Skip to main content
. 2023 Sep 8;77(10):559–568. doi: 10.1111/pcn.13578

Table 4.

Logistic regression analysis showing the adjusted effects (odds ratios with 95% CI) on the QIs between the EGUIDE (+) and EGUIDE (−) groups in patients with in major depressive disorder

QIs Unadjusted Adjusted
OR [95% CI] P‐value OR [95% CI] P‐value
DQI‐1: Antidepressant monotherapy 1.27 [1.10–1.47] 9.4 × 10 −4 1.23 [1.06–1.42] 5.5 × 10−3
DQI‐2: Antidepressant monotherapy without other psychotropics 1.65 [1.29–2.09] 4.5 × 10 −5 1.63 [1.28–2.08] 7.6 × 10 −5
DQI‐3: No prescription of anxiolytics or hypnotics 1.34 [1.15–1.56] 2.0 × 10 −4 1.36 [1.16–1.59] 9.8 × 10 −5
DQI‐4: Cognitive behavioral therapy 0.99 [0.50–1.96] 0.98 1.08 [0.54–2.16] 0.83
DQI‐5: Modified electroconvulsive therapy (mECT) 0.96 [0.79–1.18] 0.72 0.99 [0.80–1.22] 0.92

Confounding factors, age, sex, and type of facilities, were adjusted. Significant differences are shown in bold (P < 0.0033).

CI, confidence interval; DQI, quality indicator of major depressive disorder; EGUIDE (+), patients treated by psychiatrists who participated in the EGUIDE project; EGUIDE (−), patients treated by psychiatrists who did not participate in the EGUIDE project; OR, Odds ratio; QI, quality indicator.