Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 5;4(5):20230138. doi: 10.1002/EXP.20230138

TABLE 6.

The impact of DM on treatment outcomes in TB patients.

Ref. Country, year Research design

Sample size

(n)

Treatment regimen Treatment outcomes n (%) Results Conclusion
[197] China, 2017 Prospective study

TB: 21,414

DM‐TB: 3331

WHO recommended HRZ‐containing standard regimens

(1) Treatment success:

NDM‐TB, n = 13,726 (78.5%)

DM‐TB, n = 2368 (73.9%)

(2) Still on treatment:

NDM‐TB, n = 1340 (7.7%)

DM‐TB, n = 368 (11.5%)

(3) Death:

NDM‐TB, n = 1152 (6.6%)

DM‐TB, n = 316 (9.9%)

Patients with DM‐TB complications have a lower success rate than patients with TB (adjusted OR = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.75–0.93, p = 0.001). DM adversely affected the clinical presentation and treatment response of TB, but there was no difference in the drug resistance and relapse rates.
[198] Pakistan, 2016 Prospective cohort study

TB: 614

DM‐TB: 113

NTP, WHO

(1) Treatment success, n = 434 (86%)

(2) Treatment failed, n = 69 (14%)

Patients with DM‐TB were more likely to have adverse outcomes than NDM‐TB (OR = 2.6, 95% CI: 1.48–4.56, p = 0.001). Patients with DM‐TB were more likely to have adverse outcomes.
[199] South Korea, 2017 Retrospective

TB: 1044

DM‐TB: 253

WHO guidelines

(1) Treatment success:

NDM‐TB, n = 649 (84.9%)

DM‐TB, n = 177 (74.4%)

(2) Unsuccessfully treated:

NDM‐TB, n = 115 (15.1%)

DM‐TB, n = 61 (25.6%)

(3) Died:

NDM‐TB, = 28 (3.7%)

DM‐TB, n = 7 (2.9%)

Diabetes was a risk factor for unsuccessful treatment outcomes OR = 1.67, 95% CI (1.03–2.70), p = 0.039. Diabetes may delay sputum conversion and adversely affect treatment outcomes.
[200] China, 2015 Retrospective

TB: 1473

DM‐TB: 705

WHO guidelines

(1) Treatment success:

DM‐TB, n = 590 (83.7%)

NDM‐TB, n = 687 (89.5%)

(2) Treatment failed:

DM‐TB, n = 22 (3.1%)

NDM‐TB, n = 17 (2.2%)

(3) Died:

DM‐TB, n = 79 (11.2%)

NDM‐TB, n = 61 (7.9%)

DM‐TB patients were significantly less likely to have treatment success (OR = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.45–0.82).

DM‐TB patients were significantly increased risk of death (OR = 1.46, 95% CI: 1.03–2.08).

Poor glycemic control is associated with poor TB treatment outcome, and improved glycemic control may reduce the influence of diabetes on TB.
[201] Maryland, 2009 Retrospective cohort study

TB: 297

DM‐TB: 42

DOTS

Died:

DM‐TB, n = 6 (14.3%)

NDM‐TB, = 20 (7.8%)

Mortality of tuberculosis patients affected by diabetes (adjusted OR = 6.5, 95% CI: 1.1–38.0, p = 0.039). DM was a risk factor for death in Maryland TB patients.
[202] Armenia, 2020 Retrospective cohort

TB: 621

DM‐TB: 36

WHO guidelines

(1) Treatment success:

DM‐TB, n = 26 (72.22%)

NDM‐TB, n = 484 (82.74%)

(2) Treatment failed:

DM‐TB, n = 4 (11.11%)

NDM‐TB, n = 34 (5.81%)

(3) Died:

DM‐TB, = 3 (8.33%)

NDM‐TB, n = 34 (5.81%)

The odds ratio for treatment failure among DM‐TB patients was 8.99 (95% CI: 2.591–32.23), < 0.001. Diabetes comorbidity had a negative effect on TB treatment outcomes.
[203] Japan, 2014 Retrospective

TB: 260

DM‐TB: 69

Japanese guidelines: DOTS

Cavity:

DM‐TB, n = 49 (71%)

NDM‐TB, n = 87 (45.6%)

DM is the major determinant for delayed sputum culture conversion at 2 months after treatment, with OR = 3.108 (95% CI: 1.698–5.708), p = 0.0003. Compared with non‐DM patients, patients with DM had an increase in pulmonary cavities and a significantly longer transformation time of sputum culture.
[204] Mexico, 2012 Prospective

TB: 1262

DM‐TB: 374

Mexico's National TB Control Program guidelines;

WHO;

DOTS.

(1) Treatment success:

DM‐TB, n = 259 (71.35%)

NDM‐TB, n = 605 (71.43%)

(2) Treatment failed:

DM‐TB, n = 17 (4.68%)

NDM‐TB, n = 19 (2.24%)

(3) Died:

DM‐TB, n = 11 (3.03%)

NDM‐TB, = 36 (4.25%)

Patients with DM‐TB had a higher probability of treatment failure (adjusted OR = 2.93, 95% CI: 1.18–7.23), recurrence (adjusted HR = 1.76, 95% CI 1.11–2.79), and relapse (adjusted HR = 1.83, 95% CI: 1.04–3.23). DM‐TB patients exhibit severe clinical manifestations, delayed sputum conversion, and a higher likelihood of treatment failure, recurrence, and relapse.
[205] India, 2016 Prospective

TB: 316

DM‐TB: 50

RNTCP

(1) Treatment success:

DM‐TB, n = 26 (72.2%)

NDM‐TB, n = 93 (62%)

(2) Treatment failed:

DM‐TB, n = 2 (5.6%)

NDM‐TB, n = 3 (2.0%)

(3) Died:

DM‐TB, = 1 (2.8%)

NDM‐TB, n = 9 (6.0%)

The risk of unsuccessful treatment outcomes in DM‐TB patients was OR = 1.176, 95% CI (0.310–4.457). DM affects treatment outcomes for TB patients.
[206] Ethiopia, 2016 Prospective cohort study

TB: 1314

DM‐TB: 109

WHO guidelines, DOTS

(1) Treatment success:

DM‐TB, n = 26 (23.9%)

NDM‐TB, n = 291 (24.1%)

(2) Treatment failed:

DM‐TB, n = 1 (0.9%)

NDM‐TB, n = 14 (1.2%)

(3) Died:

DM‐TB, n = 15 (13.8%)

NDM‐TB, n = 42 (3.5%)

DM‐TB is associated with increased mortality adjusted HR = 3.96, 95% CI (1.76–8.89), p < 0.001. DM is associated with increased death during TB treatment.
[207] Mexico, 2015 Retrospective

TB: 181,378

DM‐TB: 34,988

WHO, DOTS

(1) Treatment success:

DM‐TB, n = 25,623 (86.76%)

NDM‐TB, n = 84.302 (80.54%)

(2) Treatment failed:

DM‐TB, n = 621 (2.1%)

NDM‐TB, = 1666 (1.59%)

(3) Died:

DM‐TB, n = 1973 (6.68%)

NDM‐TB, n = 10,465 (9.16%)

Treatment failure in patients with DM‐TB comorbidity adjusted OR = 1.34, 95% CI (1.11–1.61), = 0.002. Patients with DM‐TB are more likely to fail treatment.
[208] China, 2015 Prospective

TB: 1126

DM‐TB: 182

Chinese guidelines

(1) Treatment success:

DM‐TB, n = 162 (89.0%)

NDM‐TB, n = 904 (95.8%)

(2) Treatment failed:

DM‐TB, n = 6 (3.3%)

NDM‐TB, n = 5 (0.5%)

Treatment failure in patients with DM‐TB comorbidity OR = 6.696, 95% CI (2.019–22.200), p = 0.002. DM is associated with TB treatment failure.
[209] South Korea, 2017 Prospective

TB:661

DM‐TB: 157

(Uncontrolled‐DM: 108, Controlled‐DM: 49)

WHO guidelines

(1) Treatment success:

Uncontrolled‐DM, n = 45 (48.4%)

Controlled‐DM, n = 25 (62.5%)

NDM‐TB, n = 241 (53.3%)

(2) Treatment failed:

Uncontrolled‐DM, n = 5 (5.4%)

Controlled‐DM, n = 1 (2.5%)

NDM‐TB, n = 3 (0.7%)

(3) Died:

Uncontrolled‐DM, n = 4 (4.3%)

Controlled‐DM:

NDM‐TB, n = 2 (0.4%)

Uncontrolled DM is an independent risk factor for unsuccessful treatment outcomes in PTB. OR = 9.80, 95% CI (0.32–30.07), p < 0.001. Uncontrolled diabetes is an independent risk factor for poor treatment response in PTB.
[210] China, 2013 Retrospective cohort

TB: 1589

DM‐TB: 189

WHO guidelines

(1) Treatment success:

DM‐TB, n = 77 (79.4%)

NDM‐TB, = 416 (86.1%)

(2) Treatment failed:

DM‐TB, = 10 (10.3%)

NDM‐TB, = 11 (2.3%)

(3) Died:

DM‐TB, n = 2 (2.1%)

NDM‐TB, n = 2 (0.4%)

Treatment failure in patients with DM‐TB comorbidity OR = 4.46, 95% CI (1.96–10.18), p < 0.001. DM is associated with TB treatment failure.

Abbreviations: DM, diabetes mellitus; DOTS, Directly Observed Treatment Short course; H, isoniazid; Z, pyrazinamide; NDM, non‐diabetes mellitus; NTP, National Tuberculosis Control Program; PTB, pulmonary tuberculosis; R, rifampicin; RNTCP, Revised National TB Control Program; TB, Tuberculosis; WHO, The World Health Organization.