Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2024 Oct 18;108(1):490. doi: 10.1007/s00253-024-13274-4

Seasonal dynamics of bacterial composition and functions in biological treatment of coking wastewater

Zhijie Tan 1, Wenli Chen 1, Ziyu Guo 1, Xingyuan Xu 1, Junting Xie 1, Jiangpeng Dai 1, Yuexia Lin 1, Binbin Sheng 1, Sergei Preis 2, Chaohai Wei 3, Shuang Zhu 1,
PMCID: PMC11489252  PMID: 39422711

Abstract

Abstract

Seasonal dynamics of bacterial composition and functions were demonstrated for the biological fluidized-bed bioreactors combined in the anoxic/aerobic1/aerobic2 (AOO) coking wastewater (CWW) treatment sequences. The bacterial composition and functions in the CWW activated sludge samples were revealed by 16S rRNA genes amplicon sequencing. Thiobacillus, Cloacibacterium, Alkaliphilus and Pseudomonas were determined as core genera with seasonal changes. Mutable microbial community composition fluctuated in different seasons in same bioreactor. Distributions of predicted KEGG pathways along four seasons consistently demonstrated enrichment in biodegradation of carbon- and nitrogen-containing compounds. The major contaminants were removed from CWW by biochemical pathway of xenobiotics biodegradation and metabolism. This Level 2 pathway mainly owned the Level 3 pathways of benzoate degradation, drug metabolism-other enzymes, drug metabolism-cytochrome P450, metabolism of xenobiotics by cytochrome P450, and aminobenzoate degradation. The RDA results showed that dissolved oxygen with seasonal fluctuation was the main parameter shaping the microbial community. The observed dynamics within the microbial community composition, coupled with the maintained stability of CWW treatment efficiencies and a consistent profile of microbial functional pathways, underscore the presence of functional redundancy in the AOO bioreactors. The study underscored stable and effective operational performances of bioreactors in the AOO sequences, contributing the knowledge of microbiological basics to the advancement of CWW biological treatment.

Key points

Seasonal fluctuations of bacterial composition described for the AOO system.

Seasonal distributions of metabolic functions focused on carbon and nitrogen removal.

Functional redundancy was revealed in the AOO microbial community.

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00253-024-13274-4.

Keywords: Coking wastewater, Seasonal dynamics, Bacterial community, Functional profiling, 16S rRNA genes

Introduction

Coking wastewater (CWW), originating from coal coking, coke quenching and coal liquefaction, represents an industrial wastewater of poor biodegradation and high toxicity for its complex composition including NH3, cyanides (CN), phenolic compounds, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) (Tamang and Paul 2022). These pollutants are harmful for biological and ecosystem’s health (Li et al. 2023a; Pathak et al. 2023). For example, phenols and PAHs can cause genotoxicity, cardiotoxicity and skeletal development toxicity for aquatic and botanic creatures (Li et al. 2023a; Liu et al. 2017). Ammonia brings the biological toxicity (Wu et al. 2020). CN is a typical inorganic pollutant, with damage to human cardiac and central nervous systems. Moreover, CWW’s contaminants can pollute the soil, preventing the land recycle (Li et al. 2023b). Therefore, CWW, with serious environmental risk, must be duly treated before discharge (Pathak et al. 2023).

At present, bioprocess technology stands as a prevalent methodology for CWW treatment (Zhou et al. 2020). The biological treatment is the core for CWW process and relies upon its intricate prokaryotic microbial community, resulting in highly efficient removal of pollutants at a low cost (Zhang et al. 2022a). Therefore, microbial community is an important component to determine the operational efficiency of CWW biological treatment (Chu et al. 2021). The spectrum of biological processes are employed in CWW treatment encompasses diverse bioreactor combinations, such as anaerobic/aerobic (AO), anaerobic1/anaerobic2/aerobic (AAO), anaerobic/aerobic1/aerobic2 (AOO), anaerobic/oxic1/hydrolytic/oxic2 (AOHO) and oxic1/hydrolytic/oxic2 (OHO) (Zhu et al. 2019). The AOO fluidized-bed sequence biodegrades the major CWW pollutants and achieves stable pollutants removal efficiency with good performance (Zhu et al. 2016). The functions of AOO bioreactors consist of denitrification and nitrogen removal in the bioreactor A, metabolism of organic matters in the bioreactor O1, and nitrification and biodegradation of residual pollutants in the bioreactor O2. Besides, internal recycling facilitates the transfer of nitrified liquid from the bioreactor O2 to A, while nitrite in the bioreactor O1 is also refluxed to A, expediting nitrogen removal at low energy consumption (Ou et al. 2014). Previously, Pseudomonas, Comamonas, Thiobacillus, Nitrosomonas and Nitrosospira were reported for the organic carbon degradation and nitrogen removal in the AOO system and the microbial community and functions in the AOO bioreactors have been studied statically, although its temporal dynamics is lacking (Zhu et al. 2016).

The structure of microbial community exhibits notable variability throughout the course of a year with influencing factors encompassing temperature, character of contaminants, and operational parameters (Peces et al. 2022). Seasonal factors are recognized as particularly consequential in perturbing the bacterial composition of activated sludge (AS) (Zhang et al. 2018), potentially instigating substantial alterations in removal efficiency (Suransh et al. 2023). Microbial community were proven to go through a seasonal dynamics in wastewater treatment and some dominant species displayed an obvious seasonal dynamics pattern in different seasons (Zhang et al. 2018; Sun et al. 2021; Peces et al. 2022), subsequently affecting the quality of released wastewater (Soares-Castro et al. 2019). The nitrogen removal groups change markedly in different seasons, especially the nitrifying community (Datta et al. 2011; Wang et al. 2016). ThaueraPseudomonas and Longilinea express high sensitivity for seasonal change (Xu et al. 2022). Sludge foaming is also a problem to reduce treatment efficiency throughout the changing seasons in wastewater (Wang et al. 2016). The microbial community composition of municipal wastewater changes along with the seasons changes in temperature and wastewater compound of the influent (Nomoto et al. 2018). However, microbial community in CWW may have a different response for seasonal dynamics, especially facing the stable influent produced from industrial process. The CWW treatment efficiency, similarly, is affected by seasonal microbial fluctuations (Kim et al. 2007; Kim 2013). However, a critical gap of CWW microbial community obtained with high-throughput sequencing method limits the comprehensively microbial investigation in seasonal dynamics. Consequently, an in-depth study of AOO system microbial community composition in its dynamics becomes imperative, offering valuable insights for the enhancement of treatment methodology.

16S rRNA genes amplicon sequencing is regarded as the standard method for the investigation of microbial diversity (Klindworth et al. 2013). The highly conserved regions and highly variable regions of 16S rRNA genes lead the detection for bacterial taxonomy (Nossa et al. 2010). The Illumina MiSeq sequencing is able to uncover the rare biosphere with low per base costs and short read length (Zhu et al. 2016). PICRUSt2 is designed to predict the bacterial functions according to 16S rRNA genes amplicon data, with more accurateness than PICRUSt1 (Douglas et al. 2020). The community functions were predicted by PICRUSt2 via marker gene sequencing profiles based on the MetaCyc database. The good correlation of PICRUSt2 with shotgun metagenomics sequencing has been proven by studies (Chen et al. 2024; Yang et al. 2023). PICRUSt2 shows no disadvantage comparing with other commonly used tools (Sun et al. 2020; Douglas et al. 2020). Also, PICRUSt2 predictions are prevalent and help for the meaningful findings in environmental researches, especially in wastewater treatment (Tsukamoto et al. 2023; Wang et al. 2023; Xu et al. 2023).

This study delves into the seasonal dynamics and functions of microbial communities in the full-scale AOO bioreactors’ sequence in CWW treatment. Standard methods were employed in the analysis of the efficiency of contaminants removal. The process operation characteristics were monitored under conditions of extensive and stable operation. The diversity and composition of microbiota was delineated by 16S rRNA genes amplicon sequencing, while the microbial functions were predicted using PICRUSt2. The objectives of this study were to (1) distinguish the seasonal dynamics in pollutants removal efficiency, (2) identify the microbial consortia with their functions in the seasonal successions, and (3) discern the relationships between environmental factors and microbial consortia.

Materials and methods

Full-scale AOO bioreactors combination

The full-scale AOO CWW treatment installation schematically shown in Fig. 1 is located at the premises of Songshan Iron and Steel Corporation, Shaoguan, Guangdong Province, China. The treatment plant has continuously operated for fifteen years at a CWW processing capacity of 1680 ± 80 m3/day. To enhance operational resilience against unexpected disturbances, two independent parallel bioreactor sequences were built, being named the South and the North lines.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Schematic outline of the AOO coking wastewater treatment sequence. a BI biological influent, BE biological effluent

Collection and analysis of sludge and water samples

The AS samples were taken from the South and North lines in duplicate on March 30, May 29, October 13, 2021, and January 8, 2022, representing the spring, summer, autumn and winter samples, respectively. Every sample was meticulously preserved in ice-boxes and transported to the laboratory. The volume of two to three mL of each sample was used to form cell pellets by centrifugation at 12,000 g for ten minutes at 4 °C. The 120 mM sodium phosphate buffer at pH 8.0 was used to rinse and prepare the cell pellets for storage at -20 °C for further DNA extraction.

For the supernatant liquid analyses, the AS samples were centrifuged at 3,500 g for three minutes to separate the solids. The supernatants analyses revealed pertinent pollutant characteristics, including the chemical oxidation demand (COD), 5-day biochemical oxygen demand (BOD5), contents of NH3, phenolic compounds, sulfides, CN, thiocyanate (SCN), total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorus (TP), total organic carbon (TOC), dissolved oxygen (DO) and pH. Analytical methods were consistent with those outlined by Zhang et al. (2022a, b).

Operational parameters at the AOO treatment of CWW

For intensifying the mass transfer, an internal-loop multiphase airlift fluidized bed bioreactors were designed and commissioned at the enterprise (Wei et al. 2000). The AOO bioreactors exhibited an excellent stability in seasonal dynamics: throughout the long operation, all bioreactors maintained stable temperature within the range of 24 to26°C (Supplementary File Table S1). The pH values in the bioreactors A, O1, and O2 averaged 7.69–7.96, 7.19–7.33 and 7.04–7.14, with DO of 0.12–0.21, 1.42–1.62 and 2.90–3.22 mg L–1, respectively. The detailed operational parameters were given in Supplementary File Table S1.

PCR amplification and MiSeq sequencing

Genomic DNA from microorganisms was extracted with the powerSoil™ DNA isolation kit (Mobio Laboratories, USA) in strict adherence to the manufacturer’s instructions. High-quality DNA extracts from each sample subsequently undergone PCR-amplification using the primers F515 (5’- GTGCCAGCMGCCGCGGTAA-3’) and R806 (5’-GGACTACVSGGGTATCTAAT-3’) as described by Deng et al. (2020).

Sequence processing

The PCR products were defined through Illumina MiSeq. Samples were individually barcoded to enable multiplex sequencing in this study. The raw data underwent preprocessing and manipulation by Mothur (v1.35.1) (Schloss et al. 2009) in conjunction with QIIME (v 1.7) pipelines (Caporaso et al. 2010). Operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were demarcated at 97% sequence similarity and a RDP classifier was applied for taxonomic classification by default. Microbial alpha-diversity and Good’s coverage were statistically analyzed by Mothur and QIIME. Functional predictions of microbial communities were accomplished by q2-picrust2 (2021.11_0), a QIIME2 plugin of PICRUST2 (Douglas et al. 2020).

Data analysis

Box plot of alpha-diversity, bubble plot of xenobiotics biodegradation and metabolism distribution and bar graph of major phyla and genera were delineated by ImageGP (Chen et al. 2022) and Chiplot (https://www.chiplot.online/). The distribution of Level 2 metabolism pathways, rarefaction curves, principal co-ordinates analysis (PCOA, with the closer distance of Bray Curtis) and redundancy analysis (RDA) were generated utilizing diverse R packages.

Results

AOO seasonal performance

Twelve CWW quality indices were measured to evaluate the functional stability of the AOO combination across the seasons (Table S2). All indices achieved removals surpassing 95% except for TN in all samples. Moreover, the removals remained stable in all four seasons. Notably, the bioreactor A demonstrated, among the total removal from BI to BE, the highest removals of TN and CN with average of 38.04% and 65.39%, respectively. In the bioreactor O1, substantial removals of COD, BOD5, phenols and SCN were observed with average 56.87%, 76.67%, 77.65%, and 48.60%, respectively. The bioreactor O2 exhibited efficient nitrification, removing NH3 for 73.71%.

Biodiversity analysis of the sequences

A total of 17,763 OTUs were retrieved from 624,537 effective sequences in all AS samples. The sequences were assigned into various OTUs (3% nucleotide cut-off) by RDP Classifier. Based on OTUs, the alpha-diversity indices of each sample were listed in Supplementary File Table S3 and Fig. 2. The values of Good’s coverage showcased an average of 98.54%, affirming the sequencing depth’s representation of the main of 16S rRNA genes. The rarefaction curves further supported this depth assessment (Supplementary File Fig. S1). The Chao 1 of richness and the Shannon’s (H’) as well as Simpson’s (1-D) diversity indices were analyzed (Lemos et al. 2011). On the seasonal scale, the tendency of Chao 1 showed no significant difference in bioreactors (Supplementary File Table S4). The lowest Shannon’s (H′) and Simpson’s (1-D) indices were exhibited in the bioreactor A, which made them remarkably different from those in bioreactors O1 and O2. By winter, bioreactor A demonstrated remarkably higher Shannon’s (H′) and Simpson’s (1-D) indices than by other seasons.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Calculations of Chao 1’s (a), Shannon’s (H’) (b) and Simpson’s (1-D) (c) indices in the AOO bioreactors. a Spr Spring, Sum Summer, Aut Autumn, Win Winter, A anaerobic bioreactor sample, O1 aerobic1 bioreactor sample, O2 aerobic2 bioreactor sample

PCoA was conducted to evaluate the beta-diversity of microbial communities in the samples (Fig. 3). Evidently, winter samples (Win-A, Win-O1 and Win-O2) differed distinctly from those in other seasons, underscoring a disparate winter microbial community composition. Conversely, in the bioreactor A, Spr-A, Sum-A and Aut-A were grouped together. Bioreactors O1 and O2 showed seasonal similarity (Fig. 3), grouping of Spr-O1, Sum-O1 and Aut-O1, and Spr-O2, Sum-O2 and Aut-O2, respectively. Besides, samples taken from the North and South lines were consistent, indicating seasonal similarity in microbial community composition.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

The PCoA analysis of microbial communities among the samples

Seasonal dynamics of microbial community composition

In the bioreactors of the AOO combination, identified bacterial OTUs dominated at an average of 99.79%. The study delved into the seasonal variations of microbial community structure in the AOO bioreactors, focusing on the phylum and genera levels of the classified OTUs (Fig. 4 and Supplementary File Fig. S2). At the phylum level, eighteen major phyla were distinguished in all samples, including five subphyla of ProteobacteriaAlphaproteobacteria, Betaproteobacteria, Epsilonproteobacteria, Deltaproteobacteria and Gammaproteobacteria. In each bioreactor, the dominant phyla comprised certain share variable with seasons. Notably, the phyla compositions were obviously divergent in winter, aligning with PCoA results. Among subphyla of Proteobacteria, Alphaproteobacteria, Betaproteobacteria and Gammaproteobacteria dominated and fluctuated in seasons in all three bioreactors. During wintertime, the share of Betaproteobacteria increased in every bioreactor, while Gammaproteobacteria decreased in the bioreactors A and O1 (Fig. 4a and b). Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes emerged as the steadily subdominant phyla in the bioreactors A and O1, respectively. By winter, Bacteroidetes became the subdominant phylum in the bioreactor O2 instead of Planctomycetes (Fig. 4c).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Seasonal distribution of the major phyla and genera in the AOO bioreactors. Phylum level in the bioreactors A (a), O1 (b), and O2 (c), and genus level in the bioreactors A (d), O1 (e), and O2 (f). Average relative abundances > 0.5% were regarded as major phyla, average relative abundances > 0.3% were regarded as major genera

At the genera level, thirty major genera were identified in the AOO bioreactors across all seasons. In the bioreactor A, Pseudomonas, Alkaliphilus and Campylobacter were identified as the top three dominant genera in spring, summer and autumn with the average relative abundancy of 5.66%, 5.19% and 3.08%, respectively, whereas Thiobacillus genera with its abundancy of 5.12% dominated in winter (Fig. 4d) followed by B-42 with 2.62%, and Pseudomonas with 2.29%. In the bioreactor O1, the dominant genera abundances appeared to significantly fluctuate in seasons. Thus, Corynebacterium (5.13%), Cloacibacterium (1.61%) and Ochrobactrum (1.30%) dominated in spring, whereas certain quantitative changes were observed in summer: Corynebacterium (2.57%), Limnohabitans (1.13%) and Ochrobactrum (0.97%) comprised the leading trio. By the fall, the dominance picture changed qualitatively, showing Limnohabitans (1.52%), Thiobacillus (1.10%) and Pseudomonas (0.77%) dominant. In turn, Thiobacillus (16.67%), Cloacibacterium (7.01%) and Thauera (1.20%) dominated in the active sludge by winter (Fig. 4e). In the bioreactor O2, the abundance of Thiobacillus ranged from 16.44% to 34.28%, and stood out as the predominant genus across all seasons (Fig. 4f). Rhodoplanes (0.62%—0.90%) was also the important genus with stable abundances along all seasons, while Nitrospira (0.62%—2.69%) showed a burst in winter. The other obvious surges in winter were observed with B-42 (0.01%-1.17%) and Thauera (0.21%-1.14%).

Potential functions profiling

Functional microbiota contents in the AOO bioreactors were predicted using q2-picrust2 with the microorganisms’ assessment using the Nearest Sequenced Taxon Index (NSTI). Lower NSTI values indicated a closer association with the sequenced genomes (Gao et al. 2016). In this study, the NSTI values in the AOO bioreactors across the seasons ranged from 0.169 to 0.085, surpassing, e.g., soil inhabitants (0.170) (Zhang et al. 2022a). This establishes the obtained sequencing data as suitable for scrutinizing PICRUST2 predictions.

According to KEGG database, metabolism of Level 1 pathways was related to the performance and rate of microbial removal of pollutants. The AOO bioreactors were enriched with eleven Level 2 pathways of the Level 1 metabolism pathway, encompassing carbohydrate metabolism, amino acid metabolism, energy metabolism and xenobiotics biodegradation and metabolism, among others (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Distributions of Level 2 pathways of metabolism in the AOO bioreactors

Xenobiotics biodegradation and metabolism was an important pathway for the pollutants removal (Zhu et al. 2019), which was further analyzed in Level 3 pathways. Twenty-one Level 3 pathways within xenobiotics biodegradation and metabolism were unveiled, featuring, among others, benzoate degradation, drug metabolism-other enzymes, drug metabolism-cytochrome P450, metabolism of xenobiotics by cytochrome P450 and aminobenzoate degradation (Fig. 6). Nitrotoluene degradation supplanted aminobenzoate degradation, claiming the fifth-highest position in the bioreactor O2. These pathways exhibited harmonized seasonal patterns across various seasons in each AOO bioreactor.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Distributions of xenobiotics biodegradation and metabolism in the AOO bioreactors

Correlations between environmental factors and the major genera

In a quest to examine the correlations of chosen environmental variables (physicochemical characteristics and operational parameters) on the major genera and shed light on the predominating variables impacting the microbial community, RDA was conducted (Fig. 7). The interpretation rates of the two axes were 51.46% and 19.48%, respectively. Several major genera demonstrated robust correlations with the environmental variables, such as the content of pollutants. Thiobacillus, Cloacibacterium and Corynebacterium exhibited inverse relationships with concentrations of the key pollutants – phenolic compounds, COD, TN, CN, SCN and NH3. In contrast, Alkaliphilus, Pseudomonas and Campylobacter displayed positive correlations with concentrations of these pollutants. These relationships pointed to the biodegradability potential of identified genera in pollutants removal. In addition, the content of phenolic compounds surfaced as the foremost environmental factor exerting a profound impact on the microbial community composition in the AOO bioreactors.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

The correlations between major genera and environmental variables in the AOO bioreactors within seasonal dynamics. Arrows indicate the direction and magnitude of environmental factors (blue) associated with genera (red). a B/C-COD/BOD

Discussion

Microbial diversity can be used to represent the individual, number and distribution of microorganisms in a microbial community. Diverging from CWW quality indices stable round the year, tendencies in biodiversity in the AOO bioreactors displayed a notable variability across the seasons, particularly in the bioreactor A. In this bioreactor, Shannon’s and Simpson’s indices by winter showed exceptional elevation comparing to those in other seasons. The anaerobic bioreactor A worked being loaded with heavily polluted raw CWW, resulting in poor biodegradation and high residual toxicity, which was also observed earlier (Kim et al. 2008; Shi et al. 2017). This environmental stress made the varying microbial community and diversity in the bioreactor A. The ascent diversities in winter are also observed in textile dyeing wastewater treatment (Xu et al. 2022). On the other hand, the Chao 1 richness indices exhibited no significant seasonal variation, affirming the relatively stable bacterial members with flexible abundances. This suggests certain taxa gaining predominance during the environmental perturbations and contributing to the stable performance of CWW treatment.

As for the beta-diversity, the winter samples manifested a clustered and distinct character of microbial communities compared to those of other seasons, revealing a more pronounced impact of seasonal factors than variations among bioreactors. Conversely, in spring, summer and autumn, samples from each bioreactor were grouped together. The South China region experiences a tropical and subtropical monsoon climate (Liu et al. 2011; Zhang et al. 2022b) with warm conditions lasting from March to September. Consequently, spring, summer and autumn may be considered as a long hot season, exhibiting comparable sweltering climate, while winter stands out for its marked coldness. This climatic variation resulted in distinct beta-diversity in winter compared to other seasons.

Considering the stable water temperature throughout the four seasons, some other variations may cause the distinct alpha and beta diversities of bacterial community in winter. For the oxic bioreactors, O1 and O2, weak ultraviolet ray in winter can slack its lethality for microbe (Ye et al. 2021). Moreover, aeration in these oxic bioreactors can pump cold air into liquid phase, which decreases the temperature in a way and increases the DO in wastewater, intensifying the activity of microbe and increasing their diversity (Ferro et al. 2020). On the other hand, the internal recycling from the bioreactor O2 sending the wastewater with higher DO was considered to change the microbial diversity in the anaerobic bioreactor A of winter. In this condition, some vulnerable members gained the advantage and some dominant anaerobic groups were inhibited (Gaio et al. 2023), so the bioreactor A could achieve higher diversity in winter.

The composition of microbial community in the AOO bioreactors displayed a fluctuant seasonal pattern, which was also observed in the winter bacterial composition being distinct from those in other seasons according to the PCoA result. In the bioreactor A, the highest number of major genera in winter aligned with the alpha-diversity patterns, reflecting the relatively amenable environment. Smaller number of main genera comprised mainly of Pseudomonas, Alkaliphilus, and Campylobacter, were characteristic for spring, summer and autumn. Pseudomonas, known for its denitrification capacity (Mozumder et al. 2021), aligns with the observed TN removal in this bioreactor. Alkaliphilus, identified as an anaerobic alkaliphilic and fermentative acidogenic species, producing hydrogen sulfide in the existence of sulfur compounds in the sea (Xie et al. 2014; Postec et al. 2021), signifies a vital role in sulfur biodegradation. Campylobacter has been reported as a pathogenic bacteria (Ma et al. 2023), hinting a heathy risk for CWW treatment workers. Despite a decrease in abundance by winter, these genera still maintained sufficient abundances (1.10%-2.29%) and contributed to the system performance, making them key genera in the bioreactor A. Thiobacillus experienced a surge in winter, assuming a predominant role as a relay of denitrifying bacteria. Besides, Thiobacillus plays a key role in pollutants biodegradation, attributed to refractory organics removal, such as phenol and SCN, while concurrently executing denitrification (Yuan et al. 2020). Thiobacillus, demonstrated good performance at low temperature (Trouve et al. 1998), was found in winter environments elsewhere (Yi et al. 2021; Chen et al. 2023), justifying its abundance in the bioreactor A by winter. In the bioreactor A, however, the main bacterial groups performed the denitrification throughout all seasons.

In the bioreactor O1, genera abundances underwent seasonal fluctuations. In spring, Corynebacterium, Cloacibacterium and Ochrobactrum were of their highest abundances. Corynebacterium, identified in anaerobic/aerobic biological system for CWW treatment, was reported for biodegradation of phenol and PAHs (Lors et al. 2004; Joshi et al. 2016). Cloacibacterium is associated with the degradation of complex organic contaminants in aquatic habitats (Behnami et al. 2018), also removing nitrogen (Han et al. 2020). Ochrobactrum is associated with biodegradation of phenol and PAHs (Jayashree et al. 2014; Pugazhendi et al. 2017). In summer, however, Ochrobactrum was displaced at the subdominant genus level with Limnohabitans, which is potentially engaged in autotrophic nitrite oxidation (Zhuang et al. 2020). Corynebacterium and Ochrobactrum were the first- and third-abundant genera in summer with their abilities of organics biodegradation. In autumn, Limnohabitans, Thiobacillus and Pseudomonas became the major genera. Pseudomonas at its stable abundance of 0.77%-1.06% with the exception of 0.33% in winter was earlier assigned for denitrification, as well as for degradation of phenol, naphthalene and hydrocarbons (Li et al. 2018; Mallick and Chakraborty 2019). The important genus of Thiobacillus exhibited stable moderate abundances in spring, summer and autumn, while showing its elevated abundance in winter. Cloacibacterium also underwent an increase in winter, as well as Sphingobium and Thauera. Both of them were known as aromatic compound degraders (Mao et al. 2010; Zhang et al. 2012; Zhou et al. 2015). Thauera has been identified as a low-temperature-tolerant strain (Zhou et al. 2021). In contrast to bioreactor A, in bioreactor O1 the abundance of the main genera varied significantly, although the alpha-diversities showed no obvious changes. Due to the poor biodegradation in the bioreactor A, toxic pollutants remain at high concentrations impacting the bacterial community in the bioreactor O1: bacteria remain active maintaining a stable aerobic microbial community, and, thus, sustaining stable operation. Additionally, Thiobacillus continued to leverage its advantage adaption from the bioreactor A to winter conditions. Although the seasonal factors caused a serious impact on the microbial community composition, the bacteria managed with the most of contaminants removal to provide the performance of the bioreactor O1.

The microbial composition in the bioreactor O2 containing CWW of low load and toxicity showed the dominant shared genera across all seasons with dynamics of seasonal changes, including Thiobacillus, Rhodoplanes and Nitrospira. Thiobacillus, with its consistent predominance in winter, underscored its pivotal position in the AOO system. Rhodoplanes showed its stable dominance throughout all seasons with the capability in biodegradation of phenolic compounds, SCN and sulfides (Wu et al. 2021). The nitrite-oxidizing bacteria (NOB) Nitrospira went through a burst in winter, contributing to TN removal through nitrification (How et al. 2020). Given the minor presence of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AOB) in all samples, a family level analysis was conducted (Fig. S2). The major family of Nitrosomonadaceae was identified as AOB (Zhu et al. 2019). Both Nitrospira and Nitrosomonadaceae demonstrated higher abundances in winter, determined by the reduced inhibition from competitive microorganisms (Kim et al. 2007). Although the abundances of Nitrospira and Nitrosomonadaceae were relatively low in spring, summer and autumn, the strong expression of nitrification genes had been reported, explaining stable nitrification in these seasons (Yu and Zhang 2012). Thauera appeared as major genera in winter, indicating its importance. In the bioreactor O2, the dynamic microbial communities showed their steady functions in nitrification and refractory organics removal. However, the varying seasonal abundances of nitrifying bacteria pointed to their possible susceptibility along the seasons, requiring more studies focused on this aspect.

Due to the pronounced PCoA aggregation of bioreactors in winter, a comparative analysis of microbial communities was conducted for this season. Despite the distinct function of each bioreactor, three genera, Thiobacillus, Denitrobacter and B-42, were found to be omnipresent. Especially, Thiobacillus absolutely dominated in winter samples of the three bioreactors aggravating this cluster. The shared genera underscore their pivotal role for the CWW treatment in the cold season. In summary, the microbial community composition in the AOO bioreactors exhibited pronounced seasonal dynamics, although the changes maintained the functions of the sludge keeping strict CWW discharge standards as a result of stable operations. By the other words, microbial communities exhausted all available feed resources in CWW, adapting the microbial composition to the seasonal changes.

The seasonal function dynamics exhibited a consistent pattern in Level 2 pathways distributions in which the top four are carbohydrate metabolism, amino acid metabolism, energy metabolism and metabolism of cofactors and vitamins. This observation aligns with the expected correlation between these pathways and microbial activity. Energy metabolism, including nitrogen and sulfur metabolism, consistently maintained the abundance ranging from 12.20%to 15.07% along all seasons, indicating the AOO system’s robust and stable capability in nitrogen and sulfur removal. Similar resilience was also observed in the distribution of Level 3 pathways of xenobiotics biodegradation and metabolism across the seasons. Among the Level 3 pathways, benzoate degradation, drug metabolism-other enzymes, drug metabolism-cytochrome P450, metabolism of xenobiotics by cytochrome P450, aminobenzoate degradation, and nitrotoluene degradation emerged as major contributors to the biodegradation of phenols and other organic contaminants (Zhu et al. 2019). Therefore, the functions of microbiota in each bioreactor remain stable in seasons and are consistent in nitric and carbonic pollutants removal.

The RDA analysis results showed specific information between bacterial functions and environmental factors. CWW indicators of COD, phenols and CN had a negative correlation with Thiobacillus, Thauera, Limnohabitans, Corynebacterium, Cloacibacterium and Ochrobactrum in the first or second axes, hinting the biodegradation of pollutants. Among of these genera, Ochrobactrum, Limnohabitans and Corynebacterium showed a positive relationship with NH3, which produced NH3 for subsequent denitrification by biodegrading nitrogen pollutants. Totally, Thiobacillus, Cloacibacterium, Corynebacterium, Alkaliphilus, Pseudomonas and Campylobacter exhibited direct relationships with environmental factors in the AOO system. The Thiobacillus, Cloacibacterium, Alkaliphilus and Pseudomonas were present in the AOO bioreactors for all four seasons, being determined as core genera supporting the operation in seasonal dynamics. Interestingly, the DO showed a stronger relationship with genera than the temperature. Because the solubility of DO decreases with increasing water temperatures (Jane et al. 2021), the bacterial community seems to be mainly impacted by DO, which is changed by temperature under seasonal dynamics. Generally, the water temperature kept stable throughout the four seasons, but aeration would bring outside air into liquid phase, leaving a fluctuation of temperature and DO. In the current CWW biological treatment system, DO is an essential parameter to shape different functions of bioreactors. Therefore, variation of water temperature caused from seasonal dynamics can change the DO level to impact microbial community. For subsequent development of CWW treatment, DO may be one of the most important parameters to consider.

The observed dynamics within the microbial community composition, combining with the maintained stability of CWW treatment efficiencies and a consistent profile of microbial functional pathways, suggest the presence of functional redundancy in the AOO system, i.e., the system’s strong adaptability to seasonal variations, emphasizing its vital role in maintaining stable operations throughout the year. Functional redundancy has been reported in the researches of wastewater process (Chen et al. 2020; Zhang et al. 2018), but evidence is lacking in CWW. In winter, Thiobacillus and Thauera with winter adaptability gained obvious advantages in the AOO system, performing carbon and nitrogen removal. The same functions were performed by Limnohabitans, Corynebacterium, Cloacibacterium and Ochrobactrum in spring, summer and autumn. Although they seasonally succeed with fickle abundances, the same functions were maintained in AOO bioreactors. The toxic substances of CWW often caused AS disintegration, which could be prevented by the resistance and resilience of functional redundancy, provided by unique microbial community composition (Muñoz-Palazon et al. 2019; Suarez et al. 2022). Based on functional redundancy, the AOO system can be subsequently improved to be more stable and better processing in COD load. Overall, the seasonal dynamics in the microbial community contents and functions were revealed in tight connection with functional redundancy in the AOO system. The main conclusions of seasonal bacterial composition and functions dynamics in the AOO bioreactors include:

  1. The microbial community compositions in the AOO bioreactors exhibited substantial seasonal changes.

  2. Thiobacillus, Cloacibacterium, Alkaliphilus and Pseudomonas were determined as core genera in the AOO bioreactors.

  3. In seasons, the predicted functional genes were enriched in the pathways associated with metabolism of nitric and carbonic contaminants.

  4. The analogous distributions of the Level 1 metabolism pathways and fluctuating microbial community composition revealed the functional redundancy and composition diversity.

Supplementary information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 42277379 and U1901218), the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, (NO. 2021A1515012256).

Author contributions

BS, CW, and SZ conceived and designed the experiments. ZT, XX, and SZ collected the samples. ZT, ZG, and YL performed the experiments. ZT, CW, JX, and JD analysed the data. JX provided the reagents, materials and analytic tools. ZT wrote the manuscript. SP, WC, and SZ reviewed and edited the manuscript. All authors edited and approved the paper.

Data availability

The sequences have been deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive under the accession number SRX1056084 and SRR9651087.

Declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Human and animal rights and informed consent

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. Behnami A, Farajzadeh D, Isazadeh S, Benis KZ, Shakerkhatibi M, Shiri Z, Ghorghanlu S, Yadeghari A (2018) Diversity of bacteria in a full-scale petrochemical wastewater treatment plant experiencing stable hydrocarbon removal. J Water Process Eng 23:285–291. 10.1016/j.jwpe.2018.04.015 [Google Scholar]
  2. Caporaso JG, Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J, Bittinger K, Bushman FD, Costello EK, Fierer N, Pena AG, Goodrich JK, Gordon JI, Huttley GA, Kelley ST, Knights D, Koenig JE, Ley RE, Lozupone CA, McDonald D, Muegge BD, Pirrung M, Reeder J, Sevinsky JR, Turnbaugh PJ, Walters WA, Widmann J, Yatsunenko T, Zaneveld J, Knight R (2010) QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat Methods 7(5):335–336. 10.1038/nmeth.f.303 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chen H, Wang M, Chang S (2020) Disentangling community structure of ecological system in activated sludge: Core communities, functionality, and functional redundancy. Microb Ecol 80(2):296–308. 10.1007/s00248-020-01492-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chen X, Deng S, Ji B, Wu S, Chang J (2023) Seasonal purification efficiency, greenhouse gas emissions and microbial community characteristics of a field-scale surface-flow constructed wetland treating agricultural runoff. J Environ Manag 345:118871. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118871 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chen Z, Ding Q, Ning X, Song Z, Gu J, Wang X, Sun W, Qian X, Hu T, Wei S, Xu L, Li Y, Zhou Z, Wei Y (2024) Fe-Mn binary oxides improve the methanogenic performance and reduce the environmental health risks associated with antibiotic resistance genes during anaerobic digestion. J Hazard Mater 469:133921. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.133921 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chen T, Liu YX, Huang L (2022) ImageGP: An easy‐to‐use data visualization web server for scientific researchers. IMeta e5. 10.1002/imt2.5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  7. Chu H, Liu X, Ma J, Li T, Fan H, Zhou X, Zhang Y, Li E, Zhang X (2021) Two-stage anoxic-oxic (A/O) system for the treatment of coking wastewater: Full-scale performance and microbial community analysis. Chem Eng J 417. 10.1016/j.cej.2021.129204
  8. Datta T, Racz L, Kotay SM, Goel R (2011) Seasonal variations of nitrifying community in trickling filter-solids contact (TF/SC) activated sludge systems. Bioresource Technol 102(3):2272–2279. 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.10.043 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Douglas GM, Maffei VJ, Zaneveld JR, Yurgel SN, Brown JR, Taylor CM, Huttenhower C, Langille MGI (2020) PICRUSt2 for prediction of metagenome functions. Nat Biotechnol 38(6):685–688. 10.1038/s41587-020-0548-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ferro L, Hu YOO, Gentili FG, Andersson AF, Funk C (2020) DNA metabarcoding reveals microbial community dynamics in a microalgae-based municipal wastewater treatment open photobioreactor. Algal Res 51:102043. 10.1016/j.algal.2020.102043 [Google Scholar]
  11. Gaio J, Lora NL, Iltchenco J, Magrini FE, Paesi S (2023) Seasonal characterization of the prokaryotic microbiota of full-scale anaerobic UASB reactors treating domestic sewage in southern Brazil. Bioproc Biosyst Eng 46(1):69–87. 10.1007/s00449-022-02814-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gao J, Liu G, Li H, Xu L, Du L, Yang B (2016) Predictive functional profiling using marker gene sequences and community diversity analyses of microbes in full-scale anaerobic sludge digesters. Bioproc Biosyst Eng 39(7):1115–1127. 10.1007/s00449-016-1588-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Han F, Zhang M, Shang H, Liu Z, Zhou W (2020) Microbial community succession, species interactions and metabolic pathways of sulfur-based autotrophic denitrification system in organic-limited nitrate wastewater. Bioresour Technol 315:123826. 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123826 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. How SW, Nittami T, Ngoh GC, Curtis TP, Chua ASM (2020) An efficient oxic-anoxic process for treating low COD/N tropical wastewater: Startup, optimization and nitrifying community structure. Chemosphere 259:127444. 10.1016/j.Chemosphere2020.127444 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Jane SF, Hansen GJA, Kraemer BM, Leavitt PR, Mincer JL, North RL, Pilla RM, Stetler JT, Williamson CE, Woolway RI, Arvola L, Chandra S, DeGasperi CL, Diemer L, Dunalska J, Erina O, Flaim G, Grossart H-P, Hambright KD, Hein C, Hejzlar J, Janus LL, Jenny J-P, Jones JR, Knoll LB, Leoni B, Mackay E, Matsuzaki S-IS, McBride C, Müller-Navarra DC, Paterson AM, Pierson D, Rogora M, Rusak JA, Sadro S, Saulnier-Talbot E, Schmid M, Sommaruga R, Thiery W, Verburg P, Weathers KC, Weyhenmeyer GA, Yokota K, Rose KC (2021) Widespread deoxygenation of temperate lakes. Nature 594(7861):66–70. 10.1038/s41586-021-03550-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Jayashree C, Arulazhagan P, Adish Kumar S, Kaliappan S, Yeom IT, Rajesh Banu J (2014) Bioelectricity generation from coconut husk retting wastewater in fed batch operating microbial fuel cell by phenol degrading microorganism. Biomass Bioenerg 69:249–254. 10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.07.024 [Google Scholar]
  17. Joshi DR, Zhang Y, Tian Z, Gao Y, Yang M (2016) Performance and microbial community composition in a long-term sequential anaerobic-aerobic bioreactor operation treating coking wastewater. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 100(18):8191–8202. 10.1007/s00253-016-7591-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kim YM (2013) Acclimatization of communities of ammonia oxidizing bacteria to seasonal changes in optimal conditions in a coke wastewater treatment plant. Bioresour Technol 147:627–631. 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.08.062 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kim YM, Park D, Lee DS, Park JM (2007) Instability of biological nitrogen removal in a cokes wastewater treatment facility during summer. J Hazard Mater 141(1):27–32. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.06.074 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kim YM, Park D, Lee DS, Park JM (2008) Inhibitory effects of toxic compounds on nitrification process for cokes wastewater treatment. J Hazard Mater 152(3):915–921. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.07.065 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Klindworth A, Pruesse E, Schweer T, Peplies J, Quast C, Horn M, Glöckner FO (2013) Evaluation of general 16S ribosomal RNA gene PCR primers for classical and next-generation sequencing-based diversity studies. Nucleic Acids Res 41(1):e1–e1. 10.1093/nar/gks808 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Lemos LN, Fulthorpe RR, Triplett EW, Roesch LFW (2011) Rethinking microbial diversity analysis in the high throughput sequencing era. J Microbiol Meth 86(1):42–51. 10.1016/j.mimet.2011.03.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Li R, Wang J, Li H (2018) Isolation and characterization of organic matter-degrading bacteria from coking wastewater treatment plant. Water Sci Technol 78(7):1517–1524. 10.2166/wst.2018.427 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Li X, He M, Sun G, Ma C, Li Y, Li L, Li B, Yang M, Zhang Y (2023a) Toxicological evaluation of industrial effluents using zebrafish: Efficacy of tertiary treatment of coking wastewater. Environ Technol Innov 30:103067. 10.1016/j.eti.2023.103067 [Google Scholar]
  25. Li Y, Zhang Q, Guo D, Dang J (2023b) Characteristics and risk assessment of PAH pollution in soil of a retired coking wastewater treatment plant in Taiyuan, Northern China. Toxics 11(5):415. 10.3390/toxics11050415 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Liu C-L, Zhang Q, Singh VP, Cui Y (2011) Copula-based evaluations of drought variations in Guangdong, South China. Nat Hazards 59(3):1533–1546. 10.1007/s11069-011-9850-4 [Google Scholar]
  27. Liu Y, Liu J, Zhang A, Liu Z (2017) Treatment effects and genotoxicity relevance of the toxic organic pollutants in semi-coking wastewater by combined treatment process. Environ Pollut 220:13–19. 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.04.095 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Lors C, Mossmann JR, Barbé P (2004) Phenotypic responses of the soil bacterial community to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon contamination in soils. Polycycl Aromat Comp 24(1):21–36. 10.1080/10406630490277434 [Google Scholar]
  29. Ma Y, Shi F, Qian S, Ma J (2023) Variations in the dairy wastewater properties and bacterial diversity of each unit in membrane-enclosed anaerobic lagoon treatment process in Heilongjiang Province. J Environ Manag 347:119035. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119035 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Mallick SK, Chakraborty S (2019) Bioremediation of wastewater from automobile service station in anoxic-aerobic sequential reactors and microbial analysis. Chem Eng J 361:982–989. 10.1016/j.cej.2018.12.164 [Google Scholar]
  31. Mao Y, Zhang X, Xia X, Zhong H, Zhao L (2010) Versatile aromatic compound-degrading capacity and microdiversity of Thauera strains isolated from a coking wastewater treatment bioreactor. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 37(9):927–934. 10.1007/s10295-010-0740-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Mozumder MSI, Shahreyar S, Islam S, Sen T, Dey J, Islam S (2021) Functionality of denitrification with minerals composition, process conditions and microbial community. Int J Environ Sci Technol 19(10):9691–9702. 10.1007/s13762-021-03810-4 [Google Scholar]
  33. Muñoz-Palazon B, Rodriguez-Sanchez A, Hurtado-Martinez M, de Castro IM, Juarez-Jimenez B, Gonzalez-Martinez A, Gonzalez-Lopez J (2019) Performance and microbial community structure of an aerobic granular sludge system at different phenolic acid concentrations. J Hazard Mater 376:58–67. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.05.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Nomoto N, Hatamoto M, Hirakata Y, Ali M, Jayaswal K, Iguchi A, Okubo T, Takahashi M, Kubota K, Tagawa T, Uemura S, Yamaguchi T, Harada H (2018) Defining microbial community composition and seasonal variation in a sewage treatment plant in India using a down-flow hanging sponge reactor. Appl Microbiol Biot 102(10):4381–4392. 10.1007/s00253-018-8864-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Nossa C, Oberdorf W, Yang L, Aas J, Paster B, DeSantis T, Brodie E, Malamud D, Poles M, Pei Z (2010) Design of 16S rRNA gene primers for 454 pyrosequencing of the human foregut microbiome. World J Gastroenterol 16:4135–4144. 10.3748/wjg.v16.i33.4135 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Ou H-S, Wei C-H, Mo C-H, Wu H-Z, Ren Y, Feng C-H (2014) Novel insights into anoxic/aerobic(1)/aerobic(2) biological fluidized-bed system for coke wastewater treatment by fluorescence excitation-emission matrix spectra coupled with parallel factor analysis. Chemosphere 113:158–164. 10.1016/j.Chemosphere.2014.04.102 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Pathak U, Mogalapalli P, Mandal DD, Mandal T (2023) Biodegradation efficacy of coke oven wastewater inherent co-cultured novel sp. Alcaligenes faecalis JF339228 and Klebsiella oxytoca KF303807 on phenol and cyanide—kinetic and toxicity analysis. Biomass Convers Bioref 13(4):2687–2702. 10.1007/s13399-021-01323-1 [Google Scholar]
  38. Peces M, Dottorini G, Nierychlo M, Andersen KS, Dueholm MKD, Nielsen PH (2022) Microbial communities across activated sludge plants show recurring species-level seasonal patterns. ISME Commun 2(1). 10.1038/s43705-022-00098-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  39. Postec A, Quéméneur M, Lecoeuvre A, Chabert N, Joseph M, Erauso G (2021) Alkaliphilus serpentinus sp. nov. and Alkaliphilus pronyensis sp. nov., two novel anaerobic alkaliphilic species isolated from the serpentinite-hosted Prony Bay Hydrothermal Field (New Caledonia). Syst Appl Microbiol 44(2):126175. 10.1016/j.syapm.2020.126175 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Pugazhendi A, Qari H, Al-Badry Basahi JM, Godon JJ, Dhavamani J (2017) Role of a halothermophilic bacterial consortium for the biodegradation of PAHs and the treatment of petroleum wastewater at extreme conditions. Int Biodeter Biodegr 121:44–54. 10.1016/j.ibiod.2017.03.015 [Google Scholar]
  41. Schloss PD, Westcott SL, Ryabin T, Hall JR, Hartmann M, Hollister EB, Lesniewski RA, Oakley BB, Parks DH, Robinson CJ, Sahl JW, Stres B, Thallinger GG, Van Horn DJ, Weber CF (2009) Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 75(23):7537–7541. 10.1128/AEM.01541-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Shi L, Wang D, Cao D, Na C, Quan X, Zhang Y (2017) Is A/A/O process effective in toxicity removal? Case study with coking wastewater. Ecotox Environ Saf 142:363–368. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.04.034 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Soares-Castro P, Yadav TC, Viggor S, Kivisaar M, Kapley A, Santos PM (2019) Seasonal bacterial community dynamics in a crude oil refinery wastewater treatment plant. Appl Microbiol Biot 103(21):9131–9141. 10.1007/s00253-019-10130-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Suarez C, Sedlacek CJ, Gustavsson DJI, Eiler A, Modin O, Hermansson M, Persson F (2022) Disturbance-based management of ecosystem services and disservices in partial nitritation-anammox biofilms. Npj Biofilms Microbi 8(1):47. 10.1038/s41522-022-00308-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Sun S, Jones RB, Fodor AA (2020) Inference-based accuracy of metagenome prediction tools varies across sample types and functional categories. Microbiome 8(1):46. 10.1186/s40168-020-00815-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Sun C, Zhang B, Ning D, Zhang Y, Dai T, Wu L, Li T, Liu W, Zhou J, Wen X (2021) Seasonal dynamics of the microbial community in two full-scale wastewater treatment plants: Diversity, composition, phylogenetic group based assembly and co-occurrence pattern. Water Res 200:117295. 10.1016/j.watres.2021.117295 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Suransh J, Jadhav DA, Nguyen DD, Mungray AK (2023) Scalable architecture of low-cost household microbial fuel cell for domestic wastewater treatment and simultaneous energy recovery. Sci Total Environ 857(Pt 3):159671. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159671 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Tamang M, Paul KK (2022) Advances in treatment of coking wastewater – a state of art review. Water Sci Technol 85(1):449–473. 10.2166/wst.2021.497 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Trouve C, Chazal PM, Gueroux B, Sauvaitre N (1998) Denitrification by new strains of Thiobacillus Denitrificans under non-standard physicochemical conditions. Effect of temperature, pH, and sulphur source. Environ Technol 19(6):601–610. 10.1080/09593331908616716 [Google Scholar]
  50. Tsukamoto H, Phan HV, Suenaga T, Yasuda S, Kuroiwa M, Riya S, Ogata A, Hori T, Terada A (2023) Microaerophilic activated sludge system for ammonia retention toward recovery from high-strength nitrogenous wastewater: Performance and microbial communities. Environ Sci Technol 57(37):13874–13886. 10.1021/acs.est.3c03002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Wang P, Yu Z, Zhao J, Zhang H (2016) Seasonal changes in bacterial communities cause foaming in a wastewater treatment plant. Microb Ecol 71(3):660–671. 10.1007/s00248-015-0700-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Wang X, Hou H, Liu P, Hou L, Yang T, Dai H, Li J (2023) Acceleration of nitrogen removal performance in a biofilm reactor augmented with Pseudomonas sp. using polycaprolactone as carbon source for treating low carbon to nitrogen wastewater. Bioresource Technol 386:129507. 10.1016/j.biortech.2023.129507 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Wei CH, Xie B, Xiao HL, Wang DS (2000) Volumetric mass transfer coefficient of oxygen in an internal loop airlift reactor with a convergence-divergence draft tube. Chem Eng Technol 23(7):597–603. 10.1002/1521-4125(200007)23:7%3c597::Aid-ceat597%3e3.0.Co;2-y [Google Scholar]
  54. Wu Z, Zhu W, Liu Y, Peng P, Li X, Zhou X, Xu J (2020) An integrated three-dimensional electrochemical system for efficient treatment of coking wastewater rich in ammonia nitrogen. Chemosphere 246:125703. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.125703 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Wu Y, Song Q, Wu J, Zhou J, Zhou L, Wu W (2021) Field study on the soil bacterial associations to combined contamination with heavy metals and organic contaminants. Sci Total Environ 778:146282. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146282 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Xie Z, Wang Z, Wang Q, Zhu C, Wu Z (2014) An anaerobic dynamic membrane bioreactor (AnDMBR) for landfill leachate treatment: performance and microbial community identification. Bioresour Technol 161:29–39. 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.03.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Xu M, Gao P, Chen H-q, Huang X-h, Xue Z-x, Shen X-x, Li C, Cao J-s (2022) Spatiotemporal distribution of microorganisms in a full-scale anaerobic baffled reactor–anoxic/oxic treatment plant for printing and dyeing wastewater. J Water Process Eng 49:103090. 10.1016/j.jwpe.2022.103090 [Google Scholar]
  58. Xu R, Zhang W, Fu Y, Fan F, Zhou Z, Chen J, Liu W, Meng F (2023) The positive roles of influent species immigration in mitigating membrane fouling in membrane bioreactors treating municipal wastewater. Water Res 235:119907. 10.1016/j.watres.2023.119907 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Yang L, Yao H, Jia F, Han B, Chen Y, Jiang J, Liu T, Guo J (2023) Effects of ammonia nitrogen and organic carbon availability on microbial community structure and ecological interactions in a full-scale partial nitritation and anammox (PN/A) system. Water Res 244:120524. 10.1016/j.watres.2023.120524 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Ye C, Chen Y, Feng L, Wan K, Li J, Feng M, Yu X (2021) Effect of the ultraviolet/chlorine process on microbial community structure, typical pathogens, and antibiotic resistance genes in reclaimed water. Front Environ Sci Eng 16(8):100. 10.1007/s11783-022-1521-z [Google Scholar]
  61. Yi Y, Lin C, Wang W, Song J (2021) Habitat and seasonal variations in bacterial community structure and diversity in sediments of a Shallow lake. Ecol Indic 120:106959. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106959 [Google Scholar]
  62. Yu K, Zhang T (2012) Metagenomic and metatranscriptomic analysis of microbial community structure and gene expression of activated sludge. PLoS ONE 7(5):e38183. 10.1371/journal.pone.0038183 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Yuan K, Li S, Zhong F (2020) Treatment of coking wastewater in biofilm-based bioaugmentation process: Biofilm formation and microbial community analysis. J Hazard Mater 400. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123117 [DOI] [PubMed]
  64. Zhang J, Lang Z-F, Zheng J-W, Hang B-J, Duan X-Q, He J, Li S-P (2012) <i>Sphingobium jiangsuense</i> sp nov., a 3-phenoxybenzoic acid-degrading bacterium isolated from a wastewater treatment system. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 62:800–805. 10.1099/ijs.0.029827-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Zhang B, Yu Q, Yan G, Zhu H, Xu XY, Zhu L (2018) Seasonal bacterial community succession in four typical wastewater treatment plants: correlations between core microbes and process performance. Sci Rep 8(1):4566. 10.1038/s41598-018-22683-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Zhang Y, Xiao F, Mei H, Li Y, Liu C, Qiu X (2022b) Comprehensive analysis of climate-related comfort in southern China: Climatology, trend, and interannual variations. Urban Clim 46:101349. 10.1016/j.uclim.2022.101349 [Google Scholar]
  67. Zhang B, Deng J, Xie J, Wu H, Wei C, Li Z, Qiu G, Wei C, Zhu S (2022a) Microbial community composition and function prediction involved in the hydrolytic bioreactor of coking wastewater treatment process. Arch Microbiol 204(7). 10.1007/s00203-022-03052-z [DOI] [PubMed]
  68. Zhou NA, Kjeldal H, Gough HL, Nielsen JL (2015) Identification of putative genes involved in bisphenol a degradation using differential protein abundance analysis of Sphingobium sp. BiD32. Environ Sci Technol 49(20):12232–12241. 10.1021/acs.est.5b02987 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Zhou S, Song Z, Sun Z, Shi X, Zhang Z (2021) The effects of undulating seasonal temperature on the performance and microbial community characteristics of simultaneous anammox and denitrification (SAD) process. Bioresour Technol 321:124493. 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.124493 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Zhou X, Wang G, Yin Z, Chen J, Song J, Liu Y (2020) Performance and microbial community in a single-stage simultaneous carbon oxidation, partial nitritation, denitritation and anammox system treating synthetic coking wastewater under the stress of phenol. Chemosphere 243. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.125382 [DOI] [PubMed]
  71. Zhu S, Wu H, Wu C, Qiu G, Feng C, Wei C (2019) Structure and function of microbial community involved in a novel full-scale prefix oxic coking wastewater treatment O/H/O system. Water Res 164:114963. 10.1016/j.watres.2019.114963 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Zhu S, Wu H, Wei C, Zhou L, Xie J (2016) Contrasting microbial community composition and function perspective in sections of a full-scale coking wastewater treatment system (vol 100, pg 949, 2016). Appl Microbiol Biot 100(4):2033-2033.10.1007/s00253-016-7309-y [DOI] [PubMed]
  73. Zhuang H, Wu Z, Xu L, Leu SY, Lee PH (2020) Energy-efficient single-stage nitrite shunt denitrification with saline sewage through concise dissolved oxygen (DO) supply: Process performance and microbial communities. Microorganisms 8(6). 10.3390/microorganisms8060919 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

The sequences have been deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive under the accession number SRX1056084 and SRR9651087.


Articles from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES