Skip to main content
. 2024 Oct 21;25:41. doi: 10.1186/s40510-024-00539-x

Table 5.

Comparison of repeated linear measurements according to cephalometric analysis methods in different skeletal classes

Class I Class II Class III
G1 G2 G3 G4 G1 G2 G3 G4 G1 G2 G3 G4
U1-NA 0.107 0.18 0.999 0.021* 0.153 0.999 0.999 0.043* 0.019* 0.083 0.999 0.878
L1-NB 0.098 0.18 0.999 0.055 0.134 0.317 0.999 0.999 0.024* 0.317 0.999 0.682
Co-A 0.284 0.256 0.999 0.018* 0.139 0.056 0.999 0.074 0.012* 0.03* 0.999 0.047*
ANS-Me 0.126 0.084 0.999 0.916 0.037 0.091 0.999 0.333 0.012* 0.034* 0.999 0.441
Co-Gn 0.203 0.212 0.999 0.018* 0.114 0.067 0.999 0.021* 0.012* 0.021* 0.999 0.011*
U-E Line 0.056 0.317 0.999 0.916 0.832 0.999 0.999 0.191 0.062 0.157 0.999 0.406
L-E Line 0.033* 0.317 0.999 0.028* 0.683 0.157 0.999 0.721 0.169 0.838 0.047* 0.221

*p < 0.05 indicates a statistically significant difference, whereas p > 0.05 indicates no significant difference by Wilcoxon signed-rank test. G1, G2, and G3 are AI-assisted platforms, while G4 is a traditional digital program. G1: WebCeph, G2: WeDoCeph, G3: CephX, G4: NemoCeph