Table 2.

Primary and secondary endpoints, intention to treat

Undergloves	Brand 1 n = 1408 (reference)	Brand 2 n = 713	Brand 3 n = 682	Brand 4 n = 704	Brands 2,3,4 Combined n = 2099
Gloves with any perforation (failure) (n (%), P value)	156 (11.1%)	87 (12.2%), P = .471	70 (10.3%), P = .600	54 (7.7%), P = .014	211 (10.1%), P = .339
Number of perforations (mean (SD), P value)	0.143 (0.459)	0.174 (0.531), P = .353	0.142 (0.480), P = .383	0.122 (0.535), P = .025	0.146 (0.517), P = .295
Intraoperative failure (detected by operative team) (n (%), P value)	54 (3.8%)	14 (2.0%), P = .023	38 (5.6%), P = .076	21 (3.0%), P = .278	73 (3.5%), P = .044
Donning failure (n (%), P value)	5 (0.4%)	0 (0%), P = .113	2 (0.3%), P = .528	2 (0.3%), P = .468	4 (0.2%), P = .032
Doffing failure (n (%), P value)	6 (0.4%)	0 (0%), P = .081	2 (0.3%), P = .490	6 (0.9%), P = .216	8 (0.4%), P = .065
Overgloves	Brand 1 N = 1597 (reference)	Brand 2 N = 867	Brand 3 N = 875	Brand 4 N = 779	Brands 2,3,4 Combined N = 2521
Gloves with any perforation (n (%), P value)	280 (17.5%)	175 (20.2%), P = .115	207 (23.7%), P < .001	140 (18.0%), P = .819	522 (20.7%), P = .012
Number of perforations (mean (SD), P value)	0.267 (0.709)	0.360 (0.925), P = .146	0.374 (0.839), P = .017	0.288 (0.782), P = .634	0.342 (0.853), P = .169
Intraoperative failure (detected by operative team) (n (%), P value)	90 (5.6%)	20 (2.3%), P < .001	57 (6.5%), P = .311	27 (3.5%), P = .027	104 (4.1%), P = .003
Donning failure (n (%), P value)	6 (0.4%)	0 (0%), P = .070	3 (0.3%), P = .509	2 (0.3%), P = .491	5 (0.2%), P = .022
Doffing failure (n (%), P value)	8 (0.5%)	0 (0%), P = .034	2 (0.2%), P = .345	7 (0.9%), P = .251	9 (0.4%), P = .030