Skip to main content
F1000Research logoLink to F1000Research
. 2024 Jan 18;13:77. [Version 1] doi: 10.12688/f1000research.146156.1

A guide to selecting high-performing antibodies for PLC-gamma-2 for use in Western Blot, immunoprecipitation and immunofluorescence

Vera Ruíz Moleón 1, Maryam Fotouhi 1, Charles Alende 1, Riham Ayoubi 1, Logan M Bedford 2, Kathleen Southern 1, Timothy I Richardson 2, Carl Laflamme 1,a; NeuroSGC/YCharOS/EDDU collaborative group; ABIF consortium
PMCID: PMC11489847  PMID: 39429638

Abstract

Phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C gamma 2 (PLC-gamma-2) is an enzyme that regulates the function of immune cells. PLC-gamma-2 has been implicated in neurodegenerative and autoimmune disorders, yet investigation of this protein has been limited by a lack of independently characterized antibodies. Here we have characterized eleven PLC-gamma-2 commercial antibodies for use in Western Blot, immunoprecipitation, and immunofluorescence using a standardized experimental protocol based on comparing read-outs in knockout cell lines and isogenic parental controls. These studies are part of a larger, collaborative initiative seeking to address antibody reproducibility issues by characterizing commercially available antibodies for human proteins and publishing the results openly as a resource for the scientific community. While use of antibodies and protocols vary between laboratories, we encourage readers to use this report as a guide to select the most appropriate antibodies for their specific needs.

Keywords: Uniprot ID P16885, PLCG2, PLC-gamma-2, PLC-γ2, Phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C gamma 2, antibody characterization, antibody validation, Western Blot, immunoprecipitation, immunofluorescence 

Introduction

Phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C gamma 2 (PLC-gamma-2) is expressed primarily in immune cells. 1 It belongs to a family of phospholipases that facilitate the cleavage of phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate into inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate (IP3) and diacylglycerol (DAG). 2 DAG activates protein kinase C 3 while IP3 diffuses through the cytosol to the endoplasmic reticulum where it stimulates the release of calcium stores. 4 By regulating these second messengers, PLC-gamma-2 regulates cellular functions such as migration, adhesion, calcium signaling, and phagocytosis. 5 , 6

In the absence of activation, PLC-gamma-2 exists in an autoinhibited state in the cytosol. 7 , 8 In order for PLC-gamma-2 to be recruited to the plasma membrane, phosphorylation is required. This phosphorylation induces domain reorganization of the autoinhibitory core and exposes the catalytic domain to its substrate, IP3, at the inner membrane surface. 9

The particular kinases and scaffolding proteins that mediate the activation of PLC-gamma-2 are dependent on the receptor being activated. Unlike its related family members, PLC-gamma-2 is activated downstream of receptor tyrosine kinases rather than G protein coupled receptors. 2

PLC-gamma-2 has been implicated in a variety of diseases. Gain-of function point mutations cause autoinflammatory disease. 10 , 11 Patients with rheumatoid arthritis have upregulated PLC-gamma-2 expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. 12 PLC-gamma-2 signaling can drive leukemogenesis in cases of Ibrutinib refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia. 13 , 14 Additionally, PLC-gamma-2 is involved in solid cancers through Wnt signaling. 15 Finally, whole-exome microarray data identified a rare hypermorphic variant (P522R) associated with decreased risk of Alzheimer’s Disease (AD). 16 20 Conversely, a loss-of-function variant (M28L) is associated with increased risk. 21 These risk modifying variants suggest that PLC-gamma-2 may be a potential target for the treatment of AD and related dementia. 22 , 23 Studies aimed at elucidating the mechanistic role of PLC-gamma-2 in signaling pathways relevant to neurodegenerative processes involved in these diseases would benefit greatly from the availability of well characterized, high-quality antibodies.

This research is part of a broader collaborative initiative in which academics, funders and commercial antibody manufacturers are working together to address antibody reproducibility issues by characterizing commercial antibodies for human proteins using standardized protocols, and openly sharing the data 24 26 Here, we evaluated the performance of eleven commercially-available antibodies for PLC-gamma-2 in Western Blot, immunoprecipitation, and immunofluorescence using a knockout based approach. This article serves as a valuable guide to help researchers select high-quality antibodies for their specific needs, facilitating the biochemical and cellular assessment of PLC-gamma-2 properties and function.

Results and discussion

Our standard protocol involves comparing readouts from wild-type (WT) and knockout (KO) cells. 27 , 28 The first step is to identify a cell line(s) that expresses sufficient endogenous levels of a given protein to generate a measurable signal. To this end, we examined the DepMap transcriptomics database to identify all cell lines that express the target at levels greater than 2.5 log 2 (transcripts per million “TPM” + 1), which we have found to be a suitable cut-off (Cancer Dependency Map Portal, RRID:SCR_017655). Commercially available THP-1 cells expressed the PLC-gamma-2 transcript at RNA levels above the average range of cancer cells analyzed. Parental and PLCG2 KO THP-1 cells were obtained from Abcam ( Table 1).

Table 1. Summary of the cell lines used.

Institution Catalog number RRID (Cellosaurus) Cell line Genotype
Abcam ab271147 CVCL_0006 THP-1 WT
Abcam ab308482 - THP-1 PLCG2 KO

For Western Blot analyses, we resolved proteins from WT and PLCG2 KO cell extracts. Both WT and KO cell lines were treated with and without phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) and then probed side-by-side with all antibodies in parallel ( Figure 1).

Figure 1. PLC-gamma-2 antibody screening by Western Blot.

Figure 1.

Lysates of THP-1 (WT and PLCG2 KO) either treated (+) or not treated (-) with PMA were prepared and 10 μg of protein were processed for Western Blot with the indicated PLC-gamma-2 antibodies. The Ponceau stained transfers of each blot are presented to show equal loading of WT and KO lysates and protein transfer efficiency from the acrylamide gels to the nitrocellulose membrane. Antibody dilutions were chosen according to the recommendations of the antibody supplier. All antibodies were tested at a dilution of 1/500 except antibody 34264** was tested at 1/200. Predicted band size: 148 kDa. *Monoclonal antibody, **Recombinant antibody.

As per our standard protocol, we next used the antibodies to immunoprecipitate PLC-gamma-2 from THP-1 WT and KO cell extracts. The performance of each antibody was evaluated by detecting the PLC-gamma-2 protein in extracts, in the immunodepleted extracts and in the immunoprecipitates ( Figure 2).

Figure 2. PLC-gamma-2 antibody screening by immunoprecipitation.

Figure 2.

THP-1 lysates were prepared, and immunoprecipitation was performed using 2.0 μg of the indicated PLC-gamma-2 antibodies pre-coupled to Dynabeads protein G or protein A. Samples were washed and processed for Western Blot with the indicated PLC-gamma-2 antibody. For Western Blot, 55512** was used at 1/500. The Ponceau stained transfers of each blot are shown. SM=4% starting material; UB=4% unbound fraction; IP=immunoprecipitate. *Monoclonal antibody, **Recombinant antibody.

For immunofluorescence antibodies were screened using a mosaic strategy, as per our standardized protocol. First, THP-1 WT and PLCG2 KO cell lines were labelled with different coloured fluorescent dyes, in order to distinguish the two cell lines, and the eleven PLC-gamma-2 antibodies were evaluated. Cells were imaged in the same field of view to reduce staining, imaging and image analysis bias ( Figure 3). Quantification of immunofluorescence intensity in hundreds of WT and KO cells was performed for each antibody tested. The images presented in Figure 3 are representative of the results of this analysis.

Figure 3. PLC-gamma-2 antibody screening by immunofluorescence.

Figure 3.

THP-1 WT and PLCG2 KO cells were labelled with a green or a far-red fluorescent dye, respectively. WT and KO cells were mixed and plated to a 1:1 ratio in a 96-well plate with optically clear flat-bottom. Cells were stained with the indicated PLC-gamma-2 antibodies and with the corresponding Alexa-fluor 555 coupled secondary antibody including DAPI. Acquisition of the blue (nucleus-DAPI), green (WT), red (antibody staining) and far-red (KO) channels was performed. Representative images of the merged blue and red (grayscale) channels are shown. WT and KO cells are outlined with green and magenta dashed line, respectively. Antibodies were tested at 1.0 μg/mL. Antibody dilution used: ab109267** at 1/1300, ab133522** at 1/600, MAB3716* at 1/500, NBP2-52536* at 1/1000, 3872 at 1/1000, 34264** at 1/102, 55512** at 1/50, GTX111178 at 1/100, GTX111293 at 1/700, MA5-35670** at 1/700 and MA5-38600* at 1/1000. Bars = 10 μm. *Monoclonal antibody, **Recombinant antibody.

In summary, we have screened eleven PLC-gamma-2 commercial antibodies by Western Blot, immunoprecipitation and immunofluorescence. Several high-quality antibodies that successfully detect PLC-gamma-2 under our standardized experimental conditions were identified. In our effort to address the antibody reliability and reproducibility challenges in scientific research, the authors recommend the antibodies that demonstrated to be underperforming under our standard procedure be removed from the commercial antibody market. However, the authors do not engage in result analysis or offer explicit antibody recommendations. A limitation of this study is the use of universal protocols - any conclusions remain relevant within the confines of the experimental setup and cell line used in this study. Our primary aim is to deliver top-tier data to the scientific community, grounded in Open Science principles. This empowers experts to interpret the characterization data independently, enabling them to make informed choices regarding the most suitable antibodies for their specific experimental needs. Guidelines on how to interpret the antibody characterization data in this study are openly available. 29

The underlying data can be found on Zenodo, an open-access repository for which YCharOS has its own collection of antibody characterization reports. 30 , 31

Methods

Antibodies

All PLC-gamma-2 antibodies are listed in Table 2, along with their corresponding Research Resource Identifiers, or RRID, to ensure the antibodies are cited properly. 32 Peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit and anti-mouse antibodies are from Thermo Fisher Scientific (cat. number 65-6120 and 62-6520). Alexa-555-conjugated goat anti-rabbit and anti-mouse secondary antibodies are from Thermo Fisher Scientific (cat. number A21429 and A21424).

Table 2. Summary of the PLC-gamma-2 antibodies tested.

Company Catalog number Lot number RRID (Antibody Registry) Clonality Clone ID Host Concentration (μg/μL) Vendors recommended applications
Abcam ab109267 ** a GR498527 AB_10888119 recombinant-mono EPR1403 rabbit 1.32 WB
Abcam ab133522 ** GR962819 AB_2927390 recombinant-mono EPR5914-34 rabbit 0.63 WB
R&D Systems (a Bio-Techne brand) MAB3716 * XXN0319021 AB_2163529 monoclonal 346404 mouse 0.50 WB, IF
Novus Biologicals (a Bio-Techne brand) NBP2-52536 * a 141225 AB_2927391 monoclonal 2D9E8 mouse 1.00 WB, IF
Cell Signaling Technology 3872 5 AB_2299586 polyclonal - rabbit 0.12 WB, IP
Cell Signaling Technology 34264 ** 1 AB_2927393 recombinant-mono E7L6G rabbit 0.39 WB
Cell Signaling Technology 55512 ** 1 AB_2799488 recombinant-mono E5U4T rabbit 0.05 WB, IP, IF
GeneTex GTX111178 40058 AB_1951276 polyclonal - rabbit 0.66 WB, IF
GeneTex GTX111293 43334 AB_1951274 polyclonal - rabbit 0.75 WB
Thermo Fisher Scientific MA5-35670 ** XH3670294 AB_2849570 recombinant-mono ARC1176 rabbit 0.73 WB
Thermo Fisher Scientific MA5-38600 * XH3669859 AB_2898512 monoclonal 2D9E8 mouse 1.00 WB, IF

WB=Western Blot; IF= immunofluorescence; IP=immunoprecipitation.

*

Monoclonal antibody.

**

Recombinant antibody.

a

Antibodies that have been discontinued following this study.

Cell culture

Both THP-1 and PLCG2 KO cell lines used are listed in Table 1, together with their corresponding RRID to ensure the cell lines are cited properly. 33 Cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific, cat. number 11875119) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (Wisent, cat. number 080450), 2 mM L-glutamate (Wisent, cat. number 609065), 100 IU penicillin and 100 μg/mL streptomycin (Wisent, cat. number 450201).

One set of the THP-1 WT and PLCG2 KO cells were treated with 200 ng/mL of PMA (Abcam, cat. number ab147465) for 2 days. 200 ng/mL of PMA was added to fresh medium on both day 1 and day 2. 34 The other set of cells, WT and PLCG2 KO remained untreated.

Antibody screening by Western Blot

Western Blots were performed as described in our standard operating procedure. 27 , 28 THP-1 WT and PLCG2 KO were collected in RIPA buffer (25 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.6, 150 mM NaCl, 1% NP-40, 1% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS) supplemented with 1× protease inhibitor cocktail mix (MilliporeSigma, cat. number P8340). Lysates were sonicated briefly and incubated for 30 min on ice. Lysates were spun at ~110,000 × g for 15 min at 4°C and equal protein aliquots of the supernatants were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and Western Blot. BLUelf prestained protein ladder from GeneDireX (cat. number PM008-0500) was used.

Western Blots were performed with precast midi 4-20% Tris-Glycine polyacrylamide gels from Thermo Fisher Scientific (cat. number WXP42012BOX) ran with Tris/Glycine/SDS buffer from bio-Rad (cat. number 1610772), loaded in Laemmli loading sample buffer from Thermo Fisher Scientific (cat. number AAJ61337AD) and transferred on nitrocellulose membranes. Proteins on the blots were visualized with Ponceau S staining (Thermo Fisher Scientific, cat. number BP103-10) which is scanned to show together with individual Western Blot. Blots were blocked with 5% milk for 1 hr, and antibodies were incubated overnight at 4°C with 5% milk in TBS with 0.1% Tween 20 (TBST) (Cell Signalling Technology, cat. number 9997). Following three washes with TBST, the peroxidase conjugated secondary antibody was incubated at a dilution of ~0.2 μg/mL in TBST with 5% milk for 1 hr at room temperature followed by three washes with TBST. Membranes were incubated with Pierce ECL from Thermo Fisher Scientific (cat. number 32106) Or Clarity Western ECL Substrate from Bio-Rad (cat. number 1705061) prior to detection with the iBright™ CL1500 Imaging System from Thermo Fisher Scientific (cat. number A44240).

Antibody screening by immunoprecipitation

Immunoprecipitation was performed as described in our standard operating procedure. 27 , 28 Antibody-bead conjugates were prepared by adding 10 μL of antibodies 3872 and 55512** or 2 μg of the remaining antibodies tested to 500 μL of Pierce IP Lysis Buffer from Thermo Fisher Scientific (cat. number 87788) in a 1.5 mL microcentrifuge tube, together with 30 μL of Dynabeads protein A - (for rabbit antibodies) or protein G - (for mouse antibodies) from Thermo Fisher Scientific (cat. number 10002D and 10004D, respectively). The low concentrations of antibodies 3872 and 55512** can account for why 10 μL was added to make the antibody-bead conjugates, rather than 2 μg. Tubes were rocked ~1 hr at 4°C followed by several washes to remove unbound antibodies.

THP-1 WT were collected in Pierce IP buffer (25 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1% NP-40 and 5% glycerol) supplemented with protease inhibitor. Lysates were rocked 30 min at 4°C and spun at 110,000 × g for 15 min at 4°C. 0.5 mL aliquots at 2.0 mg/mL of lysate were incubated with an antibody-bead conjugate for ~1 hr at 4°C. The unbound fractions were collected, and beads were subsequently washed three times with 1.0 mL of IP lysis buffer and processed for SDS-PAGE and Western Blot on a precast midi 4-20% Tris-Glycine polyacrylamide gels from Thermo Fisher Scientific.

Antibody screening by immunofluorescence

Immunofluorescence was performed as described in our standard operating procedure. 27 , 28 THP-1 WT and PLCG2 KO were labelled with a green and a far-red fluorescence dye, respectively. The fluorescent dyes used are from Thermo Fisher Scientific (cat. number C2925 and C34565). The nuclei were labelled with DAPI (Thermo Fisher Scientific, cat. number D3571) fluorescent stain. WT and KO cells were plated in 96-well plate with optically clear flat bottom (Perkin Elmer, cat. number 6055300) as a mosaic and incubated for 24 hrs in a cell culture incubator at 37 oC, 5% CO 2. Cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) (Beantown chemical, cat. number 140770-10 ml) in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) (Wisent, cat. number 311-010-CL) for 15 min at room temperature and then washed 3 times with PBS. Cells were permeabilized in PBS with 0.1% Triton X-100 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, cat. number BP151-500) for 10 min at room temperature and blocked with PBS with 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) (Wisent, cat. number 800-095), 5% goat serum (Gibco, cat. number 16210-064) and 0.01% Triton X-100 for 30 min at room temperature. Cells were incubated with IF buffer (PBS, 5% BSA, 0.01% Triton X-100) containing the primary PLC-gamma-2 antibodies overnight at 4°C. Cells were then washed 3 × 10 min with IF buffer and incubated with corresponding Alexa Fluor 555-conjugated secondary antibodies in IF buffer at a dilution of 1.0 μg/mL for 1 hr at room temperature with DAPI. Cells were washed 3 × 10 min with IF buffer and once with PBS.

Images were acquired on an ImageXpress micro widefield high-content microscopy system (Molecular Devices), using a 20× NA 0.95 water objective lens and scientific CMOS camera (16-bit, 1.97 mm field of view), equipped with 395, 475, 555 and 635 nm solid state LED lights (Lumencor Aura III light engine) and bandpass emission filters (432/36 nm, 520/35 nm, 600/37 nm and 692/40 nm) to excite and capture fluorescence emission for DAPI, CellTrackerTM Green, Alexa fluor 555 and CellTrackerTM Red, respectively. Images had pixel sizes of 0.68 × 0.68 microns. Exposure time was set with maximal (relevant) pixel intensity ~80% of dynamic range and verified on multiple wells before acquisition. Since the IF staining varied depending on the primary antibody used, the exposure time was set using the most intensely stained well as reference. Frequently, the focal plane varied slightly within a single field of view. To remedy this issue, a stack of three images per channel was acquired at a z-interval of 4 microns per field and best focus projections were generated during the acquisition (MetaExpress v6.7.1, Molecular Devices). Segmentation was carried out on the projections of CellTrackerTM channels using CellPose 35 v1.0 on green (WT) and far-red (KO) channels, using as parameters the ‘cyto’ model to detect whole cells, and using an estimated diameter tested for each cell type, between 15 and 20 microns. Masks were used to generate cell outlines for intensity quantification. Figures were assembled with Adobe Photoshop (version 24.1.2) to adjust contrast then assembled with Adobe Illustrator (version 27.3.1).

Acknowledgment

We would like to thank the NeuroSGC/YCharOS/EDDU collaborative group for their important contribution to the creation of an open scientific ecosystem of antibody manufacturers and knockout cell line suppliers, for the development of community-agreed protocols, and for their shared ideas, resources and collaboration. We would also like to thank the Advanced BioImaging Facility (ABIF) consortium for their image analysis pipeline development and conduction (RRID:SCR_017697). Members of each group can be found below.

NeuroSGC/YCharOS/EDDU collaborative group: Thomas M. Durcan, Aled M. Edwards, Peter S. McPherson, Chetan Raina and Wolfgang Reintsch.

ABIF consortium: Claire M. Brown and Joel Ryan.

Thank you to the Structural Genomics Consortium, a registered charity (no. 1097737), for your support on this project. The Structural Genomics Consortium receives funding from Bayer AG, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Genentech, Genome Canada through Ontario Genomics Institute (grant no. OGI-196), the EU and EFPIA through the Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking (EUbOPEN grant no. 875510), Janssen, Merck KGaA (also known as EMD in Canada and the United States), Pfizer and Takeda.

An earlier version of this of this article can be found on Zenodo (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.10108291).

Funding Statement

This work was supported in part by the Indiana University School of Medicine Purdue University TaRget Enablement to Accelerate Therapy Development for Alzheimer’s Disease (IUSM-Purdue TREAT-AD) Center using a grant from the National Institute on Aging (U54AG065187). It was also supported by a grant from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research Foundation (FDN154305) and by the Government of Canada through Genome Canada, Genome Quebec and Ontario Genomics (OGI-210). RA was supported by a Mitacs fellowship.    

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

[version 1; peer review: 2 approved]

Data availability

Underlying data

Zenodo: Antibody Characterization Report for PLC-gamma-2, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10108291. 30

Zenodo: Dataset for the PLC-gamma-2 antibody screening study, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10149969. 31

Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC-BY 4.0).

References

  • 1. Jackson JT, Mulazzani E, Nutt SL, et al. : The role of PLCγ2 in immunological disorders, cancer, and neurodegeneration. J. Biol. Chem. 2021;297(2):100905. 10.1016/j.jbc.2021.100905 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Katan M: Families of phosphoinositide-specific phospholipase C: structure and function. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1998;1436(1-2):5–17. 10.1016/S0005-2760(98)00125-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Kolczynska K, Loza-Valdes A, Hawro I, et al. : Diacylglycerol-evoked activation of PKC and PKD isoforms in regulation of glucose and lipid metabolism: a review. Lipids Health Dis. 2020;19(1):113. 10.1186/s12944-020-01286-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Prole DL, Taylor CW: Structure and Function of IP(3) Receptors. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2019;11(4). 10.1101/cshperspect.a035063 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Obst J, Hall-Roberts HL, Smith TB, et al. : PLCγ2 regulates TREM2 signalling and integrin-mediated adhesion and migration of human iPSC-derived macrophages. Sci. Rep. 2021;11(1):19842. 10.1038/s41598-021-96144-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Andreone BJ, Przybyla L, Llapashtica C, et al. : Alzheimer’s-associated PLCγ2 is a signaling node required for both TREM2 function and the inflammatory response in human microglia. Nat. Neurosci. 2020;23(8):927–938. 10.1038/s41593-020-0650-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Gresset A, Hicks SN, Harden TK, et al. : Mechanism of phosphorylation-induced activation of phospholipase C-gamma isozymes. J. Biol. Chem. 2010;285(46):35836–35847. 10.1074/jbc.M110.166512 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Hajicek N, Charpentier TH, Rush JR, et al. : Autoinhibition and phosphorylation-induced activation of phospholipase C-γ isozymes. Biochemistry. 2013;52(28):4810–4819. 10.1021/bi400433b [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Hajicek N, Keith NC, Siraliev-Perez E, et al. : Structural basis for the activation of PLC-γ isozymes by phosphorylation and cancer-associated mutations. elife. 2019;8:8. 10.7554/eLife.51700 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Zhou Q, Lee GS, Brady J, et al. : A hypermorphic missense mutation in PLCG2, encoding phospholipase Cγ2, causes a dominantly inherited autoinflammatory disease with immunodeficiency. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2012;91(4):713–720. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2012.08.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Martín-Nalda A, Fortuny C, Rey L, et al. : Severe Autoinflammatory Manifestations and Antibody Deficiency Due to Novel Hypermorphic PLCG2 Mutations. J. Clin. Immunol. 2020;40(7):987–1000. 10.1007/s10875-020-00794-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Afroz S, Giddaluru J, Vishwakarma S, et al. : A Comprehensive Gene Expression Meta-analysis Identifies Novel Immune Signatures in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients. Front. Immunol. 2017;8:74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Ahn IE, Underbayev C, Albitar A, et al. : Clonal evolution leading to ibrutinib resistance in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood. 2017;129(11):1469–1479. 10.1182/blood-2016-06-719294 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Gángó A, Alpár D, Galik B, et al. : Dissection of subclonal evolution by temporal mutation profiling in chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients treated with ibrutinib. Int. J. Cancer. 2020;146(1):85–93. 10.1002/ijc.32502 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Maschietto M, Camargo B, Brentani H, et al. : Molecular profiling of isolated histological components of wilms tumor implicates a common role for the Wnt signaling pathway in kidney and tumor development. Oncology. 2008;75(1-2):81–91. 10.1159/000155210 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Sims R, Lee SJ, Naj AC, et al. : Rare coding variants in PLCG2, ABI3, and TREM2 implicate microglial-mediated innate immunity in Alzheimer’s disease. Nat. Genet. 2017;49(9):1373–1384. 10.1038/ng.3916 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Conway OJ, Carrasquillo MM, Wang X, et al. : ABI3 and PLCG2 missense variants as risk factors for neurodegenerative diseases in Caucasians and African Americans. Mol. Neurodegener. 2018;13(1):53. 10.1186/s13024-018-0289-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Tesi N, Lee SJ, Hulsman M, et al. : Centenarian controls increase variant effect sizes by an average twofold in an extreme case-extreme control analysis of Alzheimer’s disease. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2019;27(2):244–253. 10.1038/s41431-018-0273-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Dalmasso MC, Brusco LI, Olivar N, et al. : Transethnic meta-analysis of rare coding variants in PLCG2, ABI3, and TREM2 supports their general contribution to Alzheimer’s disease. Transl. Psychiatry. 2019;9(1):55. 10.1038/s41398-019-0394-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Lee SJ, Conway OJ, Jansen I, et al. : A nonsynonymous mutation in PLCG2 reduces the risk of Alzheimer’s disease, dementia with Lewy bodies and frontotemporal dementia, and increases the likelihood of longevity. Acta Neuropathol. 2019;138(2):237–250. 10.1007/s00401-019-02026-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Tsai AP, Dong C, Lin PB, et al. : Genetic variants of phospholipase C-γ2 alter the phenotype and function of microglia and confer differential risk for Alzheimer’s disease. Immunity. 2023;56(9):2121–2136.e6. 10.1016/j.immuni.2023.08.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Tsai AP, Dong C, Lin PB, et al. : PLCG2 is associated with the inflammatory response and is induced by amyloid plaques in Alzheimer’s disease. Genome Med. 2022;14(1):17. 10.1186/s13073-022-01022-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Claes C, England WE, Danhash EP, et al. : The P522R protective variant of PLCG2 promotes the expression of antigen presentation genes by human microglia in an Alzheimer’s disease mouse model. Alzheimers Dement. 2022;18(10):1765–1778. 10.1002/alz.12577 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Ayoubi R, Ryan J, Biddle MS, et al. : Scaling of an antibody validation procedure enables quantification of antibody performance in major research applications. elife. 2023;12:12. 10.7554/eLife.91645.2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Licciardello MP, Workman P: The era of high-quality chemical probes. RSC Med. Chem. 2022;13(12):1446–1459. 10.1039/D2MD00291D [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Carter AJ, Kraemer O, Zwick M, et al. : Target 2035: probing the human proteome. Drug Discov. Today. 2019;24(11):2111–2115. 10.1016/j.drudis.2019.06.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Laflamme C, McKeever PM, Kumar R, et al. : Implementation of an antibody characterization procedure and application to the major ALS/FTD disease gene C9ORF72. elife. 2019;8:8. 10.7554/eLife.48363 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Alshafie W, Fotouhi M, Shlaifer I, et al. : Identification of highly specific antibodies for Serine/threonine-protein kinase TBK1 for use in immunoblot, immunoprecipitation and immunofluorescence. F1000Res. 2022;11:977. 10.12688/f1000research.124632.1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Biddle MS, Virk HS: YCharOS open antibody characterisation data: Lessons learned and progress made. F1000Res. 2023;12(12):1344. 10.12688/f1000research.141719.1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Ruiz Moleon V, Fotouhi M, Ryan J, et al. : Antibody Characterization Report for PLC-gamma-2 (PLGC2). 2023.
  • 31. Southern K: Dataset for the PLC-gamma-2 antibody screening study.[Data set]. Zenodo. 2023.
  • 32. Bandrowski A, Pairish M, Eckmann P, et al. : The Antibody Registry: ten years of registering antibodies. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023;51(D1):D358–D367. 10.1093/nar/gkac927 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Bairoch A: The Cellosaurus, a Cell-Line Knowledge Resource. J. Biomol. Tech. 2018;29(2):25–38. 10.7171/jbt.18-2902-002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Starr T, Bauler TJ, Malik-Kale P, et al. : The phorbol 12-myristate-13-acetate differentiation protocol is critical to the interaction of THP-1 macrophages with Salmonella Typhimurium. PLoS One. 2018;13(3):e0193601. 10.1371/journal.pone.0193601 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Stringer C, Wang T, Michaelos M, et al. : Cellpose: a generalist algorithm for cellular segmentation. Nat. Methods. 2021;18(1):100–106. 10.1038/s41592-020-01018-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
F1000Res. 2024 Oct 18. doi: 10.5256/f1000research.160203.r330318

Reviewer response for version 1

Deborah Moshinsky 1

The authors present a scientific basis for examining PLC-gamma-2 antibody performance and tested 11 commercially available antibodies against this target in Western Blot (WB), IP, and IF using standardized protocols.  WB, IP, and IF data for each of the 11 antibodies were shown, allowing readers to assess Ab performance.  The methods were clearly described and links to the underlying data were provided.  This publication should be helpful for researchers of PLC-gamma-2 to assess commercially available antibody performance and choose the most promising antibodies for validation or use in their application.

Are sufficient details of methods and materials provided to allow replication by others?

Yes

Is the rationale for creating the dataset(s) clearly described?

Yes

Are the datasets clearly presented in a useable and accessible format?

Yes

Are the protocols appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes

Reviewer Expertise:

Antibody Characterization and Validation

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

F1000Res. 2024 Aug 5. doi: 10.5256/f1000research.160203.r300907

Reviewer response for version 1

Abhinay Ramaprasad 1

This data note compares the performance of 11 commercially available antibodies for PLC-gamma-2 with the aim to act as a guide for readers to choose appropriate antibodies in their studies and to address antibody reproducibility issues. The authors have performed careful, standardised Western blot, immunoprecipitation and immunofluorescence experiments with wildtype and KO cells to draw comparisons. Whilst they abstain from making recommendations for good reasons, the results clearly show some antibodies outperforming others. The experiments are done well with appropriate controls and reported in clear and informative manner.

I have only two minor suggestions that might further improve interpretation by readers-

1) Could the authors explain the use of PMA for general readers not familiar with the field?

2) The authors say "Quantification of immunofluorescence intensity in hundreds of WT and KO cells was performed for each antibody tested". However, I was unable to find this data. It would be helpful if this data is provided as a dotplot in Figure 3 along with the images which represent only few select cells and at times, hard to interpret.

Are sufficient details of methods and materials provided to allow replication by others?

Yes

Is the rationale for creating the dataset(s) clearly described?

Yes

Are the datasets clearly presented in a useable and accessible format?

Yes

Are the protocols appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes

Reviewer Expertise:

Biochemistry, Malaria, Conditional mutagenesis, phospholipases, protein function discovery.

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Data Citations

    1. Southern K: Dataset for the PLC-gamma-2 antibody screening study.[Data set]. Zenodo. 2023.

    Data Availability Statement

    Underlying data

    Zenodo: Antibody Characterization Report for PLC-gamma-2, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10108291. 30

    Zenodo: Dataset for the PLC-gamma-2 antibody screening study, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10149969. 31

    Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC-BY 4.0).


    Articles from F1000Research are provided here courtesy of F1000 Research Ltd

    RESOURCES