Table 3.

Primary and secondary endpoints, per protocol

Undergloves	Brand 1 n = 1388 (reference)	Brand 2 n = 723	Brand 3 n = 696	Brand 4 n = 700	Brands 2,3,4 Combined n = 2119
Gloves with any perforation (Failure) (n (%), P value)	153 (11.0%)	87 (12.0%), P = .516	73 (10.5%), P = .765	54 (7.7%), P = .016	214 (10.1%), P = .398
Number of perforations (mean (SD), P value	0.142 (0.458)	0.172 (0.527), P = .363	0.145 (0.483), P = .470	0.123 (.537), P = .032	0.147 (0.517), P = .337
Intraoperative failure (detected by operative team) (n (%), P value)	54 (3.9%)	14 (1.9%), P = .016	38 (5.5%), P = .097	21 (3.0%), P = .267	73 (3.4%), P = .036
Donning failure (n (%), P value)	5 (0.4%)	0 (0%), P = .117	2 (0.3%), P = .468	2 (0.3%), P = .469	4 (0.2%), P = .028
Doffing failure (n (%), P value)	6 (0.4%)	0 (0%), P = .066	2 (0.3%), P = .439	6 (0.9%), P = .217	8 (0.4%), P = .048
Overgloves	Brand 1 n = 1575 (reference)	Brand 2 n = 879	Brand 3 n = 887	Brand 4 n = 777	Brands 2,3,4 Combined n = 2543
Gloves with any perforation (Failure) (n (%), P value)	280 (17.8%)	174 (19.8%), P = .233	209 (23.6%), P < .001	139 (17.9%), P = .954	522 (20.5%), P = .032
Number of perforations (mean (SD), P value)	0.269 (0.710)	0.353 (0.918), P = .205	0.374 (0.840), P = .021	0.287 (0.782), P = .611	0.340 (0.852), P = .213
Intraoperative failure (detected by operative team) (n (%), P value)	92 (5.8%)	20 (2.3%), P < .001	55 (6.2%), P = .406	27 (3.5%), P = .015	102 (4.0%), P = .001
Donning failure (n (%), P value)	6 (0.4%)	0 (0%), P = .061	3 (0.3%), P = .462	2 (0.3%), P = .491	5 (0.2%), P = .021
Doffing failure (n (%), P value)	8 (0.5%)	0 (0%), P = .036	2 (0.2%), P = .234	7 (0.9%), P = .254	9 (0.4%), P = .029