Table 2.
Model performance with domain adaptation.
LR | RF | GAT | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Chicago → Houston | F1 Score | 0.417 | 0.401 | 0.665 |
AUROC | 0.643 | 0.687 | 0.743 | |
AUPRC | 0.436 | 0.477 | 0.608 | |
Houston → Chicago | F1 Score | 0.483 | 0.348 | 0.639 |
AUROC | 0.758 | 0.749 | 0.772 | |
AUPRC | 0.612 | 0.609 | 0.820 |
Training was done with 100% of the source city and 30% of the target city, with the remaining 70% of the target city for predicting HIV infection status.