Table 3.
Conditional logit regression results of the discrete choice experiment, showing significant attributes and levels as well as the relative importance of attributes in comparison.
| Attributes and levels | Coefficient (SE; 95% CIa) | Relative importance (%) | |||
| Information source | 9.22 | ||||
|
|
Student service center | –0.04 (0.05; –0.13 to 0.06) |
|
||
|
|
Student council | 0.17 (0.05; 0.07 to 0.28) |
|
||
|
|
University lecturers | –0.14 (0.04; –0.22 to –0.05) |
|
||
| Delivery mode | 24.44 | ||||
|
|
Social media | 0.27 (0.06; 0.15 to 0.39) |
|
||
|
|
0.16 (0.06; 0.05 to 0.27) |
|
|||
|
|
Seminar | 0.12 (0.07; –0.02 to 0.25) |
|
||
|
|
Print media | –0.55 (0.07; –0.68 to –0.42) |
|
||
| Timing | 32.59 | ||||
|
|
Freshman week | 0.31 (0.06; 0.19 to 0.42) |
|
||
|
|
Preclinic | 0.50 (0.06; 0.38 to 0.62) |
|
||
|
|
Clinic | –0.20 (0.05; –0.31 to –0.10) |
|
||
|
|
Practical year | –0.60 (0.07; –0.73 to –0.47) |
|
||
| Recommendation | 19.09 | ||||
|
|
HCPb | 0.14 (0.05; 0.04 to 0.24) |
|
||
|
|
Students | 0.29 (0.05; 0.18 to 0.39) |
|
||
|
|
Users | –0.07 (0.05; –0.16 to 0.02) |
|
||
|
|
No review | –0.35 (0.06; –0.47 to –0.24) |
|
||
| Quality criterion | 14.66 | ||||
|
|
Data security | –0.12 (0.06; –0.24 to –0.01) |
|
||
|
|
Evidence based | 0.30 (0.06; 0.18 to 0.41) |
|
||
|
|
Quality seal | 0.02 (0.05; –0.08 to 0.12) |
|
||
|
|
Background of developers | –0.20 (0.06; –0.31 to –0.08) |
|
||
aCI significance is assumed if the CI does not include the number 0 (no different signs).
bHCP: health care professional.