Table 2.
Statistical Information on microglial morphological measurements in Fig. 3, Fig. 4. Bold denotes significant effects following three-way ANOVA and post hoc comparisons between CD UNEXP, CD EXP, WD UNEXP, and WD EXP. Sample size: Neurohistology: 4 rats/group, Gene Expression: 3 rats/group.
|
Iba-1+ cells |
Lacunarity |
Span Ratio |
TNF-α HPC GE |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Source of Variation | F Statistic, posthoc | F Statistic, posthoc | F Statistic, posthoc | F Statistic, posthoc |
| WD x PSS | F(1, 12) = 0.4530, p = 0.5137 | F(1, 12) = 0.3175, p = 0.5835 | F(1, 12) = 0.001, p = 0.9666 | F(1, 8) = 1.691, p = 0.2297 |
| PSS | F(1, 12) = 1.256, p = 0.284 | F(1, 12) = 0.6753, p = 0.4272 | F(1, 12) = 10.87, p = 0.0064 | F(1, 8) = 23.00, p = 0.0014 |
| WD | F(1, 12) = 11.35, p = 0.0056 | F(1, 12) = 11.270, p = 0.0057 | F(1, 12) = 1.565, p = 0.2348 | F(1, 8) = 8.237, p = 0.0208 |
| CDU vs WDU | p = 0.2760 | p = 0.2500 | p = 0.7975 | p = 0.0715 |
| CDU vs CDE | p = 0.9885 | p = 0.7634 | p = 0.1383 | p = 0.0110 |
| CDU vs WDE | p = 0.0350 | p = 0.3230 | p = 0.0325 | p = 0.0028 |
| WDU vs CDE | p = 0.4198 | p = 0.0512 | p = 0.4964 | p = 0.5539 |
| WDU vs WDE | p = 0.5985 | p = 0.9977 | p = 0.1523 | p = 0.1399 |
| CDE vs WDE | p = 0.0605 | p = 0.0700 | p = 0.8277 | p = 0.6940 |