2021 | Denmark | 3/3/2020 | 2/2/2021 | Me 50.3 | Solsten ELISAd | 10 | Yes | Inpatient and outpatient | Upper respiratory tract PCR+b | URT PCR negative |
R 13.9–101.8 | ||||||||||||
Verkerke | [32] | 2021 | Atlanta, Georgia, USA | NR | NR | NR | Quanterix Simoa | 0.099 | Yes | Inpatient | RT-PCR+ with symptom onset documenteda | NA |
Verkerke | [33] | 2022 | Atlanta, Georgia, USA | 1/11/2021 | 3/12/2021 | Mn 60.6 | Quanterix Simoa | 0.099 | Yes | Inpatient and outpatient | SC2+ test (any) and −3 to 14 d since symptom onset | RT-PCR- same day |
IQR 52.2–73.0 | ||||||||||||
Veyrenche | [34] | 2022 | Montpellier, France | 3/1/2020 | 5/31/2021 | Me 63.0 | COV-QUANTO | 2.97 | Yes | Inpatient | SC2 infected | NA |
R 30.0–98.5 | ||||||||||||
Wang | [35] | 2021 | San Francisco, California, USA | 3/1/2020 | 11/30/2020 | Me 56 | MSD S-PLEX | 0.631 | Yes | Inpatient and outpatient | NAAT+ and symptomatic | NAAT- |
R 0–94 | ||||||||||||
Wick | [36] | 2022 | San Francisco, California, USA | 3/1/2020 | 8/31/2021 | Me 54.7 | Quanterix Simoa | 3 | Yes | Inpatient | RT-PCR+ | NA |
R 18.6–88.2 | ||||||||||||
Yonker | [37] | 2021 | Boston, Massachusetts, USA | NR | NR | Me 14 | Quanterix Simoa | 1.45 | No | Inpatient and outpatient | RT-PCR+ | NA |
R 0.04–22 | ||||||||||||
Zhang | [38] | 2021 | San Francisco, California, USA | 3/1/2020 | 7/31/2020 | Me 48 | BIOHIT | 2.97 | No | Inpatient and outpatient | RT-PCR+ | RT-PCR- |
Zhang | [39] | 2022 | Anhui Province, China | 1/1/2020 | 2/28/2020 | Me 49 (Ag+) | BIOHIT ELISA | 10 | No | Inpatient | RT-PCR+ | NA |
Me 31 (Ag-) |
Abbreviations: COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; CT, computed tomography; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; IQR, interquartile range; Me, median; Mn, mean; NA, not applicable; NAAT, nucleic acid amplification test; NP, nasopharyngeal; NR, not reported; PASC, postacute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection; R, range; RT-PCR, reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction; SARS-CoV-2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; SC2, SARS-CoV-2; SI, source data in supplementary information.
aFor studies with a significant number of measurements >2 weeks after COVID-19 symptom onset, only those with ≤14 days of symptoms were included in the least restrictive meta-analysis.
bFor studies with a significant number of measurements >2 weeks after first SARS-CoV-2-positive test, only those ≤14 days since positive testing were included in the least restrictive meta-analysis.
cCutoff value for Perna et al. was determined from source data.
dThe CE-IVD labeled, Solsten SARS-CoV-2 Antigen ELISA Kit (Solsten Diagnostics Intl., Aarhus, Denmark).